Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cost-Volume-Profit Relationships
Prof. Arpita Ghosh
Learning Goals
• Assumptions underlying CVP, Fixed Vs Variable Costs
• Basic CVP Relationships
– Contribution, Contribution Income Statement
– CVP Chart, Computing Contribution Margin Ratio or C/S Ratio
• Computing
– Break Even Point, Indifference Point
– Level of Sales needed to achieve Target Profit,
– Margin of safety,
– Multi-product Break even point
• Cost Structure – Operating Leverage & linkage with MOS
• Exercises
2
Assumptions Underlying - CVP Analysis
1. Selling Price Per Unit is constant through out the entire relevant range
2. Total Costs are linear in nature over the relevant range
– Total cost can be accurately split into fixed and variable
components
– Total Fixed Cost, Variable cost per unit will not change during the
period
3. In multi product companies, sales mix is constant over relevant range
4. No change in inventory:
– Units Produced = Units sold during the period
3
Income Statement – Traditional and Contribution Approach
4
Income Statement – Traditional and Contribution Approach
5
Contribution-Margin Approach
Break-even
point
125,000
100,000
75,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
Break-even
20,000 point
10,000
Profit
0 `
(30,000)
9
What is Contribution-Margin Ratio ?
Contributi on margin
Contributi on Margin Ratio 100
Sales
Contributi on - Margin Per Unit
100
Selling Price Per unit
Change in contributi on - margin
100
Change in Sales
Income Statement -
Contribution Per Unit
Approach Total (Rs) (Rs)
Profit = (s – v) q – F
Sales (1000 units) 100,000 100 100% or
Less: Variable Costs 60,000 60 60% Profit = c × q – F
EQUATION APPROACH
CONTRIBUTION MARGIN
APPROACH
q= Break-Even Point in units
Break Even Sales (units)
Profits = Sales – Variable Expenses - Fixed Expenses
= Total Fixed Expenses
Unit Sales Unit Sales Contribution-Margin per unit
sales × volume variable × volume − Fixed = Profits
price in units expense in units Expenses = Rs 30000
Rs 40
100 q - 60 q - 30,000 = Break Even Profit = 0 = 750 Units
40 q = Rs 30,000
q = Rs 30,000 ÷ 40 units Break Even Sales (Rs)
q = 750 units =Break-even Point ( in units) = Total Fixed Cost
Contribution-Margin Ratio
S = Break-even point in sales (Rs)
Sales – Variable Expenses - Fixed Expenses = Break Even Profit = 0 = Rs 30000
S – 0.60 S – Rs 30,000 = 0 0.40
0.40S = Rs 30000 = Rs 75,000
Or, 750 units * Rs100 S = Rs 30,000 ÷ 0.40
= Rs 75,000 S = Rs 75000 11
Level of Sales needed to achieve a desired Target Profit
Assume the company wants to earn a target profit of Rs 20000.
How many units should it sell to earn the target profit
EQUATION APPROACH CONTRIBUTION MARGIN APPROACH
q= Number of units to be sold to earn the Target Profit
Sales to earn target profit (units) =
Profits = Sales – Variable Expenses - Fixed Expenses Total Fixed Expenses + Target Profit
Contribution-Margin per unit
Unit Sales Unit Sales
sales × volume variable × volume − Fixed = Profits
= Rs 50000
price in units expense in units Expenses Rs 40
= 1,250 Units
100 q - 60 q - 30,000 = Target Profit = Rs 20,000
40 q = Rs 30,000 + Rs 20,000
q = Rs 50,000 ÷ 40 units Sales to earn target profit (Rs) =
q = 1,250 units Total Fixed Cost + Target Profit
S = Sales in Rupees to attain Target Profit Contribution-Margin Ratio
Sales – Variable Expenses - Fixed Expenses = Target Profit
S – 0.60 S – Rs 30,000 = Rs 20,000
= Rs 50000
0.40
0.40S = Rs 50000
Or, 1250 units * Rs100 = Rs 125,000
S = Rs 50,000 ÷ 0.40
= Rs 125,000
S = Rs 125,000
12
Level of Sales needed to achieve a desired Target Profit
Assume the company wants to earn a target profit of Rs 20000.
How many units should it sell to earn the target profit
EQUATION APPROACH CONTRIBUTION MARGIN APPROACH
q= Number of units to be sold to earn the Target Profit
Sales to earn target profit (units) =
Profits = Sales – Variable Expenses - Fixed Expenses Total Fixed Expenses + Target Profit
Contribution-Margin per unit
Unit Sales Unit Sales
sales × volume variable × volume − Fixed = Profits
= Rs 50000
price in units expense in units Expenses Rs 40
= 1,250 Units
100 q - 60 q - 30,000 = Target Profit = Rs 20,000
40 q = Rs 30,000 + Rs 20,000
q = Rs 50,000 ÷ 40 units Sales to earn target profit (Rs) =
q = 1,250 units Total Fixed Cost + Target Profit
S = Sales in Rupees to attain Target Profit Contribution-Margin Ratio
Sales – Variable Expenses - Fixed Expenses = Target Profit
S – 0.60 S – Rs 30,000 = Rs 20,000
= Rs 50000
0.40
0.40S = Rs 50000
Or, 1250 units * Rs100 = Rs 125,000
S = Rs 50,000 ÷ 0.40
= Rs 125,000
S = Rs 125,000
13
Margin of Safety
Margin of Safety (in Rs) = Total Sales (budgeted) – Break Even Sales
Margin of Safety (in Rs) = Profit
CM Ratio
Margin of Safety (in Units) = Profit
Contribution per unit
Margin of Safety Percentage = Margin of Safety (in Rs) * 100
Total Sales
18
7-43 (p 306) on Operating Leverage (H-10)
2. Operating leverage refers to the use of fixed costs in an organization’s overall cost
structure. An organization that has a relatively high proportion of fixed costs and low
proportion of variable costs has a high degree of operating leverage.
1 and 3. Calculation of contribution margin and profit at 6,000 units of sales
Plan A Plan B
Sales revenue: 6,000 units x $120 $720,000 $720,000
Less: Variable costs:
• Cost of purchasing product: 6,000 units x $75 $450,000 $450,000
• Sales commissions: $720,00 x 10% 72,000 0
Total variable cost $522,000 $450,000
Contribution margin $198,000 $270,000
Fixed costs 33,000 99,000
Operating Profit $165,000 $171,000
Unit Contribution [120-{75+(10%*120)}] (120-75)
(A: 198,000/6,000; B: 270,000/6,000) = 33 =45
1. Break-Even Point (units) = Fixed Costs = 33,000 99,000
Unit Contribution 33 45
1,000 2,200
3. Operating Leverage Factor = Contribution margin = 198,000 270,000
Operating Profit 165,000 171,000
Plan B has the higher operating leverage factor 1.2 1.578
19
7-43 continued
Operating Profit at 6,000 units of sales $165,000 $171,000
4 & 5 : Calculation of profit at 5,000 units Plan A Plan B
Sales revenue: 5,000 units x $120 $600,000 $600,000
Less: Variable costs:
• Cost of purchasing product: 5,000 units x $75 $375,000 $375,000
• Sales commissions: $600,000 x 10% 60,000 _0_
Total variable cost $435,000 $375,000
Contribution margin $165,000 $225,000
Fixed costs 33,000 99,000
Operating Profit $132,000 $126,000
Plan A profitability decrease:
$165,000 - $132,000 = $33,000
$33,000 ÷ $165,000 = 20%
Plan B profitability decrease:
$171,000 - $126,000 = $45,000
$45,000 ÷ $171,000 = 26.3%
The Company would experience a larger percentage decrease in income if it adopts Plan B.
• This situation arises because Plan B has a higher degree of operating leverage.
• Stated differently, Plan B’s cost structure produces a greater percentage decline in profitability from the
drop-off in sales revenue.
Note: The percentage decreases in profitability can be computed by multiplying the percentage decrease
in sales revenue by the operating leverage factor. Sales dropped from 6,000 units to 5,000 units, or
16.67%. Thus: Plan A: 16.67% x 1.2= 20%, Plan B: 16.67% x 1.578 = 26.3%
20
7-43 continued
21
Break Even Point: Multiple -Products
Product A Product B
1000 units Per Unit 2000 units Per Unit
Sales 100,000 100 300,000 150 400,000 100%
Variable expenses 70,000 70 120,000 60 190,000 47.5%
Contribution 30,000 30 180,000 90 210,000 52.5%
Fixed expenses 141,750
Net operating income 68,250
Sales Mix in units =1000:2000 = 1: 2 1000 units 2000 units
% of Total 0.33 0.67
Contribution Margin per unit 30.00 90
Weighted Contribution Margin (% Total* CM) 10.0 60.0
Weighted average Contribution Margin per unit = 10+60 = Rs 70
Break Even Point (units) = Fixed expenses = 141,750 2,025
Weighted average Contribution Margin per unit 70.00 Combined units
Break Even Point (units) 675 1,350
If Selling Price is cut by Rs10 per unit, Sales volume would increase to 2500 units.
Fixed costs are planned to be increased by Rs15000 and Variable Cost pu can be reduced by Rs20
Old (A) New( B)
Sales Volume 1000 units 2500 units
Sales (A:Rs100, B:Rs90) Rs 100000 Rs 225000
Less: Variable Costs (A:Rs60, B:Rs40) 60000 100000
Contribution 40000 125000
Less: Fixed Costs 30000 45000
Operating Income 10000 80000
Incremental Approach
Total Contribution Margin- New(B) (90-40) *2500 125000
Total Contribution Margin - Old (A) (100-60) *1000 40000
Increase in total contribution Margin 85000
Less: Increase in Fixed costs 15,000
Increase in Operating Profit 70,000
Difference in profit caused by 1) different Contribution per unit (cut in Selling Price and
Variable Cost) 2) different sales volume and 3) Increase in Fixed Costs
25
7-38 (p 303) on CVP Relationships (H-10)
26
7-38 (p 303) on CVP Relationships (H-10)
1. Closing of Mall store:
Loss of contribution margin at Mall Store $(108,000)
Savings of fixed cost at Mall Store (75% of $120,000) 90,000
Loss of contribution margin at Downtown Store (10% of $144,000) (14,400)
Total decrease in operating income $(32,400)
Increase in Sales and Increase in Fixed costs
2. Promotional campaign:
Increase in contribution margin (10% of $108,000) $ 10,800
Increase in monthly promotional expenses ($180,000/12) (15,000)
Decrease in operating income $(4,200)
The decision rule is to select the alternative as shown in the following chart.
Anticipated Annual Volume Optimal Model Choice
060,000 1500S
60,000225,000 1500M
225,000 and higher 1500L 30
7-54 (p 313) Break Even Analysis (H-10)
31
7-54 (p 313) Break Even Analysis (H-10)
The break-even point is 16,900 patient-days calculated as follows:
COMPUTATION OF BREAK-EVEN POINT
IN PATIENT-DAYS: PEDIATRICS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 20X6
Total fixed costs:
Medical center charges $3,480,000
Supervising nurses ($30,000 4) 120,000
Nurses ($24,000 10) 240,000
Aids ($10,800 20) 216,000
Total fixed costs $4,056,000
Contribution margin per patient-day:
Revenue per patient-day $360
Variable cost per patient-day:
($7,200,000 ÷ $360 = 20,000 patient-days)
($2,400,000 ÷ 20,000 patient-days) 120
Contribution margin per patient-day $240
Break-even point in patient-days total fixed costs $4,056,000
contributi on margin per patient - day $240
16,900 patient days
32
7-54 continued
2. Net earnings would decrease by $728,000, calculated as follows:
COMPUTATION OF PROFIT OR LOSS FROM RENTAL
OF ADDITIONAL 20 BEDS: PEDIATRICS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 20X6
A) Increase in revenue
(20 additional beds 90 days $360 charge per day) $648,000
Increase in expenses:
Variable charges by medical center
(20 additional beds 90 days $120 per day) $216,000
Fixed charges by medical center
($3,480,000 60 beds = $58,000 per bed)
($58,000 20 beds) 1160,000
Salaries
(20,000 patient-days before additional 20 beds + 20 additional
beds 90 days = 21,800, which does not exceed 22,000 patient-days;
therefore, no additional personnel are required) - 0 -
B) Total increase in expenses ($1,376,000)
Net change in earnings from rental of additional 20 beds (A)- (B) $(728,000)
33
7-54 continued
2. Net earnings would decrease by $728,000, calculated as follows:
COMPUTATION OF PROFIT OR LOSS FROM RENTAL
OF ADDITIONAL 20 BEDS: PEDIATRICS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 20X6
A) Increase in revenue
(20 additional beds 90 days $360 charge per day) $648,000
Increase in expenses:
Variable charges by medical center
(20 additional beds 90 days $120 per day) $216,000
Fixed charges by medical center
($3,480,000 60 beds = $58,000 per bed)
($58,000 20 beds) 1160,000
Salaries
(20,000 patient-days before additional 20 beds + 20 additional
beds 90 days = 21,800, which does not exceed 22,000 patient-days;
therefore, no additional personnel are required) - 0 -
B) Total increase in expenses ($1,376,000)
Net change in earnings from rental of additional 20 beds (A)- (B) $(728,000)
34
Self-Study Problems
7-46 (p350)
36
7-46 (p350)
$1,250,000 $750,000 4. Number of sales units required to earn target net profit,
1. Unit contribution margin given the manufacturing changes
25,000 units
Sales=25*50,000 =1250,000 $20 per unit new fixed costs target net profit
VC= $(1050,000-300,000) new unit contributi on margin
fixed costs $306,000 $200,000 *
Break - even point (in units)
unit contribution margin $16
31,625 units *Last year's profit:
$300,000 ($25)(50,000) – $1050,000
15,000 units
$20 = $200,000
2. Number of sales units required to earn target net profit
fixed costs target net profit unit contributi on margin
Contributi on - margin ratio
unit contributi on margin sales price
$20
Old contributi on - margin ratio .40
$300,000 $280,000 $50 *
29,000 units
$20 5. Let P denote the price required to cover increased
DM cost & maintain the same CM ratio:
new fixed costs
3. New break - even point (in units) P $30 * $4 †
new unit contributi on margin .40
P
$300,000 ($36,000/6 ) * P $34 .40 P
19,125 units .60 P $34
$20 $4 †
P $56.67 (rounded)
*Annual straight-line depreciation on new machine
†$4.00 = $9 – $5 increase in the unit cost of the new part *Old VC pu = $30 = $750,000 25,000
Increase in direct-material cost = $4
$56.67 $30 $4
New contribution - margin ratio
Changes in Fixed expenses and VC pu on BEP (units) $56.67
.40 (rounded)
37
7-35 (p302)
1 fixed costs
Break - even point (in units)
unit contributi on margin
$702,000
135,000 units
$25.00 $19.80
fixed cost
2 Break - even point (in sales dollars)
contributi on - margin ratio
$702,000
$3,375,000
$25.00 $19.80
$25.00
fixed costs
Break-even point
new unit contributi on margin
$702,000
146,250 units
$4.80
38
7-47 (p 309)
39
1. Memorandum
Date: Today
To: Vice President for Manufacturing, Saturn Game Company
From: I.M. Student, Controller
Subject: Activity-Based Costing
The $300,000 cost that has been characterized as fixed is fixed with respect to sales volume. This cost will not
increase with increases in sales volume. However, as the activity-based costing analysis demonstrates, these
costs are not fixed with respect to other important cost drivers. This is the difference between a traditional
costing system and an ABC system. The latter recognizes that costs vary with respect to a variety of cost
drivers, not just sales volume.
(a) Its break-even point will be higher (17,000 units instead of 15,000 units).
(b) The number of sales units required to show a profit of $280,000 will be lower (27,000 units instead of 29,000
units).
(c) These results are typical of situations where firms adopt advanced manufacturing equipment and practices. The
break-even point increases because of the increased fixed costs due to the large investment in equipment.
However, at higher levels of sales after fixed costs have been covered, the larger unit contribution margin ($28
instead of $20) earns a profit at a faster rate. This results in the firm needing to sell fewer units to reach a given
target profit level.
5. The controller should include the break-even analysis in the report. The Board of Directors needs a complete
picture of the financial implications of the proposed equipment acquisition. The break-even point is a relevant
piece of information. The controller should accompany the break-even analysis with an explanation as to why
the break-even point will increase. It would also be appropriate for the controller to point out in the report that
the advanced manufacturing equipment would require fewer sales units at higher volumes in order to achieve a
given target profit, as in requirement (3) of this problem.
41
Thanks
42