Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jerome Bruner’s
In full Jerome Seymour Bruner was born — blind — in New York City in 1915.
He earned a degree in psychology at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina,
He received masters and doctoral degrees in psychology from Harvard University
in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
After working in military intelligence during the Second World War, he took a
faculty position at Harvard in 1945.
American psychologist and educator who developed theories
on perception, learning, memory, and other aspects of cognition in young
children.
Helped to launch the cognitive revolution in psychology — the shift from focusing
on how stimuli or rewards provoke behaviours (behaviourism) to trying to
understand the workings of the mind.
Bruner’s studies helped to introduce Jean Piaget’s concept of developmental
stages of cognition into the classroom.
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jerome-Bruner
https://weebly.com/uploads/1/9/6/9/19692577/bruner.pdf?
c=mkt_w_chnl:aff_geo:all_prtnr:sas_subprtnr:3280369_camp:brand_adtype:txtln
k_ag:weebly_lptype:hp_var:358504&sscid=81k7_10lnb3&utm_source=ShareAS
ale
Principles of Constructivism
1. Readiness
Instruction must be concerned with the experiences and contexts
that make the student willing and able to learn
2. Spiral Organization
Instruction must be structured so that it can be easily grasped by
the student
3. Going beyond the information given
Instruction should be designed to facilitate extrapolation and or fill
in the gaps
http://methodenpool.uni-koeln.de/concept/TIP%20Theories.htm
For Bruner (1961), the purpose of education is not to impart knowledge, but instead to
facilitate a child's thinking and problem solving skills which can then be transferred to a
range of situations. Specifically, education should also develop symbolic thinking in
children.
What is the role of the teacher in constructivist classroom?
The teacher functions more as a facilitator who coaches, mediates, prompts, and helps
students develop and assess their understanding, and thereby their learning.
(https://www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/constructivism/
index_sub1.html#:~:text=In%20the%20constructivist%20model%2C
%20the,understanding%2C%20and%20thereby%20their%20learning.)
Constructivist teachers encourage students to constantly assess how the activity is
helping them gain understanding. By questioning themselves and their strategies,
students in the constructivist classroom ideally become "expert learners." This gives
them ever-broadening tools to keep learning. With a well-planned classroom
environment, the students learn HOW TO LEARN.
You might look at it as a spiral. When they continuously reflect on their experiences,
students find their ideas gaining in complexity and power, and they develop increasingly
strong abilities to integrate new information. One of the teacher's main roles becomes to
encourage this learning and reflection process.
https://www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/constructivism/index.html
https://www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/constructivism/index_sub2.html
How does this theory differ from traditional ideas about teaching and learning?
As with many of the methods addressed in this series of workshops, in the constructivist
classroom, the focus tends to shift from the teacher to the students. The classroom is
no longer a place where the teacher ("expert") pours knowledge into passive students,
who wait like empty vessels to be filled. In the constructivist model, the students are
urged to be actively involved in their own process of learning. The teacher functions
more as a facilitator who coaches, mediates, prompts, and helps students develop and
assess their understanding, and thereby their learning. One of the teacher's biggest jobs
becomes ASKING GOOD QUESTIONS.
And, in the constructivist classroom, both teacher and students think of knowledge not
as inert factoids to be memorized, but as a dynamic, ever-changing view of the world
we live in and the ability to successfully stretch and explore that view.
The chart below compares the traditional classroom to the constructivist one. You can
see significant differences in basic assumptions about knowledge, students, and
learning. (It's important, however, to bear in mind that constructivists acknowledge that
students are constructing knowledge in traditional classrooms, too. It's really a matter of
the emphasis being on the student, not on the instructor.)