Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jhilmil Nigam
Ms Sarah Rezaei
Demographic Details
Age - 19
Case Summary
Devishee was referred to treatment after having a stillbirth. Sara showed symptoms of grief,
or complicated bereavement, and was diagnosed with major depression, recurrent. The
Introduction
Chadha and Ganesan’s Social Intelligence Scale is a 66 item questionnaire which is divided
into five parts. The scale measures 8 different dimensions of social intelligence namely-
Patience (A), Cooperativeness (B), Confidence Level (C), Sensitivity (D), Recognition of the
social environment (E), Tactfulness (F), Sense of humor (G) and Memory (H). Items in Part I,
II and IV are in a forced choice format and the person taking the test has to reach each
statement and select eitherof the three response alternatives. However, in Part III, the person
taking the test has to respond in yes/no format and in Part V, the person has to recognize
eminent personalities by looking at their pictures and write their names in the space provided.
All items of the test are scored using the scoring key provided in the manual. The raw scores
thus obtained for each of the 8 dimensions are converted into a percentile score which is then
interpreted.
Social Intelligence Scale was developed by N. K. Chadha and Usha Ganesan in 1986.
39
It measures social intelligence in eight areas. They are patience, cooperation, confidence
memory. This test has been developed to measure the social intelligence of college-going
students. The social intelligence of the subjects was assessed through Chadha and Ganesan's
(1986) social intelligence scale (SIS). SIS is a group test designed to measure social
intelligence. The test consists of eight independent dimensions having 66 items. The
7. Sense of humor - Capacity to feel and cause amusement; to be able to see the
8. Memory - Ability to remember all relevant issues: names and faces of people.
Reliability is how much the results are consistent throughout the numerous
administrations of the test. If the results are relatively similar to the administrations of the
test, the reliability of the test is higher. The Validity is the ability of the test to measure what it
claims to measure.
40
41
Materials Required
Response Sheet
Pencil / Pen
Eraser
Precautions
1. Make sure the participant is comfortable and a good rapport has been formed with them.
2. Make sure the instructions are clear to the participant and the doubts are cleared if any.
Procedure / Administration
Firstly, the participant was made to sit comfortably and a rapport was formed with her.
Next, the test was introduced and was explained to her. After, explaining the test, the
instructions were given and the doubts were cleared. The participant was were asked to take
the test and after it was scored and interpreted along with being communicated to the
participant the results as per their wish. After that, all was winded up.
Introspective Report
I was nervous and excited at the same time as this was a new experience for me,
however, I did have a lot of fun during this experiment and am happy to be a part of this!
Observational Report
42
The participant was very nervous and thrilled at the same time. They were able to
Interpretation of scores
43
44
Conclusion
The aim of this practical was to assess the Social Intelligence of the Participant using
the Social Intelligence Scale given by N.K. Chadha and Usha Ganesan.
Intelligence is the mental abilities necessary for adaptation to, as well as shaping and
selection of, any environmental context (Sternberg,1997). Social intelligence can be defined
as the human ability to decode the world’s happenings and respond to them although
likewise. This ability is exclusive to humans and distinguishes us from the rest of the beings
in the animal kingdom. Social intelligence is the capacity to know oneself and to know
others. Social Intelligence develops from experience with people and learning from success
and failures in social settings. It is more commonly referred to as "tact", "common sense", or
45
"street smarts". Hatekar (2020) conducted a study to measure the Social Intelligence and
academic achievement of college students. 150 degree college students (Commerce - 75 and
Social Science - 75) selected from various degree colleges of Pune city randomly. The study
indicates that social science students have better social intelligence than Commerce students.
However, it was found that Commerce students have better academic achievement than their
Counterparts Khan et.al. (2011) did a study on the social intelligence of the students of
physical education. To measure social intelligence the scale developed by Chadda & Ganesan
(1986) was used. The sample consisted of 45 physical education students of 19-35 age range.
As per results the subjects of B.P.Ed. scored better than the students of B.P.E. in the
tactfulness dimension of social intelligence. The social intelligence of the subjects was
assessed through Chadha and Ganesan's (1986) social intelligence scale (SIS). SIS is a group
test designed to measure social intelligence. The test consists of eight independent
7. Sense of humour - Capacity to feel and cause amusement; to be able to see the
8. Memory - Ability to remember all relevant issues: names and faces of people.
47
References
Tabassum, A., & Sheela, G. (2020). A study on the relationship between social intelligence
Singh, J., & Verma, S. (2018). Investigation on sub parameter of social intelligence among
Rani, A. (2019). Relationship of social intelligence and emotional intelligence among sports
Devi, S. Relationship Between Wisdom and Social Intelligence Among Senior Secondary
School Students.
Khan, Z., Khan, N. A., & Haider, Z. (2011). A Study on Social Intelligence of the students of
48
Appendix