Survey: 2nd & 3rd Semester Affective Clinical Evaluation

Reviewer: Clinical Instructors (PIOTROWSKI, Nick)

Reviewee: Students (Sanborn, Keegan)
Survey Period: 12/14/2022
Completed: 12/15/2022 9:52:35 AM CT

1. Evaluation:

3rd of 3 - Fall Semester

3. Communications

Explains medical dosimetry procedures to N/A

patient as appropriate to situation (e.g.
when participating in procedures in the
treatment room or simulation).

Respects patient's rights to privacy and Meets Expectations [10

confidentiality. Additional Comment: Always locks his computer pts]
when stepping away.

Acts and speaks in a respectful manner Meets Expectations [10

with staff members. Additional Comment: Keegan has really opened up pts]
over the year and become more comfortable with
all of us but was never anything other than
respectful.

Asks questions in an appropriate manner. Meets Expectations [10

Additional Comment: He's been quite competent pts]
for a while now, but whenever he has a more
complicated case he is comfortable asking the
necessary questions.

Accepts correction and direction in a Meets Expectations [10

professional manner. Additional Comment: Never had an issue with this pts]
throughout the entire year. Not only did he accept
the correction but applied the suggestions the
next time around.

Contributes as a member of the medical Meets Expectations [10

dosimetry team. Additional Comment: By the end of the year he was pts]
taking on a significant workload. Whether that
was a larger volume of patients or more
complicated cases he really became a member of
the team.

Uses effective verbal communication skills Meets Expectations [10

with physician during plan consultation Additional Comment: For the last few months his pts]
and review. comfort level with the physicians and how he
showed plans were much improved.

Uses effective written communication Meets Expectations [10

skills for chart, plan, and dosimetry note pts]
documentation.

Mean: 10.00 of 10 Points: 70 Score: 100.0%

4. Accuracy

Performs dose calculations accurately. Meets Expectations [10

pts]

Reads radiation measurement devices N/A

accurately and carefully. (eg, TLD,
Diodes, Film, Ion Chamber)

Accurately designs plans by computer or Meets Expectations [10

manual computation in accordance with pts]
prescription.

Accurately enters information into chart or Meets Expectations [10

R & V system. pts]

Mean: 10.00 of 10 Points: 30 Score: 100.0%

5. Safety

Takes appropriate precautions in Meets Expectations [10

Radiation Safety. pts]

Double checks all calculations and Meets Expectations [10

treatment plans with dosimetrist/physicist. pts]

Performs Quality Assurance per Meets Expectations [10

recommended guidelines and reviews pts]
with dosimetrist/physicist.

Uses time, distance, shielding practices & Meets Expectations [10

principles. pts]

Mean: 10.00 of 10 Points: 40 Score: 100.0%

6. Dependability

Arrives promptly as scheduled. Meets Expectations [10

pts]

Schedules breaks, lunches, and other Meets Expectations [10

time needs with clinical instructors. pts]

Adheres to attendance standards of the Meets Expectations [10

program. pts]

Uses clinical time wisely. Meets Expectations [10

Additional Comment: I never had to be concerned pts]
about what he was working on. He became more
organized as the year went on and was able to
take on a larger workload because of it.

Follows school and hospital policies and Meets Expectations [10

procedures. pts]

Takes initiative in observing and assisting Meets Expectations [10

in dosimetry activities.
Additional Comment: This is probably one of his pts]
biggest strengths throughout the year. If he
wasn't looking to observe he, he was watching
the sim schedule for patients, or asking to work
on one of our cases. His initiative was important
at such a large institution, and I really feel like he
took advantage of all that Froedtert had to offer.

Mean: 10.00 of 10 Points: 60 Score: 100.0%

7. Application of Knowledge

Understands the technique and use of Meets Expectations [10

special calculation methods. pts]

Is able to enter information into the Meets Expectations [10

computer and design treatment plan in pts]
accordance with prescription.

Is able to identify anatomy and contour Meets Expectations [10

appropriate structures. pts]

Utilizes critical thinking/problem solving Meets Expectations [10

skills in approaching treatment planning. Additional Comment: Anytime we discussed his pts]
plans it was easy to see the direction he took. He
was able to clearly communicate what worked,
what didn't, and how he got to his final plan.

Understands how clinical oncology Meets Expectations [10

information is used in treatment planning pts]
(e.g. type, grade, stage of cancer).

Utilizes critical thinking skills when Meets Expectations [10

evaluating dose volume histograms. pts]

Uses problem solving skills when Meets Expectations [10

comparing various treatment plans for a
specific treatment case.
Additional Comment: We often do a lot of pts]
comparison plans for insurance authorization. It
gave him a good opportunity to compare IMRT vs
3D on a lot of cases and a full understanding of
the differences.

Is able to design optimal treatment plans Meets Expectations [10

based on calculations, dose volume Additional Comment: No matter the concept he has pts]
histograms, prescription, and treatment always been able to pick it up quick and apply it
implementation. to whatever type of plan he was working on.

Mean: 10.00 of 10 Points: 80 Score: 100.0%

 8. General Dosimetry Skills

Performs calculations in a timely manner. Meets Expectations [10

Additional Comment: This was easy in the pts]
beginning but with the heavier workload I'm sure
it became more challenging. With that said, he
always finished his plans on or ahead of
schedule.

Accurately uses dose calculation Meets Expectations [10

databooks to perform hand calculations. pts]

Is able to dose out (complete) chart per Meets Expectations [10

prescription and plan. pts]

Exhibits knowledge of anatomy, tissue Meets Expectations [10

dose tolerance, definitive tumor dose, and pts]
typical field arrangement.

Is able to independently produce Meets Expectations [10

treatment plans as required by
competency list for the semester.
Additional Comment: While he did finish his pts]
competencies, it doesn't show the complexity of
some of the plans he was working on. Being an
academic center we rarely see anything
straightforward so a lot of his competencies were
done on extremely challenging patients. While I'm
sure it wasn't his favorite thing at times, he has
become a talented and well-rounded dosimetrist
because of it.

Is able to prioritize and organize duties to Meets Expectations [10

efficiently complete requirements. Additional Comment: At some point during the year pts]
he created his own spreadsheet due to the
increase in workload. He was always organized
but I'm sure this helped him keep on task.

Mean: 10.00 of 10 Points: 60 Score: 100.0%

9. I have reviewed this evaluation with the student.

Yes

10. Please provide a comment to let the student know of any weakness they can work on, and/or any strength to
commend:

Keegan was a fantastic student in every way. He paid attention, took initiative, and immersed himself
in dosimetry both professionally and personally. There's not a whole lot he needs to work on other
than just continuing to gain more experience. He'll have to create new relationships and learn new
preferences, but I have no doubt it won't take him long to fit right into that new department.

Total points for all rating scale questions: 340 (Each main question equally weighted)
Mean percentage score for all rating scale questions: 100.0% Response as of 12/15/2022 2:53:33 PM CT