Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/333967336
CITATIONS READS
6 582
2 authors, including:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Johanes Fernandes Andry on 23 June 2019.
1022
ISSN: 2395-1664 (ONLINE) ICTACT JOURNAL ON MANAGEMENT STUDIES, MAY 2019, VOLUME: 05, ISSUE: 02
sustainability and competitiveness. EA activities are carried out motivation of the organization and its work. Here we see goals,
through a work assignment, which is a process of completion and objectives, business plans, knowledge architectures, reasons and
efficiency, which arises from tasks that do not add value and are decision making in organizations [18].
excessive, provide information flow, up to strategic system
placement and business restructuring [20]. EA activities are
delivered through the domain, which is equipped with business
functions and IS/IT provided by work assistance. Related to EA
into four domains, namely business, information, technical
architecture and application. Each domain has its own results,
which determine its implementation. Business-approved business
architecture from a business perspective, which complements the
business vision and mission as well as the objectives needed to
guide its strategic and daily operations [21]. The architecture
contains business strategies, the process of achieving stages and
the business plan process, where information architecture is
developed. Organizational information needs related to policies,
governance, and information products determined by the
information architecture. Describes high verification and quality
of information, so that it is easy for organizations to make changes
and make appropriate decisions [22]. Basically, information
architecture describes the structure of logical and physical data
assets and data management resources, which complement the Fig.1. Populated Zachman Framework [19]
application architecture. The application architecture of the
blueprint of the individual application system that will be used, Zachman Framework is a scheme to classify the organization
including interactions and relationships with key business of Zachman Framework company artifacts consisting of 6
processes. Architecture also works on transparent communication columns and 6 lines. Each column represents the focus,
and design tools for application developers. The domain of abstraction, or topic of corporate architecture, namely: data,
technical architecture is approved to support and support the function, network, human, time, and motivation. Each row
organization’s needs from strategic planning to implementation represents the following perspective:
planning [23].
• Planner’s Perspective: sets the context, background, and
2.2 ZACHMAN FRAMEWORK purpose.
• Owner Perspective: establishes the company’s conceptual
The Zachman framework is designed to involve representation model.
of information systems for all parties involved in developing,
managing, maintaining, and using organizational information • Perspective Designers: model information systems while
systems. Zachman’s framework describes a company architecture bridging the things that the owner wants and things that can
in six components, namely data, function, network, task, time, be realized technically and physically.
motivation. Each component explains and uses six different • The Builder Perspective: establishes the technical and
perspectives, namely the perspective of the planner (planner) that physical design used in overseeing technical and physical
produces architecture (contextual description), the owner’s implementation.
perspective that produces the company model (conceptual • Subcontractor’s perspective: establish roles and references
design), the system perspective model (logical design), for those responsible for developing information systems.
perspective builder to present details (design physical), the • Functional Perspective: represents the user’s perspective
perspective of subcontractors to represent details (design out of and tangible manifestations of implementation [24].
context), and finally a model of corporate functionalization [19].
The Fig.1 shows the Populated Zachman Framework, where 2.3 ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING
the framework consists of two dimensions as follows, What,
Where, When, Why, Who, and How, following from the Enterprise Architecture Planning (EAP) is a method used to
explanation of each of the 6 components. What (data), building provide information systems and organizations. However, EAP
unity is considered important in business. These units are things does not have business and architecture, but requires its business
whose information is managed. Functions, functions, and and architectural needs. In EAP, architecture considers the data,
activities determine. Inputs and outputs are also compared in this applications and technology needed to support an organization’s
column. Where (network), geographical event, location, and the business [25].
relationship between activities in the organization, which includes a) Layer 1 (Starting Position)
the main business geographical location. Who (human), i. Planning Initiation: start Planning Company
represents humans in organizations and metrics to measure their Architecture on the appropriate track (including:
abilities and performance? When (time), represents time and determining what is used, who will be involved, the
shows work criteria. This is useful for designing schedules and tools needed). At this stage a work plan will be
processing architecture. Why (motivation), describes the produced, certainty of management commitment.
1023
JEFRY LEONARDO AND JOHANES FERNANDES ANDRY: DESIGN ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE FOR INDUSTRY OF TEXTILE USING ZACHMAN FRAMEWORK
Modelling
Systems and Level 2: Where we are today 4.1.2 Purpose:
technology
Level 3: Future Vision • Being the largest company in the field of clothing textile
Data Application Technology
Architecture Architecture Architecture
Level 4: How to get there
industry in the clothing industry both nationally and
internationally.
Fig.2. EAP Components and Layers [25] • Produce quality and innovative products, according to
customer needs.
i. Initialization or Planning, in this activity includes • Increase production performance with effective and efficient
literature study in the form of material trust in the design time.
of Enterprise Architecture and designing case studies of
4.1.3 Vision:
corporate architecture carried out by others before and
determining the architecture of the scope, vision and Become the best company in the field of textile marketing and
mission in order to achieve the goals of the organization or distribution that has excellence in innovation, and presents new
company, plans and commitments from the parties clothing products with high-quality materials.
concerned to design this development process.
4.2 BUSINESS MODELING
ii. Business Modeling, this process, collecting and observing
documentation from the company’s organizational Defining the current system of PT. Sutera Indah Utama, as
structure, identifying business functions, and making a described in Fig.3, where the Current Running System addresses
beginner or initial business model. the activities of a company’s organization, namely finance,
iii. Current System and Technology, the process of human resources, inventory, production, sales and services.
identifying systems and technologies that are currently
running and analyzing conditions in the organization.
iv. Data Architecture, the activity of examining the definition
of data entities that involve in the organization then design
the data architecture.
1024
ISSN: 2395-1664 (ONLINE) ICTACT JOURNAL ON MANAGEMENT STUDIES, MAY 2019, VOLUME: 05, ISSUE: 02
1025
JEFRY LEONARDO AND JOHANES FERNANDES ANDRY: DESIGN ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE FOR INDUSTRY OF TEXTILE USING ZACHMAN FRAMEWORK
Table.2. Candidate Application 4. Purchase Order (Input, Update, Delete, Search, View);
Business process Application Code Application Candidates 5. Inventory Report (Search, View, print);
Inventory ii. Production Management
APK_1 Inventory Application
Management 1. Inventory Material Request (Input, Update, Delete,
Production Print, View);
APK_2 Production Application
Management 2. Production Status (Input, Update, Delete, Search,
Marketing View);
APK_3 Marketing Application
Management
3. Production Requests (Input, Update, Delete, View);
Financial
APK_4 Financial Application 4. Production report (Search, View, print);
Management
Human Resource iii. Marketing Management
APK_5 Human Resource Application
Management 1. Data Collection of Customer Requests (Input, Update,
Service Delete, Print, View);
APK_6 Service Application
Management 2. Product Sales (Input, Update, delete, Print, View);
4.5.2 Relationship of Candidates for Applications with 3. Sales Report (Search, View, print);
Business Processes: iv. Financial Management
This stage aims to identify business functions that are directly 1. Budget (Input, Update, Delete, View);
supported or carried out by the application, based on Fig.5, 2. Budget Disbursement (Input, Update, Delete, View);
Candidate Relation Application with Business Process.
3. Financial Statements (Search, View, print);
Information: C = Create, U = Use, V = View
v. Human Resource Management
Application Candidates
Production Application
Marketing Application
Financial Application
Service Application
Human Resource
Marketing
C, U, V 4.5.4 Candidates for Applications based on Portfolios:
Management
Financial Depending on Table.3, the candidates for application are
C, U, V
Management selected based on application portfolios.
Human
Resource C,U,V Table.3. Application Candidates Based on Application Portfolio
Management
Service Strategic High Potential
C, U, V
Management 1. Production Management
1. Inventory Management
2. Marketing Management
Fig.5. Candidate Relation Application with Business Process
Key Operational Support
4.5.3 Application Candidate Decomposition: 1. Financial Management
The following is an analysis of the features of each 2. Human Resource 1. Service Management
application, as follows: Management
i. Inventory Management 4.6 TECHNOLOGY ARCHITECTURE
1. Collection of Data Goods and Materials Enter (Input,
Update, Delete, View); 4.6.1 Technology Definition Platform:
2. Collection of Data Goods and Materials Exit (Input, The purpose of this stage is to determine the application and
Update, Delete, View); data distribution strategy and define technology that will be an
3. Check Goods Stock (Input, Search, View); environment for applications and data to support business
functions as in Fig.6, Company Technology Definition.
1026
JEFRY LEONARDO AND JOHANES FERNANDES ANDRY: DESIGN ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE FOR INDUSTRY OF TEXTILE USING ZACHMAN FRAMEWORK
DOI: 10.21917/ijms.2019.0140
Target Architecture
-Process
Interface
-Knowledge
-Workflow
Application
Business process
Ability
IS Infrastructure
Aim
Vision Organization
Infrastructure Strategy
Principle
Domain - Structure - Matrix
-Basic Framework -Database Solution - Products - Efficiency
Implementation - Service
1027
JEFRY LEONARDO AND JOHANES FERNANDES ANDRY: DESIGN ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE FOR INDUSTRY OF TEXTILE USING ZACHMAN FRAMEWORK
1028
ISSN: 2395-1664 (ONLINE) ICTACT JOURNAL ON MANAGEMENT STUDIES, MAY 2019, VOLUME: 05, ISSUE: 02
Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 27, No. 15, pp. 394- Conference on British Academy of Management, pp. 1-25,
403, 2015 2017.
[17] V. Lendel, S. Hittmar and M. Latka, “Application of [22] D. Kang, J. Lee and K. Kim, “Alignment of Business
Management of Innovation Processes in Enterprises: Enterprise Architectures using Fact-based Ontologies”,
Management Approach, Problems and Recommendations”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 3274-
Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 34, No. 15, pp. 410- 3283, 2010.
416, 2015. [23] T. Iyamu, “Understanding the Complexities of Enterprise
[18] M. Varga, “Zachman Framework in Teaching Information Architecture through Structuration Theory”, Journal of
Systems”, Proceedings International Conference on Computer Information Systems, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 1-9,
Information Technology Interfaces, pp. 161-166, 2003. 2017.
[19] M. Mani, S. Uludag and C. Zolinski, “On Evaluating the use [24] J.M. Nogueira, D. Romero, J. Espadas and A. Molina,
of Zachman Framework in Computer Science and “Leveraging the Zachman Framework Implementation
Information Systems Classes”, Journal of Computing using Action-Research Methodology-A Case Study:
Sciences, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 47-59, 2015. Aligning the Enterprise Architecture and the Business
[20] B.D. Rouhani, N. Mahrin and F. Nikpay, “Current Issues on Goals”, Enterprise Information Systems, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp.
Enterprise Architecture Implementation Methodology”, 100-132, 2013.
Proceedings International Conference on New Perspectives [25] B. Jahani, S. Reza Seyyed Javadein and H. Abedi Jafari,
in Information Systems and Technologies, pp. 85-94, 2014. “Measurement of Enterprise Architecture Readiness within
[21] F. Kitsios, “Enterprise Architecture Management for Organizations”, Business Strategy Series, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp.
Business Strategy Modelling”, Proceedings of International 177-191, 2010.
1029