Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Duke University Press and are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Journal of Music Theory
MOZART'S MUSIC
David Beach
K. 280 (I). The development section from the first movement of the
Sonata in F, K. 280, is given in Example 1. The brackets indicate the
several statements in the bass of the ascending arpeggio-figure that is such
a prominent feature of the second thematic idea (not shown). The deriva-
tion of the sequence beginning in m. 67 from the opening of the second
theme is obvious, whereas the relationship between the second theme
and the initial phrase of the development section is somewhat concealed
by the surface characteristics of the latter. First, note the elaboration
(in triplets) of the ascending arpeggio-figure in the bass. Second, note
the prolongation of g2 and its supporting harmony (I to 16 in the key of
the dominant) in mm. 57-63, which corresponds to the earlier connec-
tion between mm. 27 and 35. Internal to this prolongation is the unfold-
ing of a fifth from g2 down to c2, from an outer to an inner voice with a
transfer of resolution, as shown in Example 1.3 This motion, though
concealed, may be taken as a representation of the equivalent motion
of a fifth that is unfolded over the span of the entire second theme. The
prolongation of g2 in mm. 57-63 is extended through the remainder of
the phrase while the harmony is altered to lead to the following d minor
chord, which initiates the sequence. This sequence is broken in m. 75 at
the augmented sixth chord, which is prolonged and altered before re-
solving to the A major chord (which, in the local context, is the domi-
nant of d minor) in m. 78. These important events, the statement and
prolongation of the augmented sixth chord and its resolution to the A
major chord, are articulated by changes of surface design and register. A
further change of surface rhythmic pattern occurs in the brief retransi-
tion, in anticipation of the return to the opening thematic ideas.
A two-level representation of the voice leading of these measures is
given in Figure 1, a few features of which warrant brief comment. First,
note the fV in parentheses at m. 67. This pitch, though not stated, is im-
plied by the context-as resolution of the preceding chord and, in
retrospect, as suggested by the following sequence. The reason for the
omission of the f2 is clear enough-to allow for the direct imitation of
the opening two measures of the second theme. As shown at level b,
this implied f2 moves to e2 and d2 in parallel tenths with the bass, and
eventually to c1 via octave transfer and the chromatic passing note c#,
thus completing an additional statement of the linear progression of a
descending fifth from g2. That this progresion is again a motion from an
- i I 10F
s s
57 3
a.
10 o 10
2 -- - --- ------
b.
Figure
Figure 1
diA,~ i do of d - , Wf1
v ps moo' ',
at
17 ,L
Exampl
h
5 4
A3'
"5C
6 -- '~ 6
Figure 2
K. 280(111). It can hardly be chance that this same idea, the large-
scale bass arpeggiation, occurs in the final movement of the same sonata,
this time without the connecting dominant between III# and I. As
shown in Figure 3, the structural dominant that initiates this motion is
not stated at the outset of the development section, but rather at the
end of the exposition. The pitch g2, which is supported by this domi-
nant, is reinstated at the end of the first phrase of the development sec-
tion, now supported by the locally stabilized supertonic (G minor). Note
that the g2 of m. 85 is approached in the second half of the phrase by a
stepwise descent from c3, a note attained by octave transfer of the c2 in
mm. 78-81. The second phrase begins as a sequence of the preceding
material a step lower, but the sequence is not continued into the second
part of the phrase; instead the descending fourth is extended over eight
measures so that f2 is not reached until m. 97. As shown in Example 3,
the extension of this idea is accomplished by the repetition through
voice-exchange of the two-measure subcomponents of this section. The
sequential harmonization of the two parts of the descending fourth re-
sult in the support of fP by a d minor harmony (vi) rather than the F
major chord that would have occurred at this point if the sequential
treatment of the first phrase had been continued. This motion to d minor
is important, since it prepares for the following motion to its dominant
(III#) in mm. 103 and 105. Meanwhile the fP moves through eb 2 to d2
within the d minor harmony prior to the registral shift to d3 at the intro-
duction of the augmented sixth chord in m. 102. This shift prepares for
the subsequent restatement of the opening idea in the original register.
As shown in Figure 3b, the completion of the large-scale bass arpeggia-
tion in its "proper" register occurs in m. 123, at the end of the restate-
ment of the first theme.
There are many similarities other than the large-scale bass arpeggia-
tion between the development sections of the first and third move-
ments of K. 280. For example, both move to d minor (vi) as a way of
preparing the eventual motion to III#. In the first movement the d
minor harmony initiates a sequence that leads to the augmented sixth
chord and the following dominant (of d minor), whereas in the third
movement the d minor hamony is the goal of sequential motion, after
which the augmented sixth and dominant are introduced very shortly.
Also, both movements contain middleground melodic motions of a
descending fifth from g2(2). In the first movement this fifth is a motion
from an outer to an inner voice, but in the third movement it is the
primary melodic line, the way 5 is reinstated at the beginning of the
a.
a. - - - ,-i,t sl
l, ,16
7 7it
e--
b.
Figure 3
2f,',L k ,, F F
. a S.-R
3 3
10mm17-241
Figure 4
Figure 4
i -~lli 1.174
to m. 24
,P ,- P I I I P,i,
5 5 4 3
Figure 5
11
12
6 5 I 'M6 5 I" p-
66
4 ! 3 6 t 3
1713
... .......3......m m 94,1
_UF I
16 t1 FA R
b. 4 7
F: 6 I 3
; A - -C
F: .. 7
Figure 6
14
15
A )repeaed
43
Figure 7
16
At the outset of this study it was noted that the large scale progres-
sion V-III-I occurs in several movements of the Mozart Piano Sonatas.
To be more precise it occurs in twelve of the twenty-seven movements
17
0 L
P I
L_ ML1TY
........~ , ,... ,, i ! .-
_ I - b - _
b : i 1
b 1 ,, -6011 oe
..... 0
6-" 01.
Of00
Exampl
].8
INF) ---
Example 8 (continued)
A A
2 5
I
-BI
7 :V1
6 7 66 7 (m.103)
15 -:7)I
Figure 8
19
AM
Mr .c e r
67 "4 # i 3 3 3!
20
Except for the change of genre this description could fit those in-
stances in Mozart's sonatas where the connecting dominant has been
suppressed, that is where the connection between III# (V of vi) and I is
direct. Mozart's use of this idea is certainly derived from earlier practice,
and its prior existence helps to explain its occurrence in his works. How-
ever, what distinguishes Mozart's use of this idea from earlier practice is
its occurrence at more than just immediate levels of connection. This
unique feature of Mozart's music apparently did not go unnoticed by
later composers. Consider, for example, the first movement of Beetho-
ven's Spring Sonata-the Sonata in F major, Op. 24, for violin and
piano.7 In this case there is an immediate juxtaposition of V7 and III#
(in the sixth position) from the end of the exposition to the beginning
of the development and from III# (V of vi) to I at the end of the
development to the beginning of the recapitulation. The large-scale pat-
tern is quite clearly V 7-III-I. A somewhat different situation occurs in
Chopin's Etude in F major, op. 10 no. 8. In this work the immediate
goal of the harmonic motion in the "B" section is III (V of vi), which
is prolonged for several measures before giving way to the dominant.
When considered in the local context, the dominant is passing between
III and the return to the tonic. However, when considered in the larger
context, III# can be seen as leading to the dominant, that is as part of
the progression I-III-V.s
It is interesting that the two works just mentiond, as well as half of
the twelve movements from Mozart's piano sonatas which contain this
emphasis on the mediant, are in the key of F major. This suggests the
possibility that Mozart may have associated certain progressions W'ith
certain keys. This does not seem to be an unreasonable assumption
given the obvious keeness of Mozart's musical ear. However, it is also
clear that his interest in this progression surpasses such simple connec-
tions. Having found a unique solution to a compositional problem-the
large-scale connection of the exposition to the recapitulation-he con-
tinued to develop and reshape this idea throughout his career.
SUPPLEMENT
21
22
XI
,.- !. i I -f ii i.. .
P f
IL T
,~ ~ f ,
Example 9. K. 5
Oi
b76 b74 6
i. Figrei. 9
F444
2 16 6
Figure 9
24
fikOp L-Ei _- 4 .
mfp
m'fp
mli
fmf
III
*- i P".. _ f ' # I
. . . ..7-5! " I ! --P
?:
'
if
LDP
p
, ,
- r" " .
80d m le 0
1 0
86'
,. , i ,Li . ...A
-~~~~~~ F kt v,
14=6 1 i
K 50 F
) m . 4--
Eiol =1i ?
i!
=. ?w_,
_-P Ow' i _ i P ' _.. ...d
Ow..4'
&A-
Examle 1. K
EMM , n . -.
Em 10(cntiue
y (inv.) .
E l 1 tnuv.) y(inv.)
105
109 X
....... .......
Figure 10
- 5 th-
t Figure 11
28
1. This motion to the major triad on the mediant occurs in twelve movements
from the Piano Sonatas alone. In two instances-K. 280(III) and K. 283(II)-
the return to the tonic is direct, that is with no connecting dominant. In K.
280(I) the connecting dominant is passing, and in three others-K. 332(I),
K. 333(I), and K. 547a(I)-this passing dominant is slightly extended, more so
in the latter two. In the remainder the emphasis on the mediant articulates a
dividing point in the development section; from there the motion is directed
back by sequence to the dominant. These are K. 279(111), K. 283(III), K. 310
(II), K. 533(Allegro), K. 570(I), and K. 576(I).
2. This pattern was first pointed out to me by the late Ernst Oster in reference
to the first movement of the Sonata in F, K. 280. The present study is the
product of Oster's suggestion, made years ago, that an examination of all the
sonatas-and, in fact, other works by Mozart, Beethoven, and others-would
reveal multiple and diverse occurrences of this idea.
3. Completion of the fifth occurs through the d2 in m. 62, which in the local
context is heard as an upper neighbor-note rather than passing note to c .
4. See Maury Yeston, The Stratification of Musical Rhythm (New Haven: Yale
University Press, 1976), pp. 103-108.
5. The exceptions are the second and third movements of the Sonata in G, K.
283. In most of the other movements the arpeggiation of the tonic triad is
quite clear. On the other hand there are several movements whose opening
themes are based on the arpeggiation of the tonic triad but do not contain
this idea as a large-scale bass motion, meaning that there is not a one-to-one
correspondence between its use on these different levels.
6. Francesco Gasparini, The Practical Harmonist at the Harpsichord, trans. Frank
S. Stillings and ed. David L. Burrows (New Haven: Yale School of Music,
1963), p. 39.
7. I would like to thank Allen Forte for suggesting that I examine this piece
from this point of view.
8. See Heinrich Schenker, Five Graphic Music Analyses, with a new introduction
and glossary by Felix Salzer (New York: Dover Publications, 1969).
9. Ernst Friedrich Richter, Die Grundzige der musikalischen Formen und ihre
Analyse, (Leipzig: Georg Wignad, 185 2), p. 32.
29