Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract—This work presents a new low power and all-MOS may be negative or zero; Vin an analog voltage input signal,
voltage-to-current (V-I) converter with high linearity (∼
=0.15%), where VSS Vin VDD ; IRange a current reference range;
high bandwidth (∼ =19 MHz) and rail-to-rail input range (from and Iin(min) = Imin a minimum permissible constant current
VSS up to VDD ) to be used prioritarily as a internal building
block of current mode A/D converters. The text includes the value for Iin . Is desired that an input electric current corre-
description of the constituent stages of the converter topology, sponding to the conversion of Vin , defined as Iin , normalized
as well as the static and dynamic simulations results, validating to IRange = ΔI, is:
the proposed converter through the MOS-level implementation
using computing tool Pyxis Schematics from Mentor Graphics, Iin = f (Vin ) = a × Vin + b (1)
with XFAB 180 nm technology.
Index Terms—voltage-to-current converter, all-MOS, rail-to- Being angular ‘a’ and linear ‘b’ coeficients:
rail input range, high linearity, high bandwidth
IRange VSS IRange
a= and b = Imin −
I. I NTRODUCTION VDD − VSS VDD − VSS
Development of low power and low voltage integrated Iin starts from a non-zero Imin value, because that con-
circuits (IC) is one of market trends. Search for that led tributes to increasing the speed (frequency response) of a
researchers to design analog circuits in current mode, which current mirror when applied to its input, decreasing the input
allows decrease the source voltage, increase speed and to impedance, since the input resistance (Rin ) of this mirror
simplify analog internal processing structures. But, since most corresponds to the inverse of the transconductance (gm ), which
of the input and output signals are voltage signals, to process in is proportional to the root of the MOS device drain current
current mode a voltage-to-current (V-I) converter is required. (ID ). If gm increases, Rin decreases which increases the speed
It is a basic building block in many AMS (Analog and Mixed- of the current mirror. Thus, the graph of the function (1) is
Signals) systems designs, such as current mode analog-to- shown in Fig. 1.
digital converters (ADCs), an application in which the overall
system performance depends largely on the performance of
the V-I subcircuit [1], mainly concerning characteristics such
as low power, high linearity, high bandwidth and rail-to-rail
input range, unlike [1], [2]. Thus, in this paper is proposed
a new all-MOS V-I converter, unlike [3], with features cited
above, unlike [4], beyond having a high input impedance and
very low current output deviation, to be used prioritarily as an
internal building block of current mode ADCs [5]. This text
is organized on four main sections. Beginning with a brief
introduction, after that an topology elements description, as
well as CMOS implementation, following with the simulations Fig. 1. Voltage-to-current (V-I) conversion function graph.
and results and ending with a conclusion with future subjects.
II. T OPOLOGY AND E LEMENTS D ESCRIPTION Note: Iin in (1) corresponds to Vin converted in a current
signal. It will be the output of the proposed conversion circuit.
Let: VDD be the highest positive supply voltage of the
Because that, Iin will be called Iout .
circuit; VSS at the lower feed voltage (VSS < VDD ), which
Is proposed in this paper to implement (1) with a circuit
C. V. R. A. thanks SENAI CIMATEC for its support. topology that behaves like the Fig. 1, constituted by four basic
Authorized licensed use limited to: Synopsys. Downloaded on August 31,2022 at 07:48:02 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
elements: a voltage divider or attenuator; a level-shifter circuit;
a PMOS differential pair; and a voltage reference source. All
connected as presented in block diagram on Fig. 2.
Vof f set =Vref =(VDD + VSS )/2 according to Fig. 4.(b), result-
ing in ID2 according to Fig. 4.(c). Current ID2 corresponds
Fig. 2. General topology proposed for V-I converter. to Vin converted on current “Iout ” which can be mirrored,
copied, amplified or attenuated at the output, as shown in Fig.
3, through the drain terminal of M n3 .
All the following structures have been implemented on A differential pair was adopted using PMOS to reduce noise
Pyxis Schematics tool from Mentor Graphics, to integrated and raise the speed by raising the transconductance (gm ) of
circuits design, using XFAB 0.18 μm (1.8V) Process Design NMOS load devices (M n1 and M n2 in Fig. 3) to “common-
Kit (PDK). source” by reducing the input resistance of the output current
mirror Rin ∼ = 1/gm . Thus, the complete “PMOS Differential
A. Differential Pair (DIF AMP PMOS)
Pair” circuit (“DIF AMP PMOS”) is shown in Fig. 5. The
The MOS Differential Pair (DIF AMP PMOS) is the stage current source ISS1 of the topology shown in Fig. 3 is
that forms the core of the conversion process. Topology of the implemented by PMOS M P 3 and sized to be biased by 0.45V
circuit is based on a PMOS differential pair according to Fig. bias voltage (1/4 of VDD =1.8V ).
3.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Synopsys. Downloaded on August 31,2022 at 07:48:02 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
Regulated Cascode Current Mirror (WOS-RCCM) [6], giving
greater load resistance of the output current source and a better
dynamic response. This version was obtained by mirroring the
WOS-RCCM’s PMOS and NMOS devices [6]. It was divided
into two subcircuits: one Regulated Cascode Amplifier type
“P” (RCA-P), used as a transistor, and one VBIAS-P, for RCA-
P bias. All of the RCA-P and VBIAS-P designs were carried Fig. 11. Adopted Level-Shifter topology.
out by reversing the WOS-RCCM design and considering
the NMOS and PMOS charge carriers motility ratio (μp /μn ).
Circuit and RCA-P symbol are shown respectively in Fig. 6
In the circuit of Fig. 11, the current source “ISS2 ” was
and Fig. 7. The circuit and symbol of the VBIAS-P are shown
constituted by a composite PMOS transistor and sized to be
respectively in Fig. 8 and Fig. 9.
biased with “V b p = 0.45V ”. Thus, the complete circuit is
shown in Fig. 12 and the symbol in Fig. 13.
B. Level-Shifter (LS)
For Vin to travel only around the linear range of the
differential pair, it is necessary to add an offset voltage: Fig. 14. Graphic demonstration of the input signal attenuation.
“Vof f set = (VDD + VSS )/2”. Therefore, Vin must be DC
level-shifted, as shown in Fig. 10.
After several topologies tested, the one that presented the
best linearity was the based on “N ” MOS impedances equal
in series, as shown in Fig. 15. In this way, the total input
impedance “Zin (s)” of the proposed final voltage divider will
result in “Zin (s)=N × ZS (s)”, while maintaining the same
cutoff frequency “ω−3dB ” [rad/s] or f−3dB [Hz].
Being in Fig. 15: “r” is the equivalent resistance of a
connected diode PMOS device, given by “r=VDS /ID ; VDS ”
Fig. 10. Level-shifting of an input signal, adding a Vof f set = (VDD + is the voltage drop between the Drain (D) and Source (S)
VSS )/2.
terminals of a PMOS device; ID is the current passing through
the Drain terminal (D) of a diode connected PMOS device,
In order to obtain this result, a “Source Follower” circuit operating in the subthreshold region (VGS < VT ), given by (2);
or “Common-Drain Amplifier” (Fig. 11) was used as Level- η is the slope factor in the subthreshold region (1 < η < 3);
Shifter. ID0 is the leakage current from the drain terminal to the source
Authorized licensed use limited to: Synopsys. Downloaded on August 31,2022 at 07:48:02 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
impedance being equivalent to a “r” in parallel with a ca-
pacitance “Cin ” (ZC (s)=1/(sCin )), where ZS (s)=r||ZC (s).
Thus, after an asymptotic analysis of ZS (s), a typical behavior
of a ”low pass filter” is observed, with the cutoff frequency
“ω−3dB =1/(r·Cin )” [rad/s] or “f−3dB =1/(2πr·Cin )” [Hz].
The fully MOS version is shown in Fig. 16.(c). In the
diode configuration, seen in Fig. 16.(c) in the device “M pr”,
which exerts the resistance function “r” (Fig. 16.(b)) of it is
“short-circuited”, leaving the “gate-source” and “source-drain”
capacitances in parallel. These will still be added to the drain
Fig. 15. Proposed topology for the Voltage Divider (VD) circuit: resistors capacitance of the “M pc” device (Fig. 16.(c)), which performs
model and MOS implementation.
the function of capacitance “C” (Fig. 16.(b)). The circuit of
Fig. 16.(b)) is the basic impedance unit of the voltage divider.
For the final circuit of the voltage divider, 35 units of
terminal, when VGS =0; W/L is the aspect ratio of the PMOS Fig. 15 were used in series and another individual PMOS
device, consisting of the ratio between the PMOS channel device, totaling 36 units. The dimensions of all PMOS devices
width “W ” and the length of the “L” channel of the PMOS; acting as resistors remained the minimum for the XF AB
VGS is the voltage drop between the Gate (G) and Source (S) 0.18μm technology (W = 0, 22μm e L = 0, 18μm). In the
terminals of a PMOS device; VT is the Threshold voltage of PMOS devices acting as capacitances, L remained the same
a PMOS device; rk (k=1, 2, 3, · · · , N ) is the “k”th resistance as L = 0, 19μm of the Level-Shifter M P 1 device (Fig. 12)
“r” of a connected PMOS device as a diode. and W = WM P 1 /4 (W = 1, 57μm/4 ∴ W ∼ = 0, 4μm).
V
W GS Thus, the proposed voltage divider will be able to attenuate
∼
ID = ID0 e ηVT (2)
L Vin(aten) =Vin(max) /36=1.8V /36=50mV corresponding to the
exact linear excursion range of the par-differential. Voltage
The voltage divider proposed in Fig. 15 is a passive circuit of 50mV will be VDS of each PMOS. As VGS < VT , the
that has a voltage at its output (Vout ) as a function of the input transistors will operate in the subthreshold region, according
voltage (Vin ) given by Vout = Vin /N . With the MOS voltage (2). Thus, the proposed final Voltage Divider (VD) circuit is
divider (Fig. 15) installed at the input of V-I Converter, the shown in Fig. 17 and the symbol in Fig. 18.
total input resistance is viewed as the sum of all “N ” resistors
rk , being k = 1, 2, 3, · · · , N . Thus, the total input resistance
will be Rin(total) = N × r.
Topology proposed and presented in Fig. 15 considers
the effects of the parasitic capacitances and the capacitances
resulting from the coupling of the Level-Shifter stage, shown
in Fig. 16.(a), since at high frequencies the input port PMOS
capacitance of the Level circuit -Shifter changes the value
of the last equivalent resistor of the splitter by reducing it Fig. 17. MOS VD (voltage divider) circuit. Fig. 18. Symbol.
and decreasing the maximum value of the output voltage
of the voltage divider. This coupling (Fig. 16.(a)) can be With these dimensions, assuming that: N =36 PMOS de-
modeled as an equivalent resistor in parallel with an equivalent vices will be used; that the maximum voltage drop in each
capacitance, as shown in Fig. 16.(b). PMOS device is VDS =50mV (VGS < VT , “subthreshold
region”); and once in possession of the technology parameters
for the PMOS; from (2), ID = 503.5f A, r = 99.3GΩ
and Zin(total) = Rin(total) = 3.57T Ω is expected. The
calculated approximate value of the Level-Shifter input ca-
pacitance (Cin =∼ = 1.81f F ). Given the high resistance of
the RC network formed by Cin and Rin , one would expect
f−3dB ∼ = 1kHz without impedance balancing. With the
Fig. 16. Determination of the equivalent model of the coupling between balance, the equivalent capacitance of the circuit (Ceq ) was
voltage divider and level-shifter.
minimized, raising significantly f−3dB ∼ = 20.0M Hz, making
W = WM P 1 /4 = 1.57μm/4 ∴ W ∼ = 0.4μm of the PMOS
In Fig. 16, the “gate-source” capacitance of the input PMOS devices as capacitors of Fig. 16 “(c)”.
is represented as “Cin [M p3 ]”. The equivalent resistance of
the PMOS “M pr“N ” is represented by “r“N ”. Thus, the D. Voltage References Source (VREF SRC)
solution was to treat the voltage divider in Fig. 15, not as series Reference voltage generator circuit (“VREF SRC”) is
resistors, but rather as serial impedances “ZS (s)”, each series shown in Fig. 19 and the symbol in Fig. 20. It consists
Authorized licensed use limited to: Synopsys. Downloaded on August 31,2022 at 07:48:02 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
of a simple voltage divider of the VDD supply, with four III. S IMULATIONS AND R ESULTS
equal PMOS with W = 0.22μm and L = 0.18μm, mini- All simulations were carried out using Mentor Graphics’
mum allowed by the adopted technology, thus reducing the Pyxis software with MOS devices from XFAB 0.18 μm (1.8V)
consumption of the circuit. V REF OU T 1 = VDD /2 and technology.
V REF OU T 2 = VDD /4. All transistors operate in the
subthreshold region. M N 1 and M N 2, both with W = L = A. Test Setup
10μm, are NMOS as capacitors. For evaluation tests, the circuit of Fig. 22 was fed with
VDD =1.8VDC , VSS =0.0VDC (GND). A continuous DC volt-
age source VL was added as load on output Iout , to evaluate
the variation of Iout with VL . Finally, a DC and AC voltage
source was coupled on “V IN ” input to generate signals
between VSS =0.0VDC (GND) and VDD =1.8VDC (compatible
with XFAB 0.18μm technology). Static simulations (DC anal-
ysis and operation point analysis) and dynamics simulations
(transient and AC analysis) were carried out, aiming to:
evaluate the power consumption; evaluate the accuracy of the
converter in generating a current signal with linear variation;
evaluate the frequency response of the drive.
Fig. 19. “VREF SRC” circuit. Fig. 20. “VREF SRC” symbol.
B. Static Simulations
In Fig. 23 is presented the result of a DC analysis simulation
varying linearly Vin from 0.0 VDC to 1.8 VDC . Iout varies lin-
E. Complete Circuit early from Imin =Ioffset=108.3μA with IRange = ΔI=49.5μA
Connecting all proposed topologies, the final topology used to Imax =Imin +ΔI=157.8μA. That limits corresponded to the
for converting the input voltage signal (Vin ) into the output designed values.
current (Iout ) is shown in Fig. 21 , with Imin =Iof f set ,
according (1) and whose behavior corresponds to that shown
in Fig. 1.
Fig. 21. Final topology of the proposed V-I converter. Percentage error (“P ercent Error”) of “Iout” in relation
to its theoretical value is shown in Fig. 24. The maximum
deviation was 0.16%.
Including WOS-RCCM output stage with RCA-P (Fig. 7)
in the circuit of Fig. 21 and using only symbols of all stages
described previously, the complete circuit of the proposed V-I
converter is shown in Fig. 22.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Synopsys. Downloaded on August 31,2022 at 07:48:02 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
TABLE I
P ERFORMANCE AND C HARACTERISTICS
Authorized licensed use limited to: Synopsys. Downloaded on August 31,2022 at 07:48:02 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.