Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CONTROL
HAZARD/ ASPECT
IDENTIFICATION, RISK/ IMPACTS
ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL
Nov. 2015
REVISION RECORD
Revision Date Description of Changes
Number
0 Aug,2015 Issued as draft for review and comment
1 Nov, 2015 Issued for implementation
The custodian of this procedure is the IDC HSE Manager and any
suggested changes to this procedure or queries about the applicability
of it should be addressed to him. He is also responsible for co-
ordinating periodic reviews of this procedure, which will take place every
two years.
TABLE OF CONTENT
1- PURPOSE
2- SCOPE
3- DEFINITIONS
4- REFERENCES
5- RESPONSIBILITIES
6- PROCEDURE
1- PURPOSE
1.1. This procedure covers all activities within IDC activities, including
contractor’s personnel working for IDC. Contractors with their own HSE
arrangements must also comply with this procedure as a minimum.It
follows the general principles of international management systems.
1.2. The purpose of this procedure is to ensure that all staff in IDC operations
or offices are aware of, and understand, the importance of their
responsibilities for hazard identification, risk assessment and risk control
with respect to health, safety and environmental Aspects & Impacts
management.
1.3. Effective risk control will enable IDC to minimise the frequency and
severity of accidents/incidents and ill health, and minimise the
environmental impact of its activities.
2. SCOPE
2.1. This procedure covers all IDC operations, including activities in
offices, warehouse premises and in the Rig (s). As these operations
will have differing organisational structures, it is necessary to use
generic terms for the personnel having responsibilities for risk
screening and assessment. In order to provide clarity, these generic
terms are defined below with examples.
2.2. Further guidance may be obtained from the HSE commission if
required. In certain locations, all of the levels of supervision
described in this procedure may not be in place and the same person
may, therefore, have more than one set of responsibilities.
2.3. All personnel are responsible for working with due regard to health,
safety and the environment, especially those with responsibility for
others, e.g.
3. DEFINITIONS
3.1. General
4. REFERENCES
ISO 14001 14001:2004 & OHSAS 18001:2007 / clause 4.3.1
5. RESPONSIBILITIES
5.1. Company General Manager
5.1.1. The General Manager shall ensure that HSE risk screening and
assessments are carried out for all activities.
5.1.2. They shall ensure that actions and controls arising from the
assessments are implemented.
5.1.3. They shall also ensure that suitable and adequate resources of
funding and personnel are made available to conduct the HSE risk
assessments, to implement actions and controls arising from the
assessments, and for training of personnel.
5.2.1. HSE risk screening and assessments are conducted for all intended
activities within their remit prior to performing the activity.
5.2.2. All controls and actions arising from such HSE risk screenings and
assessments, including procedures, are developed and
implemented, and monitor the progress of implementation.
5.2.3. HSE risk screening and assessment objectives and targets are set
annually for all personnel in their Division.
5.2.4. Line managers/supervisors are fulfilling their responsibilities in
accordance with the procedure in hand.
5.2.5. All appropriate company and contractor personnel understand all
controls, procedures and precautions that apply to the activities to be
carried out and are trained as necessary.
5.3.Line Manager
6. PROCEDURE
Each step of the assessment process should be completed before going onto
the next.
This is the starting point for the risk/Aspect assessment and requires
consideration of all the tasks that are likely to be carried out.
6.3.1.1. Activities
6.3.1.2. Use of equipment
6.3.1.3. Use of materials/substances
6.3.1.4. Workplace
This should help to build up, in time, an inventory of tasks that Departments
conduct and the type of work carried out in the different workplace areas.
6.3.3.1. Decide who may be harmed and how. Think also about people
who may not be at the work place at the time, e.g. cleaners,
6.4.1. Analyse the initial Risk Rating (Risk Rating With Existing Control
Measures) by multiplying the consequence number by the likelihood
number, to provide a risk rating (or ranking) for each hazard. This
number, on a scale of 4 to 100, should be entered in the Risk/impact
column on the Risk Assessment Form (Appendix 6).
6.4.3. The objective of this process is not to arrive at a certain number but
to provide a systematic method of ensuring that consequence and
likelihood ratings are analysed carefully and a record made of the
analysis for future reference and review.
6.4.4. The next step is to consider the existing control measures and
additional control measures needed to control, reduce and minimise
the risk for each identified hazard.
6.4.6. The control measures may address the consequence, the likelihood
or both. The required control measures for each hazard should be
recorded alongside each hazard on the Risk Assessment Form.
Appendix 2 provides guidance on the type of control measures that
can be employed for the various hazards.
6.4.7. Residual Risk – to assess the residual risk that remains with the
control measures in place, new hazard effect (consequence) and
likelihood ratings are selected from the scales shown in Tables 2 and
3, respectively, with the inclusion of the control measures. The
product of these two ratings provides a measure of the Residual Risk
and completes the risk analysis stage. The information provided in
the Residual Risk box is used in the next stage of the risk/impact
assessment to evaluate whether the risk is adequately controlled or
not.
6.4.8. Risk/impact Evaluation - this is the final step in the risk assessment
process and will require the assessor to decide if the hazards
identified have been controlled to a suitable level. The risk analysis
stage took into account the control measures currently applied to the
hazard and, therefore, the result of the analysis indicates the amount
of risk that remains, or the residual risk. From this analysis, the risk
matrix shown below in Table 3 indicates whether the residual risk of
each hazard is:
6.4.9. Record the results in the final (right hand) column of the Risk
Assessment forms (IDCHSEF1.1) & Environmental impact
Assessment form(IDCHSEF1.2).
6.4.10. This risk rating assessment will assist in deciding priorities for
action and in deciding the authorisation levels for the work
commensurate with the risk.
6.4.12.4. if previously used safeguards are not appropriate for this activity
6.5.3. Segregation
Isolate the hazard from people; e.g. fencing of excavations, machine
guards.
6.5.4. Control
Control the hazard by introducing suitable measures, which may be in
either or both of the following two categories;
6.5.6. Mitigation
Provide personal protective equipment (PPE) as necessary, e.g. hard
hats, boots, gloves, harnesses to prevent falls from height, etc.
6.6.1. For each of the more significant hazards identified, e.g. fire, electric
shock, etc, write down the control measures to be used to manage
the risk from the hazard, e.g. for fire, controls including evacuation
and emergency response procedures, fire extinguishers, etc.
6.6.2. Once the risk/ impact assessments have been completed, a Work
Plan should be prepared for the more complex activities. A sample
plan is indicated in Appendix 5.
7. FORMS
- RISK ASSESSMENT FORM HSEF-1.1
APPENDICES
- APPENDICES #1 RISK SCREENING KEY WORDS
- APPENDICES #2 HAZARD CHECKLISTS
- APPENDICES #3 CONTROL MEASURES GUIDANCE
- APPENDICES #4 RISK ASSESSMENT EXAMPLE
Hazard Outcome R
Consequence Consequence Consequence A
(Asset Damage) (Environmental Damage) T
(Injury) I
(Loss of Reputation)
N
G
Extensive damage. Massive leak/spill.
Multiple fatalities, Downtime. Substantial or Major public concern. 10
total loss of rig or Reputation destroyed.
location. Major clean up. e.g. well
blowout.
Single fatality or Major damage. Massive leak/spill.
permanent disability, downtime ,shutoff one Reputation badly damaged.
e.g. cancer caused by IDC locations Non-conformance with 8
release of carcinogenic regulations.
substance, or asthma.
Major injury, lost time Localised damage. Localised leak/spill.
accident >3 days, e.g. Reputation in media 6
falling from height, Major Equipment
spotlight.
broken bones, damaged
Non-conformance with
temporary health regulations.
effect.
Note that the use of numbers for consequence rating from the above scale
does not make the risk assessment quantitative. It merely provides a
shorthand way of recording the judgement of consequence (severity) and the
priority for control measures. The person carrying out the risk assessment
should not become too obsessed with the figures; part of the purpose of the
risk assessment is to identify the control measures that need to be
implemented. These figures are designed to assist with the prioritisation of
such measures.
Table 2 Likelihood
Likelihood Rating Guidance Rating
Imminent or Acute
Harm from a hazard is imminent or acute if no control measures are
provided at all and/or if one or more of the following factors also apply:-
a) The hazard is a cause of large numbers of injuries or ill health in
national or location statistics;
b) People are exposed to the hazard continuously; 10
c) The hazard is difficult to see e.g. H2S gas;
d) Health, Safety and Environment is not considered high priority by
those involved, including manager and supervisors, e.g. non-adherence to
PTW.
Very Likely
Harm is very likely if the control measures provided depend on an individual
using them on every occasion (e.g. personal protective equipment, PTW 8
system) or if training and supervision are minimal, and/or if one or more of
the above factors are present.
Likely
Harm is likely if the control measures provided depend on an individual
using them or adjusting them on every occasion (e.g. portable gas 6
detectors, safe working procedures), or if training is provided and work
supervised, and/or if any of the factors given for certain or imminent harm
also apply.
Possible
Harm may happen if control measures include measures that do not
depend on the operator but can break down or be removed or defeated
(e.g. pressure safety valve), or if there is no defined system of maintenance 4
or supervision of the control measures. The hazard is a potentially
significant cause of injury or ill health, or for which a number of people are
often exposed.
Unlikely
The circumstances under which harm may happen will reduce to harm
being unlikely if there is a defined system of supervision and maintenance,
and/or if training is provided and repeated regularly. Other factors making 2
harm unlikely include hazards, which are a cause of few injuries or cases of
ill health, or for which a few people are occasionally exposed.
Consequence
Slight Injury Minor Major Injury Single Fatality Multiple
First Aid Injury Lost Time Fatalities
> 3 days
Short Term Minor Health Temporary Permanent
Health Effect Effect Health Effect Disability
60 – 100 (I)
Intolerable Risk
Risk unacceptable. Seek specialist advice/support.
The results of the risk analyses indicate the extent of the risks. The number
in each box is the risk rating number entered on the risk assessment form,
arrived at by multiplying together the hazard effect (severity) and likelihood
numbers. The higher the number, the higher is the risk rating.
HAZARD CHECKLIST - 1
Hazards Associated with Plant and Equipment (including non-powered hand tools)
HAZARD CHECKLIST - 2
Hazards Associated with Materials and Substances
HAZARD CHECKLIST - 3
Hazards Associated with Place of Work
HAZARD CHECKLIST - 4
HAZARD CHECKLIST - 5
Hazards Associated with the Method of Work
HAZARD CHECKLIST - 6
HAZARD CHECKLIST - 7
Elimination or Substitution
Eliminate the hazard; e.g. use of sodium hypochlorite solution instead of
free chlorine gas for disinfectant purposes.
Hazard Reduction
Reduce the hazard with an alternative; e.g. use flame retardant scaffold
boards where hot work may be taking place.
Segregation
Isolate the hazard from people; e.g. machine guards.
Control
Control the hazard by introducing suitable measures, which may be in
either or both of the following two categories;
Mitigation
Provide personal protective equipment (PPE) as necessary, e.g. hard
hats, boots, gloves, harnesses to prevent falls from height, etc.
The following tables describe typical control measures and are not
exhaustive.
Contents
1. Health Hazards
2. Falling/Swinging/Dropping objects
3. Electricity
4. Noise/Vibration
5. Emergency
6. Equipment Failure
7. Machinery/Equipment
8. Explosion
9. Fire
12. Pressure
14. Slip/Trip/Fall
1) Atmospheric Monitoring
2) Barrier Cream
3) Breathing Apparatus
4) Detailed COSHH Assessment
5) Enclosure/Segregation of Contaminant
6) Ergonomic Assessment
7) Forced Extract Ventilation
8) Information
9) Instruction
10) Local Exhaust Ventilation
11) Manual Handling Assessment
12) Medical Surveillance/Screening
13) Minimised Fume/Dust/Vapour Production
14) Natural Ventilation
15) Protective Clothing
16) Regular Cleaning/Decontamination
17) Respiratory Protective Equipment
18) Restricted Workplace Eating / Drinking / Smoking
19) Restricted/Controlled Access to Workplace
20) Substituted Safer Material
21) Supervision
22) Training
1) Anti-static
2) Classification of Hazardous Areas (Flammable Gases and Vapours) (Ref BS5345)
3) Earth Monitoring
4) Equipment & Fittings Constructed, Installed & Maintained for use in Potentially Explosive
Atmospheres
5) Fusing
6) Insulation
7) Isolating Transformer
8) Isolation
9) Phase Separation
10) Residual Current Device
11) Permit to Work/Limitation of Access
12) Shielding
13) Voltage Reduction
14) Work Carried Out by Competent Person/s
1) Audiometry
2) Design Out Noise/Vibration from Equipment
3) Design Out Noise/Vibration from Task
4) Detailed Noise/Vibration Assessment
5) Enclose Noisy/Vibrating Equipment
6) Engineering Controls
7) Hearing Protection Zone
8) Noise/Vibration Exposure Monitoring
9) Noise/Vibration Survey
10) Restricted Access to Noisy/Vibrating Areas
11) Selection and use of Appropriate Hearing Protectors
12) Warning Signs
13) Work Patterns e.g.: Defined Spells of Exposure
1) Adequate Planning
2) Competent Person/s in Charge
3) Platform PA and Alarm System
4) Emergency Response Procedures
5) Drills/Exercises/Training
6) Provision of Adequate EER Facilities
2) Blast Wall/Enclosure
3) Deluge on Confirmed Gas Detection
4) Earthing/Earth Monitoring
5) Exclusion of Ignition Sources
6) Explosion Venting/Relief
7) Inert Gas Blanketing
8) Leak/Spillage Detection - Portable Gas Monitor
9) Leak/Spillage Detection - Gas Detection System
10) Purging
11) Security of Access to Explosive Materials
12) Permit to Work System
13) Use of Non-Sparking Tools
14) Safety/Fire Watch
15) Pressure Relief Panels
16)
1) Competent Personnel
2) Dose Monitoring
3) Health Surveillance
4) Local Rules
5) Personal Protective Equipment
6) Adequate Training
7) Appointed Radiation Protection Supervisor
8) Permit to Work System
9) Warning Signs
10) Area Cordoned Off (Three Dimensionally)
11) Non-essential Personnel Cleared
12) PA Announcements
NO. HAZARD CONSEQUENCE EXISTING RISK ANALYSIS REQUIRED RISK ANALYSIS EVALUATION
CONTROL ADDITIONAL
(EXISTING CONTROL (WITH EXTRA
CONTROLS) MEASURES ONTROLS)
C
Extensive
2 Fire of Preventive 10 4 40 Increase 10 2 20 Full
damage (the fuel Maintenance frequency of implementation
fuel tank
tank can blow) System inspections of of Existing and
and possibility of and inspections of equipment Additional
multiple tank and its area Control
fatalities) and Measures
Conduct more Required
equipment (PSV,
frequent
, instruments etc.)
Reliable fire firewater tests
detection system
Reliable FF system Enhance
Operating procedure training of
In place as Permit to firefighting
Work System personnel
This generic risk assessment and control arrangements covers the erection and dismantling of
scaffolding on a construction site for work at heights carried out by employees and contractors.
2 Persons at Risk
Personnel erecting and/or dismantling the scaffolding will be especially at risk from the following
hazards. Any other person in the area could also be at risk from falling objects or scaffolding
collapse.
3 Hazards
The following arrangements should eliminate or reduce the risk from the above hazards to a
tolerable level. The risk assessment on which these are based (identification of the hazards,
analysis of severity and likelihood of the hazards and identification and evaluation of control
measures) is filed in the Site Office. Additional risk assessments must be conducted and
appended to this assessment with details of the appropriate arrangements, if any other hazards
are identified not included above.
5 Arrangements
The (responsible person) shall ensure that scaffolding can be erected and dismantled safely and
efficiently at the work site taking into account specific area hazards, other persons and activities
within the area. Where there is any doubt, the HSE Adviser shall be consulted for advice.
Competent supervisors shall be employed to carry out inspections. All scaffolding shall be
erected, altered or dismantled by competent Scaffolders or under the direct supervision of a
competent person.
The Site Construction Supervisor shall ensure that the following equipment is provided and
maintained:-
The work plan shall allow for sufficient rest periods during periods of extreme hot/cold weather.
No person shall erect, alter or dismantle any scaffolding unless authorised by the (appropriate
senior person as above) or appointed representative. The supervisor must ensure the following
when scaffolding is to be erected, altered or dismantled:-
- Conformance with BS 5973 : 1993 Code of Practice for Access and Working Scaffolds
and Special Scaffold Structures in Steel.
- Inspection and subsequent tagging of approved scaffolding.
- Compliance with load bearing capacity.
- Work is suspended and the site made safe during extreme weather conditions.
- Inspection of scaffolding prior to continuing work following extreme weather conditions.
- Standby vessel is on location, safety watch posted and overboard discharges noted, if
work over the sea.
- Compliance with manual handling assessment.
- Guard rails and toe / kicker boards are fitted.
- Scaffolding area is barrier off, warning tape/notices are posted and restricted access
imposed.
- Vulnerable/fragile equipment within the area are noted.
- Secure means for lifting/handling/storing of scaffold components are employed.
- High standard of housekeeping.
- Materials and tools are removed from or secured to the scaffolding when not in use.
- Suitable fall arrestors to be worn when working above 1.8 m.
- Ladders are secured.
- Adequate lighting is provided.
- Open areas in floors to be barriered off/hand railed.
- Access/egress routes are unobstructed and alternative escape routes are available.
- Obstructions, protrusions, hot/cold surfaces are noted.
- boards are protected from hot surfaces.
- protection is provided on cut surfaces.
- compliance with workplace noise assessment and confined space risk assessment,
where appropriate.
Any defect noted in the scaffolding equipment must be reported and attended to immediately.
6.1 Inspections
The Site Supervisor (Rig Manager) shall ensure that the equipment and working practices are
maintained to these standards by arranging regular inspections by a competent person(s).
This risk assessment and arrangements shall be reviewed at intervals annually or after any
reported complaint, incident or accident, or whenever the activity changes.