You are on page 1of 6

A new low power and all-MOS voltage-to-current

converter for current mode ADCs with high


linearity, high bandwidth and rail-to-rail input range
Cleber V. R. Almeida, M.Sc. Eng. Amauri Oliveira, D.Sc. Eng. Raimundo C. S. Freire, D.Sc. Eng.
DEE / Embedded Electronics Dept. Electrical Engineering Dept. (DEE) Electrical Engineering Department
UFBA / SENAI CIMATEC Federal University of Bahia (UFBA) Federal University of Campina Grande
Salvador, Bahia, Brazil Salvador, Bahia, Brazil Campina Grande, Paraı́ba, Brazil
cleber.vinicius@fieb.org.br amauri@ufba.br freire@dee.ufcg.edu.br

Abstract—This work presents a new low power and all-MOS may be negative or zero; Vin an analog voltage input signal,
voltage-to-current (V-I) converter with high linearity (∼
=0.15%), where VSS  Vin  VDD ; IRange a current reference range;
high bandwidth (∼ =19 MHz) and rail-to-rail input range (from and Iin(min) = Imin a minimum permissible constant current
VSS up to VDD ) to be used prioritarily as a internal building
block of current mode A/D converters. The text includes the value for Iin . Is desired that an input electric current corre-
description of the constituent stages of the converter topology, sponding to the conversion of Vin , defined as Iin , normalized
as well as the static and dynamic simulations results, validating to IRange = ΔI, is:
the proposed converter through the MOS-level implementation
using computing tool Pyxis Schematics from Mentor Graphics, Iin = f (Vin ) = a × Vin + b (1)
with XFAB 180 nm technology.
Index Terms—voltage-to-current converter, all-MOS, rail-to- Being angular ‘a’ and linear ‘b’ coeficients:
rail input range, high linearity, high bandwidth     
IRange VSS IRange
a= and b = Imin −
I. I NTRODUCTION VDD − VSS VDD − VSS
Development of low power and low voltage integrated Iin starts from a non-zero Imin value, because that con-
circuits (IC) is one of market trends. Search for that led tributes to increasing the speed (frequency response) of a
researchers to design analog circuits in current mode, which current mirror when applied to its input, decreasing the input
allows decrease the source voltage, increase speed and to impedance, since the input resistance (Rin ) of this mirror
simplify analog internal processing structures. But, since most corresponds to the inverse of the transconductance (gm ), which
of the input and output signals are voltage signals, to process in is proportional to the root of the MOS device drain current
current mode a voltage-to-current (V-I) converter is required. (ID ). If gm increases, Rin decreases which increases the speed
It is a basic building block in many AMS (Analog and Mixed- of the current mirror. Thus, the graph of the function (1) is
Signals) systems designs, such as current mode analog-to- shown in Fig. 1.
digital converters (ADCs), an application in which the overall
system performance depends largely on the performance of
the V-I subcircuit [1], mainly concerning characteristics such
as low power, high linearity, high bandwidth and rail-to-rail
input range, unlike [1], [2]. Thus, in this paper is proposed
a new all-MOS V-I converter, unlike [3], with features cited
above, unlike [4], beyond having a high input impedance and
very low current output deviation, to be used prioritarily as an
internal building block of current mode ADCs [5]. This text
is organized on four main sections. Beginning with a brief
introduction, after that an topology elements description, as
well as CMOS implementation, following with the simulations Fig. 1. Voltage-to-current (V-I) conversion function graph.
and results and ending with a conclusion with future subjects.
II. T OPOLOGY AND E LEMENTS D ESCRIPTION Note: Iin in (1) corresponds to Vin converted in a current
signal. It will be the output of the proposed conversion circuit.
Let: VDD be the highest positive supply voltage of the
Because that, Iin will be called Iout .
circuit; VSS at the lower feed voltage (VSS < VDD ), which
Is proposed in this paper to implement (1) with a circuit
C. V. R. A. thanks SENAI CIMATEC for its support. topology that behaves like the Fig. 1, constituted by four basic

978-1-5386-7298-3/18/$31.00 © 2018 IEEE

Authorized licensed use limited to: Synopsys. Downloaded on August 31,2022 at 07:48:02 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
elements: a voltage divider or attenuator; a level-shifter circuit;
a PMOS differential pair; and a voltage reference source. All
connected as presented in block diagram on Fig. 2.

Fig. 4. Operating characteristics curve of the PMOS differential pair topology,


used as V-I converter core.

Vof f set =Vref =(VDD + VSS )/2 according to Fig. 4.(b), result-
ing in ID2 according to Fig. 4.(c). Current ID2 corresponds
Fig. 2. General topology proposed for V-I converter. to Vin converted on current “Iout ” which can be mirrored,
copied, amplified or attenuated at the output, as shown in Fig.
3, through the drain terminal of M n3 .
All the following structures have been implemented on A differential pair was adopted using PMOS to reduce noise
Pyxis Schematics tool from Mentor Graphics, to integrated and raise the speed by raising the transconductance (gm ) of
circuits design, using XFAB 0.18 μm (1.8V) Process Design NMOS load devices (M n1 and M n2 in Fig. 3) to “common-
Kit (PDK). source” by reducing the input resistance of the output current
mirror Rin ∼ = 1/gm . Thus, the complete “PMOS Differential
A. Differential Pair (DIF AMP PMOS)
Pair” circuit (“DIF AMP PMOS”) is shown in Fig. 5. The
The MOS Differential Pair (DIF AMP PMOS) is the stage current source ISS1 of the topology shown in Fig. 3 is
that forms the core of the conversion process. Topology of the implemented by PMOS M P 3 and sized to be biased by 0.45V
circuit is based on a PMOS differential pair according to Fig. bias voltage (1/4 of VDD =1.8V ).
3.

Fig. 3. Proposed topology of the PMOS differential pair as V-I converter.


Fig. 5. DIF AMP PMOS circuit.

Drain terminal currents of M p1 and M p2 (ID1 and ID2


respectively) may be attenuated or amplified by mirroring In Fig. 5, the output terminals “Iout” and “Iout C” are
the VGS voltages of M n1 and M n2 . ID2 is used to gen- the current outputs in the drain and source modes respec-
erate the output current at the drain terminal Iout =kID2 , tively. The terminals “Vb Iout” and “Vb Iout C” are bias
where “k = (WM n2 /LM n2 )/(WM n3 /LM n3 )”. In the ter- outputs to mirror “Iout” and “Iout C” respectively, if desired.
minal equivalent to the inverting input, a constant reference “Vb p” is the input of the bias voltage, scaled to 0.45V .
voltage Vref =(VDD +VSS )/2 is inserted. While in the terminal “V IN P” and “V IN N” are the non-inverting and inverting
equivalent to the non-inverting input is inserted the input inputs respectively. The input voltage to be converted will
voltage signal Vin , which is to be converted into a current be in the differential mode (Vin(d) =Vin -Vref ), being applied
signal. If Vin linearly varying from VSS to VDD , the curves from the terminal “V IN P” to the terminal “V IN N”.
of the currents ID1 and ID2 are the same as those of the graph Vin(d) will be limited to the linear range of the differential
“(a)” in Fig. 4. It is noted that in Fig. 4.(a) a small excursion pair set for VDD /36=1.8/36V =50mV . “DIF AMP PMOS”
band around Vref =(VDD +VSS )/2=0.9V where the variations is designed to generate Imin =Iof f set =100.0μA and an
of the excursion of ID1 and ID2 are practically linear. ΔI=50μA. Thus, the maximum current value will be
In order to take advantage of this small linear excursion Imax =ΔI+Iof f set =50μA+100μA=150μA. The circuit is pre-
range of Fig. 4.(a), Vin must have a peak-to-peak ampli- sented in Fig. 5 and a symbol has been assigned to it.
tude equivalent to the width of the small linear voltage 1) Output Stage: The differential pair output stage was
range of the differential pair and with an offset voltage performed with a PMOS version of the Wide Output Swing -

Authorized licensed use limited to: Synopsys. Downloaded on August 31,2022 at 07:48:02 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
Regulated Cascode Current Mirror (WOS-RCCM) [6], giving
greater load resistance of the output current source and a better
dynamic response. This version was obtained by mirroring the
WOS-RCCM’s PMOS and NMOS devices [6]. It was divided
into two subcircuits: one Regulated Cascode Amplifier type
“P” (RCA-P), used as a transistor, and one VBIAS-P, for RCA-
P bias. All of the RCA-P and VBIAS-P designs were carried Fig. 11. Adopted Level-Shifter topology.
out by reversing the WOS-RCCM design and considering
the NMOS and PMOS charge carriers motility ratio (μp /μn ).
Circuit and RCA-P symbol are shown respectively in Fig. 6
In the circuit of Fig. 11, the current source “ISS2 ” was
and Fig. 7. The circuit and symbol of the VBIAS-P are shown
constituted by a composite PMOS transistor and sized to be
respectively in Fig. 8 and Fig. 9.
biased with “V b p = 0.45V ”. Thus, the complete circuit is
shown in Fig. 12 and the symbol in Fig. 13.

Fig. 6. RCA-P circuit Fig. 7. RCA-P symbol.


Fig. 12. Level-Shiffter circuit. Fig. 13. Level-Shiffter symbol.

C. Voltage Divider (VD)


At the Level-Shifter input, the excursion of the input voltage
signal must be in the small approximately linear range of
the differential pair. Voltage Divider (VD) circuit attenuates
Vin , which varies between VSS and VDD , to the linear range
(Figure 14).

Fig. 8. VBIAS-P circuit. Fig. 9. VBIAS-P symbol.

B. Level-Shifter (LS)
For Vin to travel only around the linear range of the
differential pair, it is necessary to add an offset voltage: Fig. 14. Graphic demonstration of the input signal attenuation.
“Vof f set = (VDD + VSS )/2”. Therefore, Vin must be DC
level-shifted, as shown in Fig. 10.
After several topologies tested, the one that presented the
best linearity was the based on “N ” MOS impedances equal
in series, as shown in Fig. 15. In this way, the total input
impedance “Zin (s)” of the proposed final voltage divider will
result in “Zin (s)=N × ZS (s)”, while maintaining the same
cutoff frequency “ω−3dB ” [rad/s] or f−3dB [Hz].
Being in Fig. 15: “r” is the equivalent resistance of a
connected diode PMOS device, given by “r=VDS /ID ; VDS ”
Fig. 10. Level-shifting of an input signal, adding a Vof f set = (VDD + is the voltage drop between the Drain (D) and Source (S)
VSS )/2.
terminals of a PMOS device; ID is the current passing through
the Drain terminal (D) of a diode connected PMOS device,
In order to obtain this result, a “Source Follower” circuit operating in the subthreshold region (VGS < VT ), given by (2);
or “Common-Drain Amplifier” (Fig. 11) was used as Level- η is the slope factor in the subthreshold region (1 < η < 3);
Shifter. ID0 is the leakage current from the drain terminal to the source

Authorized licensed use limited to: Synopsys. Downloaded on August 31,2022 at 07:48:02 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
impedance being equivalent to a “r” in parallel with a ca-
pacitance “Cin ” (ZC (s)=1/(sCin )), where ZS (s)=r||ZC (s).
Thus, after an asymptotic analysis of ZS (s), a typical behavior
of a ”low pass filter” is observed, with the cutoff frequency
“ω−3dB =1/(r·Cin )” [rad/s] or “f−3dB =1/(2πr·Cin )” [Hz].
The fully MOS version is shown in Fig. 16.(c). In the
diode configuration, seen in Fig. 16.(c) in the device “M pr”,
which exerts the resistance function “r” (Fig. 16.(b)) of it is
“short-circuited”, leaving the “gate-source” and “source-drain”
capacitances in parallel. These will still be added to the drain
Fig. 15. Proposed topology for the Voltage Divider (VD) circuit: resistors capacitance of the “M pc” device (Fig. 16.(c)), which performs
model and MOS implementation.
the function of capacitance “C” (Fig. 16.(b)). The circuit of
Fig. 16.(b)) is the basic impedance unit of the voltage divider.
For the final circuit of the voltage divider, 35 units of
terminal, when VGS =0; W/L is the aspect ratio of the PMOS Fig. 15 were used in series and another individual PMOS
device, consisting of the ratio between the PMOS channel device, totaling 36 units. The dimensions of all PMOS devices
width “W ” and the length of the “L” channel of the PMOS; acting as resistors remained the minimum for the XF AB
VGS is the voltage drop between the Gate (G) and Source (S) 0.18μm technology (W = 0, 22μm e L = 0, 18μm). In the
terminals of a PMOS device; VT is the Threshold voltage of PMOS devices acting as capacitances, L remained the same
a PMOS device; rk (k=1, 2, 3, · · · , N ) is the “k”th resistance as L = 0, 19μm of the Level-Shifter M P 1 device (Fig. 12)
“r” of a connected PMOS device as a diode. and W = WM P 1 /4 (W = 1, 57μm/4 ∴ W ∼ = 0, 4μm).
  V 
W GS Thus, the proposed voltage divider will be able to attenuate

ID = ID0 e ηVT (2)
L Vin(aten) =Vin(max) /36=1.8V /36=50mV corresponding to the
exact linear excursion range of the par-differential. Voltage
The voltage divider proposed in Fig. 15 is a passive circuit of 50mV will be VDS of each PMOS. As VGS < VT , the
that has a voltage at its output (Vout ) as a function of the input transistors will operate in the subthreshold region, according
voltage (Vin ) given by Vout = Vin /N . With the MOS voltage (2). Thus, the proposed final Voltage Divider (VD) circuit is
divider (Fig. 15) installed at the input of V-I Converter, the shown in Fig. 17 and the symbol in Fig. 18.
total input resistance is viewed as the sum of all “N ” resistors
rk , being k = 1, 2, 3, · · · , N . Thus, the total input resistance
will be Rin(total) = N × r.
Topology proposed and presented in Fig. 15 considers
the effects of the parasitic capacitances and the capacitances
resulting from the coupling of the Level-Shifter stage, shown
in Fig. 16.(a), since at high frequencies the input port PMOS
capacitance of the Level circuit -Shifter changes the value
of the last equivalent resistor of the splitter by reducing it Fig. 17. MOS VD (voltage divider) circuit. Fig. 18. Symbol.
and decreasing the maximum value of the output voltage
of the voltage divider. This coupling (Fig. 16.(a)) can be With these dimensions, assuming that: N =36 PMOS de-
modeled as an equivalent resistor in parallel with an equivalent vices will be used; that the maximum voltage drop in each
capacitance, as shown in Fig. 16.(b). PMOS device is VDS =50mV (VGS < VT , “subthreshold
region”); and once in possession of the technology parameters
for the PMOS; from (2), ID = 503.5f A, r = 99.3GΩ
and Zin(total) = Rin(total) = 3.57T Ω is expected. The
calculated approximate value of the Level-Shifter input ca-
pacitance (Cin =∼ = 1.81f F ). Given the high resistance of
the RC network formed by Cin and Rin , one would expect
f−3dB ∼ = 1kHz without impedance balancing. With the
Fig. 16. Determination of the equivalent model of the coupling between balance, the equivalent capacitance of the circuit (Ceq ) was
voltage divider and level-shifter.
minimized, raising significantly f−3dB ∼ = 20.0M Hz, making
W = WM P 1 /4 = 1.57μm/4 ∴ W ∼ = 0.4μm of the PMOS
In Fig. 16, the “gate-source” capacitance of the input PMOS devices as capacitors of Fig. 16 “(c)”.
is represented as “Cin [M p3 ]”. The equivalent resistance of
the PMOS “M pr“N  ” is represented by “r“N  ”. Thus, the D. Voltage References Source (VREF SRC)
solution was to treat the voltage divider in Fig. 15, not as series Reference voltage generator circuit (“VREF SRC”) is
resistors, but rather as serial impedances “ZS (s)”, each series shown in Fig. 19 and the symbol in Fig. 20. It consists

Authorized licensed use limited to: Synopsys. Downloaded on August 31,2022 at 07:48:02 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
of a simple voltage divider of the VDD supply, with four III. S IMULATIONS AND R ESULTS
equal PMOS with W = 0.22μm and L = 0.18μm, mini- All simulations were carried out using Mentor Graphics’
mum allowed by the adopted technology, thus reducing the Pyxis software with MOS devices from XFAB 0.18 μm (1.8V)
consumption of the circuit. V REF OU T 1 = VDD /2 and technology.
V REF OU T 2 = VDD /4. All transistors operate in the
subthreshold region. M N 1 and M N 2, both with W = L = A. Test Setup
10μm, are NMOS as capacitors. For evaluation tests, the circuit of Fig. 22 was fed with
VDD =1.8VDC , VSS =0.0VDC (GND). A continuous DC volt-
age source VL was added as load on output Iout , to evaluate
the variation of Iout with VL . Finally, a DC and AC voltage
source was coupled on “V IN ” input to generate signals
between VSS =0.0VDC (GND) and VDD =1.8VDC (compatible
with XFAB 0.18μm technology). Static simulations (DC anal-
ysis and operation point analysis) and dynamics simulations
(transient and AC analysis) were carried out, aiming to:
evaluate the power consumption; evaluate the accuracy of the
converter in generating a current signal with linear variation;
evaluate the frequency response of the drive.

Fig. 19. “VREF SRC” circuit. Fig. 20. “VREF SRC” symbol.
B. Static Simulations
In Fig. 23 is presented the result of a DC analysis simulation
varying linearly Vin from 0.0 VDC to 1.8 VDC . Iout varies lin-
E. Complete Circuit early from Imin =Ioffset=108.3μA with IRange = ΔI=49.5μA
Connecting all proposed topologies, the final topology used to Imax =Imin +ΔI=157.8μA. That limits corresponded to the
for converting the input voltage signal (Vin ) into the output designed values.
current (Iout ) is shown in Fig. 21 , with Imin =Iof f set ,
according (1) and whose behavior corresponds to that shown
in Fig. 1.

Fig. 23. Graph Vin × Iout .

Fig. 21. Final topology of the proposed V-I converter. Percentage error (“P ercent Error”) of “Iout” in relation
to its theoretical value is shown in Fig. 24. The maximum
deviation was 0.16%.
Including WOS-RCCM output stage with RCA-P (Fig. 7)
in the circuit of Fig. 21 and using only symbols of all stages
described previously, the complete circuit of the proposed V-I
converter is shown in Fig. 22.

Fig. 24. Percentage error variation graph of Iout .

The variation in the angular coefficient of the linear curve


in Fig. 23 is shown in Fig. 25.
Fig. 22. Complete V-I converter circuit.
Due to the use of the WOS-RCCM as output stage, sweep-
ing load voltage from 0% to 66.67% of VDD (from 0.0VDC

Authorized licensed use limited to: Synopsys. Downloaded on August 31,2022 at 07:48:02 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
TABLE I
P ERFORMANCE AND C HARACTERISTICS

Power supply (VDD ): 1.8V


Total number of transistors: 105
Total estimated effective area: 643 μm2
Total number of passive devices: 0 (all MOS)
Linearity error: 0.15%
Output current range: 108∼158μA
Output current deviation: 0.02% (for 0V VL 1.2V)
Overall power consumption: 1.17 mW
Fig. 25. Graph of derivative of Iout . Maximum input impedance: 3.6 TΩ
Input signal linear range: 0∼100% VDD (rail-to-rail)
Bandwidth: ∼
=19 MHz

to 1.2VDC ), there was a variation of 0.02% of Iout , according


to Fig. 26. high input impedance around 3.6 TΩ, very low output current
deviation around 0.02%, low power consumption around 1
mW, high bandwidth about 19 MHz, rail-to-rail input range
(from VDD up to VSS ) and all-MOS (no internal or external
resistors and capacitors is used), to be used prioritarily as an
internal building block of current mode A/D converters. Topo-
logical concepts adopted on this paper were implemented and
validated using XFAB 0.18 μm CMOS technology. Despite of
using a large numbers of transistors and a complex structure,
the proposed V-I converter has a simple working principle,
Fig. 26. Variation of Iout with variation of VL from 0% up to 66.67% of
VDD . a low power consumption, an acceptable area occupation and
promising results. In the future, V-I converter chip proposed on
this work will be fabricated using PDK of the same technology.
The operating point (OP) analysis has resulted in ID =513.11
fA and Rin =3,5 TΩ for Vin =VDD =1.8V, as expected. The total ACKNOWLEDGMENT
power dissipated was 1.17 mW at 27o C. C. V. R. A. thanks SENAI/DR-BA (National Service of
Industrial Learning / National Directory from Bahia, Brazil)
C. Dynamic Simulations
and its unit CIMATEC (Integrated Campus of Manufacturing
The result of the frequency response analysis (AC analysis) and Technology), from Salvador-BA, Brazil, for all its support,
is shown in Fig. 27, with f−3dB =19 MHz, satisfactorily close making available licenses of Mentor Graphics IC design tools
to that expected. and workstations in order to carry out this work.
R EFERENCES
[1] Y.-H. Sa, P.-H. Son, K.-H. Kim, H.-S. Kim, and H.-W. Cha, “A design
of new voltage to current converter with high linearity and wide tuning,”
pp. 119–120, October 2016, 2016 International SoC Design Conference
(ISOCC).
[2] C. W. Lin, S. F. Lin, and C. F. Wang, “Wide Band Linear Voltage-to-
Current Converter Design,” 2010 Fifth IEEE International Symposium on
Electronic Design, Test & Applications, 2010.
[3] R. Laajimi and M. Masmoudi, “High-Performance CMOS Current Mir-
rors: Application to Linear Voltage-to-Current Converter Used for Two-
Stage Operational Amplifier,” Circuits and Systems, pp. 311–316, October
Fig. 27. Frequence response from 0.0 Hz up to 1.0 GHz. 2012.
[4] M. Wan, W. Liao, K. Dai, , and X. Zou, “A nonlinearity compensated
all-mos voltage-to-current converter,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and
Systems II, pp. 1549–7747, 2015, dOI:10.1109/TCSII.2015.2468912.
D. Performance and Characteristics Summary [5] V. B. Lohit, M. Madan, B. Kaur, N. Pandey, and A. Bhattacharyya, “A
Novel CC-II Based Current Comparator and its Application as Current
Thus, on Tab. I is presented a summary about the per- Mode Flash ADC,” pp. 217–222, November 2013, 2013 International
formance and characteristics of the proposed V-I converter, Conference on Multimedia, Signal Processing and Communication Tech-
obtained by the schematics design and the results combination nologies (IMPACT 2013).
[6] S. S. Rajput, P. Vajpayee, and G. K. Sharma, “1V High Performance
of the operating point analysis, DC analysis, transient analysis Current Mirror for Low Voltage Analog and Mixed Signal Applications
and AC analysis. in Submicron Regime,” in TENCON 2009 - 2009 IEEE Region 10
Conference, Singapore, November, 23-26 2009, ISBN: 978-1-4244-4547-
IV. C ONCLUSION AND F UTURE S UBJECTS 9.
This paper presented a new voltage-to-current (V-I) con-
verter with high linearity of the output current around 0.15%,

Authorized licensed use limited to: Synopsys. Downloaded on August 31,2022 at 07:48:02 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

You might also like