Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5
Theories of Personality (TTh 8:30-10:00 AM)
By: Danielle Kate M. Fontamillas
1. How did Carl Rogers’s clinical experience differ from Sigmund Freud’s?
• Unlike Freud, Carl Rogers failed clinically before developing the non-directive approach
to therapy.
• Rogers developed a "client-centered" approach, while Freud founded psychodynamics.
• Rogers claimed that his approach does not use a predetermined theoretical structure
like Freudian psychoanalysis in which the therapist must fit the patient's problem.
Person-centered therapists only believe in the client's worth.
• Rogers opposed free association, dream analysis, and case histories. He believed they
made clients dependent on the therapist, who then assumed an aura of expertise and
authority and could solve their problems if the clients did what they said.
• He focused on the individual rather than the unconscious and was more humanistic than
Freud.
• His patients had adjustment issues, not severe emotional disorders like Freud's.
2. Differentiate the two basic assumptions of Rogers. And explain the factors involved in
experiencing incongruence.
• Vulnerability – when they are unaware of the discrepancy between their organismic self
and their significant experience.
• Anxiety – a state of uneasiness or tension whose cause is unknown.
• Threat – can represent steps toward psychological health because they signal to us that
our organismic experience is inconsistent with our self-concept.
3. Explain how conditions of worth, incongruence, defensiveness, and disorganization become
barriers to psychological growth.
4. What are the conditions necessary for Psychological Growth. Explain each condition.
5. What concept/s could you relate most in Rogers’ theory and why?
Simply put, I found deep resonance in nearly every one of Rogers' theories and ideas. First, I liked
that he took the time to explain what factors contribute to personal development. The vast
majority of people in the world want to feel accepted and understood by someone without any
hint of pretense. One of the things I seek most at Christ's feet is an expression of love that is not
conditional on anything I do or say. Secondly, I find myself agreeing with the readings because of
their emphasis on encouraging curiosity and originality. Truly, growth and improvement are
continuous processes that never reach completion. Every one of us grows and develops as time
passes, and even the smallest of these improvements is cause for joy. In the third place, I've been
thinking a lot his concept on the conditions of worth. I can't help but think that maybe I captured
this bit of wisdom when I was young, to the point that I'll always feel the need to put on a show
to earn the approval of those around me (this shall be discussed in the theory I am in the process
of making). In sum, I found Rogers' theory to be the most compelling of its kind I've encountered.