Professional Documents
Culture Documents
of emulsified heavy-oil
Chong Wang1,2, Hua Wang1, Jianhang Hu1 , Daofei Zhu1, Zhenkun Xiong2, Hongquan Hua2,Bo Li1
1
Engineering Research Center of Metallurgical Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction Ministry of Education
Kunming University of Science and Technology Kunming, China
2
CHALCO Yunnan Copper CO., LTD, BRANCH Kunming, China
qyyt-wch@163.com ; wanghuaheat@hotmail.com
Abstract—The combustion properties of emulsified presented that, due to the different initial conditions of
heavy-oil has been investigated in self-designed combustion the spray, provided complementary information. O.B.
equipment, and oil-saving ratio and combustion product Rene et al [3]. studied an experimental study of the effect
composition for emulsified heavy-oil were calculated. The of water content on combustion of heavy fuel oil/water
results showed that oil-saving ratio first increased and then emulsion droplets. M. seggiani studied on the
decreased with increasing percentage of water added, and combustion of heavy-oil fly-ashes [4], in their work, the
the highest oil-saving ratio was 11.60%. The content of NOx reactivity in air of three heavy-oil fly-ashes was
decreased with increasing percentage of water added; the investigated by using two different methods: thermal
content of NOx increased with increasing air excess analysis and a laboratory entrained-flow furnace. The
coefficient. For the same air excess coefficient, the content combustion tests were carried out in a temperature range
of SO2 decreased with increasing percentage of water added, of 700900 °C. Behaviour of a heavy fuel oil droplet on
it can be attributed to diluting effect of water in flue gas; a hot surface has been investigated by S. Anupras and K.
for the same percentage of water added, the content of SO2 Regina [5]. The burnout of a droplet of a heavy fuel oil
increased with increasing air excess coefficient, this was has been measured on a hot surface whose temperature
because formation mechanism and characteristics of SO2 varies in the interval from 400 °C to 700 °C; times of
and NOx were different. evaporation of volatile compounds and burnout of the
resulting carbon residue were measured; changes of the
Keywords—emulsified heavy-oil; combustion properties; form of the carbon residue depending on the surface
oil-saving ratio; combustion product composition temperature were recorded [6].
TABLE. THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF HEAVY OIL
Content/% 60 30 7 3
1.oil return pipe; 2.agitator; 3.thermometer; 4.heater; 5.oil valve ; 6.oil pump; 7.secondary heater ; 8.thermometer; 9.filter
10.oil pump; 11.tubing ; 12.pressure gauge ; 13.flowmeter ;14.burner; 15.combustion furnace
was varied in the range of 60 °C to 80 °C, it can be changing trend. Effects of the percentage of water added
attributed that the lower temperature was not favourable on the content of NOx were obvious below 20%. The
for the combustion and the higher temperature was not combustion of emulsified heavy-oil can improve the
favourable for experimental operation. The oil-saving process of combustion and accelerate speed of
ratio first increased and then decreased with increasing combustion, then realize low oxygen combustion, inhibit
percentage of water added [8]. When percentage of water oxidation of nitrogen and reduce the content of NOx in
added was 25%, oil-saving ratio was low; when flue gas. But the percentage of water added exceeded the
percentage of water added was 15%, oil-saving ratio was certain value, water added inhibited speed of combustion,
high, the highest was 11.60% at 80 °C. The oil-saving which was not suitable to decrease the content of NOx,
ratio increased rapidly with increasing emulsified oil and only realized diluting effect [9-10]. The calorific
temperature, but oil-saving ratio had little change at the value of emulsified heavy-oil decreased with increasing
high temperatures. percentage of water added, then unstable combustion
13
was carried out.
60
12 65
Effects of the air excess coefficient on the content of
70
NOx are showed in Figure 4. For the same percentage of
11 75
80
water added, the content of NOx increased with
Oil-saving rate
10
increasing air excess coefficient. For the different
9
percentages of water added, the content of NOx had the
8 same changing trend. When air excess coefficient was
7 large, effects of the percentages of water added on the
6
content of NOx were obvious. Factual air quantity
increased with increasing air excess coefficient in the
5
5 10 15 20 25 combustion process. Enough oxygen can promote the
Percentage of water added formation of NOx, and increase the content of NOx in
flue gas [11]. But the air excess coefficient should not be
Figure 2. Effects of percentage of water added and emulsified oil
too low, and it must select a suitable range, so the range
temperature on oil-saving ratio.
of 1.1 to 1.2 was determined.
C. The analysis of combustion product composition 130
100
heavy-oil. The elements of nitrogen and sulphur in
heavy-oil formed nitrogen and sulphur oxides during 90
100 190
1.4
180 1.5
SO2content/ppm
90
170
80
160
70
150
60
140
50 130
5 10 15 20 25
Percentage of water added/% 120
5 10 15 20 25
Percentage of water added/%
Figure 3. Effects of the percentage of water added on the content
of NO x Figure 5. Effects of the percentage of water added on the content
of SO2
Effects of the percentage of water added on the
content of NOx are showed in Figure 3. For the same air Effects of the percentage of water added on the
excess coefficient, the content of NOx decreased with content of SO2 are showed in Figure 5. For the same air
increasing percentage of water added. For the different excess coefficient, the content of SO2 decreased with
air excess coefficients, the content of NOx had the same increasing percentage of water added, it can be attributed
to diluting effect of water in flue gas, but which was not had the same changing trend. For the same percentage of
significantly decreased. The almost same content of SO2 water added, the content of NOx increased with
was obtained at 20% and 25% for the percentage of increasing air excess coefficient; for the different
water added. For the different air excess coefficients, the percentages of water added, the content of NOx had the
formation law of SO2 was basically same. same changing trend. For the same air excess coefficient,
the content of SO2 decreased with increasing percentage
Effects of the excess air coefficient on the content of
of water added, it can be attributed to diluting effect of
SO2 are showed in Figure 6. For the same percentage of
water in flue gas; for the same percentage of water added,
water added, the content of SO2 increased with
the content of SO2 increased with increasing air excess
increasing air excess coefficient, this was because
coefficient, this was because formation mechanism and
formation mechanism and characteristics of SO2 and
characteristics of SO2 and NOx were different.
NOx were different. For the different percentages of
water added, the content of SO2 had the same changing
trend. For S component in emulsified heavy-oil, it can REFERENCES
farthest oxidize at the minimum excess air coefficient [1] A. Saarioa, A. Rebolab, P.J. Coelho, et al, “Heavy fuel oil
and form SO2 [12-13]. The content of SO2 in flue gas combustion in a cylindrical laboratory furnace: measurements and
modeling”, Fuel, Oxford, vol. 84, pp. 359~369, March 2005.
decreased with increasing air quantity, it can be [2] M. Javier, Ballester, F. Norberto, D. Cesar, “Combustion
attributed to diluting effect of SO2 in flue gas. characteristics of heavy oil-water emulsions”, Fuel, Oxford, vol.
75, pp. 695~705, May 1995.
210
[3] O.B. Rene, V. Rafael, D.M. Antonio, “An experimental study of
200 the effect of water content on combustion of heavy fuel oil/water
5%
190 10% emulsion droplets”, Combustion and Flame, Newyork, vol. 126,
15% pp. 1845~1855, September, 2001.
180 20%
[4] M. Seggiani, G. Teti, S. Vitolo, “Investigation on the combustion
SO2content/ppm
25%
170 of heavy-oil fly-ashes”, Fuel, Oxford, vol. 81, pp. 1711~1715,
160 August, 2002.
150
[5] S. Anupras, K. Regina, “Behaviour of a heavy fuel oil droplet on
a hot surface”, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,
140 Oxford, vol. 49, pp. 1050~1057, March, 2006.
130 [6] A. Celso, Bertrana, S.T. Carla, Marquesa, V.F. Renato,
“Reburning and burnout simulations of natural gas for heavy oil
120
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 combustion”, Fuel, Oxford, vol. 83, pp. 109~121, January, 2004.
Air excess coefficient [7] H.F. Xiao, Y.L. Deng, Q.G. Xiao, “Design and application on the
optimization measure of adding water in emulsified heavy
Figure 6. Effects of the excess air coefficient on the content of SO2 oil(EHO)”, Journal of Xiangtan Mining Institute, Xiangtan, vol.
16, pp. 44~47, December, 2001.
[8] K. Witzel, P. Moszkowicz, G. Claust, “Mechanism of particulate
. CONCLUSIONS reduction in heavy fuel oil combustion”, Fuel, Oxford, vol. 74, pp.
1881~1886, December, 1995.
The combustion properties of emulsified heavy-oil
[9] L. Zhou, L. Li, “Effect of Nano-CeO2 on the combustion
included oil-saving ratio and combustion product performance of emulsified heavy oil”, Chinese Rare Earths,
composition have been investigated. The effects of Baotou, vol. 28, pp. 92~94, December, 2007.
percentage of water added, emulsified oil temperature [10] R. Villasenor, F. Garcia, “An experimental study of the effects
and air excess coefficient on the combustion properties of asphaltenes on heavy fuel oil droplet combustion”, Fuel,
Oxford, vol. 78, pp. 933~944, June, 1999.
of emulsified heavy-oil were carried out. Flue gas was [11] S.R. WuW.C. ChangJ. Chiao, “Low NO x heavy fuel oil
measured by gas chromatography and flue gas analyzer, combustion with high temperature air”, Fuel, Oxford, vol. 86, pp.
and oil-saving ratio and combustion product composition 820~828, March-April, 2007.
for emulsified heavy-oil were calculated. The the air [12] B.J. Zhong, W.B. Fu, “Effects of water containing in emulsified
heavy Oil on NO x and SO2 Emissions in Boiler”, Journal of
excess coefficient of the combustion for emulsified Combustion Science and Technology, Beijing, vol. 4, pp.
heavy-oil was 1.1, and the oil-saving ratio first increased 334~341, August, 1998.
and then decreased with increasing percentage of water [13] Y.L. Wang, Z.J. Zou. “Combustion Technology of Emulsified
added, the highest oil-saving ratio was 11.60% at 80 °C. Heavy Oil”, Advances in Fine Petrochemicals, Tianjing, vol. 6,
pp. 46~49, September, 2005.
For the same air excess coefficient, the content of NOx
decreased with increasing percentage of water added; for
the different air excess coefficients, the content of NOx