EV06 - Design and Drawings

QMS
DOCUMENT NUMBER: S.300.8.73.003

VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
Design and Drawings
GSS-14
Copyright © Aurizon 2013 - This document is for general information only and no part of this document may be reproduced, copied, altered or transmitted in
any form without the express written permission of Aurizon Operations Limited ABN 47 564 947 264 or its related entities (Aurizon). Aurizon does not warrant,
guarantee or make any representations regarding the currency, accuracy, correctness, reliability, useability, or any other aspect of material contained in this
document nor of material provided by others to Aurizon and contained in this document. Aurizon has no liability to any person in respect of any loss or
damage (including consequential loss or damage) which may be suffered or incurred or which may arise directly or indirectly in respect of information contained
in this document.
Copyright © Aurizon UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN TRANSMITTED OR PRINTED PAGE 1 OF 35

Design and Drawings – GSS-14 AURIZON COMMERCIAL-IN-CONFIDENCE Next Review: 30/03/2018
QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
Document Review History

REVIEW
PERIOD (12,
VERSION DATE DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE AUTHOR NAME AUTHOR TITLE
24, 36
MONTHS)
Title Page & List of Revisions

1:B 15/7/98 CG
added
MJD, NRM,
1:D 19/7/99 Author’s draft
MGW, PAH, CSW
MJD, NRM,
Updated for industry comment
2:A 23/8/99 MGW, PAH,
following review of 23/8/99
CSW, KLB
Updated following ISG & NAG

2:B 1/11/99 GB, TMcH
review
Publisher update – Visio

2:C 1-12-99
flowchart
Updated as a result of industry WSL, US&S,

2:D 6-1-00
review Alstom
Version control/identification for

MJD, NRM, PAH,
2:E 13-7-00 drawings added. Approved after
MGW. CSW
review of 26/7/00.
Updated to include EED

Signal Relay tool
Template updated, and GGD, CSW,
2:F 02-03-06
purpose added. MAS, PAH
Updated SAOS QMS document
references.
KB, ML, GC, VB,

3:A 03-06-08 Design Process Updated
RB
4.0 06-09-11 Updated as per BIR 353 & 467 CW, NR
Updated to new template

4.1 12/08/2013 KL
Added to BMS for first time
Reviewed. No content
Principal
4.2 17/02/2017 changed. Template updated to Chris Wilkins 13 months
Engineer
PD format

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
Document Approval
APPROVAL
NAME TITLE APPROVAL ROLE DATE
(DRF Number)
Chris Wilkins Principal Engineer Process Owner Email 2/04/2015
Control Systems Engineering

Jeff Wimberley Authorising Manager Email 2/04/2015
Manager

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
Table of Contents
Design and Drawings............................................................................................... 5
Definitions.................................................................................................................. 5
Responsibilities .......................................................................................................... 5
Design Planning......................................................................................................... 7
Design Approval Process ......................................................................................... 11
Stagework Design .................................................................................................... 27
Version Control ........................................................................................................ 28
Modification to Approved Design .............................................................................. 28
CADD and Drawing Requirements ........................................................................... 29
Appendices ............................................................................................................ 31
Appendix 1 - Applicable Aurizon Design Standards ............................................................... 31
Appendix 2 - Compilation of Signalling Circuit Books ............................................................ 31

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 02/04/2015
Design and Drawings

The purpose of this specification is to define design responsibilities, design management processes and
documentation requirements for designs and drawings prepared by Aurizon personnel, contractors and
consultants.
This specification does not specify technical requirements for the design.
Definitions
Design Delivery Team
The Design Delivery Team refers to different entities depending on the Project Delivery Model used. For an
Alliance Project Delivery Model, the Design Delivery Team will be the Alliance Management Team. For a
Design and Construct Contract Project Delivery Model, the Design Delivery Team will be the Contractor. For
a Aurizon Internal Project Delivery Model, the Design Delivery Team will be the Aurizon Technical Coordinator.
Project Documents
The Project Documents refer to all documents used in the Project. These may include Contracts,
Specifications; Reference the works definition document, etc.
Responsibilities
The Design Delivery Team shall be responsible for the safety, suitability and functionality of all of its designs
and documentation. Any approvals given by the Aurizon Signal Design Manager shall not relieve the Design
Delivery Team from full responsibility for mistakes or omissions therein (including any resultant mistake or
error in the Works) or for any discrepancy or deviation from the Specification and other drawings.
All designs, drawings and specifications shall be submitted to the Aurizon Signal Design Manager and written
Approval obtained before any Work covered thereby is commissioned. All such Approved designs, drawings
and specifications shall be incorporated into, and be included in the Project Documents, but, notwithstanding
such approval, the Design Delivery Team shall bear full responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of
the designs, drawings and specifications, for the safety of all portions of the Work covered thereby, and for
carrying out the Work in accordance with the Drawings and the Specification.

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
The following detailed responsibilities with respect to design shall apply to the works of the Project:
ROLE PARTY RESPONSIBILITY
Designer Aurizon Personnel, To design the signalling using suitable equipment and
Contractor, Consultant in accordance with:
Agreed Project Specification;
Documentation provided by the Principle or Aurizon

Signal Design Manager;
Legislative requirements;
Equipment manufacturers recommendations;
Any timing delay, speed of response, capacity or

performance limitations of any equipment;
Signalling Principles – Brisbane Suburban Area

(S0410), Regional RCS (S.07.4211.27);
Control Table;
Signalling Arrangement (AS);
Applicable Data Structures documents;
Design Alerts;
Approved Design Plan;
Agreed Sample Designs;
Principles of failsafe design;
Design Delivery Team’s Quality Management System;
Type Approvals.
Detailed Checker Aurizon Personnel, To completely and thoroughly check that the whole of
/ Verifier Contractor, Consultant the design meets all of the design requirements.
Passer / Certifier Aurizon Signal Design To conduct an audit of selected parts of each design
Manager’s Representative item with consideration given to complexity, difficult
design areas and areas open to interpretation.
Approver Aurizon Personnel To audit the process of design.
Design Checker Aurizon Personnel, To ensure that the initials recorded on any mod sheet
(Commissioning Contractor, Consultant as authorising the modification are correctly
Modifications) transferred to the drawing.
CADD Checker Aurizon Personnel, To check that the drafting work has been completely
Contractor, Consultant and accurately done, is in accordance with the
applicable drawing and CADD standards, and
incorporates all authorised modifications as recorded
on mod sheets.
Aurizon Personnel’s, Contractor’s and Consultant’s attention is drawn to the requirements of the Professional
Engineers Act and Regulations (Queensland) and the responsibilities stated therein.

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
All Detailed Checkers/Verifier, Passers/Certifier and Approvers shall have RPEQ and hold a tertiary
qualification in Electrical Engineering. Should the Detailed Checker or Passer not have the required
qualifications or professional membership then the Detailed Checker or Passer must be authorised by the
nominated RPEQ to sign on behalf of the RPEQ.
All Detailed Checkers/Verifier and Passers/Certifier must be approved by the Aurizon Signal Design Manager
before commencing any design work. All Designers must be approved by the Design Delivery Team. A Skills
Register for each of the Design Delivery Team’s staff working on the Project shall be maintained by the Design
Delivery Team. The Skills Register shall be used to ensure the work is performed by only those appropriately
skilled staff. The Aurizon Signal Design Manager may approve staff without the appropriate skills to perform
the required work, to allow the staff to gain the necessary skills, but approval must be given before the work
commences.
Design Planning
Within 10 working days of the Project being handed to the Design Delivery Team, a Design Planning meeting
will be held in Brisbane to review and discuss the application of the requirements of this Part 14 to the detailed
design scope required to meet the project scope defined in the works definition document of the Project
documents.
The Aurizon Signal Design Manager or Representative(s) will call and attend the meeting. The Design Delivery
Team’s Design Manager, Lead Designer and nominated Registered Professional Engineer(s) for the Project
shall attend the meeting along with relevant members of applicable design authorities to ensure that all parties
have a clear understanding of the design scope, requirements and application of standards.
The meeting will determine the Project’s application of the design standards and example designs provided by
the Aurizon Signal Design Manager to the Design Delivery Team.
The meeting will also determine a list of Sample Designs to be provided to the Aurizon Signal Design Manager
for review.
The meeting will also determine the detailed contents of the Detailed Design Plan.
The Aurizon Signal Design Manager’s representative will minute the meeting and these minutes will be
provided to the Design Delivery Team within 5 working days of the meeting. Should the Design Delivery Team
not agree with the minutes of the meeting, then the Design Delivery Team shall advise the Aurizon Signal
Design Manager of any corrections within 5 working days of receipt of the minutes from the Aurizon Signal
Design Manager. Failure of the Design Delivery Team to advise notification of any corrections to the minutes
within the stated timescale shall constitute full and complete agreement with the minutes as recorded.
All subsequent design shall be completed in accordance with the Approved Detailed Design Plan and agreed
Sample Designs. Any changes to the Detailed Design Plan or agreed Sample Designs shall be submitted to
the Aurizon Signal Design Manager for Approval.
Detailed Design Plan

Within 20 working days of acceptance of the minutes of the Design Planning Meeting, the Design Delivery
Team shall prepare a Detailed Design Plan as defined below and submit this for Approval to the Aurizon Signal
Design Manager.
The Detailed Design Plan shall be derived from, and align with, the timescales, resources and activities in the
approved project programme. The Aurizon Signal Design Manager’s Approval of the Detailed Design Plan will
be based upon correct and complete conformance to the minuted outcome of the Design Planning meeting.
The Detailed Design Plan shall address the issues listed as detailed below:
– Design Control Chart;
– Design Resource Plan;
– Design Responsibilities;
– Nomination of the Registered Professional Engineer(s) pursuant to the Professional Engineers

Act and Regulations;
– Use of design standards on the Project;
– Use of example designs on the Project;

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
– Interfaces;
– Version Control and type of version identifier used for each type of design item;
– Use of Data Approval Forms;
– Sample Designs;
– Use of procedures and manuals;
– Training Matrix;
– Type Approvals current and required.
Design Control Chart

The Design Control Chart, listing all design items to be prepared with their scheduled date for submission for
approval, shall be included in the Detailed Design Plan.
The Design Control Chart shall include an entry for each type of submission listed in 1.4.11 for each stage of
the works (as defined in the works definition document of the Project documents), for each station/interlocking
and for each phase of design.
The Design Control Chart shall be extracted from the design activity in the approved Project program. The
Design Control Chart shall include an allowance of a maximum of 15 working days approval period for each
submission and for each re-submission of designs.
For example:
DESIGN ITEM SUBMISSION DUE APPROVAL DUE
New Locations, Design Approved in Principle date 1 date 1 + 15 days
New Locations, Bell Test (Greens) date 2 date 2 + 2 days
Modified Locations, Design Approved in Principle date 3 date 3 + 15 days
SER, Design Approved in Principle date 4 date 4 + 15 days
SER, Bell Test (Greens) date 5 date 5 + 2 days
Data, Design Approved in Principle date 6 date 6 + 15 days
New Locations, Function Test Submission (Whites)
Modified Locations, Function Test Submission (Whites)

date 7 date 7 + 15 days
SER, Function Test Submission (Whites)
Data, Design Approval
New Locations, Function Test (Pinks) date 8 date 8 + 2 days
Modified Locations, Function Test (Pinks) date 9 date 9 + 2 days
SER, Function Test (Pinks) date 10 date 10 + 2 days
Data, Ready for Principle Testing etc. date 11 date 11 + 2 days

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
The Design Control Chart will be used by the Aurizon Signal Design Manager for prioritising and programming
design checking and approval activities and for monitoring the Design Delivery Team’s design progress.
The Design Control Chart shall not be altered without the prior approval of the Aurizon Signal Design Manager.
Design Resource Plan

The names of the Design Delivery Teams staff who will be undertaking the design and detailed checking
activities (as defined in 1.2 above) for each of the design submission items listed in the Design Control Chart
shall be included in the Detailed Design Plan. Personnel who are not currently approved for detailed checking
and passing of Aurizon design work shall submit their CV with the resource plan for approval by the Aurizon
Signal Design Manager.
It is the Design Delivery Team’s responsibility to ensure that all Designers, Detailed Checkers/Verifiers and
Passers/Certifier are thoroughly familiar with the Detailed Design Plan and agreed Sample Designs.
Registered Professional Engineer

The name and registration number of the nominated Registered Professional Engineer(s) shall be documented
in the Detailed Design Plan.
Use of Design Standards on the Project

A list of the agreed subset of the standard drawings supplied with the Project documents and/or data structures
that will be used in the design shall be provided along with any site-specific exceptions to the use of this subset.
Use of Example Designs on the Project

A list of the agreed subset of the example designs supplied by the Aurizon Signal Design Manager that will be
used in the design shall be provided along with any site-specific exceptions to the use of this subset.
Interfaces
For each interface point defined in the works definition document, the following shall be listed:-
– Typical functions passing in each direction across the interface
– Cable terminations at the interface
– Protocols at the interface (if applicable)
– Aurizon provision at the interface (repeated from the works definition document)
– Design Delivery Team’s provision at the interface
– Method of design checking each interface

The listing and descriptions shall be sufficiently detailed to ensure that the approach and detailed design of
each interface is clearly understood and ensures a safe and accurate operation of the interface.
For each interface between distributed interlockings, the following shall be listed:-
– Typical functions passing in each direction across the interface
– Method of checking the validity of each function passing across the interface
– Protocols at the interface (if applicable)
– Method of design checking each interface

The listing and descriptions shall be sufficiently detailed to ensure that the approach and detailed design of
each function passing between distributed interlockings is clearly understood and ensures a safe and accurate
operation of the interface.

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 02/04/2015
Version Control
The Detailed Design Plan shall list each type of electronic data file (excluding those for drawings) to be
submitted as part of the Design Delivery Team’s designs. This list is dependent on the type of electronic
equipment being supplied by the Design Delivery Team. Notwithstanding the requirements of clause 1.6, for
each file type, the version identifier shall be described and (where the version identifier caters for such) a
definition of the type of alterations which would constitute a major and minor revision update.
Data Approval Form

The agreed Data Approval Form (based on the example form EM.F.1369 as supplied with the Project
documents) shall be included. The agreed Data Approval Form shall be designed to suit the types of electronic
data-driven equipment to be used on the Project.
Sample Designs
A list of the sample design circuits/data to be submitted by the Design Delivery Team for review shall be
included. These circuits/data will be chosen and agreed jointly by the Aurizon Signal Design Manager’s
representative and the Design Delivery Team.
Procedures and Manuals

A list of the agreed subset of the Design Delivery Team’s procedures and manuals that will be used in the
design shall be provided along with any site-specific exceptions to the use of this subset.
Those procedures and manuals shall become controlled documents for the Project with the Design Delivery
Team as Document Controller. The Design Delivery Team shall issue controlled copies to the Aurizon Signal
Design Manager within 14 calendar days of the conclusion of the Design Planning Meeting.
Sample Design Review

Within 20 working days of the Design Planning Meeting the Design Delivery Team shall submit the agreed
sample designs to the Aurizon Signal Design Manager for review. The sample designs shall correctly and fully
implement the nominated function for the nominated signal, route or set of points (as appropriate) as it would
be commissioned. Two prints of each sample design drawing stamped ‘Sample Submission’ and a software
copy of the CADD file or Processor Based Interlocking data file shall be submitted for review.
Review of Sample Designs by the Aurizon Signal Design Manager is a performance monitoring process and
aimed at assessing the approach to circuit/data designs and not specifically intended for identification or
correction of design errors for each element of the circuit/data design. Any errors detected in the Sample
Designs will be advised. However, this shall not be construed to infer that a full detailed and comprehensive
check of the design or documentation has been carried out by the Aurizon Signal Design Manager and that all
errors have been identified.
The Aurizon Signal Design Manager will comment in relation to the correctness of the design methodology
accuracy and presentation of the sample designs.
A Sample Design Review Meeting will be arranged by the Aurizon Signal Design Manager within 5 working
days of submittal of the Sample Designs, to review and discuss the Sample Designs and to clarify the Aurizon
Signal Design Manager’s comments to ensure the Design Delivery Team fully understands the design
requirements. At the discretion of the Aurizon Signal Design Manager this meeting may not be required.
The agreed Sample Designs shall be used as guidelines for all subsequent designs submitted for Approval.
Design Clarification
Should the Design Delivery Team require clarification of the design requirements, these matters can be
resolved by direct contact with the nominated Aurizon Signal Design Manager’s representative.
The Design Delivery Team shall submit all design enquiries in writing in a format shown in the example for
EM.F.1359 (Technical Query). The nominated Aurizon Signal Design Manager’s design representative will
clarify design enquiries in writing. Telephone enquiries will not be accepted unless they are confirmed in writing.

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 02/04/2015
Design Progress Monitoring

A Design Progress Review Meeting will be held each month in addition to the Project meeting. This meeting
will be to review and discuss the designs and review the progress in the completion of the design.
The Design Delivery Team shall prepare a list of design submissions projected for submission to the Aurizon
Signal Design Manager during the upcoming month and table this list at the meeting. This list should be a true
subset of the submissions listed in the latest Design Control Chart.
The Aurizon Signal Design Manager reserves the right to conduct audits of design progress at the Design
Delivery Teams premises. The Aurizon Signal Design Manager will give the Design Delivery Team 24 hours’
notice in writing of the proposed audit and of the design area to be audited.
Design Approval Process

The Drawings accompanying the Specification shall be read in conjunction with the Specification and are listed
in the works definition document of this Specification. Circuits for the existing interlockings (where applicable)
are available for inspection by the Design Delivery Team. One copy of each set of existing circuits will be
issued to the Design Delivery Team within the timescales indicated in the works definition document.
Design Submissions will not be “Approved” or “Approved In Principle” by the Aurizon Signal Design Manager’s
Representative until after the Detailed Design Plan (refer 1.3.1) has been Approved.
Design Submissions will not be “Approved” or “Approved in Principle” by the Aurizon Signal Design Manager’s
Representative unless they are accompanied by:
– a completed and up-to-date Design Status Summary sheet,
– electronic files (CADD drawings, data files for PBI or other programmable equipment etc.),
and
– agreed Data Approval Form (where applicable)

The agreed Data Approval Form, as identified in the Approved Detail Design Plan, shall accompany any data
printout of any item of programmable equipment for which a hardcopy approval record containing all the
information included in EM.F.1369 is not automatically generated by the data preparation tool.
All designs and drawings shall become the property of the Principal on completion of the Works.
The Aurizon Signal Design Manager will record design correctness metrics relating to safety, functionality and
drawing/documentation standards as a performance monitoring activity.
Delays incurred by the Design Delivery Team through having to resubmit drawings and designs in excess of
the Drawing Control Chart or as a result of not gaining sufficient level of Approval or of failing
drawing/documentation audits, shall be the Design Delivery Team's responsibility and will not be considered
sufficient grounds for an extension of the project period.
Failure to receive approval for drawings not submitted in accordance with the Drawing Control Chart will not
be considered sufficient reason for extension of the Project timeframe or recovery of perceived delay and extra
costs.
Irrespective of the approval process, the Design Delivery Team shall be responsible for all costs due to any
changes deemed necessary by the Aurizon Signal Design Manager to achieve a safe and functionally accurate
system in accordance with the Project documents. Any Work on site commenced before approval of the
drawings for the Work, shall be at the Design Delivery Team's risk.
The Aurizon Signal Design Manager will allow for an audit of one Approval submission only. The Principal will
recover from the Design Delivery Team the costs applicable to auditing the resubmitted work except when the
resubmitted work is considered by the Aurizon Signal Design Manager to be of a minor nature. In the event
that the Aurizon Signal Design Manager is required to perform a detailed check in place of the audit, the Design
Delivery Team shall be responsible for any additional costs.
All changes to existing drawings shall show the alterations in colour as described in S.07.4211.02 Drawing
Mark-ups.
Any circuits that have been changed from previously submitted drawings shall be highlighted in green in the
Aurizon Signal Design Manager's copy of the submission. Any data changes from the previous data
submission shall be identified by means of a difference listing. Only the changed data together with the

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
difference listing need to be submitted. A soft copy of the data is also required to be submitted to the Aurizon
Signal Design Manager.
Designs submitted progressively for approval shall conform to the submission listing given in the approved
Detailed Design Plan and shall not be of a smaller subset than the package listed.
Design Status Summary Sheets

The Design Delivery Team shall maintain a record by way of Design Status Summary Sheets of the personnel
involved in each of the various steps relating to design, design modifications, checking, testing, documentation
updating etc. These history sheets shall provide for legible endorsements by the Design Delivery Team and
the Aurizon Signal Design Manager as appropriate.
The Design Status Summary Sheet shall be updated for each submission and a copy shall be attached to each
submission, test copy, etc. A sample form for the Design Status Summary Sheet is included in the Drawings
forming part of this Specification.
The Design Delivery Team’s Design Status Summary Sheet shall be submitted for approval if it is different
from the sample given.
Design Process Flowcharts

The Design Process is illustrated in the flowcharts on the following pages. The list of flowcharts included is:
– Process Summary;
– AS Development;
– Control Table Design;
– Circuit Design;
– Data Design.
This process is to be used by Aurizon personnel, contractors and consultants.
The flowcharts use the following symbols (see Data Design flowchart for the examples shown):
Design AS
This symbol refers to an input item for the process.
Design Data
This symbol refers to an output item for the process.

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
PROCESS SUMMARY

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
AS DEVELOPMENT
Line Diagram Produce Concept

Signal Plan
Design Site Visit

*Optional depending on
scope and size of project
Concept Signal Yes

Update Concept
Plan Site Changes?
Signal Plan
No
Vertical and
Perform Braking
Horizontal
and Headway
Alignment
Calculations
Overhead
Speed and Cant
Sectioning
Design
Requirements AS
Detailed Check
Produce URS
Requirements AS
Corrections Yes
Required?
Check Scheme Design Scheme
To Stakeholder Plan Plan
Review No
Site Visit
Corrections Yes
Required?
No
No Changes from
site visit?
Pass Scheme
Yes
Plan
Update
Requirements AS
Corrections Yes
Required?
No From Pass
B Detail Check
Requirements
AS Updated AS
Scheme Plan Approve Scheme

Plan
To Pass No Yes
C Corrections
Requirements
Required?
AS

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
AS DEVELOPMENT (continued)
From To Update From Update

A B C
Produce Requirements Requirements
URS AS AS
Pass
Requirements AS
Yes Corrections
Required?
Requirements AS No
Stakeholder
Review
User
Requirements No
Agreed?
Specification
Yes
Approve
Design AS
Requirements AS
and URS
To Detailed
Design

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
CONTROL TABLE DESIGN
Design Control Scheme Plan URS Design AS

Table
Yes
Detailed Check Corrections

Control Table Required?
No
Yes
No Design Control
Pass Control Corrections Approve Control
Table
Table Required? Table
Produce Principles Pink Control Table

Test Copies
Yes
Changes From Yes Update Master

Principles and Pink Control
Updates Required?
Testing? Tables
No No
Yes
No Commissioning
Corrections
Approve Updates Pass Updates Control Table
Required?
Produce Marked Up Pink

Commissioning Control Table
Copies
Yes
Changes
During Update Master Detailed Check Corrections
Commissioning Control Table Updates Required?
?
No No
Yes
No Corrections
Approve Updates Pass Updates
Required?
“As Built” Control

Produce “As Built” Issue “As Built”
Table
Copies Copies

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
CIRCUIT DESIGN
The following process applies for all designs (both internal and external) for
Locations, SER, PER, Cables, and Bonding.
Control Tables Scheme Plan URS Requirements AS

Produce Design
Detailed Check Design AS

Design
Procurement List
No
Approved for
Review Design
Mechanical
Layouts
Construction?
First occasion mechanically approved Approval To
Yes Commence
Construction
Review Design
Approved For
Construction
No Approved In
Principle?
Yes Green Test

Circuits
Altered or New New Produce Bell Test Changes From Yes Update Design To
Installation? Copy Bell Test? Greens
Altered No
Yes Updates No Corrections Detailed Check

Approved In Review Updates
Required? Updates
Principle?
No Yes
Produce
Function / Pink Test Copies
Pass Design Approve Design
Principles Test
Copy
To Commissioning
D
Copies

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
CIRCUIT DESIGN (continued)
From Pink D
Copies
Yes
Update Design To Yes

Corrections Detailed Check Changes from
Pinks (Mod
Required? Updates Testing?
Sheets)
No No
Corrections Yes
Review Updates
Required?
No
Produce Commissioning
Pass Updates Approve Updates Commissioning Copies
Copies
Yes
Changes
Corrections Detailed Check Update Design To Yes During
Required? Updates Mod Sheets Commissioning
?
No No
“As Built”
Produce “As Built” Issue “As Built”
Documentation
Copies Documentation

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
DATA DESIGN
The following process applies for all Data designs (both internal and
external).
Scheme Plan URS Design AS

Design Data
Yes
Control Table
Data Required?
No
No
Approved In Yes Design Data

Review Data Pass Data Approve Data
Principle?
Produce Principles Testing Data

Test Data
Yes
Changes From Yes

Principles Update Data
Updates Required?
Testing?
No No
Yes
No
Corrections
Approve Updates Pass Updates Review Updates
Required?
Produce Commissioning
Commissioning Data
Copies
Yes
Changes
During Detailed Check Corrections
Update Data
Commissioning Updates Required?
?
No No
Yes
No Corrections
Approve Updates Pass Updates Review Updates
Required?
Produce “As Built” Store ‘As Built” Issue “As Built” “As Built” Data
Copies Data Copies

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
Submission and Approvals

The Design Delivery Team shall prepare the design submission in accordance with the responsibilities of the
Designer as listed in clause 1.2 above.
The Design Delivery Team shall perform a detailed check of the design submission in accordance with the
responsibilities of the Detailed Checker/Verifier as listed in clause 1.2 above.
Before the design submission is submitted to the Aurizon Signal Design Manager, the Design Delivery Team
shall ensure that the initials of the Designer and Detailed Checker/Verifier and date are correctly recorded on
the title block of the drawing, on a Data Approval Form or in a similar applicable place dependent on the nature
of the design submission item. The Design Delivery Team shall establish and operate a documented procedure
to ensure the veracity of electronic signatures placed in documents/drawings.
Submissions shall not be made until the design item has had a Detailed Check/Verification and the appropriate
initials and date recorded on the design submission item or Data Approval Form.
The Design Delivery Team shall submit 2 white copies of the design submission and one copy of all associated
electronic files and a Data Approval Form (where applicable) to the Aurizon Signal Design Manager for
Approval.
If equipment layout and types are suitable, “Approved for Construction” status will be granted to enable
procurement and mechanical construction. The Design Delivery Team will be advised in writing.
If the design submission does not achieve “Approved In Principle” status (as defined in clause 0 below), one
white copy will be stamped “Not Approved” and returned to the Design Delivery Team with explanatory notes
as to where the design is inadequate. A copy of the Data Approval Form (where applicable) will also be
returned to the Design Delivery Team. The other paper copy, the Data Approval Form (where applicable) and
the electronic files will be retained by the Aurizon Signal Design Manager for records purposes. The Design
Delivery Team shall then rework and resubmit the design submission item.
If the design submission achieves “Approved In Principle” status (as defined in clause 0 below), the Aurizon
Signal Design Manager will sign the “Approved In Principle” box located in the left hand border of the sheet for
both white copies and stamp the Data Approval Form (where applicable) “Approved In Principle”, return one
of these copies plus a copy of the Data Approval Form (where applicable) to the Design Delivery Team for the
Design Delivery Team’s records and retain the other copy and the original of the Data Approval Form (where
applicable) for the Aurizon Signal Design Manager’s records.
If the Aurizon Signal Design Manager finds a statistically significant number of errors in a design submission
(see clause 1.4 on recording of error metrics) the Aurizon Signal Design Manager will suspend the approval of
that item (i.e. not complete the process) and return the submission to the Design Delivery Team with
explanatory notes as to what has caused the suspension of the approval. The Design Delivery Team shall
then rework and revise the whole of the design correcting any and all errors and omissions and resubmit the
item for approval.
Data files for processor based equipment will be granted approval (or otherwise) for the entire version of the
data. Drawings will be granted approval (or otherwise) for each sheet. It is therefore possible that not all sheets
in a submission of drawings (e.g. for a location, hut or SER) will achieve “Approved in Principle” status. Where
this is the case the Aurizon Signal Design Manager will clearly indicate which drawing sheets have not
achieved “Approved In Principle” status by stamping these sheets “Not Approved”.
Production of Bell Test Copies (Green)

Once an entire design submission has achieved “Approved In Principle” status (e.g. all sheets in a set of
drawings for a location, hut or SER etc.), the Design Delivery Team shall produce two photocopies of the entire
Approved in Principle design submission item, one on white paper and stamped “Copy of Bell Test Copy”, and
the other on green paper stamped “Bell Test Copy”.
The Aurizon Signal Design Manager will approve the “Certificate for Bell Testing”, in the form of EM.F.1360,
submitted by the Design Delivery Team. The Design Delivery Team is responsible for ensuring that the sheets
included in the white and green copies match the details on the “Certificate for Bell Testing”. The Design
Delivery Team shall attach the “Certificate for Bell Testing” to the green “Bell Test Copy” book. The Design
Delivery Team shall submit the white “Copy of Bell Test Copy”, with a copy of the “Certificate for Bell testing”
attached, to the Aurizon Signal Design Manager and the Aurizon Signal Design Manager will retain this copy
for records purposes.
Once Green Bell Test copies have been produced, all modifications to the item shall be done only using the
Aurizon Signal Design Manager’s “Circuit/Data Modification Sheet” and not on any other item or drawing. The

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
Aurizon Signal Design Manager will issue a set of “Circuit/Data Modification Sheets” to the Design Delivery
Team for this purpose.
Green Bell Test copies shall be produced for all new drawings.
Bell Testing shall not be carried out until the Bell Test copy drawings have the “Certificate for Bell Testing”
attached. The Circuit/Data Modification Sheets arising from the Bell Test shall be returned to the Aurizon Signal
Design Manager within 5 working days after completion of the Bell Test.
The Bell Test Copy shall be maintained on site until the completion of the bell testing and then returned to the
Design Delivery Team’s Design office within 5 working days of completion of bell testing. The Bell Test copies
shall be available for inspection by the Aurizon Signal Design Manager at all times.
Production of Function Test Submission Copies (White)

If all the design submission items for a station have achieved “Approved In Principle” status and bell testing is
complete as far as possible, the Design Delivery Team may produce the Function Test Submission and not
before.
The Function Test Submission shall be produced by the Design Delivery Team and incorporate all
modifications as per approved “Circuit/Data Modification Sheets”. The Design Delivery Team shall submit 2
white copies of the Function Test submission stamped “Function Test Submission”, one copy of any associated
electronic files and a Data Approval Form (where appropriate) for Design Integration checking by the Aurizon
Signal Design Manager. The green Bell Test Copy shall also be submitted along with copies of all approved
Mod sheets. All modifications from the Approved in Principle version shall be highlighted in green on the
Function Test Copy submission.
The purpose of Design Integration checking is to establish whether the various elements of the Design Delivery
Team’s total design (e.g. PBI data, SER circuitry, cable core plans, location case circuitry, telemetry bit
allocations etc.) are consistent with each other, and that any functionality which is split across more than one
such element is safely and accurately implemented.
If the Design Integration Check is not successful, one copy of the Function Test submission and Data Approval
Form (where applicable) will be stamped “Not Approved” and returned to the Design Delivery Team with
explanatory notes as to where the design is inadequate. The green Bell Test Copy and mod sheets will also
be returned to the Design Delivery Team. The Aurizon Signal Design Manager will retain the other copy for
records purposes.
The Design Delivery Team shall then raise Circuit/Data Modification sheets to correct any actual deficiencies
in the physical implementation. The Design Delivery Team shall subsequently update and resubmit the
Function Test Submission as described above.
If the Design Integration Check is successful, the Aurizon Signal Design Manager will initial the “Passed” and
“Approved” boxes on the title block of the white master drawing, Data Approval Form (where applicable) or in
a similar applicable place dependent on the nature of the design submission item. The Aurizon Signal Design
Manager will return the initialled master drawing (or Data Approval form) to the Design Delivery Team within 5
working days of receipt of the Function Test Submission. The Aurizon Signal Design Manager will retain the
second copy of the Function Test submission and the updated mod sheets.
The following diagram gives an example (location case circuits) of the progression of approvals with system
design integration:

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
AIP AIP AIP AIP

Drawing Drawing Drawing Drawing
Sheet Sheet Sheet Sheet
AIP AIP AIP AIP AIP AIP

Diagnostic
Location SER Non-Vital PBI Data etc.
Tools
Integration
Check
Approved
Station
Production of Function Test Copies (Pink)

Once the white master drawing has been Passed and Approved, the Design Delivery Team shall produce two
photocopies of the initialled master drawings, one on pink paper stamped “Function Test Copy” and the other
on white paper stamped “Copy of Function Test Copy”.
The Aurizon Signal Design Manager will approve the “Certificate for Function Testing”, in the form of
EM.F.1361, submitted by the Design Delivery Team. The Design Delivery Team is responsible for ensuring
the sheets included in the white and pink copies match the details on the “Certificate for Function Testing”.
The Design Delivery Team shall attach the “Certificate for Function Testing” to the pink “Function Test Copy”
book. The Design Delivery Team shall submit the “Copy of Function Test Copy”, with a copy of the “Certificate
for Function Testing” attached, to the Aurizon Signal Design Manager and the Aurizon Signal Design Manager
will retain this copy for records purposes. The Design Delivery Team will forward the pink Function Test Copy
to site for testing.
Setting to work and Function Testing shall not be carried out until the Certificate for Function Testing and pink
Function Test copy has been received by the Design Delivery Team.
The pink Function Test Copy shall be maintained on site by the Design Delivery Team’s Testing and
Commissioning Manager. All alterations made during function testing and/or setting to work shall be done
using the Aurizon Signal Design Manager’s “Circuit/Data Modification Sheet”.
Where Setting to Work of the interlocking is possible before commissioning, the interlocking shall only be Set
to Work to the version of circuits/data described in the Approved Function Test submission and recorded on
the pink Function Test copy initialled by the Aurizon Signal Design Manager or as subsequently updated via
submission and approval of Circuit/Data modification Sheets. (Testing, Inspection and Commissioning - GSS–
PART-13).
Production, Updating and Distribution of Commissioning Copies

Once all pre-testing has been completed, the Design Delivery Team shall update the master of each drawing
(or electronic data file) with all approved changes as a result of pre-testing recorded on Circuit/Data
Modification sheets and correct any documentation errors found. The Master CADD drawings shall be updated
with the “Passed” and “Approved” initials as recorded on the initialled pink Function Test copy.
The Design Delivery Team shall produce Commissioning Copies (as Specified in the works definition
document)) from the updated master. One copy shall be delivered to the Aurizon Signal Design Manager for
audit purposes at least 5 working days prior to the scheduled commissioning date. Upon approval from the
Aurizon Signal Design Manager the remaining Commissioning Copies are to be delivered to site by the Design
Delivery Team prior to Commissioning.
Commissioning Copies shall be stamped “Commissioning Copy” and shall include all updates referred to in
the above paragraph. Commissioning shall not proceed until these Commissioning Copy drawings have been
issued and the pink Function Test copies are available on site.

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
The Design Delivery Team shall supply prints to the total number specified in the works definition document of
each drawing for that portion, including prints for the locations, SER’s (singular or distributed). These prints
shall be A3 size and made up into books with protective plastic covers. A separate set of prints for each location
shall be provided and shall be of A3 size. PBI logic data print-outs shall be a type font no smaller than 10 point.
If no quantity is specified in the works definition document, three complete books, in addition to location specific
prints shall be provided.
The Testing and Commissioning Manager will confirm availability on site of the pink Function Test copies.
Once commissioning has been completed and before the Design Delivery Team leaves the site, the Design
Delivery Team shall ensure that every copy of the Function Test Copy (pink) and the Commissioning Copy
drawings/documentation has appended to it a copy of any relevant Circuit/Data Modification sheets affecting
that drawing/document.
Once commissioning has been completed and before the Design Delivery Team leaves the site, the Design
Delivery Team shall ensure that suitably updated Commissioning Copies are distributed to the places indicated
below:-
PLACE NUMBER OF COPIES
Each Location Case or

One copy of that location/hut drawings/documentation
Hut
One paper copy of each location/hut and SER/Interlocking

Each SER
drawings/documentation/data
Each Location Case or

Hut containing a PBI One paper copy of that location/hut drawings/documentation
(master or slave unit)
All remaining copies to the maximum number specified in

Deliver to Testing and
Reference in the works definition document of the
Commissioning Manager
Specification.
Audit of Updates Following Commissioning

Following the commissioning, the Design Delivery Team shall update the drawing/document master to
incorporate all outstanding modifications as per approved “Circuit/Data Modification Sheets”. All test copies
shall be returned from site to the Design Delivery Team within 10 working days on completion of the
commissioning.
The Design Delivery Team shall update the “Design Check” box in the title block of the drawing (or similar
place on the Data Approval Form) with the authorisation initials shown on any authorised Mod sheet. Where
no Mod sheets apply to the drawing sheet, “—“or “N/A” shall be inserted in the “Design Check” box.
Where more than one set of initials appear on mod sheets relating to one drawing sheet, then the Design
Delivery Team shall advise the Aurizon Signal Design Manager of the drawing sheet number and the Mods
sheet numbers. The Aurizon Signal Design Manager will advise the Design Delivery Team as to whose initials
are to be placed in the “Design Check” box.
The Design Delivery Team shall perform a CADD check in accordance with the responsibilities listed in clause
1.2 above and insert appropriate initials in the “CADD Check” box. If the CADDing is incorrect, the Design
Delivery Team shall correct any and all errors.
The Design Delivery Team shall produce 1 white copy of the entire design for the commissioning area from
the Design Checked and CADD Checked master, stamped “Audit Submission” and submit along with the pink
Function Test copy and the green Bell Test copy and all Mod sheets, to the Aurizon Signal Design Manager
for audit.
The Aurizon Signal Design Manager will conduct a sample audit of the Audit Submission to monitor the
accuracy and completeness of the updated drawings/documentation. If the audit is not successful, the audit
submission, pink Function Test copy, green Bell Test copy and all Mod sheets will be returned to the Design

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
Delivery Team with explanatory notes as to where the drawing/documentation is inadequate. The Design
Delivery Team shall then rework and resubmit the drawing/documentation for audit. Any subsequent audits
will be conducted on a progressively larger sample until a satisfactory result is achieved.
If the audit is successfully completed, the Aurizon Signal Design Manager will retain the pink Function Test
copy and the green Bell Test copy.
The duration of this audit will be time limited to the period defined in the works definition document where the
time period begins once the commissioning has been completed. Failure of the Design Delivery Team to
produce complete and accurate Audit Submission before the expiration of this audit time limit shall not absolve
the Design Delivery Team from the responsibility of delivering complete and accurate As-Built drawings and
documentation.
Delivery of As-Built Documentation

Within 5 working days of successful completion and return of drawings from the audit indicated above or the
expiration of the audit time limit as referenced above, the Aurizon Signal Design Manager will authorise the
Design Delivery Team in writing that the Final As-Built drawings may be produced. As-Built
drawings/documentation shall not be produced until such authorisation is received and shall be produced only
from the version of the Master drawing/document which passed the audit.
The Design Delivery Team shall then produce the As-Built documentation.
Within the timescales indicated in the works definition document, the Design Delivery Team shall deliver the
produced As-Built drawings/documentation to the Aurizon Signal Design Manager. If not specified in the works
definition document, 10 working days shall apply.
Design Approval Levels and Definitions

The following levels of design Approval will be given by the Aurizon Signal Design Manager’s Representative
when approving submitted designs:
– Not Approved
– Approved for Construction
– Approved in Principle
– Approved for Testing
– Approved
These approval levels are defined below:
“THE DESIGN PROPOSAL FAILS TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROJECT
NOT
AND/OR APPLICABLE FUNCTIONAL AND/OR SAFETY AND/OR OPERATIONAL
APPROVED:
REQUIREMENTS.”
Approved for “The design proposal is generally satisfactory for procurement and
Construction: mechanical construction”.
“The design proposal is generally satisfactory but some areas of the

submission require correction, alteration or clarification. Further detailed
Approved In design, equipment ordering, manufacture, construction and installation
Principle: may not proceed on the unsatisfactory areas” OR “The design is correct
within itself but may not be verifiable for consistency with other design
elements”.
“All previously required amendments have been made. The design is

Approved for correct within itself but may not be verifiable for consistency with other
Testing: design elements. Bell testing may be conducted to this drawing (for
greens). Function testing may be conducted to this drawing (for pinks).”

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
“The total design is consistent and all previously required amendments

have been made. The design has the approval of Aurizon for design
payment and function testing may be conducted to this drawing.
Notwithstanding such Approval, the Design Delivery Team shall bear full
responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the designs, drawings
Approved:
and specifications, for all portions of the Work covered thereby and for
carrying out the Work in accordance with the Drawings and the
Specification”. Such Approval may be conditional on the correction or
alteration of some minor aspects (details and/or documentation) of the
submission.
Submittable Design Items

Drawings/documentation shall be submitted in accordance with the approved Design Control Chart schedule.
Drawings and documentation shall include but not be limited to those in the list below. Unless indicated
otherwise in the body of this Part 14, the Design Delivery Team shall submit the indicated number of copies
(both hardcopy and electronic).
a. Working drawings and specifications of all signal structures. (3 paper copies)
b. Circuit Drawings and diagrams for the control and operation of all functions. (2 paper copies
plus CADD file)
c. System Schematic Drawing(s) (3 paper copies plus CADD file) showing:
– vital communications equipment and links
– telemetry communications equipment and links
– Processor Based Interlockings housings, cards, connections
– Diagnostic equipment housings, cards and connections
– Axle counter full system schematic and interfaces
– data links detailing physical type of link, data rate, protocol, etc.
– interface points and details to existing equipment (project boundary)
– and accompanied by a timing analysis and tolerance stack showing worst case time delays
(propagation time and race conditions) for time (time delay) and timing (order of operation)
related functions in the system (e.g. level crossings, time of operation locking, set
up/cancellation of bi-directional signalling, block circuits)
d. Construction Scheme Plan(s) (3 paper copies plus CADD file) showing:
– cable route details including pits, location cases and junctions
– where a cable route is provided by Aurizon, drawings of that route will be provided to the
Design Delivery Team for marking up as applicable and forwarded to Aurizon for updating on
Aurizon master.
– relevant cabling details of new and removed or relocated cables

Note that the Construction Scheme Plan is not required beyond the end of the construction and installation
phases. It is required to be submitted and will be approved by the Aurizon Signal Design Manager.

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
e. Design data for Processor Based Interlockings (2 paper copies plus electronic file) showing:-
– All applicable electronic files
– Detailed hardware setup, strappings, jumpering, switch settings, version of cards, firmware
version
f. Design data for processor based non-vital equipment (2 paper copies plus electronic file)
showing:
– All applicable electronic files
– Detailed hardware setup, strappings, jumpering, switch settings, version of cards, firmware
version
g. Design data for diagnostic tools/systems/maintenance panels (2 paper copies plus electronic
file)
h. Drawings showing the general arrangement of the control panel/indication diagrams. (2 paper
copies plus electronic file)
i. Drawings showing the layout of the equipment in the equipment rooms. (2 paper copies plus
CADD file)
j. Drawings showing the type of housings proposed, together with arrangement of associated
wiring and equipment. (2 paper copies plus CADD file)
k. Drawings and documentation showing analysis of Terminations, Cable Cores, Relay Contact
Analysis and wire counts etc. (2 paper copies plus CADD file)
l. Drawings showing the location and construction of the cable routes. (2 paper copies plus
CADD file)
m. Cable run plans and cable core plans. (2 paper copies plus CADD file)
n. Power loading calculations for the worst case interim and/or final arrangement. (2 paper copies
plus electronic file)
o. Bonding Plans where not supplied by the Aurizon Signal Design Manager. (3 paper copies
plus CADD file), showing kilometreages and details of insulated joint locations, track circuits,
track circuit and traction rail bonding, signals, locations, points machines, boom and
pedestrian gates and the associated fences and flashing lights posts, impedance bonds and
ground frames for each interlocking up to the limit of indications shown on the AS plan, spark
gap arrestors at level crossings etc. The Aurizon Signal Design Manager will provide details
of spark gap arrestors for inclusion in the bonding plan drawings
p. Mechanical design drawings (3 paper copies)
q. Wiring and Data for Test/Simulation Rigs (2 paper copies; plus CADD/electronic file where
applicable)
r. Electronic Hardware details (2 paper copies plus CADD file) including strappings, jumpering,
switch settings, version of cards, firmware version

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
Stagework Design
TERM DEFINITION
The controlled progression over time of a project from

the original configuration to the final configuration.
(There may be 0 to n of these stages). Each stage is
Stage(s)
functionally different from the original or final
configuration, is commissioned separately and runs
traffic for a period of time.
Stagework is that work which alters the system from

Stagework
one stage to the next.
Those items of signalling design which represent the

necessary configuration of the signalling system to
achieve a stage of a signalling project.
Stagework drawings/data
They will show explicitly the alterations to be made to
the signalling (circuits, data, cabling, etc.) to achieve
the necessary alterations.
Any requirements for staging of the project will be specified in the works definition document.
Unless otherwise specified, the Design Delivery Team shall prepare all necessary stagework drawings/data
for each stage indicated in the works definition document. All stagework drawings/data shall be submitted for
approval in accordance with the Design Approval Process described in clause 1.4.
Each stagework drawing/data shall be identified with the stage to which it applies. (e.g. stage 1, stage 2 etc.)
Each stagework drawing shall have new/additional items wiring etc. marked or drawn in accordance with
S.07.4211.02 Drawing Mark-ups.
Stagework drawings/data shall pertain only to the progression from one stage to another unless written
authorisation is obtained from the Aurizon Signal Design Manager (i.e. multiple stages shall not be shown on
drawings/data).
Commissioning Copies shall be produced, updated and distributed for each stage (see clause 1.4.5), but AS-
Built copies of intermediate stages are not required.
After each commissioning, the Design Delivery Team shall update the design baseline to correctly reflect the
As-Commissioned status of the signalling system configuration. This new design baseline shall be used as the
baseline for representing the stagework drawings/data for the next stage and shall be shown in black.

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
Existing Stage 1 Commissioning
red/yellow(blue) Approval
Stage 2 Commissioning
new baseline
new baseline Final Commissioning
As-Builts
Figure: Stagework Design, Approval and Baseline Update.
Version Control
Each drawing sheet and/or data file shall have a unique version identifier inherently embodied with the sheet
or file.
Version control of drawings shall be in accordance with S0504 Drawing Control.
Version control shall be effective during the entire project from initial design through testing and commissioning
until and including the delivery of As-Built documentation.
The Design Delivery Team shall establish and operate a documented procedure detailing the operation of
version control for all version controlled electronic files. The procedure shall indicate how the difference
between major and minor revisions is indicated. The procedure shall identify the sequence of version control
before and after each level of design approval.
Version controlled items shall be:
– one sheet of a drawing
– one data file
Modification to Approved Design

Modification to the approved designs after issue of the Approved In Principle status shall only be done via
Test/Design Report Sheets and Circuit/Data Modification Sheets.
These shall be controlled in accordance with P.07.4211.16 Use of Test/Design Report Logs and
Circuit/Data Modification Sheets.

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
This procedure refers to certain roles. For the purposes of this Project, the roles referred to in the procedure
shall be mapped as follows:
P.07.4211.16
PROJECT ROLE
ROLE
Designer Design Delivery Team’s Designer (refer clause 1.2)
Checker Design Delivery Team’s Checker (refer clause 1.2)
Passer Aurizon Signal Design Manager’s Representative (refer clause 1.2)
Technical
Aurizon Signal Design Manager’s Representative
Coordinator
Testing
Coordinator
Aurizon Signal Design Manager’s Representative or Design

Tester Delivery Team Member as defined in the works definition document
for the particular Project.
Test Log
Administrator
The Aurizon Signal Design Manager will issue books of Test/Design Report Logs and Circuit/Data Modification
Sheets to the Design Delivery Team for this purpose.
CADD and Drawing Requirements

Aurizon uses the PC CADD product Microstation as a design and analysis aid for the production of signalling
designs and control circuit drawings.
The Design Delivery Team shall produce the designs on a PC orientated Microstation CADD system as utilised
by Aurizon. The system shall be compatible with the current version of Microstation used by Aurizon and
specified drafting tools.
The Aurizon Signal Design Manager will issue a controlled copy of drawing ‘seed’ files and cell libraries
containing drawing symbols to the Design Delivery Team for use on the Project. All CADD drawings shall use
the issued ‘seed files’ and cell libraries. The supplied cell libraries and drawing ‘seed’ file will remain the
property of Aurizon and, on completion of the project, shall be erased from the Design Delivery Team’s CADD
system.
The designs shall be completed in accordance with Aurizon’s Quality Procedures CADD drawings as listed in
section 0. The CADD files will be checked at each submission to ensure compliance with this specification.
Drawings shall conform with best drawing practice, to a scale large enough to convey all information
adequately. Cells are not to be “dropped” (i.e. individual occurrences modified) unless approval is given by the
Aurizon Signal Design Manager’s Representative. Customisation of the software for Aurizon requirements will
be supplied by the Aurizon Signal Design Manager’s Representative.
All drawings shall be prepared on metric size drawing sheets in accordance with the provisions of AS 1100.101-
1992 unless otherwise specifically approved by the Aurizon Signal Design Manager. All drawings shall be
designed to A2 size format and plotted on A3.
Submission of circuit drawings etc. shall be in suitably bound books with four holes punched on the left hand
side at 80mm spacing, complete with Title Sheet, Index Sheet and Design Status Summary Sheets.

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
Each set of drawings shall contain a Design Status Summary Sheet showing the following information:
– Sheet number e.g. sht 110A
– Sheet content e.g. 14A/14B Route stick relays
– Sheet version e.g. version 1A:012

The Design Status Summary Sheet itself shall be listed on the index Sheet. All details shall be correct and
complete. The Index sheet shall be updated for each submission and each commissioning.
Final ’As Built’ CADD Records, Drawings and Data Files

One copy of the complete software files of the final ‘As built’ drawings on CD/DVD or USB Flash drive, and
five (unless otherwise specified) A3 paper copies of all designs and one A3 plasticised “paper” copy of all
location circuits shall be supplied to the Aurizon Signal Design Manager. Circuit books shall be bound and
covered in protective plastic.
The Bell and Function Test Copies shall be forwarded to the Aurizon Signal Design Manager with the Final ‘As
built’ software files copy.
As-built data source files of all data configurable equipment shall be delivered on CD/DVD or USB Flash drive.
The CD/DVD/USB should be clearly marked with Station Name, Project, Date and Design Delivery Teams
name. Two paper copy print outs of each data file shall also be delivered. Unless it can be established that the
Principle has compiler software for each type of file, the Design Delivery Team shall also provide the necessary
compiler software and appropriate licences for each type of file/equipment.
The Design Delivery Team shall also hold in a secure place a copy of the complete software files of the Final
‘As built’ designs for a period of two years after the delivery of the As-Built documentation.

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
Appendices
Appendix 1 - Applicable Aurizon Design Standards
The following documents available on request in “.pdf” format on CD/DVD and are applicable to the Works to
the extent described in the body of this Part 14:
S0410 Signalling Principles - Brisbane Suburban Area
S.07.4211.27 Signalling Principles – Regional RCS
S.07.4211.02 Drawings Mark-ups
P.07.4211.16 Use of Test/Design Report Logs and Circuit/Data Modification Sheets
S0504 Drawing Control
S.07.4211.24 Signalling Equipment Numbering Standard
F.300.8.73.002 Data Approval Form
DRWCTL02 SAOS CADD/DMS Enhancements
Data Structures Document
Appendix 2 - Compilation of Signalling Circuit Books

For Regional Installations
Circuit diagrams shall be drawn to show complete circuits on the one sheet. The SER (Signalling Equipment
Room) circuit drawings shall include the complete circuit including parts of the circuit contained in other
Loc’s/SER’s but omit through terminals and documentation information for the locations. The design logic shall
also be included as part of the relay room drawings.
Additionally, for each location along the trackside it is required that an extract showing the equipment and
wiring at that location be prepared as a separate series of drawings suitable for being kept in the locations,
together with the relevant section of the bonding Plan.
For minor alterations, the existing sheet numbering system shall be retained. For major alterations and new
interlockings the preferred order of sheets and requested numbering scheme is given below. The SER circuits
are first, followed by the locations in the second part of the book. The order is as follows:
00 Station Title Sheet

01 Station layout with location case areas shown, including Index Sheet.
02 ATC Schematic Line Diagrams
03 ATP Schematic Line Diagrams
04 Control Tables (including aspect sequence)
a) SER circuits as follows:

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
101. Rack Layouts

102. Track feeds and track relays
103. Track repeat relays and repeats
104. Track timers, TJR's and TFJR's
105. Block circuits and traffic relays, Axle Counter Circuits
106. Route proving relays, main signals
107. Route proving relays, shunt signals
108. Approach locking stick relays grouped
109. Signal stick relays and associated Power off relays
110. Route stick relays
111. Main signal control relays
112. Main signal line circuits and RGPR's
113. Shunt signal control relays, line circuits and RGPR’s
114. Signal lighting circuits and flasher relays, etc. ATP circuits
115. Repeat signal relays
116. Emergency push button
117. Local panel switch RPR's and local panel switch repeats
118. Ground frame circuits
119. Points control relays
120. Points machine control circuits; line circuits
121. UTC Bit Listings and indications
122. Local panel indications
123. Personnel call circuits and Dragging equipment detection circuits
124. Level crossing protection circuits
125. Power supply, PER hut including PBI and health checking relay
126. Looping
127. Communications and UTC connection
128. Contact analysis organised by function or rack layout
129. Cable Terminations including Terminal wire count analysis
130. Alternator Control Cubicle Circuits
134 . Cable core analysis plans
135. Cable run diagrams
136. Track bonding (with distances shown).
Where additional sheets are required, the sheet number shall be suffixed by A, B, C, etc.
b) Location Case circuits as follows:
Location Case details shall include case layout, equipment, power supply, circuit details, terminations,
contact analysis, looping, call and case lights, track feeds and relays etc.

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
Location drawings are to be arranged in a group for each location to commence at sheet 210, with
sheets 210, 211, 212, etc., for the first location, sheets 220, 221, 222, etc., for the next location.
Within a set of location case drawings, the sheets shall be in the following order:
i. Case Layout and locality plan
ii. Power Supplies (may include looping if there is room)
iii. Track circuits (may include through circuits where applicable)
iv. Signal Control & lighting circuits
v. Push button circuits
vi. Points circuits
vii. Level crossing Controls
viii. Level Crossing Lights
ix. Boom gates mechanism(s)
x. Pedestrian Gate Control
xi. Pedestrian Crossing Alarms
xii. Pedestrian Lights
xiii. Pedestrian Gates
xiv. Cut Section circuits
xv. Looping
xvi. Contact Analysis
xvii. Fuse and terminal analysis
For Installations in the Brisbane Suburban Area
Circuit diagrams shall be drawn to show complete circuits on the one sheet. The equipment room circuit
drawings shall include the complete circuit, but omit through terminals and documentation information for the
locations.
Additionally, for each location an extract showing the equipment and wiring at the location shall be prepared
as a separate series of drawings suitable for being kept in the locations.
The required order of sheets and the numbering scheme is given below. The equipment room circuits are first,
followed by the locations. The order shall be as follows:
2000 Index (Main Interlocking)
2001-2899 Interlocking and Control circuits
2900 Index (Locations)
2901-2999 Location Plans, Power and Signal Cables, Signal Cable Diagrams.
3000 Locations
The proposed drawing numbering scheme shall be submitted to the Aurizon Signal Design Manager for
approval.

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
The preferred order of sheets 2000 - 2899 for main interlockings is given below, refer to the typical circuits for
examples. Where additional sheets are required in the existing circuit book, the sheet number may be suffixed
by A, B, C, etc.
• Index Sheet (Sheet No.2000)
• Train Notice Diagram
• AS (if this is in a suitable A3 format)
• Bonding Plan (if this is available and in a suitable A3 format)
• Control Table
• Aspect Sequence Chart
• Point Availability
• Point Setting
• Point control and Detection
• Point Locking
• Point Correspondence
• Signal Locking/Route Checking
• Route Locking
• Approach Locking
• Signal Stick Relays
• Signal Aspect Control Signal Repeating
• Level Crossing Protection Track Circuit Repeats and Timers
• Telemetry Override Relays
• AWS Controls
• Telemetry Inputs
• Telemetry Outputs
• Signal Push buttons
• Ground Frame Control
• Maintenance Panel Circuits
• Power Supplies including PBI health checking relay
• Electronic Hardware details
• Equipment Rack Layout
• Contact Analysis

QMS
VERSION: 4.2 DATE: 17/02/2017
• Fuse/Negative Analysis
• Rack Terminations
• Cable Terminations
Location Case details shall include case layout, a locality plan, equipment, power supply, circuit details,
terminations, contact analysis, looping, call and case lights, track feeds and relays etc.
The required sheet order for location cases in the Brisbane Suburban Area is:
• Case Layout and locality plan
• Power Supplies
• Track circuits
• Signal control circuits (may also include signal lighting circuits if there is room)
• Signal Lighting circuits
• Points machine circuits
• Points control circuits
• Level crossing Controls
• Level Crossing Lights
• Boom gates mechanism(s)
• Pedestrian Gate Control
• Pedestrian Crossing Alarms
• Pedestrian Lights
• Pedestrian Gates
• Contact Analysis
• Fuse & Terminal Analysis
• Termination Analysis


EV06 - Design and Drawings

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

EV06 - Design and Drawings

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

QMS

DOCUMENT NUMBER: S.300.8.73.003

Design and Drawings

Copyright © Aurizon UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN TRANSMITTED OR PRINTED PAGE 1 OF 35

Document Review History

Title Page & List of Revisions

Updated following ISG & NAG

Publisher update – Visio

Updated as a result of industry WSL, US&S,

Version control/identification for

Updated to include EED

KB, ML, GC, VB,

4.0 06-09-11 Updated as per BIR 353 & 467 CW, NR

Updated to new template

Copyright © Aurizon UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN TRANSMITTED OR PRINTED PAGE 2 OF 35

Chris Wilkins Principal Engineer Process Owner Email 2/04/2015

Control Systems Engineering

Copyright © Aurizon UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN TRANSMITTED OR PRINTED PAGE 3 OF 35

Copyright © Aurizon UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN TRANSMITTED OR PRINTED PAGE 4 OF 35

Design and Drawings

Copyright © Aurizon UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN TRANSMITTED OR PRINTED PAGE 5 OF 35

ROLE PARTY RESPONSIBILITY

Agreed Project Specification;

Documentation provided by the Principle or Aurizon

Equipment manufacturers recommendations;

Any timing delay, speed of response, capacity or

Signalling Principles – Brisbane Suburban Area

Signalling Arrangement (AS);

Applicable Data Structures documents;

Approved Design Plan;

Agreed Sample Designs;

Principles of failsafe design;

Design Delivery Team’s Quality Management System;

Approver Aurizon Personnel To audit the process of design.

Copyright © Aurizon UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN TRANSMITTED OR PRINTED PAGE 6 OF 35

Detailed Design Plan

– Design Control Chart;

– Design Resource Plan;

– Nomination of the Registered Professional Engineer(s) pursuant to the Professional Engineers

– Use of design standards on the Project;

– Use of example designs on the Project;

Copyright © Aurizon UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN TRANSMITTED OR PRINTED PAGE 7 OF 35

– Use of Data Approval Forms;

– Use of procedures and manuals;

– Type Approvals current and required.

Design Control Chart

DESIGN ITEM SUBMISSION DUE APPROVAL DUE

New Locations, Design Approved in Principle date 1 date 1 + 15 days

New Locations, Bell Test (Greens) date 2 date 2 + 2 days

Modified Locations, Design Approved in Principle date 3 date 3 + 15 days

SER, Design Approved in Principle date 4 date 4 + 15 days

SER, Bell Test (Greens) date 5 date 5 + 2 days

Data, Design Approved in Principle date 6 date 6 + 15 days

New Locations, Function Test Submission (Whites)

Modified Locations, Function Test Submission (Whites)

Data, Design Approval

New Locations, Function Test (Pinks) date 8 date 8 + 2 days

Modified Locations, Function Test (Pinks) date 9 date 9 + 2 days

SER, Function Test (Pinks) date 10 date 10 + 2 days

Data, Ready for Principle Testing etc. date 11 date 11 + 2 days

Copyright © Aurizon UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN TRANSMITTED OR PRINTED PAGE 8 OF 35

Design Resource Plan

Registered Professional Engineer