*SLIDE 1: CONS OF ANIMAL TESTING 

            
Hi,guy. Im Vui. Im fifth speaker in group three 
Becide the benefit of animal testing , it also has dowside
And I and HẰNG will present the cons of animal testing
LET ME START
+ Cruel and inhumane treatment.
 Protocols applied in animal experiments are typically painful for the test
subject:  Animals are restrained physically for extended periods, forced fed,
deprived of water and food, inflicted with painful wounds and burns to a
certain healing process, and even killed through neck-breaking.  
 Example: when testing to determine the irritation caused by cosmetics,
rabbit eyes are kept open using clips to prevent it from blinking away the
cosmetic being evaluated. These clips usually stay on for days so that the
rabbit stays in place; the clips are incapacitated.  
MoVE ON
+ Limitation of Animal Tests 
 Animal tests often miss the most important signs of toxicity (  /tɒk
ˈsɪs.ɪ.ti/) in humans 
When examining a chemical ( /ˈkem.ɪ.kəl/), scientists frequently try to
determine whether sustained, very low-level exposure to it is safe for humans.
You spit away the toothpaste you've used after using just a dab; you don't
swallow a tube of it every morning and evening. Similar to how you don't
consume the chemicals used to create plastic food containers, you are
concerned about their safety because tiny amounts may end up in your
leftovers. In other words, researchers usually seek to find answers to queries
regarding the security of prolonged exposure to low concentrations of a
chemical, but it’s impossible to study these long-term effects in animals, since
most of them don’t live that long, and toxic effects are usually rare. 
 Animal tests are time-consuming limiting the number of chemicals that
can be tested 
Animal experiments take a long time. For example, it takes around a decade
and $3,000,000 to perform all of the animal experiments required by the US
Environmental Protection Agency to register a single pesticide. And the
pesticide ingredient testing will kill up to 10,000 animals, including mice, rats,
rabbits, guinea pigs, and even dogs. Consider that tens of thousands of
chemicals are being tested for safety in countries all over the world - and that
new legislation in some countries will mandate more extensive testing of both
old and new chemicals. For example, the European Union's Registration,
Evaluation, Authorisation, and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) legislation will
require animal testing on all new and current chemicals manufactured or
imported into the Europe Union. 
 Objections to animal testing 
Even as many industries continue to rely on faulty animal tests, others are
confronting new laws that bans certain types of products from being tested on
animals. Animal testing and/or sales limitations on cosmetics have been
implemented in the European Union, India, Israel, Sao Paulo, Brazil, South
Korea, New Zealand, and Turkey. The United Kingdom went one step further
and prohibited animal testing of home chemicals (e.g., cleaning and laundry
products, air fresheners). As more people oppose to chemical testing on
animals, other governments are likely to follow suit. 
that's all my part 
Hang will talk more about the pros of animal testing 

Practical implication and conclusion  

NEXT SLIDE 
Common mistakes when using antonyms 
 In translation  
As Linh mentioned above A word with multiple meanings can have more than
one antonym. That is remarkably interesting, but it is these multiple meanings
that confuse and misunderstand learners when translating. The first mistake is
that the learners often learn antonyms by heart. Therefore, when they use
antonyms, sometimes they do not take the context into consideration. One
polysemantic word can have more than one antonym, for take can be opposite in
meaning with “put”, “bring” and “give”. 
For example:  
 in each situation and context, the learners choose suitable words. Take >< give
She give to the boy $12 and take his hat. Take >< put Mary takes a ball then put
it in right place Take >< bring He will take you to the party and bring you home
on time. 
The most common mistake made by Vietnamese learner when using antonyms
is, contrast it to its missing antonym' It means that the learners use antonym in a
wrong way, e.g., short is opposite in meaning with long or tall although they
have the same meaning in some situation: "Thar was one more reason she didn't
look forward to Cathy's visit short or long". Not: "That was one more reason she
didn't look forward to Cathy's visit short or tall. 
NEXT SLIDE 
Some suggested solutions 
With these mistakes, the learners should take consideration to as well situation
of the sentences to use antonyms in a right way. For description adjective
antonym is by no means one of the most important and rich in content relations.
Semantic markedness of opposition members is to be defined through the
marked one. 
In the case of definition based on the antonym relation special attention should
be paid to cycles, when antonyms are defined through each other. The semantic
structure of adjectives is considered to be dependent on and specified by the
newin they change. So, in some cases, we pay attention to nouns to find the
meaning of adjectives and their antonyms. Moreover, antonyms are in
euphemism.  
For example: The poem is not good doesn't mean the poem is bad. Furthermore,
the difference in negation is optional with antonym proper, by saying that the
poem is not good, the speaker does not always mean that it is positively bad.
Similarly, the difference between beautiful and ugly has intermediary elements:
beautiful: pretty: good - looking plain: ugly. If don't want to say the fact that
someone is ugly, you can use the negation to listener imagine the intermediary
elements between beautiful and ugly: So, when we said: someone is not
beautiful, instead of thinking that someone is ugly, the listener imagines
someone is plain; someone is good looking; or someone is pretty. Based on the
intermediary elements between rich and poor: Poor. hard up: comfortably off:
wealthy: moderately: well-to-do: rich. When using euphemism to avoid saying
someone is poor, using the negation in this case, someone is not rich Therefore,
the listener images someone who is hard up, comfortably off, wealthy,
moderately or well-to-do. 
NEXT SLIDE 
Students can apply the theory to do the exercises 
Students will be able to learn parts of speech and identify them using context
clues and primary vocabulary list words and their meanings through a series of 
exercises using antonyms. Students will read words in context to connect words
and meanings use vocabulary words in context and put them into action. 
Students will also have the opportunity to review and extend their meaning and 
check the mastery 
NEXT SLIDE 
Conclusion 
The English text's coherence is improved by Antonymy. Using antonyms in
literature and translation demonstrates how opposed things are and creates a
powerful sense of comparison. As a result, writers enjoy and excel at using their
literary works, and it helps to produce characterization, scene description, and
expression of opinions, debate, and denial. Reading comprehension and
appreciation of the writers' aim are greatly enhanced by the linguistic study of
antonymy in English literature and translation. In English texts, antonyms help
readers understand and appreciate the author's intention in a simple way. They
are helpful and valuable in defining the meanings of words.