Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Group Peer-Assessment Form

    Uploaded by

    Khôi Nguyên Phan Nguyễn
    3 views1 page
    Group members were asked to assess another group's presentation for a finance course. The assessment form included criteria for content, video presentation, and discussion section, each worth a certain percentage of the total mark. For content, groups were evaluated on topic relevance, analysis strength, and quality of recommendations. Video presentation was judged on attractiveness, timing, audio/visual use, and creativity. Ability to answer all questions and provide personal views were considered for the discussion section. Groups signed after providing marks from 0-10 for each item listed.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Group peer-assessment form (2)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Group members were asked to assess another group's presentation for a finance course. The assessment form included criteria for content, video presentation, and discussion section, each worth a certain percentage of the total mark. For content, groups were evaluated on topic relevance, analysis strength, and quality of recommendations. Video presentation was judged on attractiveness, timing, audio/visual use, and creativity. Ability to answer all questions and provide personal views were considered for the discussion section. Groups signed after providing marks from 0-10 for each item listed.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    Group Peer-Assessment Form

    Uploaded by

    Khôi Nguyên Phan Nguyễn
    Group members were asked to assess another group's presentation for a finance course. The assessment form included criteria for content, video presentation, and discussion section, each worth a certain percentage of the total mark. For content, groups were evaluated on topic relevance, analysis strength, and quality of recommendations. Video presentation was judged on attractiveness, timing, audio/visual use, and creativity. Ability to answer all questions and provide personal views were considered for the discussion section. Groups signed after providing marks from 0-10 for each item listed.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    GROUP PEER -ASSESSMENT FORM

    COURSE: FIN2001

    Class code:........................................
    Assessed group: ........................................ Date:..................................................
    Marking group:.....................................

    Criteria Item Mark (0-10)


    A1 – The topic is hot
    A2 - The topic is interest
    A. Content (40%)
    A3 – Strong argument and good analysis
    A4 – Recommendation
    B1 – Attractivesness
    B. Video B2 – Meet time requirement
    (40%) B3 – Appropriate AV use
    B4 – Creativeness/ Impressiveness
    C. Discussion C1 – Answer all questions
    (20%) C2 – The answer shows personal view
    Total: (A1+A2+…+C2)/10

    Group representative
    (Sign)

    You might also like