The document discusses different types of water filtration methods including filtration, ultrafiltration, and reverse osmosis. Filtration uses larger pore membranes to remove bacteria and suspended particles while retaining minerals. Ultrafiltration has smaller pores to remove more contaminants like viruses and organic matter. Reverse osmosis has the smallest pores to remove up to 99.9% of total dissolved solids, producing wastewater but making water safest for drinking. It requires more maintenance and costs more to operate.
The document discusses different types of water filtration methods including filtration, ultrafiltration, and reverse osmosis. Filtration uses larger pore membranes to remove bacteria and suspended particles while retaining minerals. Ultrafiltration has smaller pores to remove more contaminants like viruses and organic matter. Reverse osmosis has the smallest pores to remove up to 99.9% of total dissolved solids, producing wastewater but making water safest for drinking. It requires more maintenance and costs more to operate.
The document discusses different types of water filtration methods including filtration, ultrafiltration, and reverse osmosis. Filtration uses larger pore membranes to remove bacteria and suspended particles while retaining minerals. Ultrafiltration has smaller pores to remove more contaminants like viruses and organic matter. Reverse osmosis has the smallest pores to remove up to 99.9% of total dissolved solids, producing wastewater but making water safest for drinking. It requires more maintenance and costs more to operate.
COD- Chemical Oxygen Demand BOD-Biochemical Oxygen Demand TSS-Total Suspended Solids VOC- Volatile Organic Chemicals Filtration Ultrafiltration Reverse Osmosis Type Membrane filtration Membrane filtration Size Pore size of 0.002 to 0.1 microns Pore size of 0.0001 to 0.0005 microns Target capable of removing bacteria, remove up to 99.9% of total some viruses, suspended organic dissolved solids (TDS) matter and a small amount of minerals Membrane Hallow fiber membrane-bigger Semipermeable membrane- pore size smaller pore size Discharge No waste water Produces constant waste water while in operation Installation Storage tank not required Almost requires a storage tank for constant supply Cost $150-$200 upfront installation cost $300-$600 upfront installation cost Maintenance Membrane replacement more Membrane replacement every 2 frequent year Pros Retains healthy minerals (doesn’t Removes most contaminant, filter out calcium, magnesium), makes water safe to drink, long- removes microscopic term savings contaminants, can operate with low pressure Cons Doesn’t remove viruses, can’t filter Can’t operate with a low water out dissolved ions pressure, water could taste flat, produces wastewater Summary Removes solid molecules while Thoroughness removal of retaining healthy mineral ions contaminants with added benefits from extra filters (pre, carbon, post)
Project: Tertiary Treatment Water System for Polo Brewery
Effluent Properties: PH – 6.5-9.0 TDS – 1500 PPM MAX COD – 100 PPM MAX BOD – 50 PPM MAX SILICA – 35 PPM MAX CALCIUM AS ION – 21PPM MAGNESIUM – 7 PPM ALKALINITY AS CACO3 – 800 PPM TSS – 100 PPM MAX
Targeted Filtrate Properties:
98% REMOVAL OF IONS
PH – 6-7 TOTAL HARDNESS 0 PPM BACTERIA < 1 TASTELESS, ODORLESS AND CLEAR COLIFORM – 0