You are on page 1of 4

Assignment 4 – Oral Presentation

Due date: December 14th, 19th and 21st


Grouping: 2-3 (same groups as assignment 1, 2 and 3)

In this presentation, you must:


- Explain the reasoning that underpinned your pedagogical decisions for the PBL
unit plan and lesson plan.
- Describe the materials considered for your plans and how they are aligned with
the theoretical foundations revised during the semester and others (ICT standards,
UDL, material design, among others).
- Reflect upon the process of planning a unit with a new approach, preparing the
material and how innovative your work is in comparison to other assignments
you’ve done in the program.

Consider for your presentation the following:


- You will have 10-12 minutes to present.
- You must include a visual aid to support your presentation.
- You must include 3 sources (minimum) as part of your presentation. Cite them
appropriately and include a list of references.
- Speaking time needs to be balanced among all members.

You will be assessed in the following way (check rubrics below):


- Teacher’s assessment: 90%
- Peer-assessment: 5%
- Self-assessment: 5%
Self-assessment (5%):
STUDENT:
INSTRUCTION: Rate your performance on a scale from 0 – 5, being 0 the complete absence of the criteria, and 5 the excellence in
the achievement of the criteria.
I.- INDIVIDUAL WORK
1. PARTICIPATION: I participated in classes and during our working sessions, sharing my views and experiences of
the topics treated.
2. PREPAREDNESS: When asked to prepare material in advance for a class I was always well prepared. Based on
what I read I prepared questions and comments to ask during the class.
II.- GROUP WORK
3. WILLINGNESS TO PARTICIPATE: Whenever we worked in groups, I was eager to participate.
4. CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE TASK: I was always responsible in relation to my contribution to the tasks assigned by
the group.
5. PREPAREDNESS: Knowing what we were going to work on, I always prepared myself in advance to work more
fluently during the meetings.
6. ANALYSIS: I feel I managed to understand the different sources read and connect the ideas expressed with the
reality and practical activities.
7. LEVEL OF REFLECTION: I question my own ideas, views and beliefs on the topics studied.
TOTAL SCORE ___/35

Peer-assessment (5%):
CRITERIA STUDENT NAME
1. PREPAREDNESS: Student was ALWAYS prepared to work. Looked for material or read the
material in advance.
2. PARTICIPATION: Student ALWAYS participated in the group discussions and duties assigned.
3. PUNCTUALITY: Student was ALWAYS punctual to participate in the scheduled meetings.
4. CONTRIBUTION TO THE TASK: Student ALWAYS contributed with useful ideas to the task.
5. LEVEL OF REFLECTION: Student ALWAYS demonstrated a deep level of reflection regarding
different perspectives and insightful and knowledgeable ideas about the topics studied.
STUDENT FINAL SCORE ____/25
Teacher’s assessment (90%):
STUDENT
Poor 
Competent  Good 
Criteria  0-1
2-3 4-5
Analysis: The student provides Student is not able to provide an Student demonstrates a fair analysis of the Student demonstrates a complete analysis of the
solid grounding to important analysis of the content and concepts content and concepts studied. However, not all content and ideas studied. Ideas are clearly stated
concepts and content studied and studies. Not enough ideas are ideas are clearly stated and some lack the support, and supported by official documents revised
provided, and if so, they lack examples, or necessary development.  during the unit and examples. 
used for the completion of their
development and no mention to any
work.
source is given.   

Content: Topics covered in the Student does not address the Student includes all parts, reflections, and topics of Student includes all topics, parts and reflections of
units are included properly in the different parts of the task. Some are the task. Content is somewhat clear, but some the task. All the content is clear, well addressed
presentation and in the different missing and the content is unclear at ideas are confusing or incomplete at times.   and shows a complete understanding of the task at
plans and materials. times and shows little understanding hand.  
of the task. 
Reflection: The student Response demonstrates a lack of Response demonstrates a reflection that addresses Response demonstrates an in-depth reflection on
demonstrates conscious and reflection on, or personalization of, the different topics but lacks concrete ideas at the different topics covered. Students can provide
thorough understanding of the the contribution of the sources used. times. Student provides his/her/their insights but different and concrete insights on the importance
subject matter. Fresh insights are Student fails to provide his/her/their some lack development or include incomplete of having read the different sources used and their
articulated, especially in terms of insight on the matter and barely ideas.  impact on teaching and his/her/their decisions. 
application. develops their ideas. 

Description: The student can Plans and materials are barely Plans and materials are described with concrete All plans and materials are described appropriately
describe the plans and materials described, and some ideas are vague ideas but some lack elaboration. The student with clear ideas. The student provides a thorough
with concrete and pertinent ideas. or missing. The student fails to provide provides a fair description of what has been description of what has been plan and included as
a description of what has been planned and included as part of his/her/their e- part of his/her/their e-portfolio.
planned or included as part of portfolio. This may be limited at times.
his/her/their e-portfolio.
Poor  Competent  Good 
Criteria  0-1 2-3 4-5
Student uses a limited range of Student uses a range of everyday vocabulary Student uses a range of vocabulary, including less
structures. Attempts complex appropriately, with some inappropriate use of less common lexis, appropriately. Uses a range of
sentences but these tend to be less common lexis. Uses a range of simple and some simple and complex grammatical forms with
Use of English  accurate than simple sentences. May complex grammatical forms with a reasonable control and flexibility. Errors are infrequent. 
make frequent grammatical errors and degree of control. Errors do not on the whole
punctuation may be faulty; errors can impede communication. 
cause some difficulty for the reader. 
Poor Competent Good
Criteria  1 2 3
Task does not follow the given format. Task follows the format but not entirely. One or Task follows the appropriate format. No parts are
Format  Some parts are missing, and order is two parts are missing, and the structure is not missing, and all elements are structured and
unclear.  completely clear.  ordered. 
In-text citations are used at times and In-text citations are generally used when required In-text citations are used entirely correctly when
1 source is given on a list of references, and 2 sources from the bibliography are given on a required and at least 3 sources from the
References  although APA format is works cited page, most in APA format. Minor bibliography are given on a works cited page, all in
incomplete. Citations and/or sources errors are present.  correct APA format. 
are missing. 
- The presentation is too long (more - The presentation is too long (between 14+
than 20 minutes) minutes)
Time The presentation lasts 10-12 minutes.
- The presentation is too short (less - Too short (between 9-)
than 7)
The visual aid is not organized, lacks a The visual aid is organized but at times there may The visual aid is well organized, information is
clear structure and text is either too be too much text. Use of color and images is clear. Amount of text is appropriate, and the use of
Visual Aid little or too much. Use of colors and appropriate but there is no balance between different colors and images does not interfere with
images are distracting, and it interferes these, and information being presented. the information being presented.
with the information being presented.
Total Score /37
Final Mark

You might also like