Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INFRASTRUCTURE
Betting on
Conservatism
Bid criteria
Competitive intensity
High cost of
debt
NHAI ordering
Asset monetisation
Commodity prices
cooling-off
Infrastructure
Despite strong ordering momentum, we are seeing emergence of headwinds to the
Indian highways program. Substantial dilution of bid qualification has exposed the
sector to low quality, inadequately funded developers taking large order inflow
market share. This has the potential of de-railing the NH program, creation of sub
quality infrastructure, time and cost overruns and eventually higher cost to
completion and defaults. Financial institutions are playing at the party with reckless
sector lending, benchmarking the developer’s risks under the garb of NHAI AAA
rating. We remain cautiously optimistic as HAM projects are being bid like EPC
projects, which shall lead to equity shortfall and execution delays. EPC players with
strong balance sheets, conservative bidding stance, and secured funding stand to
outperform as the dust settles.
Infrastructure
Betting on conservatism Capital Goods: Recommendation
Summary
Despite strong ordering momentum, we are seeing emergence of headwinds to CMP TP
Company Reco.
the Indian highways program. Substantial dilution of bid qualification has (INR/sh) (INR/sh)
Larsen &
exposed the sector to low quality, inadequately funded developers taking large 1,881 BUY 2,135
Toubro
order inflow market share. This has the potential of de-railing the NH program, Siemens 2,876 ADD 2,882
creation of sub quality infrastructure, time and cost overruns and eventually
ABB India 2,870 REDUCE 2,420
higher cost to completion and defaults. Financial institutions are playing at the Cummins
1,202 BUY 1,503
party with reckless sector lending, benchmarking the developer’s risks under India
the garb of NHAI AAA rating. We remain cautiously optimistic as HAM KEC
401 REDUCE 375
International
projects are being bid like EPC projects, which shall lead to equity shortfall and Kalpataru
361 BUY 471
execution delays. EPC players with strong balance sheets, conservative bidding Power
stance, and secured funding stand to outperform as the dust settles. Source: HSIE Research
taking up higher market share of orders awarded. Our analysis shows some of GR Infra 1,364 BUY 2,266
these developers have net worth lower than the cumulative HAM equity HG Infra 554 BUY 980
requirement, whilst a few don’t even have capital for upfront equity infusion and KNR
251 BUY 350
Constructions
are in the market to raise NCDs to fund equity. This poses a strong challenge to
PNC Infratech 252 BUY 407
project execution and may result in cost escalation and delays/defaults. IRB Infra
242 ADD 284
Developers
Financial institutions joining party, limited understanding on pricing risks
NCC 66 BUY 108
may squeeze sectoral funding in mid term
Ashoka
Flush liquidity, low cost of funding, and limited avenues for credit growth have 77 BUY 140
Buildcon
led to PSU banks stepping up lending to the sector, irrespective of developer Ahluwalia
427 BUY 542
Contracts
quality. Decentralized decision making, absence of in-house project finance
JMC Projects 87 BUY 142
teams, lackadaisical approach to risk have made it easy for developers to raise
PSP Projects 572 BUY 705
HAM debt. It has become L1’s market and there is limited 40-50bps rate
ITD
differentiation between best and middling developer. Tier 1 private banks have Cementation
94 BUY 126
become cautious, seeing aggressive bidding, high inflation, and rising interest Dilip Buildcon 235 BUY 369
rates. J. Kumar
300 ADD 364
Infraprojects
Asset monetisation, robust awarding and strong tier-1 balance sheet are some Source: HSIE Research
of the tailwinds
Government’s intention of expanding highway programs augurs well for project
awarding. With debt embargo on NHAI (Capex to be funded by budgetary
support), we expect its balance sheet to improve. Asset monetisation may further
strengthen NHAI balance sheet as sovereign funds have shown strong interest in
recent NHAI and private road projects. Tier-1 developers continue to remain
cautious and seem to be choosing balance sheet over growth. This augurs well for Parikshit D Kandpal, CFA
long term rerating and asset creation. parikshitd.kandpal@hdfcsec.com
Valuation multiple near trough, rerating contingent on reduction in +91-22-6171-7317
competitive intensity
Tier-1 infrastructure developers are trading at ~8.5x 1-yr forward valuation. The Nikhil Kanodia
recent correction presents an attractive entry point for strong balance sheet nikhil.kanodia@hdfcsec.com
players. We expect competitive intensity to reduce as middling players’ order +91-22-6171-7362
books are full and in recent bids we are seeing that fewer companies and bids are
Manoj Rawat
below cost. Infrastructure asset creation is top priority of the current government,
which may lead to robust ordering over the next decade. TOP PICKS: GR Infra, manoj.rawat@hdfcsec.com
KNR, PNC Infra, HG Infra and NCC. Within the Capital Goods: L&T, Cummins +91-22-6171-7358
India and Kalpataru are our preferred picks.
HSIE Research is also available on Bloomberg ERH HDF <GO> & Thomson Reuters
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Focus charts
Exhibit 1: Market share of infra developers in HAM projects
Total Listed (%) Total Unlisted (%)
80
65.22 67.27
70
60 54.41 53.13
50 40.41
40
59.59 45.59
30 46.87
34.78 32.73
20
10
0
FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22
Exhibit 2: L1 to NHAI cost spread – all companies Exhibit 3: L1 to NHAI cost spread of top-12 companies
Average NHAI Cost Average L1 cost Spread - RHS Average NHAI Cost Average L1 cost Spread - RHS
Exhibit 4: L1 to NHAI cost spread of top-6 listed Exhibit 5: L1 to NHAI cost spread of top-6 unlisted
companies companies
Average NHAI Cost Average L1 cost Spread Average NHAI Cost Average L1 cost Spread
0 -0.1 0 -0.1
FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22
Page | 2
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
50%
25%
0%
-25%
FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22
Source: HSIE Research
Exhibit 7: Average Diesel price in Mumbai, Delhi, Exhibit 8: Bitumen (VG40 grade - INR per tonne) price (-
Chennai and Kolkata 6%/-11%/+25% MoM/QoQ/YoY in Jul’22)
(INR/Litre) Avg Diesel price (daily)
60,000
Trailing 3-month Avg price
110 55,000
100 50,000
90 45,000
40,000
80
35,000
70
30,000
60 25,000
50 20,000
Dec-20
Dec-21
Apr-22
Aug-20
Apr-21
Aug-21
Oct-20
Oct-21
Aug-17
May-18
Aug-18
May-19
Aug-19
May-20
Aug-20
May-21
Aug-21
May-22
Aug-22
Jun-20
Jun-21
Jun-22
Nov-20
Nov-21
Feb-21
Nov-17
Nov-18
Nov-19
Feb-22
Feb-18
Feb-19
Feb-20
Feb-21
Feb-22
Exhibit 9: Cement price were range bound over the Exhibit 10: Hot-rolled coils (HRC) & sheets, including
last year (INR per bag) narrow strip price – INR per tonne (-5%/+6% QoQ/YoY in
Jun’22)
380 HRC price % Growth (QoQ) RHS
Mar-17
Sep-17
Mar-18
Mar-19
Sep-19
Mar-20
Sep-20
Mar-21
Sep-21
Mar-22
Sep-18
Dec-16
Dec-18
Dec-19
Dec-21
Dec-17
Dec-20
Dec-20
Dec-21
Apr-21
Aug-20
Aug-21
Apr-22
Aug-22
Jun-16
Jun-17
Jun-18
Jun-19
Jun-20
Jun-21
Jun-22
Jul-22
Oct-20
Oct-21
Jun-21
Jun-22
Feb-22
Feb-21
Page | 3
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Contents
Focus Charts ............................................................................................................................ 2
Is HAM really a viable option in the long run? .............................................................. 5
Viability concerns……………………………………………………………………….8
Rising commodity prices……………………………………………………………...11
Story so far ............................................................................................................................ 14
Large portion of awarding to unlisted companies .................................................. 17
Value unlocking through InVIT .................................................................................. 20
Bidding Analysis ................................................................................................................. 21
Region-specific bids too much comfort may prove to be growth dilutive ............ 28
Bid-win ratio: Decent success in domiciled regions .................................................. 29
Credit rating at investment grade; outlook positive ..................................................... 31
NIP program–expansion of infra pipeline beneficial for larger Tier-1 Infra
companies .............................................................................................................................. 34
Shortfall in CRIF shall be met by additional source of funding ................................ 37
Company Section ................................................................................................................. 38
Key financials of companies based on the net worth ................................................ 38
Unlisted companies remain fundamentally strong – with robust profitability .... 39
Coverage companies ............................................................................................................ 40
Composite Valuation Summary ................................................................................. 41
Key strengths of HAM model............................................................................................ 43
Key Risks ............................................................................................................................... 44
Key takeaways from interaction with NHAI .................................................................. 45
Key Financials ..................................................................................................................... 47
Page | 4
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Exhibit 11: Recent policy changes announced by NHAI/MoRTH as relaxation due to COVID
Sr. Notification
Criteria Relaxation Notification Link
No. Date
To be released in proportion of the work
Release of Retention Money
already executed
3-6 months extension depending on site
Extension of Time (EoT)
condition
Monthly payments in proportion of the
Relaxation in Schedule H
work done and accepted as per the Atmanirbhar Bharat: Relief for
payments
contract specifications contractors/developers of road
Direct payment to approved sector
sub-contractor through Escrow
1 03-Jun-20 A/c https://morth.nic.in/sites/default/fil
Waiver of penalty for delay in es/circulars_document/Covid%20re
submission of PBG lief%20atmanirbhar%20Order%200
i. Extension of concession period for a 30620.pdf
period of 3-6 months
For BOT/TOT concessionaires:
ii. Loss in collection of fee to be
i. EoTs
compensated as per the terms of CA till
ii. Loss of collection of user fee
the time daily toll collection is below 90%
of the average daily fee
Linked to average of one year MCLR of
Interest annuities for upcoming top five scheduled commercial banks +
HAM projects 125 bps as against bank rate +300 bps
linked interest annuities
To be released in ten tranches of 4% each
Construction Annuities
as against five tranches of 8% each
Allowing 100% change of ownership post
six months from COD as against earlier
lock-in period of two years from COD. Changes in model HAM
Change of ownership This shall help deleveraging the balance concession agreement
2 10-Nov-20 sheet and freeing-up the equity which
shall lead to increased investments in the https://morth.gov.in/sites/default/fi
road sector. les/mca%20for%20ham.pdf
Lowered to 15% from 25% and accepting
bids from companies with wide range of
Net Worth condition experience of executing work in hospitals,
hotels, smart cities, warehouses and oil
and gas
Eight equal instalments instead of four,
Deduction for mobilization earlier with interest to be recovered in
advance from construction grant ninth and tenth instalment equally instead
of one instalment earlier
Atmanirbhar Bharat: Relief for
contractors/developers of road
sector
Relaxation in Schedule H
3 31-Dec-20 Extended till June 30, 2021
payments
https://morth.nic.in/sites/default/fil
es/circulars_document/Atamnirbha
r%20Bharat%20(1).pdf
Page | 5
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Government of India launched Gati Shakti-National Master Plan, which will help
lead a holistic and integrated development of infrastructure, generating numerous
employment opportunities in the country.
In July, 2020 NHAI released SOP for de-scoping of the pending RoW, whereby
post the expiry of 20% of the construction period after achieving appointed date,
the pending RoW shall be removed from the project scope and BPC will be
adjusted accordingly.
In October, 2020, MoRTH relaxed technical qualifications for bidders of HAM and
BOT projects:
o Core sector would be deemed to include civil construction cost of power
sector, SEZs, airports, industrial estates, logistic parks, pipelines, irrigation,
water supply, stadium, hospitals, hostels, smart city, warehouses, silos, oil and
gas and real estate development.
o The capital cost of the project should be more than 5% of the amount specified
as the estimated project cost.
In September 2021, the NHAI issued a circular to clarify the GST implication on
the annuity payments in accordance with the CGST Circular 150/2021 issued by
the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) on 17th June 2021. The
circular stated:
o The service of access to a road or a bridge on toll payment is exempt. So,
irrespective of consideration as toll or annuity, access to the road is tax-exempt.
Therefore, no GST is charged on the toll collected.
o However, the exemption does not cover the construction of road services,
whether or not payment is made via deferred payments or annuities. Private
Page | 6
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
developers raise invoices and receive annuity payments from the government
department, including GST, deposited with the tax authorities. GST, at 12%, is
chargeable on annuities paid to private developers, which they must deposit.
o It further clarified that NHAI will reimburse the concessionaire any additional
payable amount, which is the net impact on annuity after adjusting ITC for
project bids on or before 30th June 2017 and from 14th October 2017 to 16th
June 2021.
In order to safeguard the viability of the HAM projects, MoRTH, via a circular
dated 23 May 2022, has done away with quoting O&M cost and the projects will
be awarded purely on the basis of BPC. For the maintenance obligation of the
concessionaire, the authority shall extend lump sum financial support in the form
of bi-annual payments which will a fixed percentage of BPC depending on the type
of the project stretch and pavement.
Page | 7
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Viability concerns
Concerns over easing the eligibility criteria…
Some of the smaller After the NHAI reduced the eligibility criteria for HAM projects, many unlisted
developers have (1) net worth companies have bid for these projects. We classified the companies on the basis of
lower than the cumulative their net worth. There were 3/2/12/10 new companies with net worth up to INR
HAM equity requirement (2) 5bn in FY19/20/21/22. The average equity infusion required by these companies is
whilst few don’t even have INR c.41bn for FY22 (vs. INR c.25bn for FY21). With a net worth of INR 60bn as of
capital for upfront equity Mar-21, the HAM equity to net worth ratio has already crossed 0.7x, whereas the
infusion and are in market to HAM equity to cash profit ratio has already crossed 1.1x. With the order backlog
raise NCDs to fund equity. and new orders, the total equity requirement would already have exceeded the net
This poses strong challenge to worth. Going ahead, they might face issues in completing/maintaining the project
project execution and may stretch.
result in cost escalation and
delays/defaults. Exhibit 12: Number of new companies winning orders
Companies <Rs 500cr 500<companies<Rs 1000cr
1000<companies<Rs 1500cr 1500<companies<Rs 2000cr
2000<companies<Rs 2500cr Companies >Rs 2500cr
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22
Page | 8
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Exhibit 16: Equity required for HAM projects to net worth ratio
HAM equity/net worth* max (x) FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22
Companies <INR 5bn 0.15 0.24 0.50 0.78
5bn <Companies< INR 10bn 0.04 0.07 0.12 -
10bn <Companies< INR 15bn 0.07 - 0.87 0.06
15bn <Companies< INR 20bn 0.03 - 0.07 -
20bn <Companies< INR 25bn 0.16 0.04 0.33 0.11
Companies > INR 25bn 0.01 0.04 0.11 0.06
Source: HSIE Research
*HAM Equity requirement for the projects won in the current year and Net worth is as at end of immediately
preceding financial year. This is the max ratio which these companies will have to plan for whilst infusing
equity into projects as pending equity requirement from previous year may add to the overall equity
requirement
The L1 and NHAI cost trend shows that, over FY20-22, smaller companies are
bidding more aggressively as compared to bigger/more stable companies. In FY22,
companies other than those with a net worth between INR 10bn and 15bn have bid
for NHAI HAM projects, with L1 lower than the NHAI cost (i.e. at discount).
Directionally, all categories have been aggressive in FY22.
Exhibit 18: L1 vs. NHAI cost
Companies <INR 5bn INR 5bn<companies<INR 10bn
INR 10bn<companies<INR 15bn INR 15bn<companies<INR 20bn
INR 20bn<companies<INR 25bn Companies >INR 25bn
75%
50%
25%
0%
-25%
FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22
Page | 9
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 10
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
120
Crude prices directly impact 100
diesel and bitumen prices.
80
Commercial grade diesel is
60
costlier than the one available
at petrol pumps. Rising crude 40
Sep-17
Sep-18
Sep-19
Sep-20
Sep-21
Mar-18
Mar-19
Mar-20
Mar-21
Mar-22
Dec-17
Dec-18
Dec-19
Dec-20
Dec-21
Aug-22
Jun-17
Jun-18
Jun-19
Jun-20
Jun-21
Jun-22
Source: Bloomberg, HSIE Research
Exhibit 20: Average Diesel price in Mumbai, Delhi, Chennai and Kolkata
(INR/Litre) Avg Diesel price (daily) Trailing 3-month Avg price
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
Aug-17
May-18
Aug-18
May-19
Aug-19
May-20
Aug-20
May-21
Aug-21
May-22
Aug-22
Nov-17
Nov-18
Nov-19
Nov-20
Nov-21
Feb-18
Feb-19
Feb-20
Feb-21
Feb-22
Source: Bloomberg, HSIE Research
Exhibit 21: Bitumen (VG40 grade – INR per tonne) price (-6%/-11%/+25%
MoM/QoQ/YoY in Jul’22)
60,000
55,000
50,000
45,000
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
Sep-20
Sep-21
Aug-20
Dec-20
Aug-21
Dec-21
Apr-21
Apr-22
Jun-20
Jan-21
Jun-21
Jan-22
Jun-22
Nov-20
Mar-21
May-21
Nov-21
Mar-22
May-22
Oct-20
Oct-21
Jul-20
Feb-21
Jul-21
Feb-22
Jul-22
Page | 11
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Exhibit 22: Cement price were range bound over the last year (INR per bag)
380
370
360
350
340
330
320
310
Sep-20
Dec-20
Sep-21
Dec-21
Aug-20
Apr-21
Apr-22
May-21
Jun-21
Aug-21
May-22
Jun-22
Aug-22
Nov-20
Jan-21
Nov-21
Jan-22
Oct-20
Feb-21
Mar-21
Jul-21
Oct-21
Feb-22
Mar-22
Jul-22
Source: Bloomberg, HSIE Research
Exhibit 23: Hot-rolled coils (HRC) & sheets, including narrow strip price – INR per
tonne (-5%/+6% QoQ/YoY in Jun’22)
HRC price % Growth (QoQ) RHS
1,00,000 20.0%
80,000 15.0%
10.0%
60,000
5.0%
40,000
0.0%
20,000 -5.0%
0 -10.0%
Sep-16
Sep-17
Sep-18
Sep-19
Sep-20
Sep-21
Jun-16
Dec-16
Jun-17
Dec-17
Jun-18
Dec-18
Jun-19
Dec-19
Jun-20
Dec-20
Jun-21
Dec-21
Jun-22
Mar-17
Mar-18
Mar-19
Mar-20
Mar-21
Mar-22
Jul-22
Source: RBI, HSIE Research
Page | 12
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 13
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Story so far…
Robust awarding; sluggish execution
In FY22, NHAI & MoRTH In order to increase the interest of the private players in the public-private
awarded 12,731 kms partnership (PPP) model, GoI introduced the HAM model and NHAI started
awarding projects under HAM from 27 January 2016. In FY22, the NHAI and
EPC order constituted MoRTH have awarded as many as 127 projects spanning into 12,731 km (+21.6%
45%, with HAM at 44% YoY). Out of these 127 projects, 62 (49%) were HAM projects, while 63 (50%) were
and 1% of the OB was EPC projects and balance 1% were BOT projects. However, due to labour shortage
BOT orders and delayed payments from government and other funding issues, execution was
slower in the fiscal. The average road constructed in FY22 fell to 28.6 km per day
During the year, NHAI & vs. 36.4 km per day in FY21.
MoRTH constructed 10,457
kms, averaging 28.6km per
The capacity of National Highways in terms of handling traffic (passenger and
goods) needs to keep pace with economic growth. India has the second-largest
day
road network in the world of about 6.2 million km (as of 31 March 2021) comprising
national and state highways and urban and rural roads. National highways
account for 2% of the total road network and carry over 40% of total traffic.
Ashoka, DBL, GR Infra,
HG Infra, KNR, and PNC India has a well-developed framework for Public-Private-Partnerships (PPP) in the
stand to benefit from highway sector. The Asia Development Bank ranked India at the first spot in PPP
outlays on NH operational maturity and also designated India as a developed market for PPPs. In
the last seven years, the length of national highways for which the Ministry of Road
Transport & Highways, Government of India, is responsible has gone up by more
than 50%, from 91,287 km (2013-14) to around 1,41,000 km at present.
Exhibit 25: Total road (NHAI + MoRTH) awarding and completion trend – km
Km awarded Km completed Km/day
10,885
10,467
10,457
15,948
17,055
10,237
13,394
12,731
4,510
8,301
5,470
4,400
7,972
6,067
9,829
8,948
3,620
5.0
0 0.0
FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22
80
60
40
20
0
FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22
Page | 14
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
1,726
1,901
3,067
1,501
4,344
1,988
4,335
2,628
7,396
3,071
2,222
3,380
3,211
3,979
4,788
4,192
6,306
4,325
as well 1,000 2.00
0 0.00
We estimate that NHAI will FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22
10,000
3,900
4,344
5,300
4,335
7,396
6,000
3,211
6,000
4,788
4,500
6,306
5,500
3,067
0 0.0
FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22
Page | 15
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
During Q1FY23, NHAI awarded nine HAM projects with a total length of 329.2 kms at
L1 cost of INR 105bn vs. NHAI cost of INR 98bn and one EPC project at L1 cost of INR
7.3bn vs. NHAI cost of INR 7.7bn.
NHAI is planning to award ~500 kms (8% of 6,500 km target) through the BOT mode.
It may also give a minimum toll revenue guarantee to make it easier for contractors to
bid for BOT projects.
The emphasis on BOT is aimed at reducing the authority’s burden on financing
highway projects, currently being built more on HAM and EPC. For BOT projects, the
government does not pay for the construction cost, the developer recoups investment
by collecting toll on the stretch for the entire concession period, typically 20-30 years.
For an attractive stretch, developers often offer premium to the authority as well.
Page | 16
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 17
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Exhibit 32: L1 to NHAI cost spread – all companies Exhibit 33: L1 to NHAI cost spread of top-12 companies
Average NHAI Cost Average L1 cost Spread - RHS Average NHAI Cost Average L1 cost Spread - RHS
Exhibit 34: L1 to NHAI cost spread of top-6 listed Exhibit 35: L1 to NHAI cost spread of top-6 unlisted
companies companies
Average NHAI Cost Average L1 cost Spread Average NHAI Cost Average L1 cost Spread
0 -0.1 0 -0.1
FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22
Page | 18
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
their balance sheets to bid PNC 13,065 71,197 5,056 29,085 17.4%
Megha 74,497 62,552 8,223 1,59,369 5.2%
for more projects and are
Ceigall 8,748 28,837 2,255 3,048 74.0%
likely to see major wins on
DRA 17,290 14,888 1,931 7,770 24.8%
the back of a robust bid
Source: HSIE Research
pipeline in FY23/FY24
Page | 19
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 20
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Bidding analysis
Ashoka Buildcon
In FY22, ASBL bagged one HAM project from the NHAI at a premium of -15.5% over
the NHAI cost. The OB stood at INR 137.3bn at the end of Mar-22; including order wins
of Q1FY23, OB stands at INR 146.3bn (3.2x FY22 revenue). ASBL has received INR 98bn
order inflow until now since the start of FY22. Order inflow in FY23 is expected to be
more than INR 100bn. In FY22, ASBL was not declared L2 for any projects.
Bidding Analysis L3
Bidding Analysis L2
NHAI cost (INR mn) L1 Bid (INR mn)
NHAI cost (INR mn) L1 Bid (INR mn) L3 Bid (INR mn) L1 Premium on NHAI cost
L3 Premium on NHAI cost
L2 Bid (INR mn) L1 Premium on NHAI cost
Page | 21
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Dilip Buildcon
In FY22, DBL has won three HAM projects at a BPC of -6.9% over the NHAI cost. It lost
four HAM projects in FY22 worth 51.7bn, as the average L1 cost for these projects was
14.6% lower than the NHAI cost whereas DBL’s bid for the projects was an average
BPC of 9.8% lower than the NHAI cost. Of these four projects, DBL lost two projects
by a margin of just 1%, where cumulative BPC was INR 24.6bn. The OB, as of Mar-22,
stood at INR 256bn, with INR 78bn worth of order inflows in FY22. 58% of the OB
comprises road projects. DBL has won two HAM projects worth INR 29bn since Apr-
22. The total NHAI bid pipeline stands at INR 400bn, with HAM/EPC share at 50/50%.
During the year, DBL witnessed intense competition in HAM and EPC both. It
participated in 105 projects in FY22, of which it won only five. However, in the recent
bidding, the competition has slightly reduced. FY23 order inflow is expected at INR
80-100bn.
Page | 22
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
GR Infraprojects
GRIL was one of the relatively less aggressive bidder in FY22. It won eight HAM
projects at a BPC of -0.5% of the NHAI cost. It lost six HAM projects in FY22 worth INR
70.9bn as the average L1 bids were at 4.9% above the NHAI cost whereas it bid at 8.5%
above the NHAI cost. Of these six projects, GRIL lost one/one/two projects with a
margin of 1/2/3%, where the cumulative BPC was INR 11.9/9.8/22.6bn. The OB stood
at INR 131bn in Mar-22 (vs. INR146bn in Dec-21). With L1 of INR 70.9bn, the OB stood
at INR 201.9bn. OI guidance for FY23 is INR 150bn, with INR 100/50bn in road/non-
road segments. GRIL expects appointed date for all eight HAM projects by Q3FY23.
Page | 23
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
HG Infra
During FY22, HG Infra won two HAM projects at a BPC of 7.6% over the NHAI cost.
It lost four HAM projects in FY22 worth INR 50.3bn, as the average L1 was 3.1% over
the NHAI cost whereas HG Infra bid at 7.3% above the NHAI cost. Of these four
projects, HG Infra lost one project each with a margin of 1%/5% and BPC of INR
14.7/11.2bn. With OI of INR 43.3bn (vs. guidance of INR 50bn), the OB stood at INR
79.7bn (the highest-ever) at the end of Mar22. HG has given an order inflow guidance
of INR 90-100bn for FY23. The appointed date (AD) for all five new HAMs is expected
to be received by H1FY23.
16.5%
13.8% 6,000
18.9% 16.5% 15.0%
15.0% 7.6% 13.8%
17.7%
3,000
13.5% 7.6%
6.5% 0.0% 0.0% 7.3%
0.0%
- 0.0%
FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22
FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22
Page | 24
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
KNR
KNR has won one HAM project at a premium of 13% over the NHAI cost. It also lost
a HAM project in FY22 worth INR 14.6bn, as the L1 bid was at 21% over the NHAI cost
while KNR bid was at 23.4% over the NHAI cost. The OB stands at INR 90bn (~2.8x
FY22 revenue), excluding one HAM project worth INR 7.7bn that is not included in the
OB yet. Captive (HAM project) works constitute 49% of the OB whereas state/Central
government orders constitute 38/10%. Geographically, the OB is diversified in
southern India with Karnataka/Kerala/TN/AP/Telangana contributing
16/36.3/18/29.7%. Business segment-wise, irrigation/HAM/roads (others) account for
23%/49%/28% of the OB. OI for FY23 is pegged at INR 40-50bn.
Page | 25
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
PNC
In FY22, PNC bagged six HAM projects from NHAI at a premium of -16.5% over NHAI
cost. It also lost two HAM projects in FY22 worth INR 25bn, as L1 bids were lower by
9% as compared to NHAI cost while PNC bid was 6.2% lower than the NHAI cost. Of
these two projects, PNC lost one project with a margin of 1% where the BPC was INR
14.2bn. OB, as of Mar-22, stood at INR 146.6bn. With the EPC value of seven HAM
projects awarded in Q1FY23, the OB stands at INR 210bn. Of these seven, 80% RoW is
available for five HAM projects. The AD for all the seven projects is expected by
Q3FY23. Road EPC constitutes 44% of the OB. PNC expects an order inflow of INR 80-
100bn in FY23.
6,000 -16.5%
-15.0% -6.2% -15.0%
3,000
-16.5%
-30.0% - -30.0%
FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22
Page | 26
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Megha
In FY22, Megha engineering bagged seven HAM projects from NHAI at a premium of
-3.4% over NHAI cost. It also lost nine HAM projects in the year worth INR 107bn, as
the L1 bids were at a premium of 1.2% over the NHAI cost, whereas Megha bid at a
premium of 6.3% over the NHAI cost. Of these nine projects, it lost one project each
with a margin of 1/3/4% where the BPC was INR 10.8/15.9/12.1bn. It lost two projects
with a margin of 2% where the BPC was INR 29.2bn.
L1 Premium on NHAI cost L2 Premium on NHAI cost NHAI cost (INR mn) L1 Bid (INR mn)
21,000 45.0%
L3 Premium on NHAI cost
45.0% 18,000 34.8%
30.0%
34.8% 37% 15,000
24.3%
30.0% 24.3% 12,000
16% 15.0%
9,000
15.0%
9% 6,000
0.0%
6.3% -3.4%
0.0% 3,000
-3.4% - -15.0%
-15.0%
FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22
FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22
Page | 27
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 28
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 29
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 30
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 31
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Credit Rating
Latest Press
Company Outlook Rating Rationale
Release Date
Short-term Long-term
Dilip CRISIL A1 CRISIL A Stable The ratings reflect the established market position of DBL, backed November 1,
Buildcon by its strong project execution capability, robust orders providing 2022
revenue visibility over the medium term, and a moderate financial
risk profile supported by its ability to monetize assets. These
strengths are partially offset by large working capital requirement
and exposure to cyclicality in the construction industry.
DRA CARE A1+ - - The rating derives strength from experienced promoters and its March 29, 2022
established presence in the infrastructure segment, operational track
record of over five decades with demonstrated execution capability
along with healthy revenue visibility marked by segmentally and
geographically well-diversified order book with limited
counterparty credit risk. The rating further derives strength from
DRAIPL’s growth in scale of operations, comfortable capital
structure, robust debt coverage indicators. The rating is also
underpinned by efficient management of its working capital
requirement despite being present in a working capital intensive
industry along with strong liquidity position marked by sizeable
amount of liquid cash and bank balances along with unutilized bank
lines. The rating favourably takes cognizance of achievement of AD
in its four under construction HAM SPVs, satisfactory project
progress thereupon along with infusion of part equity commitments
in the projects.
Gawar CARE A1+ CARE Stable Consistent improvement in the company’s financial risk profile February 21, 2022
AA- marked by the sustained growth in its scale of operations with
CAGR of 24% over the past four years ended March 31, 2021, healthy
profitability margins and low reliance on debt leading to
comfortable debt coverage metrics. Healthy outstanding order book
position with strong counterparties and diversified presence across
various states is a credit positive. The rating strengths are, however,
tempered by sectoral concentration in roads, significant equity
commitments towards HAM projects, inherent through-the-lifecycle
risks in HAM projects, including, inter alia, variability of annuities
to changes in bank rate and inflation indices, during both execution
and operation stages, innate cyclical trends associated with the
construction
sector and competitive nature of the construction industry.
GR Infra CRISIL A1+ CRISIL Stable The ratings of GRIL continue to reflect the company's established January 11, 2022
AA position in the construction industry, backed by strong project
execution capabilities, robust order flow, efficient working capital
management, and comfortable financial risk profile. These strengths
are partially offset by exposure to risks related to segmental
concentration and inherent cyclicality in the construction industry.
HG Infra ICRA A1 ICRA A+ Positive The ratings take into account the healthy growth in revenue at a December 13,
CAGR of 22% during FY18 and FY21 on the back of improved order 2021
book along with timely execution and the growth is expected to be
sustained over the medium term on the back of strong order book
position of INR 69bn as on September 30, 2021. The operating profit
margins also improved to 16.2% in FY21 and 16.3% in H1FY22 from
15.6% in FY20 supported by scale benefits and reduced dependence
on sub-contracting expenses. The working capital intensity also
improved to 7% in FY21 from 16% in FY20 with recovery of
payments from PWD in Rajasthan; the working capital intensity is
expected to remain at low levels going forward with majority of
order book comprising of HAM and EPC works from reputed
customers. The ratings also consider reduction in project risk with
three of the four under construction HAM projects expected to be
completed in FY22. The ratings, however, remain constrained by the
high consolidated TOL/TNW of 1.42 times as of March 31, 2021
owing to high mobilization advances and trade creditors. Further,
the ratings factor in sizeable equity commitment and pending
execution related risks for the HAM portfolio.
Page | 32
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Credit Rating
Latest Press
Company Outlook Rating Rationale
Release Date
Short-term Long-term
KNR CRISIL A1+ CRISIL Positive Expected revenue growth of over 15% annually in the medium term August 6, 2021
AA- while maintaining its healthy financial risk profile. Strong execution
track record along with healthy order book to revenue ratio of 4.5x
times is expected to support revenue growth. Operating income
reported a healthy growth of 20% in FY21 despite the lockdowns. This
was supported by execution of orders from the irrigation segment
which is less labour intensive work. Further, operating margin
remained at healthy levels of 20% and is expected to sustain in the
future as well.
Working capital cycle increased in FY21 largely due to high debtor
days of more than 140 days in FY21. However, this was largely from
KNRCL’s own ongoing HAM asset portfolio where the debt was
undrawn to keep the project cost low. This was a one-time impact and
debtor’s days are expected to normalize around 100 days going
forward. While the working capital requirements increased, reliance
on the debt remained low given the realization of funds from
monetization of toll project housed under KNR Walayar Tollways
Private Ltd. Financial risk profile of the company has remained
comfortable as reflected in lower TOL/ANW ratio of around 0.47
times as of March 31, 2021. KNRCL has entered in sale agreement for
sale of three of its HAM projects. Realization of sale proceeds in next
6-12 months with completion of these HAM assets this fiscal is
expected to keep the dependence on borrowing low and help
company sustain its healthy financial profile.
Megha CRISIL A1+ - - Strong and established market position in the EPC business with a January 11, 2022
track record in executing complex and large projects along with
improved diversity in its large order book size, which provides
healthy revenue visibility over the medium term. It also factors in the
company’s healthy operating efficiency and its minimal dependence
on external debt which has resulted in comfortable financial risk
profile. These strengths are partially offset by the investments made
by MEIL in unrelated businesses and group companies, susceptibility
to intense competition and cyclicality in the infrastructure and
construction industry and large working capital requirement.
PNC CARE A1+ CARE AA Stable Sustained growth in its operations over the past five years at a CAGR December 7, 2021
of 30% and its robust execution abilities amid the challenges from
second wave of Covid-19 pandemic, underscores its ability to win and
simultaneously execute large road projects. Around 64% of the order-
book of the company is from NHAI thereby precluding counterparty
risk. The ratings are also supported by PIL’s strong liquidity position
which is expected to enable the company to mobilize new work sites
without over-reliance on debt as the company executes a larger order
book, amid committed equity investments in ongoing HAM projects.
The above rating strengths, however, continue to remain constrained
by moderate level of financial support towards few SPVs in which PIL
has majority stake or substantial minority stake.
Source: Credit rating agencies, company, HSIE
Page | 33
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
About 1,820 projects have been identified, which would be implemented in 2020-25.
The total Capex for these projects by the Centre is estimated at INR 13.8trn from fiscals
We remain positive on infra 2020 to 2025. The projects include the construction of new expressways such as Delhi–
players with strong balance Mumbai Expressway, Bengaluru–Chennai Expressway, etc. Several projects being
sheet and funding lines. implemented include four-laning/ two-laning or widening of existing highways.
Page | 34
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 36
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
The ministry of roads, transport and highways (MORTH) has been the biggest
beneficiary of CRIF funds, holding 50% share of CRIF budget capital outlays. CRIF
allocation can be levered 3-4x to raise incremental funds for the NHAI program. NIP
program also stands to benefit as concerns on funding will recede. Though allocation
will only improve if fuel volume recovers and crude price cools off and remains at
lower level. Any increase in crude prices may result in further rollback of cess. This is
directionally positive for the sector, and any further fiscal stimulus will be the icing on
the cake.
Page | 37
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Companies Section
Key financials of companies based on the net worth
Net worth HAM orders won
(INR mn) FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 (INR mn) FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21
Companies <INR 5bn 59,105 62,362 61,068 59,852 Companies <INR 5bn 1,83,258 74,451 1,22,614 2,45,551
5bn <Companies< INR 10bn 54,707 63,104 84,762 36,175 5bn <Companies< INR 10bn 87,360 18,097 34,356 83,452
10bn <Companies< INR 15bn 26,153 35,099 10,584 46,634 10bn <Companies< INR 15bn 55,956 14,976 - 76,527
15bn <Companies< INR 20bn 68,201 33,526 64,767 55,808 15bn <Companies< INR 20bn 1,30,534 18,373 - 40,278
20bn <Companies< INR 25bn 24,570 63,273 24,586 22,095 20bn <Companies< INR 25bn 1,34,727 33,034 19,156 67,115
Companies > INR 25bn 1,81,669 2,49,427 3,59,665 4,31,833 Companies > INR 25bn 67,130 12,017 78,997 3,26,100
Total 4,14,405 5,06,792 6,05,432 6,52,396 Total 6,58,964 1,70,948 2,55,124 8,39,024
Source: VCC Edge, HSIE Research Source: VCC Edge, HSIE Research
Page | 38
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 39
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Coverage Companies
SOTP: Valuation of coverage companies
Infra/EPC Ahluwalia Ashoka DBL GR Infra HG Infra IRB ITDC
Standalone (A) 527 108 211 1,868 - - 126
BOT 15 - 158 - 856 121 -
EPC - - - - - 146 -
HAM - 32 - 398 124 -
INVIT - - - - - 8 -
Real Estate - - - - - 9 -
Sub-Total (B) 15 32 158 398 980 284 -
SOTP (A+B) 542 140 369 2,266 980 284 126
CMP 427 77 235 1,364 554 242 94
Upside 27% 83% 57% 66% 77% 17% 35%
Source: HSIE Research
Larsen &
Capital Goods ABB Cummins Kalpataru Power KEC International Siemens
Toubro
Standalone (A) 2,420 1,191 372 375 1,308 2,599
Subsidiaries (B) - 310 99 - 827 187
SOTP (A+B) 2,420 1,503 471 375 2,135 2,882
CMP 2,870 1,202 361 401 1,881 2,876
Upside -16% 25% 30% -7% 14% 0%
Source: HSIE Research
Page | 40
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Mcap Adj. EPS (INR/sh) P/E (x) EV/EBITDA (x) ROE (%)
CMP TP RECO
Core EPC (INR
(INR) (INR) FY22 FY23E FY24E FY22 FY23E FY24E FY22 FY23E FY24E FY22 FY23E FY24E
Bn)
G R Infraprojects 132 1,364 2,266 BUY 69.4 82.7 103.7 17.9 13.1 9.4 11.5 7.9 6.1 16.9 16.6 17.1
Dilip Buildcon 34 235 369 BUY (9.0) 11.2 17.6 (8.5) 6.9 4.4 5.6 3.4 3.1 (3.2) 3.7 5.6
PNC Infratech 65 252 407 BUY 19.0 20.9 24.1 10.9 9.9 8.6 6.3 6.0 5.2 15.6 14.9 15.0
KNR
70 251 350 BUY 12.8 14.7 17.2 16.5 14.3 12.2 8.5 8.5 7.3 17.5 17.5 17.9
Constructions
IRB Infra
146 242 284 ADD 6.0 9.7 11.7 40.5 24.9 20.8 10.4 9.6 9.1 3.7 4.6 5.2
Developers
NCC 40 66 108 BUY 5.7 8.8 12.0 11.6 7.5 5.5 4.7 4.2 3.6 6.2 8.9 11.0
HG Infra
36 554 980 BUY 52.0 59.8 61.1 9.6 8.3 8.2 6.0 5.4 5.0 28.3 25.0 20.4
Engineering
Ashoka Buildcon 22 77 140 BUY 14.6 10.6 12.0 1.5 2.0 1.8 2.0 1.1 0.8 14.3 10.4 10.3
Ahluwalia
29 427 542 BUY 23.2 34.2 40.5 17.8 12.0 10.2 9.1 6.6 5.5 16.2 20.1 19.6
Contracts
JMC Projects 15 87 142 BUY 6.5 10.8 12.9 13.4 8.1 6.8 5.2 4.4 3.5 11.5 18.7 18.8
PSP Projects 21 572 705 BUY 45.1 43.8 54.2 12.7 13.1 10.6 7.7 8.2 6.4 26.6 21.4 22.5
ITD Cementation 16 94 114 BUY 4.0 7.8 11.4 23.4 12.0 8.2 5.6 4.8 3.7 6.2 11.0 14.1
J. Kumar
23 300 324 ADD 27.2 33.7 40.4 11.0 8.9 7.4 4.8 4.1 3.2 10.4 11.6 12.4
Infraprojects
Wt. Average 19.0 14.0 11.3 8.3 7.0 6.0 12.3 13.0 13.4
Source: Company, HSIE Research; *Consolidated
Page | 41
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 42
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
The BPC shall be inflation-indexed via a price index multiple (PIM), which is the
weighted average of wholesale price index (WPI) and consumer price index (CPI)
in the ratio of 7:3.
The authority shall pay the balance 60% of the BPC to the concessionaire in the
form of semi-annual annuity payments. Along with the inflation-indexed annuity
payments, the authority pays interest on the reducing the BPC amount. Interest
rate is linked to average of one-year marginal cost of fund-based lending rate
(MCLR) of top-5 scheduled commercial banks along with a spread of 125 bps. This
provides a natural hedge between the annuity payments and the interest costs. The
annuities shall commence within 15 days after the expiry of 180 days from COD.
Since the interest annuities and the interest on debt both are linked with MCLR,
the interest rate risk is mitigated to a great extent. Also, lending rates are at an all-
time low, though inching up now, owing to RBI repo rate hikes.
Concessionaire shall be responsible for maintaining the project till the end of the
concession period. The authority shall make O&M payments to the concessionaire
along with annuity payments. These payouts are also inflation linked.
Page | 43
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Key risks
Order Roads Non-roads
book (%) (%) The slowdown in NHAI awarding
Ashoka 57.58 42.42
We expect Bharatmala Pariyojna-1 (BM1) to get awarded by FY23/24 and in the absence
DBL 45.15 54.85
of any announcement on BM2, there are concerns on roads awards longevity. This may
GR Infra 88.00 12.00
lead to growth rate moderation for companies with a single segment as roads.
HG Infra 100.00 0.00
KNR 75.44 24.56 Living in the comfort zone, diversification necessary
PNC 44.00 56.00
Source: Companies
With the level of road awards, some of the developers in the coverage universe have
achieved larger size and scale. Growing beyond the INR 50-60bn revenue per annum
will be a serious challenge with just the road segment as the only focused segment.
Companies need to walk out of the comfort zone and align the capabilities, in line with
the NIP program. They need to focus on railways, water, metro, power EPC, etc. DBL
and PNC are there in terms of diversification with roads now being about 45.15% and
44% respectively, while HG infra has 100% of its order book as road projects and
Ashoka/GR Infra/KNR have 57.58/88/75.44% of OB as road projects.
Challenges so far
Delayed dispute resolution
Need for rapid asset monetisation
Need for IT-based infrastructure maintenance and accident monitoring
Page | 44
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Vision 2025
Infrastructure is an enabler for growth. To achieve the target of $ 5trn economy by 2025
and meet the aspirations of the citizens of India, creating new and upgrading existing
infrastructure will be important factors in raising India’s competitiveness. We expect
the infrastructure sector to grow in the next five years and the growth to be supported
by the following:
Post clean-up of the balance sheet, the lending institutions will be better positioned
to provide credit to corporates.
Post deleveraging their balance sheets, corporates will be better positioned to
unlock the next phase of growth and avail fresh credit lines on better terms and
conditions.
Development of overall 60,000 kms of NHs, including 2,500/9,000/2,000 kms of
expressway/economic corridors/coastal and port connectivity, bypasses for 45
towns and enhanced connectivity for 100 tourist destinations.
Improved connectivity to key airports, ports, railway stations, military, other
strategic installations, rail, intercity bus, metro, ferry terminals and improved
access to all remote areas after the completion of Bharatmala Phase-I.
Significant share of private sector in NHs.
Improved PPP models and agreements with more balanced risk-reward sharing.
Long-term financing through credit-enhanced project bonds, innovative models of
financing–NIIF-led project development, value capture financing, green highways
or plantation-surrounding roads to result in lesser pollution.
Higher penetration of advanced technology in traffic management, safety and
security.
Vision 2030
The Bharatmala Phase-I, envisaged to construction a total of 34,800 kms (including
10,000 kms currently under-construction which are incomplete under NHDP) by
December 2022. Until FY22, only 22% of the target has been achieved. Hence, the
deadline now stands extended until FY27, with the NHAI awarding all the projects
under BMP-I by FY24.
About 10,000km of old NHDP project continue to get implemented as and when
required, while 15,000/24,800KM of BM-1 projects must have got awarded till now,
so balance c.10,000km and BM-2A c.8,000km (i.e. a total of c.18,000km) would be
awarded by 2027.
BMP-IIA is being envisaged covering c.8,000km and INR 3.68trn project cost.
Overall balance projects cost would be awarded INR 7.7trn. This will increase as
more phases of BM-2 get implemented. DPRs are being prepared and project by
project approvals will be taken. This is mostly covering the greenfield
expressways.
Page | 45
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Cost escalation of BM-I is largely on account of the following (1) estimates being
old and largely drawn on per lane cost when the earlier programmes got subsumed
into BM-1; (2) earlier projects were planned for 4/6 lanes, the design changed to 6/8
which led to increased costs and changes to structures on roads; (3) multiple
greenfield expressways getting into drawing board and implementation wherein
number of lanes increased albeit reduction in land cost, but overall cost increased;
(4) delays in land acquisitions, time and cost overruns, higher-than-expected
inflation added to costs; (5) land costs are still under control as greenfield
expressways land is cheaper.
The Capex will continue despite concerns on fuel cess collections, inflation, etc.
Government intent on growth is clear and it wants to implement this program.
New highway addition will keep happening beyond 2027 as well as more phases
of BM-2 may get added.
With abundant liquidity, financial closure is taking place for even smaller players.
Page | 46
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 47
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Key Ratios
Particulars FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23E FY24E
PROFITABILITY (%)
GPM 24.9 23.4 23.1 20.2 19.9 18.3 21.7 22.0
EBITDA Margin 12.1 13.3 12.3 8.1 7.8 9.5 11.9 12.2
EBIT Margin 10.4 11.8 10.8 6.4 6.2 8.3 10.7 11.0
APAT Margin 7.7 7.0 6.7 3.4 3.9 5.8 7.3 7.6
RoE 23.1 20.1 17.3 8.4 9.2 16.2 20.1 19.6
Core RoCE 19.3 21.0 18.3 10.4 12.3 27.7 24.0 23.0
RoCE 16.6 19.4 15.6 9.3 10.1 16.5 19.4 18.7
EFFICIENCY
Tax Rate (%) 28.8 33.9 34.6 33.3 25.4 25.5 26.0 26.0
Asset Turnover (x) 3.2 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.4 4.2 4.6 4.9
Inventory (days) 63 42 46 43 55 33 48 48
Debtors (days) 116 125 135 116 80 60 80 80
Cash FDR 10 14 12 15 17 - 2 3
Payables (days) 90 84 89 101 127 84 80 74
Cash Conversion Cycle (days) 100 97 104 72 24 9 50 58
Other Current Assets (days) 17 5 10 63 87 60 53 54
Other Current Liab (days) 56 42 40 52 49 35 41 41
Net Working Capital Cycle (Days) 61 60 74 84 62 33 62 71
Debt/EBITDA (x) 0.5 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1
Net D/E (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.4) (0.4) (0.2) (0.2)
Interest Coverage 55.7 7.7 9.8 3.5 2.9 5.1 6.9 7.4
PER SHARE DATA
EPS (INR/sh) 16.4 17.3 17.5 9.6 11.5 23.2 34.2 40.5
CEPS (INR/sh) 20.0 21.1 21.6 14.4 16.1 28.2 39.9 46.6
DPS (INR/sh) - - 0.4 0.4 - 0.7 0.7 0.7
BV (INR/sh) 79 96 110 120 131 155 187 226
VALUATION
P/E 27.4 26.1 25.7 46.8 39.1 19.4 13.2 11.1
P/BV 5.7 4.7 4.1 3.8 3.4 2.9 2.4 2.0
EV/EBITDA 17.3 13.6 13.5 19.0 17.6 10.1 7.5 6.3
OCF/EV (%) 6.5 2.7 2.9 3.8 9.6 2.5 (0.4) 5.0
FCF/EV (%) 5.8 2.1 1.9 2.5 8.3 5.6 (5.9) 3.6
FCFE/Market Cap (%) 4.0 (0.2) 2.6 1.3 5.7 2.8 (6.2) 1.5
Dividend Yield (%) - - 8% 8% 0% 16% 16% 16%
Source: Company, HSIE Research
Page | 48
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 49
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 50
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 51
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Key Ratios
Particulars FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23E FY24E
PROFITABILITY (%)
GPM 24.0 21.1 21.2 20.8 20.0 13.3 17.2 17.5
EBITDA Margin 17.8 16.7 17.1 16.3 15.0 8.4 12.0 12.5
EBIT Margin 13.2 13.1 13.5 11.5 10.5 4.0 7.9 8.8
APAT Margin 7.2 8.3 8.4 4.7 3.5 (1.5) 1.7 2.5
RoE 24.8 29.5 26.9 12.2 8.5 (3.2) 3.7 5.6
Core RoCE 18.1 20.5 20.7 12.4 10.3 4.4 10.5 13.4
RoCE 18.2 19.7 18.1 10.8 8.5 3.5 6.7 7.5
EFFICIENCY
Tax Rate (%) (0) 7 5 26 36.7 29.9 28.0 26.0
Asset Turnover (x) 2.1 2.7 2.7 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.2 2.2
Inventory (days) 122 97 101 108 121 138 80 80
Debtors (days) 74 66 57 51 44 42 58 58
Loans & Advances (days) 18 11 18 22 24 8 22 22
Other Current Assets (days) 57 55 66 66 58 68 60 60
Payables (days) 65 72 71 68 83 91 103 111
Other Current Liabilities & Provns (days) 62 46 45 60 36 37 30 26
NWC Cycle (days) 143 111 127 120 129 129 88 84
Debt/EBITDA (x) 2.9 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.5 4.5 3.0 2.8
Net D/E 1.3 1.1 1.1 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6
Interest Coverage 1.6 2.1 2.3 1.7 1.6 0.6 1.3 1.5
PER SHARE DATA 2.8 2.2 2.2 2.0 2.3 4.1 2.4 2.2
EPS (INR/sh) 24.7 43.5 52.0 28.5 21.8 (9.0) 11.2 17.6
CEPS (INR/sh) 40.3 62.3 73.9 57.5 49.7 17.9 37.7 43.8
DPS (INR/sh) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
BV (INR/sh) 126.7 168.0 219.2 246.6 267.9 296.6 308.1 325.7
VALUATION
P/E 10.1 5.8 4.8 8.8 11.5 (27.7) 22.4 14.2
P/BV 2.0 1.5 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8
EV/EBITDA 6.9 4.9 4.4 4.4 4.8 8.9 5.6 5.1
EV/Net Revenues 1.2 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6
OCF/EV (%) 10.7 6.8 14.1 29.2 10.7 (0.2) 31.0 14.8
FCF/EV (%) 2.7 (0.1) 5.7 24.3 6.2 (2.2) 26.6 11.6
FCFE/Market Cap (%) (6.9) 2.8 8.4 17.8 (1.4) (29.4) 32.0 7.5
Dividend Yield (%) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
Source: Company, HSIE Research
Page | 52
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 53
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Key Ratios
Particulars FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23E FY24E
PROFITABILITY (%)
GPM 22.4 25.2 28.4 28.8 23.5 23.7 25.4 25.3
EBITDA Margin 17.0 18.0 20.0 19.3 15.6 14.6 16.5 17.0
EBIT Margin 15.0 15.4 17.2 16.1 12.4 11.0 13.4 14.0
APAT Margin 12.3 12.1 11.2 9.7 8.2 8.6 9.0 9.6
RoE 46.9 28.2 30.0 23.1 17.9 16.9 16.6 17.1
Core RoCE 42.5 25.3 27.8 26.1 17.1 15.2 23.6 26.6
RoCE 28.4 19.8 20.1 16.9 13.5 13.9 13.0 13.9
EFFICIENCY
Tax Rate (%) 11.3 16.9 28.3 31.3 27.1 24.1 26.1 26.1
Asset Turnover (x) 8.3 5.0 5.5 5.7 5.2 5.2 5.8 6.6
Inventory (days) 30 54 45 47 55 48 52 52
Debtors (days) 61 77 65 50 47 34 50 50
Payables (days) 26 38 38 34 38 34 35 35
Cash Conversion Cycle (days) 65 93 72 63 64 48 67 66
Other Current Assets (days) 53 61 74 64 71 89 52 50
Other Current Liab (days) 66 54 57 40 32 23 36 35
Net Working Capital Cycle (Days) 52 101 90 87 103 114 83 81
Debt/EBITDA (x) 0.7 1.1 1.1 0.9 1.2 1.0 1.0 0.8
Net D/E (0.0) 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2
Interest Coverage 8.9 7.6 8.0 6.6 6.3 6.7 10.8 12.4
PER SHARE DATA
EPS (INR/sh) 40.5 38.9 57.2 59.3 59.6 69.4 82.7 103.7
CEPS (INR/sh) 47.1 47.2 71.5 78.6 83.1 98.6 112.0 135.4
DPS (INR/sh) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
BV (INR/sh) 117 159 221 292 373 451 546 666
VALUATION
P/E 34.7 36.1 24.6 23.7 23.6 20.2 17.0 13.5
Core P/E 31.4 32.7 22.2 21.4 21.3 18.3 15.3 12.2
P/BV 12.0 8.8 6.4 4.8 3.8 3.1 2.6 2.1
EV/EBITDA 25.2 25.3 14.7 12.4 13.4 12.9 10.0 8.4
OCF/EV (%) 2.8 (0.0) 4.5 5.9 2.8 3.8 10.6 7.1
FCF/EV (%) 2.9 (2.0) 1.3 3.9 (0.6) 0.9 8.4 4.8
FCFE/Market Cap (%) 2.8 (1.2) 3.4 3.7 0.5 (1.8) 10.8 3.6
Dividend Yield (%) - - - - - - - -
Source: Company, HSIE Research
Page | 54
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 55
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 56
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 57
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Key Ratios
Particulars FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23E FY24E
PROFITABILITY (%)
GPM 60.9 57.9 53.5 52.5 59.2 59.0 53.9 53.0
EBITDA Margin 52.1 47.1 43.8 43.4 47.4 48.2 45.0 43.5
EBIT Margin 37.5 37.5 35.7 36.5 36.4 36.4 33.1 32.0
APAT Margin 12.0 13.9 12.7 9.7 2.2 6.2 8.6 9.3
RoE 13.9 14.5 14.2 10.2 1.7 3.7 4.6 5.2
RoIC 4.4 3.8 3.9 5.4 4.8 4.9 4.9 4.8
RoCE 4.4 3.8 4.0 5.0 3.7 4.6 4.1 4.1
EFFICIENCY
Tax Rate (%) 27.3 37.2 42.3 38.1 33.8 24.3 25.2 31.5
Fixed Asset Turnover (x) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3
Inventory (days) 22.0 31.2 24.1 17.7 22.2 20.0 17.9 16.5
Debtors (days) 4.4 8.5 6.2 23.5 23.4 62.5 21.5 21.0
Other Current Assets (days) 174.7 60.6 78.1 77.9 149.9 167.9 147.4 150.1
Current Liab (days) 73.8 123.8 251.8 571.6 250.6 104.1 202.3 186.2
Provision (days) 0.5 0.6 2.2 0.7 0.9 3.7 0.7 0.6
Cash Conversion Cycle (days) 126.7 (24.1) (145.7) (453.3) (55.9) 142.4 (16.2) 0.8
Debt/EBITDA (x) 4.6 5.2 5.6 2.9 7.2 5.8 5.4 5.2
Net D/E 2.4 2.2 2.4 0.9 2.2 1.2 1.1 1.1
Interest Coverage 1.6 2.2 2.1 1.6 1.1 1.1 1.5 1.6
PER SHARE DATA
EPS (INR/sh) 11.6 13.1 14.1 11.0 1.9 6.0 9.7 11.7
CEPS (INR/sh) 25.8 22.1 23.0 18.7 11.6 17.3 23.2 26.1
DPS (INR/sh) 4.1 5.2 4.8 4.1 0.7 1.1 2.8 2.3
BV (INR/sh) 87.3 94.3 104.6 110.7 114.3 208.1 218.0 227.0
VALUATION
P/E 23.0 20.3 19.0 24.3 137.7 44.6 27.5 22.9
P/BV 3.1 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.3 1.3 1.2 1.2
EV/EBITDA 9.4 10.6 10.6 7.5 12.6 11.0 10.1 9.6
EV/Revenues 4.9 5.0 4.6 3.3 6.0 5.3 4.5 4.2
OCF/EV (%) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1
FCF/EV (%) 1.5 (6.4) (4.8) (6.3) (21.9) 2.9 8.7 5.3
FCFE/Market Cap (%) 1.9 (6.7) 0.2 (0.6) 4.8 (19.4) 11.1 4.8
Dividend Yield (%) 1.5 2.0 1.8 1.5 0.2 0.4 1.1 0.9
Source: Company, HSIE Research
Page | 58
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 59
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 60
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 61
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Key Ratios
Particulars FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23E FY24E
PROFITABILITY (%)
GPM 39.8 41.1 38.3 38.8 37.3 35.7 35.9 35.5
EBITDA Margin 15.6 15.7 15.7 14.4 12.1 14.3 14.2 14.0
EBIT Margin 12.1 12.1 12.0 10.2 6.5 10.1 10.5 10.6
APAT Margin 6.4 6.5 6.4 6.2 2.5 5.8 6.3 6.6
RoE 7.7 9.2 11.1 10.5 3.4 10.4 11.6 12.4
Core RoCE 13.7 14.4 17.1 14.3 7.8 16.9 18.4 19.0
RoCE 12.7 14.4 17.1 14.3 7.8 16.9 18.4 19.0
EFFICIENCY
Tax Rate (%) 32.9 33.9 34.0 21.3 27.8 27.2 25.5 26.0
Asset Turnover (x) 2.6 2.3 2.6 2.4 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.7
Inventory (days) 146 145 120 38 41 38 37 37
Debtors (days) 111 94 65 79 88 92 79 79
Payables (days) 41 59 40 57 65 59 58 58
Cash Conversion Cycle (days) 216 180 146 61 64 70 59 59
Loans & Advances (days) 15 14 4 8 9 4 8 8
Other Assets (days) 145 127 98 159 191 107 135 126
Other Liab (days) 168 163 105 84 106 88 94 94
NWC (days) 208 159 144 144 158 93 108 98
Debt/EBITDA (x) 1.7 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.7 0.9 0.9 0.8
Net D/E 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 (0.1)
Interest Coverage 2.9 3.5 3.6 3.1 1.6 3.6 4.0 4.6
PER SHARE DATA
EPS (INR/sh) 13.5 17.5 23.4 24.3 8.4 27.2 33.7 40.4
CEPS (INR/sh) 20.9 27.2 36.9 41.0 27.4 46.6 53.6 61.5
DPS (INR/sh) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.2 1.0 2.2 2.2 2.2
BV (INR/sh) 183.8 199.4 220.4 242.0 249.4 275.8 306.2 344.4
VALUATION
P/E 24.6 18.9 14.2 13.7 39.3 12.2 9.8 8.2
P/BV 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0
EV/EBITDA 11.4 9.3 7.2 7.3 9.6 5.3 4.5 3.5
OCF/EV (%) (0.7) 8.8 2.6 8.3 12.3 11.5 17.4 19.8
FCF/EV (%) (5.6) (2.3) (0.9) 4.6 8.0 8.9 14.3 15.9
FCFE/Market Cap (%) (5.2) 0.2 (0.4) 0.7 (0.8) 5.5 10.3 10.3
Dividend Yield (%) 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.3 0.7 0.7 0.7
Source: Company, HSIE Research
Page | 62
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 63
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Key Ratios
Particulars FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23E FY24E
PROFITABILITY (%)
GPM 25.4 25.5 23.0 24.2 22.2 19.7 22.3 22.9
EBITDA Margin 9.1 10.3 10.4 11.1 9.0 7.9 8.8 9.2
EBIT Margin 6.6 7.7 8.0 7.9 5.1 4.7 6.2 6.4
APAT Margin 2.6 3.9 4.4 6.4 1.9 2.0 3.1 3.3
RoE 9.0 14.4 16.6 25.1 7.2 11.5 18.7 18.8
Core RoCE 9.5 12.7 13.9 16.9 9.6 11.5 15.0 16.2
RoCE 9.2 11.3 13.0 19.2 8.6 11.6 15.5 16.7
EFFICIENCY
Tax Rate (%) 29.0 26.8 24.6 19.3 30.4 26.8 25.2 25.2
Asset Turnover (x) 5.2 5.1 4.7 4.4 4.0 5.1 4.7 4.9
Inventory (days) 28 25 28 24 23 21 25 25
Debtors (days) 103 97 104 89 93 69 90 90
Payables (days) 117 110 132 114 130 103 100 100
Cash Conversion Cycle (days) 15 13 -0 -1 -14 -13 15 15
Other Current Assets (days) 128 148 152 142 150 128 102 103
Other Current Liab (days) 38 63 57 76 75 67 55 50
Net Working Capital Cycle (Days) 105 98 94 65 61 48 63 68
Debt/EBITDA (x) 3.0 2.6 2.2 2.0 2.4 2.3 1.8 1.5
Net D/E 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.5
Interest Coverage 1.8 2.5 2.7 2.3 1.7 2.1 2.6 2.7
PER SHARE DATA
EPS (INR/sh) 3.6 6.3 8.5 14.2 4.2 6.5 10.8 12.9
CEPS (INR/sh) 7.0 10.6 13.1 21.2 12.7 16.5 19.9 23.7
DPS (INR/sh) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
BV (INR/sh) 41 47 55 58 61 52 63 75
VALUATION
P/E 23.8 13.4 10.0 6.0 20.1 13.0 7.9 6.6
P/BV 2.1 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.6 1.4 1.1
EV/EBITDA 9.7 7.1 6.3 5.4 6.0 5.1 4.3 3.5
OCF/EV (%) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2
FCF/EV (%) 8.5 8.2 1.7 11.4 20.5 7.2 8.8 15.0
FCFE/Market Cap (%) (1.0) 12.5 (2.7) 14.4 15.0 13.4 0.8 7.1
Dividend Yield (%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Source: Company, HSIE Research
Page | 64
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 65
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Key Ratios
Particulars FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23E FY24E
PROFITABILITY (%)
GPM 20.3 25.7 35.1 39.6 35.8 32.9 34.1 33.9
EBITDA Margin 14.9 20.0 20.0 21.7 19.8 20.7 19.3 19.3
EBIT Margin 10.8 13.0 12.1 13.2 14.5 16.6 15.4 15.5
APAT Margin 8.9 8.4 10.7 10.5 9.3 11.0 11.6 11.6
RoE 16.9 15.8 17.8 15.5 14.4 17.5 17.5 17.9
Core RoCE 40.4 38.7 26.4 23.5 22.1 22.4 29.1 28.9
RoCE 16.1 14.7 16.8 15.9 16.3 17.5 15.8 15.6
EFFICIENCY
Tax Rate (%) 3.7 (1.4) 9.4 23.3 35.9 35.3 25.2 25.4
Asset Turnover (x) 2.4 2.4 2.1 1.9 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.3
Inventory (days) 14 13 16 20 20 25 16 15
Debtors (days) 39 44 40 77 117 95 70 70
Payables (days) 32 40 38 41 32 33 30 30
Cash Conversion Cycle (days) 21 18 18 57 104 87 56 56
Other Current Assets (days) 75 81 96 104 87 101 80 84
Other Current Liab (days) 98 66 60 97 107 85 83 72
Net Working Capital Cycle (Days) (3) 33 54 64 84 103 54 67
Debt/EBITDA (x) 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2
Net D/E 0.09 0.2 0.2 0.1 (0.1) (0.1) (0.0) (0.0)
Interest Coverage 7.6 10.9 8.9 6.2 8.0 19.8 18.2 18.4
PER SHARE DATA
EPS (INR/sh) 4.9 5.8 8.1 8.4 9.0 12.8 14.7 17.2
CEPS (INR/sh) 7.2 10.5 14.1 15.2 14.1 17.6 19.7 22.8
DPS (INR/sh) 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.5
BV (INR/sh) 32 41 50 58 66 80 98 115
VALUATION
P/E 53.0 45.1 31.9 31.0 29.0 20.4 17.7 15.1
P/BV 8.2 6.3 5.2 4.5 3.9 3.3 2.7 2.3
EV/EBITDA 32.2 19.4 17.7 15.4 13.4 10.5 10.5 9.0
OCF/EV (%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
FCF/EV (%) 2.4 (0.6) 0.6 2.5 2.8 0.7 4.3 3.7
FCFE/Market Cap (%) 2.5 0.2 0.6 1.5 (1.0) 0.2 4.2 3.5
Dividend Yield (%) 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2
Source: Company, HSIE Research
Page | 66
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 67
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Key Ratios
Particulars FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23E FY24E
PROFITABILITY (%)
GPM 15.3 18.1 17.8 21.0 19.1 16.7 17.5 18.2
EBITDA Margin 8.7 10.4 11.8 12.5 11.8 10.0 10.4 11.1
EBIT Margin 7.3 8.8 10.5 10.4 9.4 8.2 8.9 9.7
APAT Margin 3.5 4.2 5.2 5.0 3.6 3.5 4.3 5.3
RoE 8.2 8.1 13.8 8.4 5.0 6.2 8.9 11.0
Core RoCE 12.6 13.0 15.8 13.5 8.6 10.4 11.4 12.5
RoCE 11.3 10.6 12.7 11.9 8.6 11.7 11.1 12.4
EFFICIENCY
Tax Rate (%) 15.6 22.0 36.0 15.7 22.8 25.5 25.2 25.2
Asset Turnover (x) 5.8 4.6 5.7 3.8 3.1 3.7 4.3 4.6
Inventory (days) 71 83 15 23 27 29 22 23
Debtors (days) 109 170 92 107 127 92 100 100
Other Current assets (days) 134 133 182 275 308 257 209 198
Payables (days) 133 166 132 175 186 157 135 125
Other Current liab & provns (days) 45 85 57 77 90 89 57 53
Cash Conversion Cycle (days) 136 134 100 153 186 132 139 143
Debt/EBITDA (x) 2.3 1.7 1.4 1.9 2.1 1.3 1.4 1.1
Net D/E 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.2
Interest Coverage 1.4 1.7 2.8 1.6 1.5 1.8 2.3 2.9
PER SHARE DATA
EPS (INR/sh) 5.0 5.1 10.2 6.8 4.3 5.7 8.8 12.0
CEPS (INR/sh) 6.1 6.6 11.7 9.2 7.1 11.0 11.8 15.0
DPS (INR/sh) 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
BV (INR/sh) 61.9 69.6 78.0 83.7 88.0 95.2 102.6 114.1
VALUATION
P/E 13.4 12.9 6.5 9.7 15.5 11.7 7.5 5.5
P/BV 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6
EV/EBITDA 7.5 6.8 4.0 5.5 6.3 4.8 4.2 3.6
EV/Revenues 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4
OCF/EV (%) 3.8 8.5 6.0 11.3 12.8 18.2 5.3 9.5
FCF/EV (%) 1.3 2.6 (2.5) 9.7 10.0 13.8 0.4 4.3
FCFE/Market Cap (%) 1.9 3.4 (3.6) 13.6 13.3 16.2 0.6 6.0
Dividend Yield (%) 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
Source: Company, HSIE Research
Page | 68
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 69
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 70
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 71
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Key Ratios
Particulars FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23E FY24E
PROFITABILITY (%)
GPM 24.0 18.8 19.4 17.6 16.2 20.4 17.0 18.5
EBITDA Margin 16.4 13.7 14.3 12.7 10.9 14.7 12.5 13.0
EBIT Margin 14.5 12.2 11.9 11.0 8.8 12.8 10.5 11.2
APAT Margin 10.4 8.7 8.6 8.6 6.7 9.3 7.7 7.9
RoE 48.2 31.0 26.8 31.2 16.8 26.6 21.4 22.5
Core RoCE 58.0 30.6 25.8 30.1 17.4 47.4 24.7 27.5
RoCE 26.8 21.4 23.4 25.8 15.3 23.5 19.0 20.3
EFFICIENCY
Tax Rate (%) 35.3 36.1 34.9 25.9 25.7 25.9 25.2 25.2
Asset Turnover (x) 4.9 6.1 6.2 7.5 5.3 6.2 6.1 6.4
Inventory (days) 3 17 26 24 26 17 26 26
Unbilled Revenue (days) - - 8 30 26 - 16 13
Retention (days) 17 20 17 16 20 - 17 17
Debtors (days) 49 58 50 55 65 65 60 60
Payables (days) 63 61 49 48 71 54 64 62
Cash Conversion Cycle (days) -12 14 27 30 20 28 22 24
Cash Margin/FDR 62 81 65 37 49 0 33 29
Advances from customers 42 60 50 44 27 0 13 7
Other Current Assets (days) 9 6 18 10 12 48 14 13
Other Current Liab (days) 22 11 12 8 9 47 6 5
Net Working Capital Cycle (Days) 12 51 73 72 90 30 83 82
Debt/EBITDA (x) 1.0 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.7 0.5
Net D/E 0.2 (0.2) 0.0 0.1 0.0 (0.1) 0.1 0.0
Interest Coverage 7.7 10.2 13.6 11.2 7.4 8.5 7.5 7.1
PER SHARE DATA
EPS (INR/sh) 14.5 17.6 25.1 35.9 23.2 45.1 43.8 54.2
CEPS (INR/sh) 17.1 20.7 31.8 43.3 30.3 54.0 54.8 67.1
DPS (INR/sh) 0.0 3.0 6.0 12.1 0.0 7.3 7.9 9.8
BV (INR/sh) 37 84 103 127 149 190 218 263
VALUATION
P/E 41.4 33.9 23.9 16.7 25.8 13.3 13.6 11.0
P/BV 16.1 7.1 5.8 4.7 4.0 3.1 2.7 2.3
EV/EBITDA 26.5 21.0 14.5 11.5 16.1 8.0 8.6 6.7
OCF/EV (%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1
FCF/EV (%) (0.3) 1.1 (0.5) (0.6) (0.4) 3.6 4.0 6.2
FCFE/Market Cap (%) 0.6 (1.2) (0.5) 1.3 (0.5) 2.2 6.4 4.4
Dividend Yield (%) 0.0 0.5 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.2 1.3 1.6
Source: Company, HSIE Research
Page | 72
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 73
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 74
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 75
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 76
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 77
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Key Ratios
Particulars FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23E FY24E
PROFITABILITY (%)
GPM 29.9 28.2 26.2 25.3 27.7 25.2 24.2 23.9
EBITDA Margin 10.8 11.0 10.9 10.9 10.5 9.2 8.7 9.4
EBIT Margin 9.2 9.7 9.7 9.5 9.0 7.7 7.1 7.9
APAT Margin 5.5 5.6 5.6 6.1 6.5 5.3 4.7 5.3
RoE 11.5 12.3 13.6 14.4 13.4 9.2 7.8 9.0
Core RoCE 14.0 14.5 14.7 14.3 11.5 6.9 7.8 9.5
RoCE 11.5 11.8 13.0 13.7 11.4 7.7 7.0 8.7
EFFICIENCY
Tax Rate (%) 33.2 35.5 35.7 31.6 32.6 40.9 27.7 27.7
Asset Turnover (x) 8 9 10 9 8 6 7 7
Inventory (days) 34 31 32 34 28 32 41 41
Debtors (days) 212 215 173 167 183 167 180 180
Other Current Assets (days) 98 126 147 158 157 213.75 166 153
Payables (days) 144 149 138 133 138 118 114 116
Other Current Liab (days) 81 78 77 76 65 64 75 66
Net Working Capital Cycle (Days) 119 145 137 151 166 231 199 193
Debt/EBITDA (x) 1.0 1.2 0.8 1.6 1.6 3.3 1.8 1.4
Net D/E 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2
Interest Coverage 4.6 5.4 5.8 4.5 6.4 4.4 4.7 5.9
PER SHARE DATA
EPS (INR/sh) 18.1 21.6 27.0 32.3 33.3 25.4 23.5 29.6
CEPS (INR/sh) 23.3 26.8 32.7 39.7 41.0 32.4 31.7 38.1
DPS (INR/sh) 2.0 2.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
BV (INR/sh) 166.5 186.0 211.7 237.4 259.4 292.9 313.7 340.6
VALUATION
P/E 20.6 17.2 13.8 11.5 11.2 14.7 15.8 12.6
P/BV 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1
EV/EBITDA 11.1 9.9 7.8 7.6 8.1 10.6 9.8 8.2
OCF/EV (%) 5.5 1.7 8.7 3.7 3.0 0.7 12.3 3.9
FCF/EV (%) 4.5 - 0.0 6.7 1.1 1.4 0.1 11.3 3.0
FCFE/Market Cap (%) 6.5 1.4 5.1 13.5 1.1 7.5 - 4.7 1.6
Dividend Yield (%) 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
Source: Company, HSIE Research
Page | 78
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 79
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Key Ratios
Particulars FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23E FY24E
PROFITABILITY (%)
GPM 30.7 27.7 26.2 29.6 26.7 23.9 25.2 26.5
EBITDA Margin 9.5 10.0 10.5 10.3 8.7 6.6 6.4 9.4
EBIT Margin 8.0 8.9 9.4 9.1 7.5 5.4 5.3 8.3
APAT Margin 3.6 4.6 4.4 4.7 4.2 2.4 2.0 4.3
RoE 21.2 25.7 21.9 21.6 18.0 9.5 7.9 16.9
Core RoCE 9.8 12.6 13.2 14.3 12.2 9.3 7.2 11.7
RoCE 9.8 12.0 12.2 13.4 11.4 7.7 6.4 10.5
EFFICIENCY
Tax Rate (%) 34.2 33.3 34.6 28.4 26.9 15.2 28.6 26.8
Asset Turnover (x) 5.5 6.3 6.3 5.8 5.9 5.5 5.6 5.6
Inventory (days) 17 23 21 24 23 28 31 24
Debtors (days) 180 183 162 166 150 136 135 135
Other Current Assets (days) 105 107 145 142 151 193 190 191
Payables (days) 166 162 199 193 195 194 193 189
Other Current Liab (days) 4 3 2 2 2 2 2 2
Net Working Capital Cycle (Days) 130 147 127 136 127 160 162 159
Debt/EBITDA (x) 3.6 3.8 2.6 2.8 3.0 5.6 5.7 3.5
Net D/E 1.7 1.8 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.3 1.4 1.2
Interest Coverage 2.7 3.6 3.3 3.5 3.8 2.4 2.0 3.2
PER SHARE DATA
EPS (INR/sh) 11.9 17.9 18.9 22.0 21.5 12.9 11.4 26.8
CEPS (INR/sh) 16.9 22.2 23.5 27.7 27.4 19.1 17.8 33.8
DPS (INR/sh) 1.6 2.4 2.7 3.4 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0
BV (INR/sh) 61.7 77.7 94.7 108.8 130.7 140.8 147.4 170.6
VALUATION
P/E 37.5 24.8 23.5 20.2 20.7 34.4 38.9 16.6
P/BV 7.2 5.7 4.7 4.1 3.4 3.2 3.0 2.6
EV/EBITDA 17.3 14.9 12.3 11.9 12.8 18.0 17.5 10.9
OCF/EV (%) 11.7 4.4 1.4 0.6 5.8 -1.7 1.7 5.0
FCF/EV (%) 11.2 3.5 0.6 -0.8 5.0 -2.6 0.7 3.6
FCFE/Market Cap (%) 4.1 1.3 2.8 2.7 3.7 3.9 4.0 4.8
Dividend Yield (%) 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7
Source: Company, HSIE Research
Page | 80
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 81
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 82
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Page | 83
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Key Ratios
Particulars FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22E FY23E FY24E
PROFITABILITY (%)
GPM 33.3 32.5 32.6 36.0 31.5 32.3 32.5 32.7
EBITDA Margin 9.5 10.3 11.6 10.0 11.3 11.2 13.2 13.6
EBIT Margin 7.8 8.8 10.1 7.5 9.5 9.8 12.0 12.5
APAT Margin 6.3 7.0 8.6 7.7 8.2 8.5 10.1 10.2
RoE 9.5 11.2 12.9 8.2 10.7 11.6 14.5 16.3
Core RoCE 18.6 18.7 21.0 14.7 21.8 21.5 26.8 30.0
RoCE 9.6 11.2 13.0 8.4 10.9 11.8 14.7 16.4
EFFICIENCY
Tax Rate (%) 32.1 35.7 34.5 25.8 25.0 26.0 26.0 26.0
Asset Turnover (x) 3.4 3.7 3.6 2.7 3.4 3.7 4.1 4.8
Inventory (days) 34 33 31 41 34 33 34 34
Debtors (days) 113 105 107 116 109 106 113 113
Payables (days) 88 87 92 106 86 82 84 84
Cash Conversion (days) 59 50 45 51 58 56 62 62
Other Current Assets (days) 58 71 73 79 63 58 53 44
Other Current Liab (days) 83 76 72 97 66 66 56 49
Net Working Capital Cycle (Days) 34 46 47 33 55 48 59 58
Debt/EBITDA (x) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Net D/E (0.5) (0.4) (0.5) (0.6) (0.5) (0.5) (0.5) (0.5)
Interest Coverage 110.8 136.5 117.3 25.3 62.8 62.2 66.8 80.9
PER SHARE DATA
EPS (INR/sh) 19.4 25.1 31.5 21.3 29.8 35.3 48.7 61.4
CEPS (INR/sh) 24.9 30.6 37.1 28.3 36.3 41.1 54.8 67.8
DPS (INR/sh) 7.2 8.4 8.4 8.4 7.0 11.0 12.0 13.0
BV (INR/sh) 216 233 254 266 290 317 354 402
VALUATION
P/E 141.0 109.0 86.8 128.7 91.7 77.6 56.1 44.6
P/BV 12.7 11.7 10.8 10.3 9.4 8.6 7.7 6.8
EV/EBITDA 88.8 71.3 61.2 92.8 63.3 55.1 40.2 31.0
OCF/EV (%) 0.6 0.0 1.3 0.7 (0.1) 1.2 0.7 1.5
FCF/EV (%) 0.9 (0.1) 1.3 0.7 (0.3) 1.0 0.5 1.3
FCFE/Market Cap (%) 0.9 (0.1) 1.2 0.6 (0.4) 0.8 0.4 1.1
Dividend Yield (%) 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5
Source: Company, HSIE Research; YE: September
Page | 84
BUY:
1,000
1,500
100
100
500
120
100
150
100
200
300
400
200
300
400
600
500
2,000
2,500
0
0
0
0
0
20
40
60
80
50
ADD:
SELL:
Aug-21 Aug-21 Aug-21 Aug-21 Aug-21
Sep-21 Sep-21 Sep-21 Sep-21 Sep-21
Oct -21 Oct -21 Oct -21 Oct -21 Oct -21
Nov-21 Nov-21 Nov-21 Nov-21 Nov-21
Dec-21 Dec-21 Dec-21 Dec-21 Dec-21
Rating Criteria
Jan-22 Jan-22 Jan-22 Jan-22 Jan-22
KNR
Feb-22 Feb-22 Feb-22 Feb-22 Feb-22
KEC
Mar-22 Mar-22 Mar-22 Mar-22 Mar-22
Apr-22 Apr-22 Apr-22 Apr-22 Apr-22
May -22 May -22 May -22 May -22 May -22
1 Year price movement
ITD Cementation
Ashoka Buildcon
Jul- 22 Jul- 22 Jul- 22 Jul- 22 Jul- 22
Aug-22 Aug-22 Aug-22 Aug-22 Aug-22
200
400
600
800
200
300
400
600
100
400
500
200
300
400
600
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
0
0
0
0
0
PNC Infra
Ahluwalia
S iemens
May -22 May -22 May -22 May -22 May -22
Dilip Buildcon
Jun-22 Jun-22 Jun-22 Jun-22 Jun-22
Kalpataru Power
100
200
300
400
100
150
100
200
300
400
500
2,000
2,500
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
0
0
0
0
0
50
Aug-21 Aug-21 Aug-21 Aug-21 Aug-21
Sep-21 Sep-21 Sep-21 Sep-21 Sep-21
Oct -21 Oct -21 Oct -21 Oct -21 Oct -21
Nov-21 Nov-21 Nov-21 Nov-21 Nov-21
Dec-21 Dec-21 Dec-21 Dec-21 Dec-21
Jan-22 Jan-22 Jan-22 Jan-22 Jan-22
Feb-22 Feb-22 Feb-22 Feb-22 Feb-22
IRB
G R Infra
JMC Projec ts
J.Kumar Infra
May -22 May -22 May -22 May -22 May -22
Jun-22 Jun-22 Jun-22 Jun-22 Jun-22
Jul- 22 Jul- 22 Jul- 22 Jul- 22 Jul- 22
Aug-22 Aug-22 Aug-22 Aug-22 Aug-22
400
600
200
400
600
800
100
200
800
1,000
500
1,000
1,500
0
0
0
0
40
60
20
80
NCC
Page | 85
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Cement: WHRS – A key cog in the Autos: Where are we on “S” curve? FMCG: Defensive businesses but Autos: A changed landscape Banks: Double whammy for some India Equity Strategy: Atma Indian IT: Demand recovery in
flywheel not valuations Nirbhar Bharat sight
Life Insurance: Recovery may be Retail: Whole flywheel is broken? Appliances: Looing beyond near- Pharma: Chronic therapy – A Indian Gas: Looking beyond the India Equity Strategy: Quarterly Real Estate: Ripe for consumption
swift with protection driving term disruption portfolio prescription pandemic flipbook
margins
Indian IT: expanding centre of Indian Chemical: Evolution to Life Insurance: ULIP vs. MF Infrastructure: On the road to Cement: Spotting the sweet spot Pharma: Cardiac: the heartbeat of Life Insurance: Comparative annual
gravity revolution! rerating domestic market report analysis
Indian microfinance: Should you India Equity Strategy: Quarterly Autos: Divergent trends in PVs and India Internet: the stage is set FMCG: Opportunity in adversity - Logistics: Indian Railways - getting Industrials: Triggering a new cycle
look micro as macros disappoint? flipbook 2Ws A comparative scorecard aggressive
Indian IT: raising the bar India Equity Strategy: Quarterly FinTech Playbook: P2M Payments | India Hospitals: capital discipline Autos: Will EVs impact the ‘EV’? Cement: Riding High Power: Reforms essential for
flipbook Surging pool, dwindling yields improving, sustenance is key rennaissance
Fashion & Lifestyle: From a India Equity Strategy: Quarterly Indian Gas Sector: Resilience in the Consumer Durables: Fans - a Quarterly flipbook: Q2FY22– FinTech Playbook: Discount Footwear: No bargains here!
disruptor’s lens II flipbook eye of the storm compounding story but underrated Demand environment improves but Brokers
input cost inflation dents
profitability
Holdcos for portfolio Cement: A concrete road for net- FinTech Playbook: Buy Now Pay India Equity Strategy: PLI: Power: Shifting energy landscape: IT sector: Decoding signal from Vehicle Financing: Secular
diversification zero emissions Later | De-mystifying the Spearheading India’s Grey to green gains pace noise opportunity meets cyclical
tablestakes manufacturing push tailwinds
Page | 86
Sector Thematic: Hybrid Annuity Method
Disclosure:
We, Parikshit Kandpal, CFA, Nikhil Kanodia, MBA & Manoj Rawat, MBA, authors and the names subscribed to this report, hereby certify that all of the views
expressed in this research report accurately reflect our views about the subject issuer(s) or securities. SEBI conducted the inspection and based on their
observations have issued advise/warning. The said observations have been complied with. We also certify that no part of our compensation was, is, or will be
directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendation(s) or view(s) in this report.
Research Analyst or his/her relative or HDFC Securities Ltd. does have/ does not have any financial interest in the subject company. Also Research Analyst or
his relative or HDFC Securities Ltd. or its Associate may have beneficial ownership of 1% or more in the subject company at the end of the month immediately
preceding the date of publication of the Research Report. Further Research Analyst or his relative or HDFC Securities Ltd. or its associate does have/does not
have any material conflict of interest.
Any holding in stock – No
HDFC Securities Limited (HSL) is a SEBI Registered Research Analyst having registration no. INH000002475.
Disclaimer:
This report has been prepared by HDFC Securities Ltd and is solely for information of the recipient only. The report must not be used as a singular basis of any
investment decision. The views herein are of a general nature and do not consider the risk appetite or the particular circumstances of an individual investor;
readers are requested to take professional advice before investing. Nothing in this document should be construed as investment advice. Each recipient of this
document should make such investigations as they deem necessary to arrive at an independent evaluation of an investment in securities of the companies referred
to in this document (including merits and risks) and should consult their own advisors to determine merits and risks of such investment. The information and
opinions contained herein have been compiled or arrived at, based upon information obtained in good faith from sources believed to be reliable. Such information
has not been independently verified and no guaranty, representation of warranty, express or implied, is made as to its accuracy, completeness or correctness. All
such information and opinions are subject to change without notice. Descriptions of any company or companies or their securities mentioned herein are not
intended to be complete. HSL is not obliged to update this report for such changes. HSL has the right to make changes and modifications at any time.
This report is not directed to, or intended for display, downloading, printing, reproducing or for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen
or resident or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, reproduction, availability or use would be contrary
to law or regulation or what would subject HSL or its affiliates to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction.
If this report is inadvertently sent or has reached any person in such country, especially, United States of America, the same should be ignored and brought to
the attention of the sender. This document may not be reproduced, distributed or published in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, for any purposes or in any
manner.
Foreign currencies denominated securities, wherever mentioned, are subject to exchange rate fluctuations, which could have an adverse effect on their value or
price, or the income derived from them. In addition, investors in securities such as ADRs, the values of which are influenced by foreign currencies effectively
assume currency risk. It should not be considered to be taken as an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security.
This document is not, and should not, be construed as an offer or solicitation of an offer, to buy or sell any securities or other financial instruments. This report
should not be construed as an invitation or solicitation to do business with HSL. HSL may from time to time solicit from, or perform broking, or other services
for, any company mentioned in this mail and/or its attachments.
HSL and its affiliated company(ies), their directors and employees may; (a) from time to time, have a long or short position in, and buy or sell the securities of
the company(ies) mentioned herein or (b) be engaged in any other transaction involving such securities and earn brokerage or other compensation or act as a
market maker in the financial instruments of the company(ies) discussed herein or act as an advisor or lender/borrower to such company(ies) or may have any
other potential conflict of interests with respect to any recommendation and other related information and opinions.
HSL, its directors, analysts or employees do not take any responsibility, financial or otherwise, of the losses or the damages sustained due to the investments
made or any action taken on basis of this report, including but not restricted to, fluctuation in the prices of shares and bonds, changes in the currency rates,
diminution in the NAVs, reduction in the dividend or income, etc.
HSL and other group companies, its directors, associates, employees may have various positions in any of the stocks, securities and financial instruments dealt
in the report, or may make sell or purchase or other deals in these securities from time to time or may deal in other securities of the companies / organizations
described in this report.
HSL or its associates might have managed or co-managed public offering of securities for the subject company or might have been mandated by the subject
company for any other assignment in the past twelve months.
HSL or its associates might have received any compensation from the companies mentioned in the report during the period preceding twelve months from t date
of this report for services in respect of managing or co-managing public offerings, corporate finance, investment banking or merchant banking, brokerage services
or other advisory service in a merger or specific transaction in the normal course of business.
HSL or its analysts did not receive any compensation or other benefits from the companies mentioned in the report or third party in connection with preparation
of the research report. Accordingly, neither HSL nor Research Analysts have any material conflict of interest at the time of publication of this report. Compensation
of our Research Analysts is not based on any specific merchant banking, investment banking or brokerage service transactions. HSL may have issued other
reports that are inconsistent with and reach different conclusion from the information presented in this report.
Research entity has not been engaged in market making activity for the subject company. Research analyst has not served as an officer, director or employee of
the subject company. We have not received any compensation/benefits from the subject company or third party in connection with the Research Report.
HDFC securities Limited, I Think Techno Campus, Building - B, "Alpha", Office Floor 8, Near Kanjurmarg Station, Opp. Crompton Greaves, Kanjurmarg (East),
Mumbai 400 042 Phone: (022) 3075 3400 Fax: (022) 2496 5066
Compliance Officer: Murli V Karkera Email: complianceofficer@hdfcsec.com Phone: (022) 3045 3600
HDFC Securities Limited, SEBI Reg. No.: NSE, BSE, MSEI, MCX: INZ000186937; AMFI Reg. No. ARN: 13549; PFRDA Reg. No. POP: 11092018; IRDA Corporate
Agent License No.: CA0062; SEBI Research Analyst Reg. No.: INH000002475; SEBI Investment Adviser Reg. No.: INA000011538; CIN - U67120MH2000PLC152193
Mutual Funds Investments are subject to market risk. Please read the offer and scheme related documents carefully before investing.
HDFC securities
Institutional Equities
Unit No. 1602, 16th Floor, Tower A, Peninsula Business Park,
Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai - 400 013
Board: +91-22-6171-7330 www.hdfcsec.com
Page | 87