Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prof. Ferrara
Sir Ken Robinson, a former professor of arts education at the University of Warwick,
proposes a very harsh question: Do Schools Kill Creativity? Robinson has been in the arts
education field for a long time and has even worked with governments and education systems
I selected this TED Talk because personally I have seen a lot of popularity around this
argument. I think the school system is very beneficial, but could they be doing something
different? I would ask myself. Ken Robinson dives into the topic of creativity and how the school
system is not set up for it. In the first few minutes Robinson makes a bold claim that receives
applause from the audience: “Creativity is as important now in education as literacy and we
should treat it with the same status.” This receives a round of applause from the audience.
Robinson addresses a very broad audience for his argument. It mainly consists of anyone that
In his TED Talk, Robinson makes many rhetorical decisions to apply logic to his
argument. Robinson presents a lot of his ideas on education systems based on his own
experiences and through telling stories, which works very well for him. Although at some point,
the audience needs reassurance why these ideas logically make sense. Robinson gives a brief
history lesson to the audience to apply this logic. Robinson states that “around the world, there
were no public systems of education, really, before the 19th century. They all came into being to
meet the needs of industrialism.” Due to this, Robinson adds that there is a “hierarchy [that is]
rooted on two ideas.” Using this logical approach, Robinson describes his own two ideas. One
idea being that the “most useful subjects for work are at the top”, so many students did not
pursue any subjects that were considered to be low-paying professions regardless of their
interests. The second idea being that students had to be equipped with a certain academic
ability to succeed, and if they did not have this, the system would penalize them. This major
fundamental idea from Robinson is really why creativity is killed in school systems. Because of
the importance of this main idea, Robinson applied logic to his argument by talking about the
In addition, Robinson applies a lot more of a serious tone when laying out this idea. For
most of the TED Talk, Robinson maintains a light-hearted tone so the audience’s mood is
content when listening to him speak. When Robinson presents one of his major ideas, he shifts
his tone from light-hearted to serious to captivate the audience and express to them that this is
a significant concept.
Although Robinson does present a serious tone for his major ideas, he maintains a light-
hearted tone for a good portion of his TED Talk. In this tone, Ken Robinson uses a lot of
emotional appeal to the audience. Barely into his speech, Robinson has already made several
sarcastic comments and jokes which lightens the mood and adds comedic value to his
presentation. You hear the audience burst into laughter many times through his TED Talk.
Robinson also adds a lot of self-deprecating humor regarding his past as a professor. At the
expense of himself, Robinson has the audience laughing and enjoying his presentation which
makes him very favorable to the audience. It is a lot easier for Robinson to present his
Robinson receives an emotional reaction from the audience when he describes one
particular story. Robinson tells the audience that there was this young girl that told her teacher
she was drawing a picture of God in class. The teacher replied “but nobody knows what God
looks like.” This young creative girl responded, “they will in a minute.” The audience burst into
laughter and so did Robinson. This short story adds to Robinson’s argument, but in a very
comedic and light hearted manner. This style isn’t the most effective for Robinson presenting his
main ideas, but it is necessary to trigger the audience’s emotions and maintain the content
mood.
Throughout his TED Talk, Robinson also established his credibility as a speaker on this
issue in many ways. As if his very credible background didn’t do enough, Robinson often uses
quotes from credible sources. Early into his argument, Robinson quotes Pablo Pissaco, possibly
the most profound artist of all time. He states that “all children are born artists.” It is a very
simple quote, but Robinson spins this quote into his own idea. Robinson adds that “the problem
is to remain an artist as you grow up. [He believes] this passionately that we don’t grow into
creativity, we grow out of it… or rather we get educated out of it.” How Robinson introduces his
big idea is a great rhetorical decision. When Robinson quotes a great name like Piscasso, this
will immediately captivate the audience because everyone knows of this great artist. This will
also establish Robinson’s credibility and trust with the audience because he is quoting such a
Most importantly, Robinson’s overall presentation skills establish his credibility to the
audience. Robinson is very well-spoken and he uses very complex words during a lot of points.
While the audience may not know how to define all these terms, it reveals how intelligent
Robinson is on this subject, thus his own education must be impeccable. Although, without
saying a polysyllabic word Robinson appears to be a credible speaker. Robinson’s relaxed body
language, and blend of formal and satirical styles really shows the audience that he has
motivated to make a change. His experiences within the education systems he encountered fuel
his motivation to revise the way the education system teaches children. Robinson’s purpose of
this TED Talk was to challenge the audience to rethink how everyone teaches their children,
and to accept different versions of intelligence. To reach the audience, Ken Robinson makes
many rhetorical decisions including emotional appeal, applying logic to his argument, and