Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/266732830
CITATIONS READS
3 3,688
3 authors, including:
Rouhollah Farhadi
Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan
10 PUBLICATIONS 17 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Rouhollah Farhadi on 29 June 2016.
DOI: 10.2478/cerce-2014-0022
Cercetări Agronomice în Moldova
Vol. XLVII , No. 3 (159) / 2014
*E-mail: r.farhadi@urmia.ac.ir
ABSTRACT. Potato has an important role angle and rotational speed. Results showed
in human food. It was the sixth alimentary that advance speed of 1.5-3 km/h, rotational
product in the world after sugar cane, maze, speed of 20-25 RPM and blade angle of 10-
rice, wheat and milk in 2011 year. In 15○ were proper for system. The average of
addition, potato is the third product in Iran damaged potatoes was 4%.
after wheat and sugar cane in 2011 year.
Therefore, any attempt in the improvement Key words: Rotary Potato Digger; Feed
of potato harvester will be valuable. In this Rate; Helix; Potato Damages; Simulation.
study, a new semi-mounted one-row potato
digger with rotary blade was designed and
made in the workshop of Shahrekord
University. It can be connected to rotary INTRODUCTION
potato graders. Transmission system was
mechanical from tractor (PTO) to blade by Potato is one of the main human
belt, pulley, gearbox, chain and sprocket. alimentary resources. It was the sixth
Blade diameter was 76 cm and the length
alimentary product in the world after
was 10 cm which was assigned by the
researchers. For separating of soil from sugar cane, maze, rice and paddy,
potato, a helix containing bars with 2.6 cm wheat and milk (FAO, 2011) and the
distance and diameter of 9 mm was applied. third product in Iran after wheat and
Entered soil into set was calculated as 227 sugar cane (Ministry of agriculture,
ton/h. Required power was got 5.5 2011) There are problems regarding
horsepower. Computerized model of set was potato cultivation and storage in Iran.
prepared in Mechanical Desktop Software
and potato motion was studied in Visual
The collection of these problems
Nastran Software. The device was tested at cause the cut of product yield and rise
field with various advance speed, blade of wastage value as the mean of
1 Depart. of Mechanical Engineering in Biosystems, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
2 Department of Mechanical Engineering in Biosystems, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
5
Brought to you by | provisional account
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 3/22/16 4:11 PM
P. AZIZI, N. SAKENIAN DEHKORDI, R. FARHADI
potato production is 24 tons/ha but digger and reported that potato bruises
this number amounts to 50 tons/ha at were increased with addition of
developed countries (Tarkesh, 2005). frequency and amplitude of vibration
Head factors of low operation at but it had not much effect on the
harvest time and post harvest consists remained potatoes in soil. In addition,
in disregard to finish physiologic amplitude had not much effect on
maturity, unavailability of labor at traction but with increase of
harvest season, unsuitable methods of frequency traction was diminished.
harvest, gradation, transport, packing Vasta et al. (1993) made a potato
and inaccessibility on proper technical digger with oscillatory sieves and
storehouse (Modareserazavi, 1996). studied effects of blade shape,
Potato wastage values during the advance seed and sieve vibration on
investigation were 48% from harvest potato digger operation. The best
stage to consumption and wastages of results were related to V shape blade
harvest implements were declared with 99.23% intact potato and
1.72% (Nasre Isfahani, 2003). minimum cut damages of 0.65% and
Mechanical harvest of potato relative zero bruise. Kang et al. (2001) tested a
to manual harvest causes 65% single-row commercial potato digger
frugality at harvest time and 45% at by replacing the fixed blade with a
harvest costs (Muhhamad et al., vibrating blade. Yasin and others
2003). (2003) made a rotary potato digger at
These statistics show importance Research Center of Agricultural
of activities in the field of potato Engineering in Faisalabad, Pakistan.
diggers. Misener (1985) made a potato Intact harvested, cut and bruised
digger and evaluated it. Mean of hurt potatoes were 99, 4 and 1%,
potato tubers by set was stated 3.2%. respectively, at field test with
Sharma (1986) designed a one row moisture 10.3% and speed of 6 km/h.
mounted potato digger that the hurts Singh (2006) developed and tested a
of harvested potatoes were reported tractor mounted, two-row
4% and up to skin. Saqib and Wright multipurpose potato digger.
(1986 ) studied a potato digger with Maximum exposure percentage of
oscillating blade. Generated clods tubers was gotten 84.5% at 4.5 km/h
with lower mean of geometric and damages were 1.48%. Pasaman
diameter were reported and and Zakharchuk (2012) determined
volumetric density was decreased. the parameters of a ploughshare-rotor
Hyde (1986) compared performance potato digger.
and required power of potato digger Now there is a new potato digger
with fixed and rotary blade. Tubers and it`s different parts, mechanism
damages were about 3% at rotary state simulation, performance and
and blade cut was negligible. Kang efficiency should be studied. The aim
and Halderson (1991) designed and of this study is to probe these factors.
tested a two row mounted potato
6
Brought to you by | provisional account
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 3/22/16 4:11 PM
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND EVALUATION OF POTATO DIGGER WITH ROTARY BLADE
MATERIAL AND METHODS Blades cut potato row and soils and
potatoes arrive to separating nets. At this
Brief explanation of system part, soils are severed from potatoes. Set
performance blade has rotation about central axle. This
Set was designed into a semi- motion is provided by tractor PTO.
mounted state. Fig. 1 shows various parts Because of rotational motion and it`s
of set except power transmission system. geometry, machine has capability to
The potato digger is connected by connect to rotary grader (Farhadi et al.,
drawbar on tractors arms during work. 2012).
Blades
The blade is circular (Fig. 2) and
formed from two parts of cutting and
preserver. The cutting part contains
crescent edges that slice soil hill.
Preserver part contains steel belts with
circular shape that their duty is blade
keeping (the cutting blade connected to
steel belts by bolt). Blade diameter Figure 2 - Rotary potato digger blades
(circle) D=76 cm and length L=10 cm
was assigned.
Required torque of blade is
calculated as below:
Tt = TC + T f f
+ TC a
⇒ Tt = Fc × R + F f × R + FC a
× R
( )
Tt = R FC + F f + FCa = R ( Ac × C + μ N + Aca × C a )
,
where: Tt: total torque (N.m);Tc: torque of (m2); C : soil cohesion (N/m2); R: blade
cohesion force (N.m);TFf: torque of radius (m); μ : coefficient of friction
frictional force (N.m);Tca: torque of between soil and metal; N : normal force
adhesion force (N.m); Fc : cohesion force (N).
(N); F f : frictional force (N); Fca : N is computed as following:
adhesion force (N); Ac : fracture area
7
Brought to you by | provisional account
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 3/22/16 4:11 PM
P. AZIZI, N. SAKENIAN DEHKORDI, R. FARHADI
According to Fig.3:
1
dA = ( y1 + y2 ) dx
2
y1 : soil height at position of x;
y 2 : soil height at position of (x+dx)
x = R sin γ , dx = R cos γ d γ
y1 = R cos γ − y '
y2 = R cos ( γ + d γ ) − y '
y + y' = R
y ' : free space between soil surface and
blade center
γ : angle between radius passing from
Figure 3 - Element for the calculation of element and vertical axel of circle
surface reaction dA can be written as:
1⎡
dA =
2⎣
( )
( R cos γ − y ') + ( R cos ( γ + d γ ) − y ') ⎤ R cos γ d γ
⎦
By expanding cos ( γ + dγ ) : cos (γ + dγ ) = cos γ cos dγ − sin γ sin dγ
dA =
1
2
(
R cos 2 γ d γ − 2 y 'cos γ d γ + R cos 2 γ cos d γ d γ − R sin γ sin d γ cos γ d γ R )
Whereas d γ is very small: Element weight is equal:
sin dγ → 0 , cos dγ → 1 , hence dW = ρ × dV
ρ : soil specific weight (N/m3)
(
dA = R R cos 2 γ − y 'cos γ d γ ) Element of normal force is:
Element volume is equal: dN = cos α cos γ dW
dV = dA × l
α: blade angle relative to movement
l: blade length direction (Fig.1)
Now we can write:
dN = ( cos α cos γ ) ρ dV = ρ .l.cos α .cos γ .dA
∫ dN = ∫ ρ .l.cos α .cos γ .dA = ρ .l.cos α ∫ cos γ .dA =
( ) (
= ρ .l.cos α ∫ cos γ .R R.cos 2 γ − y '.cos γ .d γ = ρ .l.R.cos α ∫ R.cos3 γ − y '.cos 2 γ d γ )
Therefore, with R = 38cm and y ' = 8cm :
⎡ ⎛ 1 ⎞ y'⎛ 1 ⎞ ⎤ 77.8o
N = ρ .l.R.cos α ⎢ R ⎜ sin γ − sin 3 γ ⎟ − 2 ⎜ γ + 2 sin 2γ ⎟⎥
⎣ ⎝ 3 ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎦ 0
Finally,
(
N = ρ lR cos α 0.2531R − 0.7822 y ' )
8
Brought to you by | provisional account
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 3/22/16 4:11 PM
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND EVALUATION OF POTATO DIGGER WITH ROTARY BLADE
This normal force was calculated for The volume of cut soil by blade is
the half of blade. delivered momently to net. The net should
Maximum torque was calculated as have this transition capacity. Thus, helix
0.8 kN.m. volumetric capacity is computed.
Maximum draft force was calculated
as 1.8 kN. For summarizing, the details of Volumetric capacity of helix net
calculation were not presented. According to Fig. 5 if area of AE is
calculated, swept volume by this area can
Separating net compute with having of net arc length
Cut soil after blade path arrives to (Fig. 6).
separating net; at this part, soil should be
separated from potato tubers. For
separating net, diameter of bars was
selected 9 mm and distances between
them 2.6 cm. Proper plan for separating is
usage of net with helix shape. Separating
net is formed by sweeping semi- circle on
helix path (Fig. 4). Figure 5 - Filled product and soil into
helix
2 2
y =r x= r − y y =r y =r
AE = ∫∫ dA = ∫ ∫ dydx = ∫ ⎛⎜ r 2 − y 2 + r 2 − y 2 ⎞⎟ dy = 2 ∫ r 2 − y 2 dy =
y = y ' x =− r 2 − y 2 y= y '⎝ ⎠ y= y '
π r2 ⎛ ⎛ y' ⎞⎞
= − ⎜ y ' x + r 2 sin −1 ⎜ ⎟ ⎟
2 ⎝ ⎝ r ⎠⎠
With substitution of parameters
⎧ θ2
k2 k2
⎪
⎪⎪ x = r sin θ '
S = ∫ r2 + 2
dθ ⇒ S = r 2 + (θ2 − θ1 )
, θ1 4π 4π 2
⎨ y ' = r cos θ '
⎪ S: arc length
⎪sin −1 ⎛⎜ y ' ⎞⎟ = ⎛⎜ π − θ ' ⎞⎟
⎪⎩ ⎝ r ⎠ ⎝2 ⎠ So swept volume is:
k2
above relation is converted to below V = A E s = r 2 (θ ' − s in θ ' c o s θ ' ) r2 + 2 (Δ θ ),
4π
equation:
AE = r 2 (θ '− sin θ 'cos θ ') where: r : Helix radius (m ) ; θ ' : angle of
,
filled product into helix; θ : angle of
where: θ ' : angle of filled product and soil
into helix; y ' : distance between product product static surface; k : Helix
surface and helix center. pitch (m ) .
9
Brought to you by | provisional account
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 3/22/16 4:11 PM
P. AZIZI, N. SAKENIAN DEHKORDI, R. FARHADI
10
Brought to you by | provisional account
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 3/22/16 4:11 PM
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND EVALUATION OF POTATO DIGGER WITH ROTARY BLADE
11
Brought to you by | provisional account
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 3/22/16 4:11 PM
P. AZIZI, N. SAKENIAN DEHKORDI, R. FARHADI
12
Brought to you by | provisional account
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 3/22/16 4:11 PM
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND EVALUATION OF POTATO DIGGER WITH ROTARY BLADE
13
Brought to you by | provisional account
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 3/22/16 4:11 PM
View publication stats