Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4
3 Type Data
Qualitative Data Quantitative Data
• Deals with descriptions. • Deals with numbers.
• Qualitative data is collected by • Quantitative data is gathered by
interviewing and observing measuring and counting.
• Qualitative data is subjective and dynamic • Quantitative data is fixed and universal
• Qualitative data is analyzed by grouping it • Quantitative data is analyzed using
in terms of meaningful categories statistical analysis
• Qualitative → Quality • Quantitative → Quantity
5
4 Data 1. Text
2. Tabular
Presentation 3. Pie chart
4. Bar chart
5. Histogram
6. Line graph
7. Pictogram graph
8. Radar chart
9. Heat map
10. Scatter plot
6
Figures, Photos
▪ Figure; well-selected scales; appropriate axis label size; symbols
▪ Each photograph must have a scale marker of professional
quality on one corner.
▪ Use color ONLY when necessary.
If different line styles can clarify the meaning, never use colors
▪ Do not include long boring tables!
7
Wood disk
Pith
A2 Fiber length and MFA test specimen
A3
A1
Schematic 1 2 3 4
Radial rings from pith
Diagram 1 2 3 4
B1 B3
B2
8
Photograph
9
Treatments
GMA-thermal at
Untreated Furfurylation Thermal at 220 GMA-thermal at 150
220
treated short
rotation teak woods
before and after Weathered PU
accelerated
weathering process;
PU = Polyurethane, Unweathered
Acr
Acr = Acrylic
Weathered Acr
10
Line Chart
11
1200 70
1000 60
MFA (degree)
800
40
600
30
Fiber Length
400
MFA 20
200 10
0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Radial increment from pith to bark
12
160 Unpainted
Unpainted weathered
140
Acrylic painted weathered
120
100
60
40
20
0
Teak Camphor Pine
Wood Species
13
Characteristics Description
Paint :
14
The value of surface roughness, total SFE, polar SFE, dispersive
SFE for untreated and treated short rotation teak wood
s
± 2.06 b
d
s ab
Thermal at 220 oC 5.72 ± 0.89ab 34.27 ± 2.04a 13.59 ± 3.94a 20.68 ± 1.92ab
GMA-thermal at 150 oC 6.03 ± 0.46bc 39.36 ± 1.26b 14.58 ± 2.34ab 24.78 ± 2.31b
GMA-thermal at 220 oC 5.09 ± 0.52a 33.21 ± 2.53a 16.21 ± 6.00ab 17.01 ± 4.58a
Note : a-d : values followed by the same letters do not differ significantly (α=0.05) based on Duncan test
15
Mean values from pith to bark Mean p value of
Table Calculated p Traits
difference t test
Perhutani teak Community teak
values of
statistical t Density (g/cm3) 0.67 (0.03) 0.49 (0.03) 0.18 0.0001
test at 0.05
Longit. shrinkage (%) 0.81 (0.11) 0.13 (0.02) 0.68 0.001
significant
level for Radial shrinkage (%) 2.31 (0.63) 1.68 (0.24) 0.63 0.042
mean
Tangential shrinkage (%) 3.27 (0.82) 3.61 (1.01) -0.34 0.377
differences
between the Fiber length (µm) 1406 (170) 1155 (238) 251 0.004
Perhutani
MFA (degree) 28 (6) 34 (7) -6 0.041
and
Community MOE (kg/cm2) 130196 (11417) 84925 (13216) 45271 0.0001
teak traits
MOR (kg/cm2) 1042 (150) 782 (90) 260 0.004
16
Penjualan produk TV, Phones, Computer Suatu Toko
17
HAVE A GOOD ARTICLE
Ready for publish
Terima Kasih