This task made me realize how difficult it is to choose who to assist in circumstances like

this, mainly if you are an empath. Because you want to save everyone, but you still have to
consider your safety and well-being. It also showed me how to weigh people in life,
especially those who require assistance. Nothing about my relationships with them will alter,
regardless of gender, ethnicity, or age. Group categorization and survival, or who should be
given a chance in the fallout shelter, are two issues that are relevant to my decisions. These
people are helpless and need assistance to survive. You need a team that works well
together and a group that supports one another during trying times when things like these
happen. The standard of work you can produce together will increase the chance of
survival. The features and attributes you wish to keep to survive to depend on effective
communication and the support of each other. The makeup of individuals you choose to
save will change over time.
Additionally, I selected social figures who give back to the community in their way. This
assessment brought me back to when I was in high school, and we would have a red team
going against the blue team in P.E. The leaders who picked the players on their side would
choose those who they think will help their team and leave the others who don't look fit
enough to be a part of the team. At times the opposing team, who had to stick with the
leftovers, build a stronger bond with them and encouraged them that if they work together
as a team, they could win against the opposing team. This assignment has taught me that
relationships have a critical role in our social and professional communities. Finding our
community is aided by the requirement to identify those we can rely on and trust as
opposed to those we cannot.