Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
1. What is the mean rating of the respondents on the activity in terms of:
1.1 Content
1.2 Speaker/Facilitator
1.3 Group Interaction
METHODOLOGY
In this survey, there are 61 participants who responded to the given evaluation
forms. The respondents rated the activity by the scale of 1 to 5; 1-Poor, 2-Below
Average, 3-Average, 4-Above Average, and 5-Excellent. Data responses gathered and
were computed.
The mean ratings on each of the following components of the activity: content
coverage is relevant to the objective of the activity, topic is useful to my development,
content coverage in thorough, Organization, Knowledge of subject matter, Clarity of
voice and presentation, Ability to sustain students interest and attention, Time allotment,
Participants' engagement in discussion, Moderators' effectiveness, Appropriateness,
Adequacy of space and Conduciveness to activity. All Comments and Suggestions of
the students towards the activity were also presented in this study.
FINDINGS
Table 1 shows that in terms of content: the content coverage obtained an excellent
rating from the participants (M=4.910
Table 3 shows that in terms of open forum/group interaction: the open forum/group
interaction coverage obtained an excellent rating with a mean of 4.59.
Table 4 shows that in terms of venue/facilities: the venue facilities coverage obtained an
excellent rating (M=4.84).
Table 5 shows that the assessment of the activity’s over-all mean with a rating of 4.80 is
excellent.
CONCLUSION
RECOMMENDATION