Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What Is HR
Planning
Strategic HR Planning
• Strategic human resource planning is a process that
identifies current and future human resources needs
for an organization to achieve its goals.
• SHRP goes hand-in-hand with an organization's
overall strategic plan.
Strategic HR Planning
The basic questions to be answered for strategic
planning are:
• Where are we going?
• How will we develop HR strategies to successfully get
there, given the circumstances?
• What skill sets do we need?
HRP: Steps
Analyze organizational plan
Supply Forecasting
Demand Forecasting
For deficit, plan for recruitment or rethink the organization strategy to right fit
Group Work
HR Supply Analysis
Markov Analysis
No of 12 36 96 288 1440
Employee
Turn Over 10% 6% 15% 16% 20%
Promotion 11% 11% 10% 6%
Demotion - - 8% 2%
Promotion
10% 6% 15% 16% 20%
11% 11% 10% 6%
Demotion
- - 8% 2%
2003 Store Asstt Store Sec. Mgr Dept. Mgr Sales Exit
2002 Manager Mgr Associate
Store Manager
[12]
Asstt Store
Mgr [36]
Sec Mgr [96]
Dept. Mgr
[288]
Sales
Associate
1440]
Total
Promotion
10% 6% 15% 16% 20%
11% 11% 10% 6%
Demotion
- - 8% 2%
2003 Store Asstt Store Sec. Mgr Dept. Mgr Sales Exit
2002 Manager Mgr Associate
Store Manager
[12] 10% = 1
Asstt Store
Mgr [36]
Sec Mgr [96]
Dept. Mgr
[288]
Sales
Associate
1440]
Total
Promotion
10% 6% 15% 16% 20%
11% 11% 10% 6%
Demotion
- - 8% 2%
2003 Store Asstt Store Sec. Mgr Dept.Mgr Sales Exit
2002 Manager Mgr Associate
Store Manager
[12] 90% = 11 10% = 1
Asstt Store
Mgr [36]
Sec Mgr [96]
Dept. Mgr
[288]
Sales
Associate
1440]
Total
Promotion
10% 6% 15% 16% 20%
11% 11% 10% 6%
Demotion
- - 8% 2%
2003 Store Asstt Store Sec. Mgr Dept.Mgr Sales Exit
2002 Manager Mgr Associate
Store Manager
[12] 90% = 11 10% = 1
Asstt Store
Mgr [36] 6% = 2
Sec Mgr [96]
Dept. Mgr
[288]
Sales
Associate
1440]
Total
Promotion
10% 6% 15% 16% 20%
11% 11% 10% 6%
Demotion
- - 8% 2%
2003 Store Asstt Store Sec. Mgr Dept.Mgr Sales Exit
2002 Manager Mgr Associate
Store Manager
[12] 90% = 11 10% = 1
Asstt Store
Mgr [36] 11% = 4 6% = 2
Sec Mgr [96]
Dept. Mgr
[288]
Sales
Associate
1440]
Total
Promotion
10% 6% 15% 16% 20%
11% 11% 10% 6%
Demotion
- - 8% 2%
2003 Store Asstt Store Sec. Mgr Dept.Mgr Sales Exit
2002 Manager Mgr Associate
Store Manager
[12] 90% = 11 10% = 1
Asstt Store
Mgr [36] 11% = 4 83%= 30 6% = 2
Sec Mgr [96]
Dept. Mgr
[288]
Sales
Associate
1440]
Total
Promotion
10% 6% 15% 16% 20%
11% 11% 10% 6%
Demotion
- - 8% 2%
2003 Store Asstt Store Sec. Mgr Dept.Mgr Sales Exit
2002 Manager Mgr Associate
Store Manager
[12] 90% = 11 10% = 1
Asstt Store
Mgr [36] 11% = 4 83%= 30 6% = 2
Sec Mgr [96]
15%= 14
Dept. Mgr
[288]
Sales
Associate
1440]
Total
Promotion
10% 6% 15% 16% 20%
11% 11% 10% 6%
Demotion
- - 8% 2%
2003 Store Asstt Store Sec. Mgr Dept.Mgr Sales Exit
2002 Manager Mgr Associate
Store Manager
[12] 90% = 11 10% = 1
Asstt Store
Mgr [36] 11% = 4 83%= 30 6% = 2
Sec Mgr [96]
11%= 11 15%= 14
Dept. Mgr
[288]
Sales
Associate
1440]
Total
Promotion
10% 6% 15% 16% 20%
11% 11% 10% 6%
Demotion
- - 8% 2%
2003 Store Asstt Store Sec. Mgr Dept.Mgr Sales Exit
2002 Manager Mgr Associate
Store Manager
[12] 90% = 11 10% = 1
Asstt Store
Mgr [36] 11% = 4 83%= 30 6% = 2
Sec Mgr [96]
11%= 11 8%= 8 15%= 14
Dept. Mgr
[288]
Sales
Associate
1440]
Total
Promotion
10% 6% 15% 16% 20%
11% 11% 10% 6%
Demotion
- - 8% 2%
2003 Store Asstt Store Sec. Mgr Dept.Mgr Sales Exit
2002 Manager Mgr Associate
Store Manager
[12] 90% = 11 10% = 1
Asstt Store
Mgr [36] 11% = 4 83%= 30 6% = 2
Sec Mgr [96]
11%= 11 66% = 63 8%= 8 15%= 14
Dept. Mgr
[288]
Sales
Associate
1440]
Total
Promotion
10% 6% 15% 16% 20%
11% 11% 10% 6%
Demotion
- - 8% 2%
2003 Store Asstt Store Sec. Mgr Dept.Mgr Sales Exit
2002 Manager Mgr Associate
Store Manager
[12] 90% = 11 10% = 1
Asstt Store
Mgr [36] 11% = 4 83%= 30 6% = 2
Sec Mgr [96]
11%= 11 66% = 63 8%= 8 15%= 14
Dept. Mgr
[288]
16% = 46
Sales
Associate
1440]
Total
Promotion
10% 6% 15% 16% 20%
11% 11% 10% 6%
Demotion
- - 8% 2%
2003 Store Asstt Store Sec. Mgr Dept.Mgr Sales Exit
2002 Manager Mgr Associate
Store Manager
[12] 90% = 11 10% = 1
Asstt Store
Mgr [36] 11% = 4 83%= 30 6% = 2
Sec Mgr [96]
11%= 11 66% = 63 8%= 8 15%= 14
Dept. Mgr
[288]
10% = 29 16% = 46
Sales
Associate
1440]
Total
Promotion
10% 6% 15% 16% 20%
11% 11% 10% 6%
Demotion
- - 8% 2%
2003 Store Asstt Store Sec. Mgr Dept.Mgr Sales Exit
2002 Manager Mgr Associate
Store Manager
[12] 90% = 11 10% = 1
Asstt Store
Mgr [36] 11% = 4 83%= 30 6% = 2
Sec Mgr [96]
11%= 11 66% = 63 8%= 8 15%= 14
Dept. Mgr
[288]
10% = 29 2%= 6 16% = 46
Sales
Associate
1440]
Total
Promotion
10% 6% 15% 16% 20%
11% 11% 10% 6%
Demotion
- - 8% 2%
2003 Store Asstt Store Sec. Mgr Dept.Mgr Sales Exit
2002 Manager Mgr Associate
Store Manager
[12] 90% = 11 10% = 1
Asstt Store
Mgr [36] 11% = 4 83%= 30 6% = 2
Sec Mgr [96]
11%= 11 66% = 63 8%= 8 15%= 14
Dept. Mgr
[288]
10% = 29 72%= 207 2%= 6 16% = 46
Sales
Associate
1440]
Total
Promotion
10% 6% 15% 16% 20%
11% 11% 10% 6%
Demotion
- - 8% 2%
2003 Store Asstt Store Sec. Mgr Dept.Mgr Sales Exit
2002 Manager Mgr Associate
Store Manager
[12] 90% = 11 10% = 1
Asstt Store
Mgr [36] 11% = 4 83%= 30 6% = 2
Sec Mgr [96]
11%= 11 66% = 63 8%= 8 15%= 14
Dept. Mgr
[288]
10% = 29 72%= 207 2%= 6 16% = 46
Sales Associate
1440]
20%= 288
Total
Promotion
10% 6% 15% 16% 20%
11% 11% 10% 6%
Demotion
- - 8% 2%
2003 Store Asstt Store Sec. Mgr Dept.Mgr Sales Exit
2002 Manager Mgr Associate
Store Manager
[12] 90% = 11 10% = 1
Asstt Store
Mgr [36] 11% = 4 83%= 30 6% = 2
Sec Mgr [96]
11%= 11 66% = 63 8%= 8 15%= 14
Dept. Mgr
[288]
10% = 29 72%= 207 2%= 6 16% = 46
Sales Associate
1440] 6%= 86 20%= 288
Total
Promotion
10% 6% 15% 16% 20%
11% 11% 10% 6%
Demotion
- - 8% 2%
2003 Store Asstt Store Sec. Mgr Dept.Mgr Sales Exit
2002 Manager Mgr Associate
Store Manager
[12] 90% = 11 10% = 1
Asstt Store
Mgr [36] 11% = 4 83%= 30 6% = 2
Sec Mgr [96]
11%= 11 66% = 63 8%= 8 15%= 14
Dept. Mgr
[288]
10% = 29 72%= 207 2%= 6 16% = 46
Sales Associate
1440] 6%= 86 74%=1066 20%= 288
Total
Promotion
10% 6% 15% 16% 20%
11% 11% 10% 6%
Demotion
- - 8% 2%
2003 Store Asstt Store Sec. Mgr Dept.Mgr Sales Exit
2002 Manager Mgr Associate
Store Manager
[12] 90% = 11 10% = 1
Asstt Store
Mgr [36] 11% = 4 83%= 30 6% = 2
Sec Mgr [96]
11%= 11 66% = 63 8%= 8 15%= 14
Dept. Mgr
[288]
10% = 29 72%= 207 2%= 6 16% = 46
Sales Associate
1440] 6%= 86 74%=1066 20%= 288
Total
15 41 92 301 1072 351
HR Demand Forecasting
Succession planning
Expansion forecasting
Technological up gradation
A B C D E
Year Sales [,000] No of Index Avrg Index
Employee
1
2
3
4
5
6
A B C D E
Year Sales [,000] No of Index Avrg Index
Employee
1 2002 2800 155
2 2003 3050 171
3 2004 3195 166
4 2005 3300 177
5 2006 3500 [assumed]
6 2007 3600 [assumed]
A B C D E
Year Sales [,000] No of Index Avrg Index
Employee
1 2002 2800 155 18.06 [B1/C1]
2 2003 3050 171
3 2004 3195 166
4 2005 3300 177
5 2006 3500 [assumed]
6 2007 3600 [assumed]
A B C D E
Year Sales [,000] No of Index Avrg Index
Employee
1 2002 2800 155 18.06 [B1/C1]
2 2003 3050 171 17.83 [B2/C2]
3 2004 3195 166
4 2005 3300 177
5 2006 3500 [assumed]
6 2007 3600 [assumed]
A B C D E
Year Sales [,000] No of Index Avrg Index
Employee
1 2002 2800 155 18.06 [B1/C1]
2 2003 3050 171 17.83 [B2/C2]
3 2004 3195 166 19.25 [B3/C3]
4 2005 3300 177
5 2006 3500 [assumed]
6 2007 3600 [assumed]
A B C D E
Year Sales [,000] No of Index Avrg Index
Employee
1 2002 2800 155 18.06 [B1/C1]
2 2003 3050 171 17.83 [B2/C2]
3 2004 3195 166 19.25 [B3/C3]
4 2005 3300 177 18.64 [B4/C4]
5 2006 3500 [assumed]
6 2007 3600 [assumed]
A B C D E
Year Sales [,000] No of Index Avrg Index
Employee
1 2002 2800 155 18.06 [B1/C1] 18.45
2 2003 3050 171 17.83 [B2/C2] [D1+D2+D3
3 2004 3195 166 19.25 [B3/C3] +D4]/4
4 2005 3300 177 18.64 [B4/C4]
5 2006 3500 [assumed]
6 2007 3600 [assumed]
A B C D E
Year Sales [,000] No of Index Avrg Index
Employee
1 2002 2800 155 18.06 [B1/C1] 18.45
2 2003 3050 171 17.83 [B2/C2] [D1+D2+D3
3 2004 3195 166 19.25 [B3/C3] +D4]/4
4 2005 3300 177 18.64 [B4/C4]
5 2006 3500 [assumed] 18.64
6 2007 3600 [assumed] 18.64
Either use last year index or average index or near round figure. As the average of first 4
years is 18.45 and the last year index is 18.64, so we are using last year index.
A B C D E
Year Sales [,000] No of Index Avrg Index
Employee
1 2002 2800 155 18.06 [B1/C1] 18.45
2 2003 3050 171 17.83 [B2/C2] [D1+D2+D3
3 2004 3195 166 19.25 [B3/C3] +D4]/4
4 2005 3300 177 18.64 [B4/C4]
5 2006 3500 [assumed] 188 [B5/D4] 18.64
6 2007 3600 [assumed] 193 [B6/D4] 18.64
Either use last year index or average index or near round figure. As the average of first 4
years is 18.45 and the last year index is 18.64, so we are using last year index.
Forecasting HR Demand
• Ratio analysis
• A forecasting technique for determining future staff needs by using
ratios between a causal factor and the number of employees needed.
• Assumes that the relationship between the causal factor and staffing
needs is constant .For example, suppose a salesperson traditionally
generates $500 000 in sales and that plans call for increasing the
firm’s sales by $3 million next year. Then, if the sales revenue &
salespeople ratio remains the same, six new salespeople would be
required (each of whom produces an extra $500 000 in sales).
Leader looks
for consensus
Detail Number
Production for the year 2014 2,400,000 unit
Average no of employee during the year 400
No of weeks works during the year 49
Average hours per week per worker 40
For the year 2014:Total hours per worker per year = 49*40 = 1960 man-hour
Thanks