Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In
Partial Fulfillment
Of
The Requirements of
[07/11/2022]
2
reorganization of the cognitive structures through which humans process and store information”
and the learner as an active participant in the process of knowledge acquisition and integration
(Good & Brophy 1990, Merriam & Caffarella 1999; Simon 2001). The cognitive theory
describes knowledge acquisition as a mental activity involving internal coding and structures by
the learner (Derry 1996; Spiro et al. 1992) and suggests that learning happens best under
conditions that aligned with human cognitive architecture (Sobel 2001). Cognitive psychologist
place more emphasis on what learners know and how they come to acquire it than on what they
do. For this reason, the cognitive approach focuses on making knowledge meaningful and
helping learners organize and relate new information to prior knowledge in memory. Instructions
are based on a student’s existing mental structures or schema to be effective (Ertmer & Newby
1993). Three cognitive theories, cognitive information processing, meaningful learning, schema
theory, and situated cognition theory, are examined based on how learning occurs, the
similarities and differences, their use in instruction, and the descriptive strategy of each.
According to the cognitive information processing (CIP) view, the human learner is conceived to
be a processor of information, in much the same way as a computer (Mc Leod 2008). Acquiring
and processing knowledge is a mental process, through which the learner stores, orders,
5
memory, processed, transferred, and encoded into long-term memory. In addition, the CIP has
three phases of the memory process: encoding, storage, and retrieval. The other two use the same
process, even if the meaning is reinforced by real-world experiences and situations. (Driscoll,
2013). Schunk (1996) posits that the learner is an active seeker and processor of information,
however, in instruction; the instructor plays an active role in helping students focus their
attention and select important information as well as activate prior knowledge, which facilitates
encoding. In addition, effective strategies must be used to transfer information into long-term
memory. Strategies such as chunking, rehearsal, mnemonics, and serial positioning are effective.
Consequently, David Ausubel’s meaningful learning theory postulates that new information is
meaningful when it relates to prior knowledge (Driscoll, 2005). In meaningful learning, there is a
“hierarchal cognitive structure” and “anchoring ideas.” These lead to the assimilation and
retention of new knowledge. The most crucial element in meaningful learning is how new
information is integrated into the previous knowledge structure. Schema theory on the other
hand, according to Stein and Trabasso (1982), is prior knowledge or mental models composed of
generic knowledge, and experiences gained through individuals, groups, or cultures which can be
intentional or not. There are “packets of knowledge similar to theories and procedures” and
“mental models” that guide and govern performance. For meaningful learning to be effective in
instruction, the learner has to have an existing cognitive structure to build on. Instructors can use
advanced organizers that are used to activate prior knowledge, for example, through concept
mapping. Instructors may ask questions, give think-aloud activities, and use cues through
6
students’ responses, and errors to determine what students’ current schemata might be and how
Furthermore, situated cognition studies how learning takes place when the learner is doing
something in both the real and virtual world, and therefore learning occurs in a situated activity
that has social-cultural and physical contexts. (Ataizi 2012) This theory supports the idea that
learning takes place when an individual is doing something ‘learning in progress.’ The
knowledge obtained cannot be separated from the context or situation in which the acquisition
was done. This means that learning is connected to a culture, place, activity, or social situation.
In other words, learning does not happen in isolation from other people or our environment. We
learn in and from specific places and interactions. Lave and Wenger (1990) suggest that situated
learning occurs in dynamic communities that involve teachers, learners, experts in business, and
the community where knowledge is shared in an authentic context. This allows learners to use
cognitive tools in authentic domains both outside and inside the school. The learner, having
acquired and mastered the knowledge, skills, or abilities, will eventually become an expert and
Theories are similar in that they attempt to explain how humans behave, gaining a better
understanding of the mental processes of learners. All cognitive learning theories address the role
of learning and memory. Both the meaningful learning and schema theory and situated cognition
focus on teacher-centered approaches to instruction. They also require the learner to have
existing knowledge in the quest for the instruction to be effective. The role of memory in the
situated cognition theory is to assist learners to recall familiar conditions while allowing them to
engage in activities and relations that can make new information meaningful. While in
meaningful learning and schema theory, recalling and organizing prior knowledge provides a
7
processing, transfers occur when learners acquire new information through experiences, enabling
the learner to retrieve previous information that assists the learner in organizing and
In contrast, situated cognition theory assumes that learning involves social participation, such
that cognition takes place within the world and not in the minds constructed as somehow
separate from or outside the world. The knowledge of the individual is the outcome of an
individual learning context and culture. Learning is social and not isolated, as people learn while
interacting with each other through shared activities and through language, as they discuss, share
knowledge, and problem-solving during these tasks. The theory focuses on the social aspect of
the learning process while the meaningful learning and schema theory places no emphasis on the
social aspect of learners. Meaningful learning and schema occur when previous knowledge
combines and links to current learning. On the other hand, cognitive information processing
focuses primarily on the process by which information received by the brain through the various
sensory organs is processed and eventually stored (whether for immediate, short-term, or long-
term use) for retrieval. In addition, cognitive information processing covers all the mechanisms
through which the learning processes can occur in the individual. Hence, its focus is internal as it
looks at how the brain receives, stores encodes, and eventually retrieves information.
Overall, meaningful learning links new information to previous knowledge. Driscoll (2005)
implies that when previous knowledge is activated meaning is achieved. Situated cognition
8
provides the most descriptive strategy for human learning. This theory defines an individual
individual’s knowledge is shaped by the various activities that they are exposed to as well as the
context and culture in which learning occurs. This theory has helped researchers understand
more widely how people learn because it has focused on what people learn in their everyday
lives, which are authentic contexts for a variety of skills. In addition, it helps educators
understand how to capitalize on knowledge and skills that their students may already possess in
References
Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. Grune and Stratton: New
York.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning.
Derry, S. 1996. Cognitive schema theory in the constructivist debate. Educational Psychologist
3: 163–74
Driscoll, M., (2005). Psychology of Learning for Instruction. The USA. Pearson Education Inc.
Ertmer, P. A., and T. J. Newby. 1993. Behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism; comparing
50–66.
Sobel, C. P. 2001. The cognitive sciences: An interdisciplinary approach. Mountain View, CA:
Mayfield
10
Good, T. L., and J. E. Brophy. 1990. Educational psychology: A realistic approach, 4th ed.
Merriam, S. B., and R. S. Caffarella. 1999. Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide, 2nd