You are on page 1of 5

ITEM AND RESPONSE QUESTIONNAIRE VALIDATION

Tick (√) the box that corresponds to your rating.

Outstanding Satisfactory Fair Needs


Improvement
4 3 2 1

1. Directions are clear and unequivocal. ✓

2. Questions are unequivocal. ✓

3. Used correct grammar. ✓

4. No biased questions. ✓

5. Every item/question applies to each ✓


respondent.

6. All questions are related to the ✓


topic/research problems under study.

7. All questions would gather data relevant ✓


to the study and would answer the
research problems.

8. Made as many questions as would supply ✓


adequate information for the study.

9. Grouped the questions in logical ✓


sequence, i.e., Questions may be grouped
according to the research problems under
the statement of the problem or easier
questions should be asked first.

10. Asked one item at a time, thereby ✓


avoiding multi-barrelled items.

11. Used positive language. Stated all ✓


questions affirmatively.
12. Worded carefully or avoided questions ✓
that deal with confidential or embarrassing
information.

13. Explained and illustrated difficult ✓


question/s or used simple terms for easy
understanding.

14. Used the appropriate scale/s (e.g., Likert). ✓

15. Choices or options are objective and n/a


aligned to the question (for multiple choice
and multiple response questions).

16. Created a sufficient number of response n/a


categories. This is to make possible the
inclusion of the correct choice of the
respondent.

17. Proper reverse scoring (if applicable). n/a


Sometimes, a group of statements on a
single measure is stated in different
“directions.” That is, a 5 indicates a high
level of endorsement of a particular
attitude, whereas on other items, a 5
means low level. Before responses can be
combined into a single meaningful total
score, all items must be in the same
direction. To accomplish this, the scores
for those items that are in an opposite
direction are “reversed.” High scores
become low scores and low scores
become high scores.

18. Balanced the visual, numeric, and ✓


conceptual mid-point of the response
options.

19. Placed all spaces for replies at the left n/a


side (if applicable).
20. Made the respondents anonymous (if ✓
need be).

21. If the respondent is anonymous, are there n/a


questions/items about their identification
depending on the variables needed for the
study? e.g., age, grade level, sex, etc.

22. Added a catch-all-word into the options of n/a


multiple response questions, i.e., Others,
pls. specify

Comment/s:

None so far.

Validated by:

Name (Optional): Sir J.J. Rosales

Position: SHS Teacher

Thank you for participating in our study. We appreciate your validation and feedback ☺

Academic Demands

4 3 2 1
(Strongly Agree) (Agree) (Disagree) (Strongly Disagree)

I feel like my workload is


not manageable.
I spend so much time
accomplishing my
workload.

I feel like I don’t have


time for personal
matters anymore
because of my workload.

I feel as though I’m not


learning enough as I just
focus on completing my
tasks.

My academic standing is
improving because of the
demands in my
academics.

Academic Burnout

4 3 2 1
(Strongly Agree) (Agree) (Disagree) (Strongly Disagree)

I feel burnt out from


school.

I often get overwhelmed


by the amount of
workload in school.

Academic demands are


emotionally draining.

I always lack energy for


school.
I feel like I’m working
too hard at school.

You might also like