Professional Documents
Culture Documents
monesctor
Gramática Inglesa
Facultad de Filología
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
No se permite la explotación económica ni la transformación de esta obra. Queda permitida la impresión en su totalidad.
1. Which of the following is NOT a syntactic element of a clause?:
A. Circumstantial adjunct.
B. Stance adjunct.
C. Subjunctive adjunct. *(70)
Circumstantial adjunct → details about what is described by the VERB (where, when,
how, etc.), so within its scope (70).
Stance adjunct → speaker' s comment on the CONTENT of the clause (as in the example in
73); often, before or after the clause, but it is solely related to it.
Subjunctive adjunct → ='CONNECTIVE' ADJUNCT in your textbook: show the “semantic
RELATIONSHIP between TWO UTTERANCES, or parts of an utterance” (74) “They are not
therefore elements of structures, but connectors of structure”. Contrary to the earlier adjuncts, it
does not refer to only one clause, but to two, and says how they are connected (as in “He is a
great scientist. However, he is hopeless with women”).
The AGENT is not and element of (namely, within) a GROUP, but a PARTICIPANT in the
CLAUSE (128).
The elements of a group are (18):
·pre-modifier (in nominal groups we distinguish between 'modifiers' and 'determiners'):
m
·head (only element always there): h
·post-modifier=qualifier (1 type is the 'complement' of a noun or adjective, always
introduced by a preposition or 'that'-element): m
The obligatory parts of a PP are the head (the preposition) and the complement (the
nominal group). It may but often does not include a modifier before the preposition, normally an
adverb of degree. Your book mentions 'right' and 'quite' in sentences such as 'right in the middle'.
Obviously, 'right' is not an obligatory element in this sentence. (19)
4. What type of element corresponds to the structure: “lexical verb + particle + preposition”?:
a. Phrasal catenative verb.
b. Prepositional locative verb
c. Phrasal prepositional verb. *(62)
A phrasal catenative verb is one that controls (namely, requires right after it) a non-finite
complement. If such a complement has 'to', this 'to' will not correspond to the homonymous
preposition, to the 'to-infinitive' particle. Ex: I wanted to work with those teachers. (108)
Some intransitive verbs require a Complement of place, direction or destination (which
a64b0469ff35958ef4ab887a898bd50bdfbbe91a-3927719
can sometimes be used to refer to time). Therefore, the obligatory Circumstance normally
contains a preposition, but there are exceptions, when they are performed by groups such as
'home' or 'there'. Ex: He lies on the floor/there.
Phrasal prepositional verbs always have the same elements and in the same
position (first particle, second preposition), as in 'I' ve run out of milk'. Because the last element
is a preposition, a pronoun will necessarily go after the whole group. (62)
No se permite la explotación económica ni la transformación de esta obra. Queda permitida la impresión en su totalidad.
c. Much.
Assertive items ('some', 'something', 'somebody', etc. ) have factual meanings. They
normally appear in positive declarative clauses (“There is some milk in the fridge”).
Non-assertive items ('any', 'anything',..., 'ever', 'yet', …) have non-factual meanings. They
appear in negative clauses, but also in questions and conditional, comparative clauses, as
well as others with words with words that have some negative meaning, such as 'hardly' and
'without'. The reason is that they appear where things seem hypothetical or unfulfilled.
('There isn' t any milk in the fridge', but also in 'If he had any friends, he' d be a happy man'.)
Regarding the words in this exercise, we see that 'still' appears in positive clauses with a
positive meaning, as in 'I still feel young' (I do feel so), while 'ever' either appears in negations ('I
haven' t ever visited Paris') or in statements that do not convey the idea of fulfillment
Anticipatory 'it' is a pronoun that appears in the syntactic position of a clause which,
because it is so, is too 'heavy' (namely, long and harder to understand than a group would be) for
such Direct Object position. Therefore, 'it' is semantically empty, since the meaning that would
have been conveyed in that position is expressed by the postponed clause, whether that clause is
finite or non-finite. (52)
Ex: I consider it worrying that Mike won' t answer our phone calls.
Ex: I consider it worrying receiving no e-mails from Mike.
No se permite la explotación económica ni la transformación de esta obra. Queda permitida la impresión en su totalidad.
E: Peter is Sarah' s eldest son.
On the other hand, there are special types (rather than patterns) of relational processes:
circumstancial and possessive. In circumstancial relational processes the circumstance is
A related concept in these processes is that Token (entity that 'fills the role of the other')
and 'Value'. These concepts do not always match with those of 'identified' and 'identifier'.
Ex: My father(Identified & Token) is my boss (Identifier & Value). (148, 149)
Processes of transfer correspond to verbs such as 'give, send, lend, charge, pay, owe, etc.'
In them, the action applies to three particants: Agent, Affected and either a Recipient or
Beneficiary. The difference between the two latter ones is that the Recipient is inherent to the
action (in other words, obligatory and even logical), as in 'I sent a letter to my father' and the
Beneficiary is optional ('I bought flowers for my best friend', 'I baked a cake for my son Mark').
Obviously, a process (a verb) is never a partipant.
No se permite la explotación económica ni la transformación de esta obra. Queda permitida la impresión en su totalidad.
b. Carrier and Token
c. Force and Affected *(130)
In a and b there are several participants in each case, even if a sentence like a does talk
about existence.
a64b0469ff35958ef4ab887a898bd50bdfbbe91a-3927719
13. Which of the following statements about existential processes is NOT true?
a. The process is typically expressed by ‘be’.
b. The process may be expressed by intransitive verbs of positional states.
c. The process may be expressed by transitive verbs of ‘occurring’ or ‘coming into view’. *(153)
As pointed out in the previous exercise, only intransitive verbs can replace 'be' in
existential processes. (153)
No se permite la explotación económica ni la transformación de esta obra. Queda permitida la impresión en su totalidad.
b. Behavioural processes are borderline between mental and material processes.
c. “See” and “hear” are examples of behavioural processes. *(153)
Behavioural processes are verbs such as 'cough, sneeze, yawn, blink, laugh, sigh, etc.' are
typically involuntary and one-participant, but sometimes a slight agency can be implied (as in
'He coughed discreetly', showing that he did something he could not help doing, but could at
least control the way he did it). Nevertheless, it is impossible to think of any agency with
behavioural verbs such as 'die, collapse, grow'.
The proof that this sort of verbs is borderline between mental and material processes is
that there are a few pairs behavioural-mental process: watch-see, listen-hear (dynamic and
volitional, with agentive subjects-stative, with subjects that are experiencers).
Besides, there are verbs that can be used both as behavioural or mental: see, taste, feel,
15. What difference is there between the following two Phenomena in affectivity processes:
“I love going shopping” and “I love to go shopping”?
a. The former has a hypothetical meaning and the latter expresses certainty.
b. None; it is just a matter of style.
c. The former is actual/habitual and the latter one is potential. *(143)
Affectivity processes refer to the positive and negative reactions expressed by verbs in the
love-hate continuum (like, please, delight, dislike, detest, etc.). Their Phenomenon is expressed by
either a NG or a clause. When it is a clause, it can represent an event or a situation.
There are two ways to express the situation after an affectivity process:
--ing clause: shows it is actual or habitual
-to-infinitive clause: potential (thus, more unreal; similarly)
Ex: I love going shopping (I generally like it) /vs./ I love to go shopping (nearly the same
as 'I would love to go shopping today if that is what you feel like doing'). (142, 143)
B is the best definition for a pseudo-intransitive, because processes such as 'break, read,
translate, wash, tan, fasten, lock' work in this fashion, as exemplified in 'Comic books read very
well' meaning 'It is easy to read comic books', whose meaning explains the problem in c: pseudo-
intransitives do show general properties or propensities, those of entities to undergo the process.
For this reason, they often appear with expressions such as 'easily', 'well', modal verbs ('Cars
won' t start quickly in this weather) , negation, etc. (135, 136)
The participants referred as Phenomenon, Recipient and Beneficiary have been already
No se permite la explotación económica ni la transformación de esta obra. Queda permitida la impresión en su totalidad.
explained. For this reason, I will focus on a: ergative pairs are clauses with the same affected
participant having different syntactic functions and with different structures:
-transitive-causative: My brother opened a window. (an Agent did it to an Affected)
Peter broke an egg.
The general marched the soldiers. (here, this is the least common
structure)
-intransitive-anti-causative: A window opened. (1 participant only: Affected; intrans. vb)
An egg broke.
The soldiers marched.
It is important that we distinguish these pairs from the ones originating from pseudo-
intransitives, which, as already mentioned before, talk about general propensities. In 'A window
broke' there is no sense that that on any other window has a tendency to break, as in 'Glass
18. Which of the following sentences is an analytical causative with a resulting attribute?
a. The plan made me nervous. *(134)
b. He jumped the horse over the fence.
c. Colloquial language translates badly.
It has already been stated that resulting attributes are those that exist as a result of the
process in question: 'an Agent brings about a change of state in the Affected participant'.
Syntactically, we have a Subject-V-DO-Complement of the Object structure:
These clauses contain verbs such as 'make, turn, have' (the latter with a passive
meaning):
My children make me happy.
I' ve had my hair cut.
AFFECT. RESULTING ATTRIBUTE
DO. Co
The sentence in b is the Agent-Affected part of an ergative pair (with a typically intransitive
verb), that has a 'circumstance' participant. C is a pseudo-intransitive clause.
The only ergative pair is the third one because it is the only one in which exactly
the same verb appears both transitively and intransitively, and in which in the second case it
changes from a two-participant process to a one-participant one.
If we consider a, we can see that we have exactly the same participants and meaning.
¿No te llega para pagar Wuolah Pro? ¿Un año sin anuncios gratis?
a64b0469ff35958ef4ab887a898bd50bdfbbe91a-3927719
Their corresponding syntactic functions and ordering changes, as is the main goal when we
change from the active to the passive voice:
No se permite la explotación económica ni la transformación de esta obra. Queda permitida la impresión en su totalidad.
He closed her eyes. Her eyes were closed by him
AGENT AFFECTED AFFECTED AGENT
B is different, because the second clause, 'Her eyes were closed', has a different verb,
'were', and an Attribute in intensive relation with the Carrier-subject. (133, 145, 252)
a64b0469ff35958ef4ab887a898bd50bdfbbe91a-3927719