Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. What is the mean rating of the respondents on the activity in terms of:
1.1 Content
1.2 Speaker/Facilitator
1.3 Group Interaction
METHODOLOGY
In this survey, there are thirty (30) participants who responded to the given
evaluation forms. The respondents rated the activity by the scale of 1 to 5; 1-
Poor, 2-Below Average, 3-Average, 4-Above Average, and 5-Excellent. Data
responses gathered and were computed.
The mean ratings on each of the following components of the activity: content
coverage is relevant to the objective of the activity, topic is useful to my
development, content coverage in thorough, Organization, Knowledge of
subject matter, Clarity of voice and presentation, Ability to sustain students
interest and attention, Time allotment, Participants' engagement in discussion,
Moderators' effectiveness, Appropriateness, Adequacy of space and
Conduciveness to activity. All Comments and Suggestions of the students
towards the activity were also presented in this study.
FINDINGS
Table 1 shows that all areas under the content area obtained an excellent
rating with a mean of 4.84.
Table 3 shows that overall, the open forum/group interaction was rated as
excellent (M=4.68).
Table 5 shows the assessment of the activity’s over-all mean with a rating of
4.79or Excellent.
CONCLUSION
Prepared by:
Noted by: