lOMoARcPSD|15836198

Final examination in practical research 2 Qualitative

Research using Technology
Essentials of Electrical & Electronics Engineering (University of the Philippines System)

StuDocu is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university

Downloaded by Irene Rechelle Fajarito (irene051310@gmail.com)
 lOMoARcPSD|15836198

TOMINJAO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

Tominjao, Daanbantayan, Cebu

FI
NALEXAM I
N PRACTI
CALRESEARCH 2

GENERALRULES

1. Thi
sassessmentr
ubr
icwi
llbeusedi
neval
uat
ingyourFi
nalExami
nat
ioni
nPr
act
icalResear
ch 2.
2. Thetot
alscor
eforal
lCHAPTERSwi l
lbeyourfinalscore.
3. Remember,ALLtheareasi
nthesechapt
erswi
llbeconsideredPERFORMANCE TASKS.
4. Yourr
esear
cht
eacherwi
llr
atet
heout
putbasedont
her
ubr
icsbel
ow.
5. NO EXTENSI
ONSwi
llbegi
veni
nthesubmi
ssi
on.
6. Thel
eadr
esear
chershal
lsubmi
tal
ltheout
put
stot
hei
nst
ruct
or.
putSHOULD becl
7. Theout eanandpr
esent
abl
e.Pr
intal
lthedocument
sinSHORT BOND ONLY.
8. Thescor
egi
venwi
llbefinalandi
rrevocabl
e.
Excel lent ( 10 points): Good:( 9 points)
:Good t o Average:( 8poi nt s)
: Below Aver age( 7andbel ow):
Excel lent to superior wor ki n fai
r wor k i n most aspect s; Passing wor k, but i n serious Conf usi
ng,l acksexplanationor
allar eas as indicated i nt he mi nordefici ency inrelation t o need ofi mpr ovementi n many compl et
ion;l i
ttl
econformingt o
instruct ors’ writ
ten instruct or s’ wr itten areas, especiall
yi nr egardt o instruct
or s’ wri
tten
expect ations; exempl ar y expect ationsr egar
dingcont ent , form and cont ent ; mi ni
mal expectati
onsr egar
dingcont ent,
perfor mance, participati
on, wr it
ing st yl
e or pr ocedur es; grasp of f acts, analysis and wr i
tingstyleorpr ocedures;
creativity and wr it
ing; f ully adequat e gr asp of f act s, applicat
ion;v eryfew clear
overall
, bel ow pr
ofessi
onal
addr esses t
he cr it
eri
on; anal ysis, and pr actical stat
ement sorexpl anations
qualitystandar ds;notqual i
ty
excellent gr asp of f acts, appl ication; cl ear statement s
work
analysi s and appl i
cati
on; and expl anations arel imi ted,
consi stently clear s t
at ement s butaboveaver agequality
andexpl anat
ions
Ar
eaofAssessment Poi
ntsEar
ned
ResearchTitle.(Area1)
Thet i
tl
eofthes t
udycl earlystatest
het opi
coft
hes t
udywithvari
ables.
RationaleoftheSt udy.( Area2)
Ther ati
onal
eoft hes t
udycl ear
lystat
esi t
spurposeappr
opri
atefortheresear
ch pr
obl
em
wit
hsuppor ti
ngl i
terat
ur e/studi
es.
ConceptualFramework.(Area3)
Theconceptualf
ramework ofthestudypr ovi
desaclearresearch paradi
gm and atl
east
thr
ee(3)support
ingconcept
sthatestabl
ishgroundasbasesf ortheresearch.
Problem/Pur poseSt atement .( Ar ea4)
Thepr oblem/pur posest atementsect i
onst atest
her esear chpr oblem indi r
ectandobvi ous
l
anguage and t he problem i s pr oper ly placed i
n ar elevantcont ext.Sub- probl
ems ar e
l
ogicallyarr angedandcl earl
yst at edt hei ssuestobeanswer ed.
Significanceoft heSt udy.( Area5)
The si gni
ficance oft he s t
udy i s cl early stat
ed the need f or r
esear ch and pr ovides
benefactorsoft her esearchi ndi fferentar easofdiscipline( i
.e.,how ther esear
chmi ghtbe
usedbypr act i
tionersorot hersinpr acticalways).
StatementofNul lHypot hesisandScopeandLi mi tat i
ons/Del imit ations.(Area6)
The scope and l i
mitations sect ion pr ovi de a cl
ear di rection oft he s tudy speci
fical
ly
rei
teratingt heset softhescopeandl i
mi tationstheresear cher smustt ake.

DefinitionofTer ms.( Ar ea7)

The definition oft erms f oll
ows t he al phabeti
calor der and has i
ncluded key t
erms i
n
researchwi thacl eardefini ti
onofdi fficultandkeywor dsinthestudy.
Revi ew ofRel atedLi terat ureandSt udies(Area8)
Mustcont ai
natl east10r el
atedl i
terat ureandstudies.
Resear chDesi gn/I nstrument s/Respondent s.(Ar
ea9)
Clearlystatest hespeci ficdesi gn,instr umentsandr espondentsusedi nthestudy.
Synt hesis(Ar ea10)
Givest heover-allr esultsoft her esear chstudy.
Gener
alComment
s:
_______/100

RUBRI
CSFI
NALEXAMI
NATI
ON I
N PRACTI
CALRESEARCH 2(
QUANTI
TATI
VE)

Downloaded by Irene Rechelle Fajarito (irene051310@gmail.com)

 lOMoARcPSD|15836198

RC CODE SH-
PROG-
2A12-
C210-
008
ORALDEFENSE

Resear
cher
s Presentati
o Q&A Tot
alScor
e
n (
50poi
nts)
(50poi nt
s)
LeadResear
cher
:
Resear
chAssoci
ate:
Resear
chAssoci
ate:
Resear
chAssoci
ate:
Resear
chAssoci
ate:
Resear
chAssoci
ate:
Resear
chAssoci
ate:
Resear
chAssoci
ate:
Resear
chAssoci
ate:
Resear
chAssoci
ate:
Resear
chAssoci
ate:
Resear
chAssoci
ate:
Resear
chAssoci
ate:
Resear
chAssoci
ate:
Resear
chAssoci
ate:
Resear
chAssoci
ate:
Resear
chAssoci
ate:
Resear
chAssoci
ate:
Resear
chAssoci
ate:

I
VYC.ATUP,MAEd–Math
Subj
ectTeacher
1.Whydi
dyouchooset
hist
opi
c?
2.Whatarethel
imi t
ationsyouf acedinwr it
ingt hi stopi
c?
3.Whydi dyouchooset hismet hod?
4.Whataretherecommendat ionsoft hestudy?
5.How di
dyourelateyours t
udyt oexisti
ngr esear ches?
6.Canyousummar i
zeyourr esearchinjustfew sent ences?
7.Whatistheweaknesspar tofyourwor k?
8.I
fyoucouldst
ar tover,whathaveyoudonedi fferentl
y?

Downloaded by Irene Rechelle Fajarito (irene051310@gmail.com)

 lOMoARcPSD|15836198

1. The most common question you may be asked is what you learned from the study you have done. You
have to sum up your entire study in a few sentences and remember the technical terms you have mentioned in
your research because that is what your examiner wants to hear from you.
2. The next question to follow by default is why you chose this particular topic or what your inspiration
behind this study was. This is one of the trickiest questions as you have to prove your convincing power to the
panel of the teachers that what you did is valuable for the society and was worth their time. Tell about how
zealous you were about this particular problem.
3. What is the importance of your study or how will it contribute or add up to the existing body of
knowledge?
4. You may be asked to summarize your key findings of the research.
5. What type of background research have you done for the study?
6. What are the limitations you have faced while writing?
7. Why did you choose this particular method or sample for the study?
8. What will you include if you are told to add something extra to the study?
9. What are the recommendations of your study?
10. Who identify your respondents and why you selected this particular age group?
11. What was your hypothesis and how you framed it?
12. If given a chance, would like to do something different with your work?
13. What are the limitations you faced while dealing with your samples?
14. How did you relate your study to the existing theories?
15. What is the future scope of this study?
16. What do you plan to do with your work after you have completed your degree?
17. What are the research variables you used?
18. Do you have any questions to be asked?
19. Did you evaluate your work?
20. How would you improve your work?

GENERALRULES

1. Thi
sassessmentr
ubr
icwi
llbeusedi
neval
uat
ingyourFi
rstQuar
terExami
nat
ioni
nPr
act
icalResear
ch2.

Downloaded by Irene Rechelle Fajarito (irene051310@gmail.com)

 lOMoARcPSD|15836198

2. Thet
otalscor
eforChapt
er1:I
ntr
oduct
ionwi
llbeyourFi
rstQuar
terExami
nat
ioncomposedof
seven
(7)ar eas.
3. Re member ,ALLt hear easi nt hischapt erwi l
lbeconsi der edPERFORMANCE TASKS.
4. Allresear cher swillhavet hesamescor eONLYi nar ea7.
5. Makes uret oputt hecor rectedver sionsofyourout putast hiswi llbefinalandi rr
evocabl eexcept
forsuggest ionsandr ecommendat ionsbyyourr esearchi nstructor.
6. Yourr esear chi nstructorwi llratetheout putbasedont her ubr i
csbel ow.
7. Thel eadr esearcherwi llratehi s/herr esearchassoci atesbasedont hegravityofeffortshared.The
leadr esear cherMUSTseet oi tthatt hereisapr operbasi sfort hegradehe/shewi llgive.The
gradingwi llbedonei nf r
ontoft her esearchassoci atest oavoidbi ases/personalgains.
8. NO EXTENSI ONSwi llbegi veni nt hesubmi ssion.
9. Thel eadr esearchershal lsubmi talltheout put stot hei nst
ruct or
.
10.Theout putSHOULD becl eanandpr esentable.Pr i
ntal lthedocument nSHORT BOND ONLY.
si
11.Thes cor egi venwi l
lbefinalandi rrevocable.
12.Submi tyourout putonorbe f
oreAugust20,2018.Thesubmi ssionisunt il6:
00pm ONLY.

RUBRI
CSFI
RST QUARTER EXAMI
NATI
ON I
N PRACTI
CALRESEARCH 2(
QUANTI
TATI
VE)
Excel lent (30- 28 poi nts): Good: ( 27-25 poi nts): Average:( 24-22poi nts)
: Below Aver age(lesst han20
Excel lent to superior worki n Good t o fair wor k in most Passing wor k, but i n serious points):
allar eas as indicated int he aspects; mi nor deficiency i n need ofi mpr ovementi n many Conf usi
ng,l acksexpl anat ionor
instruct ors’ writ
ten rel
ation t oinstructor
s’wr itt
en areas, especiall
yi nr egardt o compl et
ion;l i
ttl
econf ormi ngt o
expect ations; exemplar y expectationsr egar
dingcont ent, form and cont ent ; mi nimal instruct
or s’ written
perfor mance, partici
pati
on, writi
ng st yl
e or pr ocedur es; grasp of f acts, analysis and expectati
onsr egar
dingcont ent,
creativity and wr it
ing; fully adequat e gr asp of f acts, appl i
cat
ion;v eryfew clear wr i
tingstyleorpr ocedur es;
addr esses t
he crit
eri
on; analysis, and practical statementsorexpl anations overall
, bel ow professional
excellent gr asp of f acts, applicati
on; cl ear statement s
qualitystandar ds;notqual i
ty
analysi s and appli
cati
on; and expl anations arel i
mi ted,
work
consi stently clear s t
atement s butaboveaver agequal i
ty
andexpl anat
ions
Ar
eaofAssessment Poi
ntsEar
ned
RationaleoftheStudy.(Area1)
Ther at
ional
eofthes t
udycl ear
lystat
esi
tspur
poseappr
opr
iat
efort
her
esear
ch pr
obl
em
wit
hsuppor ti
ngli
ter
ature/studi
es.

Theor eti
calBackgroundoft heStudy.(Area2)
Thet heoret
ical–concept
ualframework ofthest
udyprovi
desaclearr
esear
ch par
adi
gm
andatl eastthree(
3)suppor
tingtheori
esandconcept
sthatest
abl
ishgr
oundasbasesfor
theresearch.

Problem/Pur poseStatement .(Area3)

Thepr obl
em/pur posestatementsecti
onst atest
heresearchprobl
em indi
rectandobvi
ous
l
anguage and t he pr
oblem is proper
ly placed i
n arelevantcontext
.Sub-probl
ems ar
e
l
ogicall
yarrangedandcl earl
ystatedtheissuestobeanswer ed.

Signi
ficanceoft heSt udy.(Area4)
The signi
ficance oft he st
udy i s clearly st
ated the need for r
esear
ch and pr
ovi
des
benef
actorsoft heresear
chi ndiffer
entar easofdisci
pli
ne(i.
e.,how theresear
chmi
ghtbe
usedbypr actit
ionersorothersinpr acticalways).

StatementofNullHypothesisandScopeandLi mi t
at i
ons/Delimi
tations.( ea5)The
Ar
scopeandlimi
tat
ionssect
ion pr
ovideacleardirec
tion ofthestudyspecifical
lyrei
ter
ati
ng
thesetsoft
hescopeandlimit
ationsther
esearchersmustt ake.

Definiti
onofTer ms.(Ar ea6)
The defini
ti
on ofterms f ol
lows t
he al phabet
icalor
der and has i
ncl
uded key t
erms i
n
resear
chwi thacleardefinit
ionofdifficultandkeywordsinthestudy.

Grammar,Sent
enceConst ruction,andAPA St yleFormat.(Area7)
Grammarandsentenceconstructi
on areproper
lyobservedin al
lcomponent
sofr
esear
ch.
UsesAPAfor
mattoproperl
ycitethereferencemateri
alusedforresear
ch.

Gener
alComment
s:
_______/90

Downloaded by Irene Rechelle Fajarito (irene051310@gmail.com)

 lOMoARcPSD|15836198

RC CODE SH-
PROG-
2A12-
C210-
002
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATI
ON

Resear
cher
s Area Ar
ea Area Ar
ea Area Area Ar
ea Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Scor
e
LeadResear
cher
:SAMOSI
NO,JOHN LESTER
Asst
.LeadResear
cher
:RABADON,MESI
E
Resear
chAssoci
ate:MOMO,TRI
CIA MARI
E
Resear
chAssoci
ate:PELANDAS,JACOB CLI
FF
Resear
chAssoci
ate:BORDADORA,KI
M
Resear
chAssoci
ate:CELESTI
AL,YOLLY
Resear
chAssoci
ate:

NONI
ELJOHN VASQUEZERNO,LPT
Resear
chLect
urer

GENERALRULES

1. Thi
sassessmentr
ubr
icwi
llbeusedi
neval
uat
ingyourFi
rstQuar
terExami
nat
ioni
nPr
act
icalResear
ch2.
2. Thet
otalscor
eforChapt
er1:I
ntr
oduct
ionwi
llbeyourFi
rstQuar
terExami
nat
ioncomposedof
seven
(7)ar eas.
3. Re member ,ALLt hear easi nt hischapt erwi l
lbeconsi der edPERFORMANCE TASKS.
4. Allresear cher swillhavet hesamescor eONLYi nar ea7.
5. Makes uret oputt hecor rectedver sionsofyourout putast hiswi llbefinalandi rr
evocabl eexcept
forsuggest ionsandr ecommendat ionsbyyourr esearchi nstructor.
6. Yourr esear chi nstructorwi llratetheout putbasedont her ubr i
csbel ow.
7. Thel eadr esearcherwi llratehi s/herr esearchassoci atesbasedont hegravityofeffortshared.The
leadr esear cherMUSTseet oi tthatt hereisapr operbasi sfort hegradehe/shewi llgive.The
gradingwi llbedonei nf r
ontoft her esearchassoci atest oavoidbi ases/personalgains.
8. NO EXTENSI ONSwi llbegi veni nt hesubmi ssion.
9. Thel eadr esearchershal lsubmi talltheout put stot hei nst
ruct or
.
10.Theout putSHOULD becl eanandpr esentable.Pr i
ntal lthedocument nSHORT BOND ONLY.
si
11.Thes cor egi venwi l
lbefinalandi rrevocable.
12.Submi tyourout putonorbe f
oreAugust20,2018.Thesubmi ssionisunt il6:
00pm ONLY.

RUBRI
CSFI
RST QUARTER EXAMI
NATI
ON I
N PRACTI
CALRESEARCH 2(
QUANTI
TATI
VE)
Excel lent (30- 28 poi nts): Good: ( 27-25 poi nts): Average:( 24-22poi nts)
: Below Aver age(lesst han20
Excel lent to superior worki n Good t o fair wor k in most Passing wor k, but i n serious points):
allar eas as indicated int he aspects; mi nor deficiency i n need ofi mpr ovementi n many Conf usi
ng,l acksexpl anat ionor
instruct ors’ writ
ten rel
ation t oinstructor
s’wr itt
en areas, especiall
yi nr egardt o compl et
ion;l i
ttl
econf ormi ngt o
expect ations; exemplar y expectationsr egar
dingcont ent, form and cont ent ; mi nimal instruct
or s’ written
perfor mance, partici
pati
on, writi
ng st yl
e or pr ocedur es; grasp of f acts, analysis and expectati
onsr egar
dingcont ent,
creativity and wr it
ing; fully adequat e gr asp of f acts, appl i
cat
ion;v eryfew clear wr i
tingstyleorpr ocedur es;
addr esses t
he crit
eri
on; analysis, and practical statementsorexpl anations overall
, bel ow professional
excellent gr asp of f acts, applicati
on; cl ear statement s
qualitystandar ds;notqual i
ty
analysi s and appli
cati
on; and expl anations arel i
mi ted,
work
consi stently clear s t
atement s butaboveaver agequal i
ty
andexpl anat
ions
Ar
eaofAssessment Poi
ntsEar
ned
RationaleoftheStudy.(Area1)
Ther at
ional
eofthes t
udycl ear
lystat
esi
tspur
poseappr
opr
iat
efort
her
esear
ch pr
obl
em
wit
hsuppor ti
ngli
ter
ature/studi
es.

Theor eti
calBackgroundoft heStudy.(Area2)
Thet heoret
ical–concept
ualframework ofthest
udyprovi
desaclearr
esear
ch par
adi
gm
andatl eastthree(
3)suppor
tingtheori
esandconcept
sthatest
abl
ishgr
oundasbasesfor
theresearch.

Downloaded by Irene Rechelle Fajarito (irene051310@gmail.com)

 lOMoARcPSD|15836198

Problem/Pur poseStatement .(Area3)

Thepr obl
em/pur posestatementsecti
onst atest
heresearchprobl
em indi
rectandobvi
ous
l
anguage and t he pr
oblem is proper
ly placed i
n arelevantcontext
.Sub-probl
ems ar
e
l
ogicall
yarrangedandcl earl
ystatedtheissuestobeanswer ed.

Signi
ficanceoft heSt udy.(Area4)
The signi
ficance oft he st
udy i s clearly st
ated the need for r
esear
ch and pr
ovi
des
benef
actorsoft heresear
chi ndiffer
entar easofdisci
pli
ne(i.
e.,how theresear
chmi
ghtbe
usedbypr actit
ionersorothersinpr acticalways).

StatementofNullHypothesisandScopeandLi mi t
at i
ons/Delimi
tations.( ea5)The
Ar
scopeandlimi
tat
ionssect
ion pr
ovideacleardirec
tion ofthestudyspecifical
lyrei
ter
ati
ng
thesetsoft
hescopeandlimit
ationsther
esearchersmustt ake.

Definiti
onofTer ms.(Ar ea6)
The defini
ti
on ofterms f ol
lows t
he al phabet
icalor
der and has i
ncl
uded key t
erms i
n
resear
chwi thacleardefinit
ionofdifficultandkeywordsinthestudy.

Grammar,Sent
enceConst ruction,andAPA St yleFormat.(Area7)
Grammarandsentenceconstructi
on areproper
lyobservedin al
lcomponent
sofr
esear
ch.
UsesAPAfor
mattoproperl
ycitethereferencemateri
alusedforresear
ch.

Gener
alComment
s:
_______/90

RC CODE SH-
PROG-
2A12-
C210-
003
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATI
ON

Resear
cher
s Area Ar
ea Area Ar
ea Area Area Ar
ea Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Scor
e
LeadResear
cher
:TRASMONTE,LEI
LA MAE
Asst
.LeadResear
cher
:CHI
ONG,AI
RANI
ÑA
Resear
chAssoci
ate:PI
TOGO,RYAN
Resear
chAssoci
ate:BALABA,STEPHEN
Resear
chAssoci
ate:OLI
VIA,JI
MMUEL
Resear
chAssoci
ate:ARROYO,ABBE
Resear
chAssoci
ate:

NONI
ELJOHN VASQUEZERNO,LPT
Resear
chLect
urer

GENERALRULES

1. Thi
sassessmentr
ubr
icwi
llbeusedi
neval
uat
ingyourFi
rstQuar
terExami
nat
ioni
nPr
act
icalResear
ch2.
2. Thet
otalscor
eforChapt
er1:I
ntr
oduct
ionwi
llbeyourFi
rstQuar
terExami
nat
ioncomposedof
seven
(7)areas.
3. Remember ,ALLtheareasint hi
schapterwillbeconsideredPERFORMANCE TASKS.
4. Allresear
cher swil
lhavethesamescor eONLYi nar ea7.
5. Makes ur
et oputthecorrect
edversionsofyouroutputast hiswil
lbefinalandi
rrevocabl
eexcept
forsuggestionsandrecommendat i
onsbyyourr esearchinstr
uctor
.

Downloaded by Irene Rechelle Fajarito (irene051310@gmail.com)

 lOMoARcPSD|15836198

6. Yourr
esear
chi
nst
ruct
orwi
llr
atet
heout
putbasedont
her
ubr
icsbel
ow.
7. Thel
eadr
esear
cherwi
llr
atehi
s/herr
esear
chassoci
atesbasedont
hegr
avi
tyofeffor
tshar
ed.The
leadresearcherMUSTseet oitthatt hereisapr operbasisforthegradehe/shewi l
lgi
ve.The
gradi
ngwi llbedonei nfrontofther esearchassoci atestoavoidbiases/per
sonalgai
ns.
8. NO EXTENSI ONSwi l
lbegiveninthesubmi ssion.
9. Theleadr esearchershallsubmitalltheout put stot heinst
ructor
.
10.Theout putSHOULD becl eanandpr esentable.Pr i
ntallthedocument sinSHORT BOND ONLY.
11.Thescor egivenwi l
lbefinalandirr
evocabl e.
12.Submi tyourout putonorbe f eAugust20,2018.Thesubmi
or ssi
oni suntil6:
00pm ONLY.

RUBRI
CSFI
RST QUARTER EXAMI
NATI
ON I
N PRACTI
CALRESEARCH 2(
QUANTI
TATI
VE)
Excel lent (30- 28 poi nts): Good: ( 27-25 poi nts): Average:( 24-22poi nts)
: Below Aver age(lesst han20
Excel lent to superior worki n Good t o fair wor k in most Passing wor k, but i n serious points):
allar eas as indicated int he aspects; mi nor deficiency i n need ofi mpr ovementi n many Conf usi
ng,l acksexpl anat ionor
instruct ors’ writ
ten rel
ation t oinstructor
s’wr itt
en areas, especiall
yi nr egardt o compl et
ion;l i
ttl
econf ormi ngt o
expect ations; exemplar y expectationsr egar
dingcont ent, form and cont ent ; mi nimal instruct
or s’ written
perfor mance, partici
pati
on, writi
ng st yl
e or pr ocedur es; grasp of f acts, analysis and expectati
onsr egar
dingcont ent,
creativity and wr it
ing; fully adequat e gr asp of f acts, appl i
cat
ion;v eryfew clear wr i
tingstyleorpr ocedur es;
addr esses t
he crit
eri
on; analysis, and practical statementsorexpl anations overall
, bel ow professional
excellent gr asp of f acts, applicati
on; cl ear statement s
qualitystandar ds;notqual i
ty
analysi s and appli
cati
on; and expl anations arel i
mi ted,
work
consi stently clear s t
atement s butaboveaver agequal i
ty
andexpl anat
ions
Ar
eaofAssessment Poi
ntsEar
ned
RationaleoftheStudy.(Area1)
Ther at
ional
eofthes t
udycl ear
lystat
esi
tspur
poseappr
opr
iat
efort
her
esear
ch pr
obl
em
wit
hsuppor ti
ngli
ter
ature/studi
es.

Theor eti
calBackgroundoft heStudy.(Area2)
Thet heoret
ical–concept
ualframework ofthest
udyprovi
desaclearr
esear
ch par
adi
gm
andatl eastthree(
3)suppor
tingtheori
esandconcept
sthatest
abl
ishgr
oundasbasesfor
theresearch.

Problem/Pur poseStatement .(Area3)

Thepr obl
em/pur posestatementsecti
onst atest
heresearchprobl
em indi
rectandobvi
ous
l
anguage and t he pr
oblem is proper
ly placed i
n arelevantcontext
.Sub-probl
ems ar
e
l
ogicall
yarrangedandcl earl
ystatedtheissuestobeanswer ed.

Signi
ficanceoft heSt udy.(Area4)
The signi
ficance oft he st
udy i s clearly st
ated the need for r
esear
ch and pr
ovi
des
benef
actorsoft heresear
chi ndiffer
entar easofdisci
pli
ne(i.
e.,how theresear
chmi
ghtbe
usedbypr actit
ionersorothersinpr acticalways).

StatementofNullHypothesisandScopeandLi mi t
at i
ons/Delimi
tations.( ea5)The
Ar
scopeandlimi
tat
ionssect
ion pr
ovideacleardirec
tion ofthestudyspecifical
lyrei
ter
ati
ng
thesetsoft
hescopeandlimit
ationsther
esearchersmustt ake.

Definiti
onofTer ms.(Ar ea6)
The defini
ti
on ofterms f ol
lows t
he al phabet
icalor
der and has i
ncl
uded key t
erms i
n
resear
chwi thacleardefinit
ionofdifficultandkeywordsinthestudy.

Grammar,Sent
enceConst ruction,andAPA St yleFormat.(Area7)
Grammarandsentenceconstructi
on areproper
lyobservedin al
lcomponent
sofr
esear
ch.
UsesAPAfor
mattoproperl
ycitethereferencemateri
alusedforresear
ch.

Gener
alComment
s:
_______/90

RC CODE SH-
PROG-
2A12-
C210-
004
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATI
ON

Resear
cher
s Area Ar
ea Area Ar
ea Area Area Ar
ea Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Scor
e
LeadResear
cher
:ROSALES,VANREY CHRI
S
Asst
.LeadResear
cher
:RUEDAS,RAYVEN JOHN
Resear
chAssoci
ate:PANSOY,MAY VALERI
E
Resear
chAssoci
ate:TABAR,ARBY
Resear
chAssoci
ate:TULABI
NG,SHEI
LA
Resear
chAssoci
ate:
Resear
chAssoci
ate:

Downloaded by Irene Rechelle Fajarito (irene051310@gmail.com)

 lOMoARcPSD|15836198

NONI
ELJOHN VASQUEZERNO,LPT
Resear
chLect
urer

GENERALRULES

1. Thi
sassessmentr
ubr
icwi
llbeusedi
neval
uat
ingyourFi
rstQuar
terExami
nat
ioni
nPr
act
icalResear
ch2.
2. Thet
otalscor
eforChapt
er1:I
ntr
oduct
ionwi
llbeyourFi
rstQuar
terExami
nat
ioncomposedof
seven
(7)ar eas.
3. Re member ,ALLt hear easi nt hischapt erwi l
lbeconsi der edPERFORMANCE TASKS.
4. Allresear cher swillhavet hesamescor eONLYi nar ea7.
5. Makes uret oputt hecor rectedver sionsofyourout putast hiswi llbefinalandi rr
evocabl eexcept
forsuggest ionsandr ecommendat ionsbyyourr esearchi nstructor.
6. Yourr esear chi nstructorwi llratetheout putbasedont her ubr i
csbel ow.
7. Thel eadr esearcherwi llratehi s/herr esearchassoci atesbasedont hegravityofeffortshared.The
leadr esear cherMUSTseet oi tthatt hereisapr operbasi sfort hegradehe/shewi llgive.The
gradingwi llbedonei nf r
ontoft her esearchassoci atest oavoidbi ases/personalgains.
8. NO EXTENSI ONSwi llbegi veni nt hesubmi ssion.
9. Thel eadr esearchershal lsubmi talltheout put stot hei nst
ruct or
.
10.Theout putSHOULD becl eanandpr esentable.Pr i
ntal lthedocument nSHORT BOND ONLY.
si
11.Thes cor egi venwi l
lbefinalandi rrevocable.
12.Submi tyourout putonorbe f
oreAugust20,2018.Thesubmi ssionisunt il6:
00pm ONLY.

RUBRI
CSFI
RST QUARTER EXAMI
NATI
ON I
N PRACTI
CALRESEARCH 2(
QUANTI
TATI
VE)
Excel lent (30- 28 poi nts): Good: ( 27-25 poi nts): Average:( 24-22poi nts)
: Below Aver age(lesst han20
Excel lent to superior worki n Good t o fair wor k in most Passing wor k, but i n serious points):
allar eas as indicated int he aspects; mi nor deficiency i n need ofi mpr ovementi n many Conf usi
ng,l acksexpl anat ionor
instruct ors’ writ
ten rel
ation t oinstructor
s’wr itt
en areas, especiall
yi nr egardt o compl et
ion;l i
ttl
econf ormi ngt o
expect ations; exemplar y expectationsr egar
dingcont ent, form and cont ent ; mi nimal instruct
or s’ written
perfor mance, partici
pati
on, writi
ng st yl
e or pr ocedur es; grasp of f acts, analysis and expectati
onsr egar
dingcont ent,
creativity and wr it
ing; fully adequat e gr asp of f acts, appl i
cat
ion;v eryfew clear wr i
tingstyleorpr ocedur es;
addr esses t
he crit
eri
on; analysis, and practical statementsorexpl anations overall
, bel ow professional
excellent gr asp of f acts, applicati
on; cl ear statement s
qualitystandar ds;notqual i
ty
analysi s and appli
cati
on; and expl anations arel i
mi ted,
work
consi stently clear s t
atement s butaboveaver agequal i
ty
andexpl anat
ions
Ar
eaofAssessment Poi
ntsEar
ned
RationaleoftheStudy.(Area1)
Ther at
ional
eofthes t
udycl ear
lystat
esi
tspur
poseappr
opr
iat
efort
her
esear
ch pr
obl
em
wit
hsuppor ti
ngli
ter
ature/studi
es.

Theor eti
calBackgroundoft heStudy.(Area2)
Thet heoret
ical–concept
ualframework ofthest
udyprovi
desaclearr
esear
ch par
adi
gm
andatl eastthree(
3)suppor
tingtheori
esandconcept
sthatest
abl
ishgr
oundasbasesfor
theresearch.

Problem/Pur poseStatement .(Area3)

Thepr obl
em/pur posestatementsecti
onst atest
heresearchprobl
em indi
rectandobvi
ous
l
anguage and t he pr
oblem is proper
ly placed i
n arelevantcontext
.Sub-probl
ems ar
e
l
ogicall
yarrangedandcl earl
ystatedtheissuestobeanswer ed.

Signi
ficanceoft heStudy.(
Area4)
The signi
ficance oft
he study i
s cl
ear
ly st
ated t
he need f
or r
esear
ch and pr
ovi
des

Downloaded by Irene Rechelle Fajarito (irene051310@gmail.com)

 lOMoARcPSD|15836198

benef
act
orsoftheresear
chi ndi
ffer
entar easofdi
sci
pli
ne(
i.
e.,how t
her
esear
chmi
ghtbe
usedbypract
iti
onersorothersi
npr act
icalways)
.

StatementofNullHypothesisandScopeandLi mi t
at i
ons/Delimi
tations.( ea5)The
Ar
scopeandlimi
tat
ionssect
ion pr
ovideacleardirec
tion ofthestudyspecifical
lyrei
ter
ati
ng
thesetsoft
hescopeandlimit
ationsther
esearchersmustt ake.

Definiti
onofTer ms.(Ar ea6)
The defini
ti
on ofterms f ol
lows t
he al phabet
icalor
der and has i
ncl
uded key t
erms i
n
resear
chwi thacleardefinit
ionofdifficultandkeywordsinthestudy.

Grammar,Sent
enceConst ruction,andAPA St yleFormat.(Area7)
Grammarandsentenceconstructi
on areproper
lyobservedin al
lcomponent
sofr
esear
ch.
UsesAPAfor
mattoproperl
ycitethereferencemateri
alusedforresear
ch.

Gener
alComment
s:
_______/90

RC CODE SH-
PROG-
2A12-
C210-
005
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATI
ON

Resear
cher
s Area Ar
ea Area Ar
ea Area Area Ar
ea Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Scor
e
LeadResear
cher
:ESPI
NOZA,ROMMELVI
NCENT
Asst
.LeadResear
cher
:ENRI
QUEZ,GODWI
N
CLAYD
Resear
chAssoci
ate:MUÑASQUE,CATHERI
NE MAE
Resear
chAssoci
ate:MONI
CIT,CHRI
STI
NE MAE
Resear
chAssoci
ate:MATARANAS,REX
Resear
chAssoci
ate:ABANI
D,RYAN
Resear
chAssoci
ate:

NONI
ELJOHN VASQUEZERNO,LPT
Resear
chLect
urer

GENERALRULES

1. Thi
sassessmentr
ubr
icwi
llbeusedi
neval
uat
ingyourFi
rstQuar
terExami
nat
ioni
nPr
act
icalResear
ch2.
2. Thet
otalscor
eforChapt
er1:I
ntr
oduct
ionwi
llbeyourFi
rstQuar
terExami
nat
ioncomposedof
seven
(7)ar eas.
3. Re member ,ALLt hear easi nt hischapt erwi l
lbeconsi der edPERFORMANCE TASKS.
4. Allresear cher swillhavet hesamescor eONLYi nar ea7.
5. Makes uret oputt hecor rectedver sionsofyourout putast hiswi llbefinalandi rr
evocabl eexcept
forsuggest ionsandr ecommendat ionsbyyourr esearchi nstructor.
6. Yourr esear chi nstructorwi llratetheout putbasedont her ubr i
csbel ow.
7. Thel eadr esearcherwi llratehi s/herr esearchassoci atesbasedont hegravityofeffortshared.The
leadr esear cherMUSTseet oi tthatt hereisapr operbasi sfort hegradehe/shewi llgive.The
gradingwi llbedonei nf r
ontoft her esearchassoci atest oavoidbi ases/personalgains.
8. NO EXTENSI ONSwi llbegi veni nt hesubmi ssion.
9. Thel eadr esearchershal lsubmi talltheout put stot hei nst
ruct or
.
10.Theout putSHOULD becl eanandpr esentable.Pr i
ntal lthedocument nSHORT BOND ONLY.
si
11.Thes cor egi venwi l
lbefinalandi rrevocable.
12.Submi tyourout putonorbe f
oreAugust20,2018.Thesubmi ssionisunt il6:
00pm ONLY.

RUBRI
CSFI
RST QUARTER EXAMI
NATI
ON I
N PRACTI
CALRESEARCH 2(
QUANTI
TATI
VE)
Excell
ent (30-28 points)
: Good: (27-
25 point
s): Average:(
24-22poi nt
s): Bel
ow Average(lesst
han20
Excel
lent t
o super
ior wor
ki n Good t
o fai
r work i
n most Passi
ng work, but i
n seri
ous point
s):

Downloaded by Irene Rechelle Fajarito (irene051310@gmail.com)

 lOMoARcPSD|15836198

allar eas as indicated int he aspects; mi nor deficiency i n need ofi mpr ovementi n many Conf usi
ng,l acksexplanationor
instruct ors’ writ
ten rel
ation toinst ruct
ors’wr itt
en areas, especiall
yi nr egardto compl et
ion;l i
ttl
econformingt o
expect ations; exemplar y expectati
onsr egardingcont ent, form and cont ent ; mi ni
mal instruct
or s’ wri
tten
perfor mance, partici
pati
on, writi
ng st yle or pr ocedur es; grasp of f acts, analysis and expectati
onsr egar
dingcont ent,
creativity and wr it
ing; fully adequat e gr asp of f acts, applicat
ion;v eryfew cl
ear wr i
tingstyleorpr ocedures;
addr esses t
he crit
eri
on; analysis, and practical stat
ement sorexpl anations
overall
, bel ow pr
ofessi
onal
excellent gr asp of f acts, applicati
on; cl ear statement s
qualitystandar ds;notqual i
ty
analysi s and appli
cati
on; and expl anati
ons ar el i
mi ted,
work
consi stently clear s t
atement s butaboveaver agequal i
ty
andexpl anat
ions
Ar
eaofAssessment Poi
ntsEar
ned
RationaleoftheStudy.(Area1)
Ther at
ional
eofthes t
udycl ear
lystat
esi
tspur
poseappr
opr
iat
efort
her
esear
ch pr
obl
em
wit
hsuppor ti
ngli
ter
ature/studi
es.

Theor eti
calBackgroundoft heStudy.(Area2)
Thet heoret
ical–concept
ualframework ofthest
udyprovi
desaclearr
esear
ch par
adi
gm
andatl eastthree(
3)suppor
tingtheori
esandconcept
sthatest
abl
ishgr
oundasbasesfor
theresearch.

Problem/Pur poseStatement .(Area3)

Thepr obl
em/pur posestatementsecti
onst atest
heresearchprobl
em indi
rectandobvi
ous
l
anguage and t he pr
oblem is proper
ly placed i
n arelevantcontext
.Sub-probl
ems ar
e
l
ogicall
yarrangedandcl earl
ystatedtheissuestobeanswer ed.

Signi
ficanceoft heSt udy.(Area4)
The signi
ficance oft he st
udy i s clearly st
ated the need for r
esear
ch and pr
ovi
des
benef
actorsoft heresear
chi ndiffer
entar easofdisci
pli
ne(i.
e.,how theresear
chmi
ghtbe
usedbypr actit
ionersorothersinpr acticalways).

StatementofNullHypothesisandScopeandLi mi t
at i
ons/Delimi
tations.( ea5)The
Ar
scopeandlimi
tat
ionssect
ion pr
ovideacleardirec
tion ofthestudyspecifical
lyrei
ter
ati
ng
thesetsoft
hescopeandlimit
ationsther
esearchersmustt ake.

Definiti
onofTer ms.(Ar ea6)
The defini
ti
on ofterms f ol
lows t
he al phabet
icalor
der and has i
ncl
uded key t
erms i
n
resear
chwi thacleardefinit
ionofdifficultandkeywordsinthestudy.

Grammar,Sent
enceConst ruction,andAPA St yleFormat.(Area7)
Grammarandsentenceconstructi
on areproper
lyobservedin al
lcomponent
sofr
esear
ch.
UsesAPAfor
mattoproperl
ycitethereferencemateri
alusedforresear
ch.

Gener
alComment
s:
_______/90

RC CODE SH-
PROG-
2A12-
C210-
006
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATI
ON

Resear
cher
s Area Ar
ea Area Ar
ea Area Area Ar
ea Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Scor
e
LeadResear
cher
:CAHAYAGAN,MARY ROSE
Asst
.LeadResear
cher
:LAPI
NIG,MARY JOY
Resear
chAssoci
ate:DI
AMOS,CLI
NT D’
ART
VINCENT
Resear
chAssoci
ate:ALVADA,VI
CTOR
Resear
chAssoci
ate:AGCOL,JASON
Resear
chAssoci
ate:TABANAO,REEJAY
Resear
chAssoci
ate:

Downloaded by Irene Rechelle Fajarito (irene051310@gmail.com)

 lOMoARcPSD|15836198

NONI
ELJOHN VASQUEZERNO,LPT
Resear
chLect
urer

GENERALRULES

1. Thi
sassessmentr
ubr
icwi
llbeusedi
neval
uat
ingyourFi
rstQuar
terExami
nat
ioni
nPr
act
icalResear
ch2.
2. Thet
otalscor
eforChapt
er1:I
ntr
oduct
ionwi
llbeyourFi
rstQuar
terExami
nat
ioncomposedof
seven
(7)ar eas.
3. Re member ,ALLt hear easi nt hischapt erwi l
lbeconsi der edPERFORMANCE TASKS.
4. Allresear cher swillhavet hesamescor eONLYi nar ea7.
5. Makes uret oputt hecor rectedver sionsofyourout putast hiswi llbefinalandi rr
evocabl eexcept
forsuggest ionsandr ecommendat ionsbyyourr esearchi nstructor.
6. Yourr esear chi nstructorwi llratetheout putbasedont her ubr i
csbel ow.
7. Thel eadr esearcherwi llratehi s/herr esearchassoci atesbasedont hegravityofeffortshared.The
leadr esear cherMUSTseet oi tthatt hereisapr operbasi sfort hegradehe/shewi llgive.The
gradingwi llbedonei nf r
ontoft her esearchassoci atest oavoidbi ases/personalgains.
8. NO EXTENSI ONSwi llbegi veni nt hesubmi ssion.
9. Thel eadr esearchershal lsubmi talltheout put stot hei nst
ruct or
.
10.Theout putSHOULD becl eanandpr esentable.Pr i
ntal lthedocument nSHORT BOND ONLY.
si
11.Thes cor egi venwi l
lbefinalandi rrevocable.
12.Submi tyourout putonorbe f
oreAugust20,2018.Thesubmi ssionisunt il6:
00pm ONLY.

RUBRI
CSFI
RST QUARTER EXAMI
NATI
ON I
N PRACTI
CALRESEARCH 2(
QUANTI
TATI
VE)
Excel lent (30- 28 poi nts): Good: ( 27-25 poi nts): Average:( 24-22poi nts)
: Below Aver age(lesst han20
Excel lent to superior worki n Good t o fair wor k in most Passing wor k, but i n serious points):
allar eas as indicated int he aspects; mi nor deficiency i n need ofi mpr ovementi n many Conf usi
ng,l acksexpl anat ionor
instruct ors’ writ
ten rel
ation t oinstructor
s’wr itt
en areas, especiall
yi nr egardt o compl et
ion;l i
ttl
econf ormi ngt o
expect ations; exemplar y expectationsr egar
dingcont ent, form and cont ent ; mi nimal instruct
or s’ written
perfor mance, partici
pati
on, writi
ng st yl
e or pr ocedur es; grasp of f acts, analysis and expectati
onsr egar
dingcont ent,
creativity and wr it
ing; fully adequat e gr asp of f acts, appl i
cat
ion;v eryfew clear wr i
tingstyleorpr ocedur es;
addr esses t
he crit
eri
on; analysis, and practical statementsorexpl anations overall
, bel ow professional
excellent gr asp of f acts, applicati
on; cl ear statement s
qualitystandar ds;notqual i
ty
analysi s and appli
cati
on; and expl anations arel i
mi ted,
work
consi stently clear s t
atement s butaboveaver agequal i
ty
andexpl anat
ions
Ar
eaofAssessment Poi
ntsEar
ned
RationaleoftheStudy.(Area1)
Ther at
ional
eofthes t
udycl ear
lystat
esi
tspur
poseappr
opr
iat
efort
her
esear
ch pr
obl
em
wit
hsuppor ti
ngli
ter
ature/studi
es.

Theor eti
calBackgroundoft heStudy.(Area2)
Thet heoret
ical–concept
ualframework ofthest
udyprovi
desaclearr
esear
ch par
adi
gm
andatl eastthree(
3)suppor
tingtheori
esandconcept
sthatest
abl
ishgr
oundasbasesfor
theresearch.

Problem/Pur poseStatement .(Area3)

Thepr obl
em/pur posestatementsecti
onst atest
heresearchprobl
em indi
rectandobvi
ous
l
anguage and t he pr
oblem is proper
ly placed i
n arelevantcontext
.Sub-probl
ems ar
e
l
ogicall
yarrangedandcl earl
ystatedtheissuestobeanswer ed.

Signi
ficanceoft heSt udy.(Area4)
The signi
ficance oft he st
udy i s clearly st
ated the need for r
esear
ch and pr
ovi
des
benef
actorsoft heresear
chi ndiffer
entar easofdisci
pli
ne(i.
e.,how theresear
chmi
ghtbe
usedbypr actit
ionersorothersinpr acticalways).

St
atementofNul
lHypot
hesi
sandScopeandLi
mit
ati
ons/Del
imi
tat
ions.(
Area5)The

Downloaded by Irene Rechelle Fajarito (irene051310@gmail.com)

 lOMoARcPSD|15836198

scopeandl
imi
tat
ionssect
ion pr
ovideacleardirec
tion oft
hes tudyspeci
fical
lyr
eit
erat
ing
theset
soft
hescopeandlimit
ationsther
esearchersmustt ake.

Definiti
onofTer ms.(Ar ea6)
The defini
ti
on ofterms f ol
lows t
he al phabet
icalor
der and has i
ncl
uded key t
erms i
n
resear
chwi thacleardefinit
ionofdifficultandkeywordsinthestudy.

Grammar,Sent
enceConst ruction,andAPA St yleFormat.(Area7)
Grammarandsentenceconstructi
on areproper
lyobservedin al
lcomponent
sofr
esear
ch.
UsesAPAfor
mattoproperl
ycitethereferencemateri
alusedforresear
ch.

Gener
alComment
s:
_______/90

RC CODE SH-
PROG-
2A12-
C210-
007
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATI
ON

Resear
cher
s Area Ar
ea Area Ar
ea Area Area Ar
ea Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Scor
e
LeadResear
cher
:VI
LLAFRANCA,HEART HAROLD
Asst
.LeadResear
cher
:SALONOY,EMMACULATE
Resear
chAssoci
ate:RAMI
REZ,ALCELAZI
EL
Resear
chAssoci
ate:ANDOC,JOHN PHI
LIP
Resear
chAssoci
ate:REALES,CHRI
STOPHER
Resear
chAssoci
ate:LANO,CHARLESJUSTI
N
Resear
chAssoci
ate:

NONI
ELJOHN VASQUEZERNO,LPT
Resear
chLect
urer

Downloaded by Irene Rechelle Fajarito (irene051310@gmail.com)