Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Particle charging
Particle collection
Particle removal
Particle charging
Particle Charging
Particle Charging
Particle Collection
Particle Removal
Dust that has accumulated to a certain thickness on
the collection electrode is removed by one of two
processes depending on the type of collection
electrode:
TUBES
- water sprays
PLATES
- either by water sprays or Rapping.
Particle Removal
Rapper
-deposited, dry particles
are dislodged from the
collection plates by
sending mechanical
impulses, or vibrations, to
the plates
Particle Removal
Liquid Sprays
-the sludge collects in a
holding basin at the
bottom of the vessel
-The sludge is then sent to
settling ponds or lined
landfills for proper
ultimate disposal
Types of ESP
Plate ESP
Tubular ESP
BAGHOUSE VS. ESP
A. COST
Collector electrode
Nozzle
In a Wet ESP, it sprays water and flushes the accumulated dusts into the hopper.
Hopper
Used to store dust particles and ash content coming out from the Electrostatic
precipitator.
Calculations.. ^^
Game na ba?
Drift Speed
The particle drift speed (we) results from a balance between the electrostatic
force due to the charge (Fe) and the resisting drag force (Fd) exerted by the
air due the relative motion between air and particle.
Charge q
The charge q acquired by a particle is a certain number times
the charge of the electron, which is 1.6 x 10-19 C, or by using the
formula:
Efficiency
The efficiency is defined as the percentage of removal
Since the flow speed U is the volumetric flow Q of air divided by the
cross-sectional area Wd, we can also write the efficiency as:
SAMPLE PROBLEM
SAMPLE PROBLEM
SAMPLE PROBLEM
ADVANTAGES
✓ This is more effective to remove very small particles
like smoke, mist and fly ash. Its range of dust removal
is sufficiently large (0.01 micron to 1.00 micron).
✓ This is also most effective for high dust loaded gas (as
high as 100 grams per cu. meter)
✓ Provides easy operation
✓ The dust is collected in dry form and can be removed
either dry or wet.
✓ The dust is collected in dry form and can be removed
either dry or wet.
DISADVANTAGES
✓ The direct current is not available with the modern plants,
therefore considerable electrical equipment is necessary to
convert low voltage (400 V) A.C to high voltage (60000 V)
D.C.
✓ The running charges are also considerably high as the amount
of power required for charging is considerably large.
✓ The efficiency of the collector is not maintained if the gas
velocity exceeds that for which the plant is designed.
✓ Because of closeness of the charged plates and high potential
used, it is necessary to protect the entire collector from
sparking by providing a fine mesh before the ionizing
chamber.
References
❖ http://www.hamonusa.com/hamonresearchcottrell/products/esp_fundamentals
❖ http://www.epa.state.oh.us/portals/27/engineer/eguides/electro.pdf
❖ https://engineering.dartmouth.edu/~d30345d/courses/engs37/ESPs.pdf
❖ https://noppa.aalto.fi/noppa/kurssi/puu-0.4400/luennot/Puu-
0_4400_types_of_electrostatic_precipitators.pdf
❖ http://www.epa.gov/ttn/caaa/t1/reports/sect5-2.pdf
❖ http://www.indiastudychannel.com/resources/140937-Working-of-electrostatic-
precipitators-with-its-advantages-and-disadvantages.aspx
❖ http://www.environmentalengineering.net/environmental/baghouses.php
❖ http://www.thomasnet.com/articles/plant-facility-equipment/electrostatic-precipitators
❖ http://www.mhims.co.jp/en/products/environmental/atmosphere/precipitator/ep/feature
s.html
❖ http://www.neundorfer.com/knowledge_base/electrostatic_precipitators.aspx#itp
❖ http://www.iowadnr.gov/Environment/AirQuality/HowAirPollutionIsControlled/Electrostatic
Precipitators.aspx
❖ Cooper, C.D and F.C. Alley. Air Pollution Control: A Design Approach. 2nd ed. Waveland Press,
Prospect Heights, Illinois. 1994.