Re: Quality Review -EAs

1 message

KZSP Classes <deepkumar2392@gmail.com> Sat, 9 Apr 2022 at 23:43

To: ayushsingh841763@gmail.com

On Sat, Apr 9, 2022, 23:38 Lovely Lavi <lovelylavi523@gmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, Apr 1, 2022, 11:02 COMIS-Administrator <comis@ses.comis.chegg.com> wrote:

Dear Reena Prajapati,

In order to ensure that students are being provided with the best answers possible, our reviewers review random
samples of each expert’s work.

Unfortunately, this is the second time that your answers did not meet our guidelines, and your privileges as an
Expert Answerer have been revoked.

QC Decision/Result: Failed

Sno Id QR Date Score Reason Comments

Incorrect It was asked to take t as the number of years

1 92912393 03/20/2022 0.00 method or since 2000. This was not followed in the
approach solution.

Parts b, e and f are not answered. Detailed

Incomplete computation steps are missing in parts c and d.
2 93261317 03/20/2022 1.50
answer In part a, last element is wrong due to
calculation error. Avoid cuttings and overwriting.

Calculation In the first solution, calculation error in 4th step

3 93025959 03/20/2022 2.00
errors led to incorrect answer.

Honor Direct answers do not facilitate the learning

4 93222611 03/20/2022 0.00 code process for students. Providing direct answers is
violation a violation of CHEGG's Honor code.

If you have any queries, please raise a Support ticket or get in touch with your subject lead.

Thanks,
The Chegg Team.
***This is an auto generated email – please do not reply to it.***