The document appears to be a survey evaluating a digital notebook across three respondent groups - content experts, IT experts, and students/users. Each group was asked to rate different aspects of the digital notebook on a scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Content experts rated content, grammar, methods, and overall quality. IT experts rated design, effects, methods, and overall performance. Students/users rated ease of use, ability to find topics/modules, potential to improve academic performance, and ability to improve understanding.
The document appears to be a survey evaluating a digital notebook across three respondent groups - content experts, IT experts, and students/users. Each group was asked to rate different aspects of the digital notebook on a scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Content experts rated content, grammar, methods, and overall quality. IT experts rated design, effects, methods, and overall performance. Students/users rated ease of use, ability to find topics/modules, potential to improve academic performance, and ability to improve understanding.
The document appears to be a survey evaluating a digital notebook across three respondent groups - content experts, IT experts, and students/users. Each group was asked to rate different aspects of the digital notebook on a scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Content experts rated content, grammar, methods, and overall quality. IT experts rated design, effects, methods, and overall performance. Students/users rated ease of use, ability to find topics/modules, potential to improve academic performance, and ability to improve understanding.