Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Valuations limit upside but a great business to own from a long-term standpoint
We initiate coverage on CST with a REDUCE rating and DCF-based FV of Rs1,950. Rich
valuations of 58X Sept 2023E EPS limit material upside in an otherwise stellar chemicals
franchise in the making. CST outshines peers on high RoIC of ~58% along with high EPS
growth (27% CAGR over FY2021-24E), driving healthy FCF generation. Our DCF (11.5%
WACC, 5% terminal growth) builds in 17%/17% EBIT/FCF CAGR over FY2022-47E.
Synergistic M&As, consolidation of BHA market, DCC import duty could drive upside.
For Private Circulation Only. In the US, this document may only be distributed to QIBs (qualified institutional buyers) as defined under rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. This document is not for public distribution
and has been furnished to you solely for your information and may not be reproduced or redistributed to any other person. The manner of circulation and distribution of this document may be restricted by law or
regulation in certain countries, including the United States. Persons into whose possession this document may come are required to inform themselves of, and to observe, such restrictions.
Specialty Chemicals Clean Science & Technology
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Good opportunities in existing market; HALS the next big revenue driver ...... 16
Company profile: Largest producer for four of its seven products .................. 27
The prices in this report are based on the market close of September 24, 2021.
FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT
Exhibit 1: Key financials of CST, March fiscal year-ends, 2019-24E
Exhibit 2: Summary financials of CST, March fiscal year-ends, 2018-24E (Rs mn, unless specified)
Supportive macros. Macros are extremely supportive for Indian companies – (1) globally
companies are looking to add more India-based suppliers, (2) Indian consumers are
looking to substitute imports with quality Indian suppliers and (3) India’s cost
competitiveness is improving with cost structures in China as well as other developed
countries going up while the Indian government is improving incentive structures for
indigenous manufacturers. We believe that while the opportunity is large, only a few
quality promoters in India will be able to take maximum advantage of the same.
Technocrat promoters. We see a winning team within promoters with Ashok Boob and
Krishna Boob handling the operations, finance, government/local liaison and other
compliances even as Siddharth Sikchi drives R&D and business development. All three of
them are technocrats with many years of experience. Siddharth presents a unique
combination of being a technocrat as well as a person with solid business acumen and
client relationship building skills driving CST’s superior capabilities in both. Parth
Maheshwari (son of Ashok Boob) along with Siddharth Sikchi adds comfort on succession
planning of the business. The management recognizes the growth ask and has been
stepping up new product launches amid supportive macros.
Quality board and corporate governance. We like the fact that CST has invested in a
high-quality board of directors for the past many years comprising (1) Pradeep Rathi, the
promoter of Sudarshan Chemicals, (2) Prof GD Yadav – well-regarded professor of UDCT
(now ICT Mumbai) and (3) Sanjay Kothari – a veteran financial investor. BSR and Co
(KPMG affiliated) have been the auditors of the company for the past many years.
Promoter directors have also capped their combined performance incentives at 4% of PBT
versus 10% of PBT pre-IPO.
Similarity with Vinati Organics and ATBS. CST is similar to Vinati in terms of its DNA to
focus on inventing disruptive chemical processes and then build global leadership backed
by cost leadership and greener footprint of the process. This is further backed by
backward and forward integration to expand the target market as well as cost leadership.
We note that Lubrizol exited the ATBS market, leading to a sharp improvement in market
share and realizations for Vinati from FY2019. We believe there can be a possibility of
CST benefitting from similar consolidation where competitors leave MEHQ/BHA
eventually. CST has the advantage of lower cost structures versus peers, similar to ATBS
which can drive exit of competition from the market.
Our DCF model builds in revenue growth CAGR of 27% over FY2021-24E, 22% revenue
CAGR over FY2024-37E and 12% CAGR over FY2037-47E. We estimate EBITDA margins to
taper down as CST enters into new opportunities. We estimate EBITDA growth CAGR of 25%
over FY2021-24E, 18% CAGR over FY2024-37E and 12% CAGR over FY2037-47E. We take
WACC of 11.5% for CST and terminal growth of 5%. We model FCF growth CAGR of 12%
over FY2021-24E, 19% over FY2024-37E and 12% CAGR over FY2037-47E.
Exhibit 3: Our DCF-based Fair Value of Rs1,950 implies 5% downside from CMP
2022E 2023E 2024E 2025E 2026E 2027E 2028E 2029E 2030E 2037E 2047E
Revenue 6,296 8,332 10,603 13,448 16,810 21,013 26,266 32,570 39,410 135,274 434,761
EBIT 2,866 3,918 4,774 6,055 7,568 9,460 11,826 14,664 17,743 41,964 134,871
EBIT*(1-t) 2,131 2,938 3,580 4,541 5,676 7,039 8,798 10,910 13,201 31,221 100,344
Depreciation 18 7 234 276 322 465 573 692 8 32 995 2,967 13,129
Capex (8 00) (1,400) (1,000) (1,200) (1,600) (2,000) (2,200) (2,600) (3,000) (7,296) (35,347)
Changes in working capital (151) (263) (312) (412) (48 7) (609) (761) (913) (991) (2,703) (5,726)
Free cash flow 1,367 1,510 2,544 3,251 4,054 5,003 6,529 8,229 10,204 24,189 72,399
PV of FCF 1,367 1,427 2,157 2,472 2,765 3,060 3,581 4,048 4,502 4,981 5,020
Year of discounting — 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 14.5 24.5
DCF summary
Discount rate (%) 11.5
Terminal growth rate (%) 5
NPV of FCF (FY2023-47E 112,815
Terminal value 1,323,216
PV of terminal value 91,751
Enterprise value 204,565
FY2023E net cash 1,719
Equity value 206,285
Number of shares 106
NPV /share (Rs) 1,950
Assumptions
Revenue growth (%) 23 32 27 27 25 25 25 24 21 16 10
EBIT margin (%) 45.5 47.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 31 31
Gross block turn (X) 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 3 2
Net working capital days 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53
Exhibit 4: CST is one of the fastest-growing companies in the sector along with best RoIC resulting in premium valuations versus peers
Comparison of CST with sector peers
CAGR 2017-21 (%) Cumulative 2018-21 (Rs bn) 2021 CAGR 2021-24 (%) P/E (X)
Revenue EBITDA CFO Capex FCF RoIC (%) RoCE (%) Revenue EBITDA 2023E 2024E
Aarti 12.3 10.7 28.2 38.8 (10.5) 19.9 11.2 25.0 25.9 33.7 28.9
Atul 7.1 15.8 24.1 10.5 13.6 31.3 16.2 17.2 13.6 33.2 28.0
Clean Science 28.1 37.5 4.8 2.1 2.8 73.7 40.6 27.4 27.4 69.7 54.2
NFIL 11.8 22.4 5.1 3.9 1.2 21.2 12.5 27.1 32.0 69.8 49.4
PI 26.2 22.3 23.6 20.8 2.8 20.5 15.1 28.0 33.8 39.8 30.1
SRF 14.9 21.1 40.5 49.1 (8.7) 16.8 13.9 25.1 21.6 33.6 28.4
Vinati 10.5 12.9 9.7 4.8 5.0 19.1 26.2 37.0 35.4 37.9 29.9
CST differentiates its Strong product development capabilities demonstrated in MEHQ and BHA
processes from CST develops unconventional chemical processes aided by catalysts, which provide it (1) cost
conventional processes by advantages, (2) better product yields, (3) reduced toxicity in effluents and end products, (4)
employing clean lower effluent discharge and (5) ability to start from cheaper and domestically available raw
technologies and has materials. This mix of cleaner, greener and cheaper products is appealing to both domestic
and international customers, providing it with scale advantages eventually. Full backward
optimized the use of non-
integration into basic chemicals (such as phenols) also drives a much more reliable supply
toxic raw materials, chain compared to peers leading to greater trust with clients.
resulting in lower effluent
Further, based on the technical expertise, CST has created global scale capacities, which are
generation, and better
difficult to replicate, and has created significant barriers for new entrants. CST’s position as
quality products (such as
the most cost-competitive producer of these critical products is evident by its significant
sulphur-free BHA) versus exports to China (~35% of sales). Most of the catalysts used by CST are non-metallic in
conventionally produced nature leading to no metal sludge in the effluent.
chemicals.
CST has broadly structured its R&D activities into three verticals: (1) for existing products and
catalyst systems, to improve yields and selectivity in their existing product portfolio, (2) for
expanding their product portfolio in the stabilizer and additives business and (3) for
identifying products with high demand that only limited manufacturers produce within India
and globally. In particular, they focus on specialty chemicals, which find applications in
critical industries such as pharmaceuticals and agriculture. We believe such differentiated
focus is likely to keep new product introductions flowing while existing products continue to
witness margin improvement.
Anisole is an interesting key case study on CST’s ability to build entry barriers
CST uses Anisole as a starting material for most of its key products such as MEHQ, BHA, 4-
MAP and Guaiacol. Not only is CST’s process of making these products from Anisole unique
but the entire process of making Anisole is in itself distinctive.
Over the years, (1) it backward integrated into manufacturing of Anisole in 2017 and then (2)
it changed its process of manufacturing Anisole from liquid-phase to vapour-phase, which
improved its cost by ~20%. Its R&D-driven process innovation has created an advantage in a
highly competitive industry and helped the company achieve industry-leading margins for
FY2021.
CST is the only company globally to deploy vapour-phase technology for manufacturing
Anisole from phenol, driving better atom economy and only water as effluent compared to
liquid phase manufacturing processes that would have sulphates as a by-product.
Exhibit 5: CST develops catalysts in house, which makes difficult reactions feasible with low effluents and high-quality products
CST’s manufacturing route starting from key raw materials to final product
MEHQ Water
Catalyst +
Anisole
Guaiacol Water
Catalyst +
MEHQ Sulphur-free BHA Water
Catalyst +
Anisole 4-MAP
CST uses unique catalyst driven processes to convert Anisole to (1) MEHQ and Guaiacol, (2)
convert MEHQ to BHA. The BHA manufacturing process is unique in the sense that it
produces sulphur free BHA resulting in CST’s products being preferred over those of peers in
segments like food and pharma. Similarly the Guaiacol produced by CST finds applications in
pharma which also drives better margins for the company. Most of the competition is able
to sell Guaiacol only to Vanillin producers in China which is not a meaningful margin driver.
Due to its catalytic processes and backward integration, CST’s raw materials largely comprise
commodity chemicals. Key raw materials comprise major bulk chemicals including phenol,
hydrogen peroxide, acetic anhydride, and tertiary butanol, which are widely available, unlike
conventionally used diphenols (used by CST’s competition) such as hydroquinone and
catechol that are susceptible to increased price volatility due to controlled supply. CST
engages with numerous suppliers for its raw materials that are available domestically and
imported in large volumes in India, enabling it to have greater control over costs.
CST’s unique backward and forward integration as well as process advantages drive its
ability to gain rapid market share in whichever categories it enters into. This cost leadership
backed by good business development capabilities builds further entry barriers of scale
advantages. CST is the world’s largest producer in terms of capacities for MEHQ, BHA,
Anisole and 4-MAP. CST is the world’s second-largest producer for L-Ascorbyl Plamitate and
the third-largest producer of Guaiacol.
Exhibit 6: CST has global leadership in four products out of its seven existing products
CST’s key products, global market size, competitive positioning and application
Camlin Fine Sciences Used in infant food formulations, breakfast cereals and
AP 450 Second largest in India
Yasho Industries cosmetics
Pharmaceutical intermediates
Camlin Fine Sciences (a) Pre-cursor to manufacture APIs for cough syrup
Guaiacol 60,000 Third largest globally
Solvay (b) Pre-cursor to Vanilin
Notes:
(a) CST doesn’t participate in Vanillin market for Guaiacol.
CST’s specialty chemicals have a wide range of applications and its key raw materials are
abundantly available resulting in a significantly de-risked business model.
Promoters bring in complementary skills and man different functions. Siddharth takes care
of business development as well as R&D. We believe Siddarth’s acumen in R&D along with
feedback mechanism from customers on new products drive CST’s success. Krishna Boob
takes care of regulatory compliances and government/regulatory liaison. Parth Maheshwari,
Boob family’s second generation has also been manning manufacturing operations.
Promoters have started hiring critical professional resources as and when required, including
a professional CFO and a seasoned R&D head. We believe the management is now building
the first layer of professionals and then subsequently new layers of professionals will be built.
Exhibit 7: Promoter family members employed in the business are well-qualified and man different critical functions for the organization
Siddharth Sikchi
M.Sc - University of Manitoba, Canada
Executive Director Over fourteen years of experience in the
chemical industry
B.Tech - ICT, Mumbai
Key functions: Marketing and R&D
Parth Maheswari
Over 5 years of work experience in the MBA - Babson College
Vice President
chemical industry B.Chem. Engg - Savitribai Phule University,
Pune
Key functions: Business operations
CST has professional team heading key verticals like production, R&D, finance, compliance etc.
Exhibit 8: CST has hired at the senior levels to look at R&D and finance aspects of the business
Company
secretary and Law Graduate, University of Pune,
Mahesh Kulkarni Mar-21 Tech Mahindra
Compliance Fellow of ICSI
officer
CST has benefited from guidance of a high-quality board, which has a mix of technocrats,
proven entrepreneurs and investors. Professor G D Yadav, Non-Executive Independent
Director, is a senior professor at ICT Mumbai and has had many research breakthroughs over
the years. Pradeep Rathi, Non-Executive Chairman of the Board, brings in two decades of
experience in the industry and is also the promoter of Sudarshan Chemicals.
Exhibit 9: CST has a credible board right from its early days
CST’s board members, their educational qualifications and work experience
Mr Boob holds a bachelor’s degree in chemical engineering from the Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai. He
Ashok Ramnarayan
Managing Director has close to 25 years of experience in the chemical industry and has previously worked as an executive director at
Boob
Mangalam Drugs and Organics Limited.
Mr Sikchi holds a master’s degree in science from the University of Manitoba, Canada and a bachelor’s degree in
Siddhartha Ashok
Wholetime Director technology from the Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai. He has over 15 years of experience in the chemical
Sikchi
industry.
Mr Boob holds a bachelor's degree in pharmacy from the University of Bombay, India. He has close to two decades
Krishnakumar
Wholetime Director of experience in the chemical industry and has previously worked as a director at Mangalam Drugs and Organics
Ramnarayan Boob
Limited
Mr Kothari holds a bachelor’s degree in commerce from University of Calcutta. He is a member of the ICAI and ICSI.
He has been awarded a certificate of merit from Institute of Cost and Works Accountants of India. He has
Sanjay Kothari Non-Executive Director previously been associated with Industrial Meters Limited, Ajanta Auto Industries Private Limited, Akar Tools
Limited and Hindustan Wires Limited. He is currently a director of Anantroop Financial Advisory Services Private
Limited amongst others
Mr Yadav holds a bachelor’s degree in chemical engineering from University of Bombay. He also holds a doctorate
Ganapati Dadasaheb Non-Executive, Independent in philosophy (technology) from University of Bombay, a doctorate of science (Honoris Causa) from D.Y. Patil
Yadav Director University, Kolhapur and a doctorate of engineering (Honoris Causa) from National Institute of Technology
Agartala.
Keval Navinchandra Non-Executive, Independent Mr Doshi holds a bachelor’s degree in commerce from University of Bombay. He is a member of the ICAI. He has
Doshi Director been associated with Ernst & Young LLP in the past.
Non-Executive, Independent Ms Dubhashi holds a post graduate diploma in business administration from the Indian Institute of Management,
Madhu Dubhashi
Director Ahmedabad. She has been associated with Global Data Services of India Limited in the past.
Exhibit 10: CST allocated capital into backward integration, foray into forward integration products, developed more products from same
raw material apart from capacity expansion into existing projects consistently, improving its RoCE
Exhibit 11: CST has consistently maintained higher gross margin versus its peers
Gross margin (%) of CST and its peers, March fiscal year-ends, 2018-23E
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Aarti Atul Clean Science PI NFIL Vinati
Exhibit 12: CST has consistently maintained higher EBITDA margin versus its peers
EBITDA margin (%) of CST and its peers, March fiscal year-ends, 2018-23E
50
40
30
20
10
0
Aarti Atul Clean Science PI NFIL Vinati
Exhibit 13:
Exhibit 13: CST’s gross block is comparable to the best in the sector
Exhibit
Gross 13: turnover (X) of CST and its peers, March fiscal year-ends, 2018-23E
block
Exhibit
2.5 13:
Exhibit 13:
2.0
Exhibit 13:
1.5
Exhibit 13:
1.0
Exhibit 13:
0.5 13:
Exhibit
Exhibit
- 13:
Aarti Atul Clean Science PI NFIL Vinati
Exhibit 13:
Source: Companies, Kotak Institutional Equities estimates
Exhibit 13:
Exhibit 13:
Exhibit 13:
Exhibit 13:
Exhibit 13:
Exhibit 13:
Exhibit 13:
Exhibit 13:
Exhibit 13:
Exhibit 13:
Exhibit 14: CST has consistently maintained superior RoCE in the sector
RoCE (%) of CST and its peers, March fiscal year-ends, 2018-23E
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
0
Aarti Atul Clean Science PI NFIL Vinati
3.0 CFO (Rs bn) Capex (Rs bn) FCF (Rs bn)
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022E 2023E
Exhibit 16: Exports to China indicate CST’s competitiveness Exhibit 17: Diversified product portfolio within sub-segments
CST’s revenue breakdown by geography, March fiscal year-ends CST’s revenue breakdown by products, March fiscal year-ends
38 37 60
40
40
69
60
20
30 31 20
0 0
2018 2021 2018 2021
Source: Company, Kotak Institutional Equities Source: Company, Kotak Institutional Equities
GOOD OPPORTUNITIES IN EXISTING MARKET; HALS THE NEXT BIG REVENUE DRIVER
CST’s new revenue drivers are already in place and include (1) capacity expansion for existing products by ~50%
specially on Anisole, MEHQ and BHA, (2) entry into HALS which should start contributing revenues from
FY2023E, (3) developments on new products in adjacencies complementing existing products. In addition,
management is looking at (1) new product launches for import substitution in agro and pharma
intermediates, (2) more products in HALS/other antioxidants, (3) adjacent intermediates in existing product
lines based out of phenols and acetone.
CST’s core value CST, through its R&D team, identifies target products. It does not target any particular
chemistry but focuses on the number of steps involved, quantity and toxicity of effluents
proposition hinges
generated and number of competitors. It generally restricts itself to 3-4 steps (reactions) and
around product
prefers products having high volume and low effluents. CST then tries to improve the
identification, processes which also result in acceleration in market share gain. CST uses multiple catalysts
developing unique for manufacturing products and actual details of these catalysts are known only to the
processes and then senior management. One of the key focuses of the R&D and engineering team is to develop
gradually gaining these catalysts and regenerate these catalysts.
market share in those R&D is only one aspect of the business; the commercialization and scale up of products to
products through better plant scale from lab scale holds the key requiring a long learning curve and differentiates the
quality products, stable company from any new entrants. CST has been consistently improving its processes, as it
pricing and healthy scaled up CST products, and these can be classified into three groups
client relationships.
Core products. CST has a set of core products like BHA, MEHQ and Guaiacol which are
key growth and margin drivers. CST’s entire phenol chain revolves around maximizing the
output for these products.
Satellite products. Customers prefer a basket of products and as such having a presence
in some of these products helps in gaining higher wallet share of customers. Products like
AP, Veratole and TBHQ are satellite products which alone may not drive significant sales
but will help in driving higher sales and improving margins of core products.
New products. CST is entering new products like HALS which would be the next key
growth driver for the company. These products are entirely on a different raw material
chain i.e. acetone. This would help diversify the company’s product chain.
Exhibit 18: CST is taking capacity expansion in existing products and expected to be completed by FY2022 end
CST’s capacity expansion plan across existing segments
MEHQ. This product is finding incremental usage in agrochemicals which has accelerated
market growth. CST has been supplying MEHQ to agrochemical players such as PI and
SRF who in turn are gaining market share in agrochemical contract manufacturing from
European players. Management expects current 50% market share to increase to 65%
over the next three years. The ongoing project for doubling of capacity for MEHQ would
cater to (1) internal consumption of BHA, (2) growing agrochemical sales and higher
exports share. On an overall basis we expect ~13% volume CAGR for MEHQ over the
next three years.
BHA. CST is expanding capacity here too by 50%. CST has about 16-17% market share
currently and it intends to go to ~50% market share over the next few years. We also see
the possibility of further consolidation in these products, similar to what we saw in ATBS
for Vinati Organics
Guaiacol. Guaiacol is a co-product while making MEHQ from Anisole. CST sells the
product to the pharma segment which is an ~8,000 TPA market. We believe CST
accounts for 25% of the market. CST is expanding into downstream products such as
Veratrole which finds applications in agro, pharma APIs/intermediates and electronic
chemicals.
HALS is likely to be the next big growth driver for CST. It offers (1) a large target market of
~US$1bn growing at ~7% pa, (2) a differentiated chemical process which is also fully
backward integrated upto base chemicals like acetone and (3) healthy gross margins of ~60%
(KIE estimate) which will scale up as further yield improvements are done. CST is likely to
generate Rs6 bn revenue from HALS by FY2025E as a large import substitution market is
already in place with no Indian manufacturers.
Market size. HALS (Hindered Amine Light Stabilizers) are used in the prevention of
photo-oxidation of underlying polymers. They are used in plastics, auto, paints, and
coatings to increases the life of the product. There are multiple kind of HALS used with
different substrates. HALS globally is a US$1bn market growing at 7% CAGR in
US$ terms. BASF, Adeka, Sabo and SI group are the key players here.
Product differentiation. CST will manufacture HALS using a catalytic process as well.
Realizations for various types of HALS vary from US$6-12/kg. The products that CST is
targeting currently are witnessing imports of ~200 tons/month.
Multiple HALS in the pipeline. Over the next few years, CST is expected to launch
multiple new HALS products backed by differentiated chemical processes and full
backward integration into key intermediates.
Multiple applications. HALS have different applications in polymers, paints etc. HALS
701 will go to blenders who ultimately give to polymer producers. HALS 701 is purchased
by similar customers as MEHQ. Hence there is likely to be some cross-selling synergy
effect from HALS launch.
What are HALS? Hindered Amine Light Stabilizers (HALS) are chemical compounds
containing an amine functional group that are used as stabilizers in plastics and polymers.
These compounds are typically derivatives of tetramethylpiperidine and are primarily used to
protect the polymers from the effects of photo-oxidation; as opposed to other forms of
polymer degradation such as ozonolysis.
How do they prevent photo oxidation? HALS do not absorb UV radiation, but inhibit
degradation of the polymer by continuously and cyclically removing free radicals that are
produced by photo-oxidation of the polymer. The overall process is sometimes referred to as
the Denisov cycle and is exceedingly complex. Broadly, HALS react with the initial polymer
peroxy radical and alkyl polymer radicals formed by the reaction of the polymer and oxygen,
preventing further radical oxidation. By these reactions HALS are oxidised to their
corresponding aminoxyl radicals, however they are able to return to their initial amine form
via a series of additional radical reactions. HALS's high efficiency and longevity are due to
this cyclic process wherein the HALS are regenerated rather than consumed during the
stabilization process.
Growing usage as thermal stabilizers. HALS are also increasingly being used as thermal
stabilizers, particularly for a low and moderate level of heat, however during the high
temperature processing of polymers (e.g. injection molding) they remain less effective than
traditional phenolic antioxidants.
Clean sciences is evaluation new products which will complement existing products: (1) agro
intermediate which is a phenol derivative, (2) complementary anti-oxidant products to BHA
which can boost the cross-selling for the latter, (3) Veratrol which is a downstream for
Guaiacol and gets used across agro, pharma. Solvay is a global competitor here.
New plant (Unit#4) would house more new products in HALS series
Unit-4 would be used for multiple new products including HALS, and is expected to
contribute to revenue from 2HFY23. CST is targeting products where it has no domestic
manufacturer and globally only 5-6 players are present. Margin in new products would be
initially lower but will improve gradually as has been the case with existing products led by
yield improvement and improved scale. CST has recently brought 70acre plot to drive further
expansion.
Exhibit 19: CST would continue to grow led by expansion in existing products and new products
CST’s revenue (Rs bn) and growth (%, yoy), March fiscal year-ends, 2018-24E
10 60
50
8
40
6
30
4
20
2 10
0 0
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022E 2023E 2024E
Exhibit 20: FY2021-24E growth would be led by both existing and new products
CST’s revenue breakdown by existing products and new products (Rs mn)
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
-
FY2021 revenue Existing products New products FY2024 revenue
expansion
We expect FY2022E margin to decline from the peak of FY2021 due to high raw material
pressure. We further expect margins to remain at the FY2022E level going ahead as new
products will initially be at lower margins compared to existing products. CST’s capex would
increase as the company enters into new products.
Exhibit 21: Gross margin peaked in FY2021 Exhibit 22: EBITDAM to improve after slight dip in FY2022E
CST’s gross margin (%), March fiscal year-ends, 2018-24E CST’s EBITDA margin (%), March fiscal year-ends, 2018-24E
75 50
70
45
65
40
60
35
55
50 30
45 25
40 20
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022E
2023E
2024E
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022E
2023E
2024E
Source: Company, Kotak Institutional Equities estimates
Source: Company, Kotak Institutional Equities estimates
CST’s cumulative performance bonus component of the total compensation for the whole
time directors comprising the managing director and other two whole time directors in
FY2021 was ~10% of FY2021 PBT. This amount has been brought down to 4% of FY2022
PBT as a prudent governance practice. We have taken the performance component of
remuneration for the directors at 4% of PBT into our estimates.
Exhibit 23: Performance bonus of whole time directors/managing directors capped at 4% of PBT
Promoter family compensation structure for 2021-22, March fiscal year-ends
Exhibit 24: CST’s revenue growth over FY2021-24E would be driven by performance chemicals and new products
CST’s revenue breakdown, March fiscal year-ends, 2018-24E
Segmental revenue (Rs mn) 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022E 2023E 2024E
Performance chemicals (MEHQ, BHA, AP) 1,469 2,490 2,721 3,548 4,166 5,266 6,199
Pharmaceutical intermediates (Guaiacol, DCC) 499 681 644 830 1,128 1,466 1,613
FMCG intermediates (4-MAP, Anisole) 332 612 666 632 757 879 967
New products (HALS, Veratrole, etc.) — — — — 99 545 1,548
Other products (co-products such as TBHQ) 38 65 63 59 80 100 200
Total 2,337 3,848 4,093 5,069 6,231 8,256 10,527
Growth (yoy, %)
Performance chemicals 69.5 9.3 30.4 17.4 26.4 17.7
Pharmaceutical intermediates 36.5 -5.5 28.9 35.9 29.9 10.0
FMCG intermediates 84.6 8.7 -5.1 19.8 16.1 10.0
New products — — — — 451.2 184.3
Total 65% 6% 24% 23% 32% 28%
Contribution to total revenue (%)
Performance chemicals 62.9 64.7 66.5 70.0 66.9 63.8 58.9
Pharmaceutical intermediates 21.3 17.7 15.7 16.4 18.1 17.8 15.3
FMCG intermediates 14.2 15.9 16.3 12.5 12.2 10.7 9.2
New products 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 6.6 14.7
Notes:
(a) Some of the new products could also be classified into existing segments.
CST’s impressive capital allocation is also observed from its sector leading RoCE. The
company has relied on cash generated from operations to fund its capex requirements. The
recent IPO was OFS only without any primary raise. We believe that CST would continue to
maintain superior RoCE with a slight drop from the peak of FY2021levels as it enters into
new products. CST’s capex will increase going ahead but can be supported through internal
accruals.
Exhibit 25: Cash from operations is the primary source of funds Exhibit 26: Funds primarily for capex and investments
CST’s source of funds (2018-21), March fiscal year-ends (Rs mn) CST’s application of funds (2018-21), March fiscal year-ends (Rs mn)
6,000 2,500
5,000 2,000
4,000
1,500
3,000
1,000
2,000
500
1,000
0
0 Capex Dividends paid Buyback of Others
CFO Dividend/interest received equity
Source: Company, Kotak Institutional Equities Source: Company, Kotak Institutional Equities
Exhibit 27: Consolidated income statement of CST, March fiscal year-ends, 2018-24E (Rs mn, unless specified)
Exhibit 28: Consolidated balance sheet of CST, March fiscal year-ends, 2018-24E (Rs mn, unless specified)
Exhibit 29: Consolidated cashflow statement of CST, March fiscal year-ends, 2018-24E (Rs mn, unless specified)
KEY RISKS
Key downside risks for CST investors stem from (1) high dependency on promoters for various functions given
early stages of professionalization of business management, (2) process disruption risks for MEHQ/BHA which
contribute ~70% of revenues and even larger profit pools, (3) high expectations from the company to
consistently find successes like MEHQ/BHA. Key upside risks include significant success in HALS, anti-dumping
duties on DCC and consolidation in the BHA/MEHQ market.
Siddharth Sikchi and Ashok Boob are the key architects of CST’s success from a product
standpoint. Siddharth’s deep understanding of chemistry, the time bound pursuit of new
product development even with limited resources, and ability to identify new products by
double hatting the business development function are valuable for the business. This has
driven CST’s uncommon success; the company has managed both high RoCEs and rapid
growth in a reasonably short time frame.
Promoter family has so far led the company efficiently with each of the four members
having complementary skill sets and clearly defined functions such as R&D, marketing,
finance, operations, compliance etc. These also help in maintaining cohesion and an efficient
decision making process.
That said, promoters are hardcore entrepreneurs and enjoy building new businesses. Ashok
and Krishna boob exited Mangalam Drugs & Organics and eventually built CST. Siddharth’s
family too has two other businesses, one run by his father and one run by his brother. Any
exits from the promoter side to pursue another business on their own may be a challenge
for the company for new product development.
MEHQ and BHA drive most of the profit pool for CST. Existing competitors Solvay and
Camlin are using processes which make them less competitive and provide little threat to
CST’s market share gains. CST and Solvay too have refrained from aggressive actions either
on pricing or on working capital discipline. There is a substantial difference in terms of gross
margins for CST (~70-80%) versus peers (30-40%). This is also a key reason why we believe
CST would continue to gain market share. However, if new competition comes in which has
an even more differentiated process or provides alternatives for MEHQ/BHA, it may impact
CST’s profits.
Our FV builds in 25% topline growth from FY2021 to FY2037 though we expect EBIT
margins to gradually come down by 16 ppt from 51% in FY2021. Even with 31% EBIT
margin, this would be materially higher than peers which are in the 15-25% margin range.
This essentially means that CST would continue replicating success similar to MEHQ/BHA
consistently every few years. We believe margins are likely to remain healthy due to CST’s
differentiated process capabilities and a relatively soft revenue base. Revenue growth and
healthy margins at least have clear visibility over the next five years. Additionally, sector
tailwinds will continue to help CST find successful products consistently.
Given CSTs sustained (and improving) cost leadership over the past many years, we believe
there is a possibility of consolidation in BHA and MEHQ markets, driving further market
share gain for CST.
HALS is a large opportunity if executed well. While the management has only announced
the definite success on two products, there are multiple opportunities in HALS. CST can
establish cost leadership in these products as well if it successfully manages to use catalytic
reactions and backward integrate itself.
The Government is considering imposing anti-dumping duties on DCC which may result in
significantly higher volumes and margin for CST. A verdict on the same is likely to be
announced soon.
CST’s products are used as polymerization inhibitors, intermediates for agrochemicals and
pharmaceuticals, anti-oxidants, UV blockers, and anti-retroviral reagents, which are used
across several industries, including in the manufacture of paints and inks, agro-chemical,
pharmaceuticals, flavors and fragrance, food and animal nutrition (feed), and personal care
(cosmetics) products.
CST’s key customers include Bayer AG, SRF, Gennex Laboratories, Nutriad International NV
and Vinati Organics.
Exhibit 30: Products manufactured by CST find applications across several industries
Key products manufactured by CST and their applications
Spice, medicine and make-up intermediate, ingredient for UV filters, Personal care (cosmetics), flavors and fragrance
4-MAP
cigarette additive and flavouring in food industry
Source: Company
R&D—CST has two R&D units within the premises of the company manufacturing facilities.
R&D activities are focused on—(1) designing catalysts to create new manufacturing
processes, (2) improving existing processes and (3) developing new chemistries to develop
eco-friendly processes by eliminating use of toxic starting materials and improve the
commercial viability of finished products.
The company’s R&D abilities have led to the identification, design and customization of
catalysts that are used across the company processes in order to improve yields, reduce
effluents and increase cost competitiveness. CST has designed, developed and regenerated a
catalyst for manufacturing Anisole from phenol and methanol. The catalyst is used in a
vapor-phase reaction that eliminates the use of conventional starting materials of DMS and
caustic soda that generate effluent. Through the catalytic production process for Anisole,
CST generates only water as an effluent.
R&D activities are structured across three verticals—(1) existing products and catalyst
systems—to improve yields and selectivity in the existing product portfolio, (2) expanding the
product portfolio in stabilizers and additives business and (3) identifying products with high
demand that only limited manufacturers produce within India and globally.
Raw materials—the primary raw materials used in the manufacture of products include
crude oil derivatives such as phenol and other commodities such as hydrogen peroxide.
Other raw materials used include—(1) acetone, (2) cyclohexylamine, (3) methanol, (4)
tertiary butyl alcohol and (5) acetic anhydride. RM is procured from both domestic and
international markets using a mix of spot contracts and fixed-price agreements. As the term
of supply agreements is limited to a few months, the company is subject to the risk of an
increase in the prices of raw materials.
In order to meet the growing market demand for key products and develop and introduce
new products, CST is setting up two new manufacturing facilities, located adjacent to its
existing facilities. The third facility is proposed to be used to manufacture Anisole and certain
performance chemicals, including MEHQ and BHA. The company also acquired land for the
fourth facility, to manufacture stabilizer and other intermediates for application in
pharmaceutical, flavors and fragrance and agriculture industries. CST intends to add capacity
in a phased manner to ensure optimal capacity utilization levels.
Exhibit 31: CST has more than doubled its overall capacity since FY2018
CST’s capacity, production and utilization trends, March year-ends, 2018 onwards (tons, %)
Public, 21.5%
Promoter and
promoter group,
78 .5%
CST – History
CST started its operations in 2008. The first plant came up in the year 2009 where CST
started commercial production of MEHQ and Guaiacol, the first company to have
commercialized this technology (of producing these from Anisole) on a global platform.
In 2011 it added a third product called para methoxyacetophenone (MAP), again using a
very interesting catalytic process and the only company globally to be producing it through
the Anisole route. In 2014 came the fourth product, which was forward integration of
MEHQ into BHA, again via a catalytic process, only the second company globally doing this.
In 2018. In 2020 CST added another product, called DCC i.e. dicyclohexylcarbodiimide,
which is used as a pharmaceutical intermediate.
CST’s products are used as key starting level materials, as inhibitors, or additives by their
customers for finished products and sale in regulated markets. Customer engagements are
dependent on delivering quality products, and it can take a few years to approve suppliers,
based on—(1) quality control systems and (2) product approvals across jurisdictions by
multiple regulators. Due to the resources involved in engaging with new suppliers,
customers are less inclined to pursue alternate supply sources, providing CST with an
advantage over new entrants that would need to make significant investments and endure a
long gestation period with potential customers.
Manufacturing facilities
CST has three manufacturing facilities in India with 12 production lines (including three lines
for catalyst production and regeneration), with a total installed capacity of 29,900 MTPA as
of March 31, 2021, located at Kurkumbh (Maharashtra).
Key products have dedicated production lines which limit losses and capacity reductions that
are typically incurred during transitioning between products. Multiple lines across separate
units for key products limit contagion risk and enable CST to consistently meet the demand
for these products.
Each facility is equipped to function independently, with its own quality department,
effluent treatment plant, warehouse and R&D center. All facilities are automated to a large
extent, which helps ensure consistent product quality and reduced costs, mitigating
exposure to human error and industrial accidents involving labor force.
"Each of the analysts named below hereby certifies that, with respect to each subject
company and its securities for which the analyst is responsible in this report, (1) all of the
views expressed in this report accurately reflect his or her personal views about the subject
companies and securities, and (2) no part of his or her compensation was, is, or will be,
directly or indirectly, related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in this
report: Ritesh Gupta, Prasenjit Bhuiya."
60%
Percentage of companies within each category for which Kotak
Institutional Equities and or its affiliates has provided
50%
investment banking services within the previous 12 months.
60,000
2,000
50,000
1,500
40,000
30,000
1,000
20,000
500
10,000
Stock Price
- 0
Jun-19
Jun-20
Jun-21
Apr-19
Apr-20
Apr-21
Oct-18
Feb-19
Oct-19
Feb-20
Oct-20
Feb-21
Aug-18
Aug-19
Aug-20
Aug-21
Dec-20
Dec-18
Dec-19
Index
Price
Source: Kotak Institutional Equities Research for ratings and price targets, Bloomberg for daily closing prices.
The price targets shown should be considered in the context of all prior published Kotak Institutional Equities research, which may or may
not have included price targets, as well as developments relating to the company, its industry and financial markets
Analyst coverage
Companies that the analyst mentioned in this document follow
BUY. We expect this stock to deliver more than 15% returns over the next 12 months.
ADD. We expect this stock to deliver 5-15% returns over the next 12 months.
REDUCE. We expect this stock to deliver -5-+5% returns over the next 12 months.
SELL. We expect this stock to deliver <-5% returns over the next 12 months.
Our Ratings System does not take into account short-term volatility in stock prices related to movements in the market. Hence, a particular Rating may not strictly be in
accordance with the Rating System at all times.
Other definitions
Coverage view. The coverage view represents each analyst’s overall fundamental outlook on the Sector. The coverage view will consist of one of the following designations:
Attractive, Neutral, Cautious.
Other ratings/identifiers
NR = Not Rated. The investment rating and fair value, if any, have been suspended temporarily. Such suspension is in compliance with applicable regulation(s) and/or Kotak
Securities policies in circumstances when Kotak Securities or its affiliates is acting in an advisory capacity in a merger or strategic transaction involving this company and in
certain other circumstances.
RS = Rating Suspended. Kotak Securities Research has suspended the investment rating and fair value, if any, for this stock, because there is not a sufficient fundamental
basis for determining an investment rating or fair value. The previous investment rating and fair value, if any, are no longer in effect for this stock and should not be relied
upon.
NA = Not Available or Not Applicable. The information is not available for display or is not applicable.