Registration and Stamps Department - Si 1931/2016 filed by Sri R. Sattaiah & others ~ Document No. 19790 of 2005 - Injunction order Regarding. 5 Ref:- Application of Sri R. Sattaiah, dt: 17.07.2021, Repres GPA holder Sri D. Pratap A copy of the reference cited is enc Josed and the Sub Registrar's Serilingampally & Gandipet Ranga Reddy District are requested to Beeeseary action in pursuance of the orders of the Court im tH=esaaia™ 20 in O.S No. 1331 of 2020. The Sub-Regisirar, erilingampally, Reddy District. Scanned By Camera Scannerstanding in the name of M/s. Sarayu Agro Farms Pvt Ltd and 2 others in respect lands covered by Survey Nos. 113 admeasuring 5 acres situated at Gopanpally Serlingampally Mandal and Municipality, Ragen DStet, in sui No. a admeasuring 3 acres 20 gts out of 5 acres situated at Gopanpally Village, — Serlingampally Mai dM /; Rangareddy District. Thus, totally admeasuring No. 38 admeasuring 20 gts out of 2 acres 21 gts situated at Vatinagulapally Village, Rajendranagar Mandal previously, presently Serlingampally Mandal, Rangareddy District, as the said document was cancelled by the Hon'ble Principle District Judge, Rangareddy District at L.B. Nagar by virtue of Judgment and Decree in O.S. No. 1331 of 2016, dated 31-12-2020 standing in the name of M/s. Sarayu Agro Farms Pvt Ltd and others upon the suit filed by the Rasuri Sattalah and 6 ‘others represented by their Irrevocable General Power Of Attorney Sri Dandu Pratap S/o. Late. Dandu Kumariah R/o. Prashanth Nagar, Quthubullapur Village and Mandal, Rangareddy District and issue a proceedings to that effect in order to make an entry in’ ROR before the Tahsildar, Serlingampally Mandal, Rangareddy District to avoid future complications-Reg. Ref: 1. Xerox copy of Judgment and Decree in O.S. No. 1331 of 2016 dated 31-12- 2020 passed by the Hon'ble Principle District Judge, Rangareddy District at LB. Nagar filed by Rasuri Sattaiah and 6 others represented by their Irrevocable General Power Of Attorney Sri Dandu Pratap against Sarayu Agro Farms Pvt Ltd represented by its director K. Gopala Krishnam Raju and others. 2. Xerox copy of Exchange Deed dated 1-12-2005. 3. Xerox Copy of Irrevocable General Power Of Attorney dated 25-11-2015. 1, undersigned bringing the following few facts for your kind consideration and necessary action at your end. Scanned By Camera Scanner4 K. Gopalakrishnam Raju and 2 others in ‘of the aforesaid lan “agreeing In lew of that the aforesaid firms and personsiagreed to transfer their ins survey no 420 admeasuring 2 acres, in survey No. 457/AA admeasuting 3 2 gts and survey No. 458 admeasuring 4 acres 30 gts thus totally admeasuring 10 a situated at Vatinagulapally Village, Rajendranagar Mandal previously, presently Serlingampally Mandal, Rangaredcy District styling themselves as owners of the - aforesaid land. 3. That believing the words of the aforesaid persons, my principles are illiterates ‘and agriculturist executed a exchange deed No. 19790 of 2005 registered at DRO, Rangareddy District .e., Defendant No.4 in the suit. After that when my principles gone: to the lands mentioned in the exchange deed they found that the said lands are in: Aispute and after realizing the same my principles through me approached the Hon'ble Principle District Judge, Rangareddy District at L.B. Nagar by filing O.S. No. 1331 of 2016 seeking cancellation of the said exchange deed and grant permanent injunction restraining M/s. Sarayu Agro Farm Pvt Ltd and 2 others from altering and changing the nrature of the suit lands. Scanned By Camera Scanner0 gts and in Survey No. 38 admeasuring 20 gts out of 2 acres 21 § inagulapally Village, Rajendranagar Mandal previously, presently Serlingar al, Rangareddy District, as the said document was cancelled by the H District Judge, Rangareddy District at L.B. Nagar by virtue of Judg in O.S. No. 1331 of 2016, dated 31-12-2020 standing in the name of Agro Farms Pvt Ltd and others upon the suit filed by the Rasuri Sattaiah a Tepresented by their Irrevocable General Power Of Attorney Sri Dandu Pratap: “complications. For Act of kindness, I shall ever grateful to you. Thanking you, Scanned By Camera Scanner165 years, 0 eure, Sori Venkataiah, S/o. Late R. Jangaiah, igulture, Late R. Jangaiah, 52 culture, ori Vittal, S/o. Late R. Jangeiah, ed 45 years, Occ: Agriculture, Sori Srisailam, 8/0. Late R. Jangaiah, “42 years, Occ: Agriculture, Ia dhe plaintiff are R/o. Vattinagulapaly VIAES, Dfiajendranegar Mandel, Rangareddy D'S" Pieintifie 1 to 7 are rep. by their Irrevoc Mipider Sri Dandu Pratap, S/o. Late Dect "Aged 44 years, Oce: Business, Ne Prashanth Nagar, Quinubullepar Vil Rangareddy District. AND Die. Saray Agro-Farms Pet Lid Ne its Regd Office at No.1-11-195, Flat No.503, ‘Vemakamala’s Promila Rao emoy, ShamalelBuildings, Begumpet Hyderabad- 500 016 iy its Director, K.Gopala Krishnalt Raju, ‘Rama Raju, Aged about 94 years, R/o. B79, nagar, Hyderabad-38- ‘gro Prt. Ltd., having its Re No.503, Vi Scanned By Camera Scanneré Jaintiffs against the = This is a suit filed by the Pl th a ison rgiteed xchange deed bear 01.12.2005 an permanent No 19790/2005, fonts no to alter or change the suit lands. a suit relief of cancellation is valued for the area! ee pe 00.000/- and court fee of Rs.1,08,426/- is h car eat Riv Arc (0) & (c) of APCF & SV Act and for the si Pe eent injunction is valued at Rs.1,00,000/- and court Fe3.426): is paid U/s 24 (c) of APCF & SV Act. Thus a tot Rs. 1,11,859/- is paid Cause of Action:- The cause of action for the suit arose on 05.09.2014 the plaintiffs have obtained memo from the Deputy Collector and Seriingampally, Rangareddy District through their irrevocable Power of Attomey holder seeking information with regard to the el ROR and the plentifs got issued legal notice dated 07.09.20 efendants 1 to 3 for cancellation of exchange deed bearing No.19790 of 2005 dated 01.12.2005 cautioning the defendants 1 cancellation of exchange deed and also not to resort for creation off barty rights over the suit lands and the plaintiffs had also filed WP. 5 tere the Hone High Court at Hyderabad on 19.11,201: Scanned By Camera Scannerhand and seal of the court on this the 31* day 0 hams PRL.DISTRICT JUDGE, Ong BATRA 9 oe Memo ofcosts “Ranga Reddy Lu For Plaintiffs | For Defendants (Rs) Rs) 1. Stamp on Plaint 1,11,852-00 0-00. 2. Stamp on power 2-00 2-00. ‘3. Stamp on Process 100-00 0-00 4. Advocate Fee ford Plet TEC not Pac) ‘S.Miscellaneous 0-00] 0-00 Total| 1,11,454-00 2-00] cM PRL.DISTRICT JUDGE, Dish RF SRGts Ite f Schedule A Property OE ay Di {All that piece of landed property i.., in Survey No.113 admeasuring an fof Ac.5.00 situated at Gopanpalli village, Serilingampally Mandal and | Rangareddy District and all that piece of landed property i-e., prey No.l14 admeasuring an extent of Ac.3.20 gu at of Ac.5.00 dal and Municipality, “Zt Gopanpalli Village, Serilingampally M Dre a Ac.8.20 guntas as follows: East ‘Survey No.114 part and Survey No.115 West Survey Nos.111 and 112 South Survey No.40 and 42 of Vattinagulapally Village and Survey No.114 of Gopanpalli Village North Part of Survey No.113 dul 1 ‘that piece of landed property i.e, in Survey No.38 admeasuring an Fof Ac.0.20 guntas out of Ac.2.21 guntas situated at Vat ‘Mandal, Rangareddy District bounded Neighbours Land in survey No.39 Survey No.38 part ‘Survey No.38 part ‘Survey Nos.109 and 112 of Gopanpalli Village Scanned By Camera ScannerPrecipel Dict Jade ‘Thursday, the 31 day of December, 2020 O.S.No. 1331 of 2016 1. Rascori Setteich, S/o. Late RJengsich, fged 55 years, Occ: Agric 0.4-84, Prashanth Nagar, Ranga Reddy District. Scanned By Camera ScannerAged about 55 years, -195, Flat No.503, a's Pramila Rao Residency, Shamlal Hyderabad-500016, S/o. Late K.Rama Raju, lusiness, ‘agar, Rangareddy District. ©. The Tahsildar, s, rilingampally Mandal, Serilingampaliy, Rangareddy District, The Station House o; "cer, Serilingampally Police Station, Rangareddy District a This suit is coming before me for final Presence of Sri Karunalee Reddy, pararte and upon hearing ang ‘having stood over for consideration Scanned By Camera Scanner-patta pass book and title deed from the ‘that they were absolute owners in possession: ‘Sy.No.114 admeasuring land an extent of Ac.05-00 gts ‘Village, Serilingampally Mandal and Municipality, Ranga Red having purchased the same through registered sale deed bearing ‘document No.2446/1982 dt.05.04.1982 registered at Registrar Office, Ranga Reddy District from their vendor /original owner Sri B.Prasad Dubey and after the said purchase, the plaintiffs have mutated their names in Record of Rights ‘and obtained patta pass book and title deed from the revenue authorities. They further submitted that they were the absolute owners in possession of ‘agricultural land in Sy.No.38 admeasuring an extent of Ac.02-21 gts situated at ‘Vattinagulapalli Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District having Purchased the same through registered sale deed bearing document No.1507/1979 dt.19.07.1979 registered at Registrar Officer, Hyderabad West from their vendor/original owner Sri U.Shankar Reddy and after the said purchase got mutated their names in Record of Rights and obtained pattadar pass book and title deed No.231526 from the revenue authorities. Thus, the became the absolute owners and possessors of the land totally Scanned By Camera Scanner420 admeasuring Ac.02+ 458 admeasuring Ac.04-30 Eis situated at Vattinagulapalli Village, Serilingampally M he said land. The plaintiffs District styling themselves as owners of t ats, thus totally edmeasuring illiterates and agriculturist believed the words of defendant Nos.1 to 3 fagreed for exchange of their lands and entered into an exchange d 11.01.12.2005 with defendant Nos.1 to 3 which was registered as do No.19790/2005 registered at DRO Ranga Reddy District i, defendant N herein believing that the land offered by defendant Nos.1 to 3 was free from al encumbrances. The defendant Nos.1 to 3 also made the plaintiffs to believe : there was no litigation and claims of third parties including protected claims. Believing the words of defendant Nos.1 to 3, the plaintiffs Scanned By Camera Scanner15.09.2014 stating that no implementation was fn respect of subject survey numbers. The defendant Nos.1 to 3 in with a view to cheat the plaintiffs iowingly well that the Bpemoerred lands by virtue of exchange deed dt (01.12.2005 in favour of the " plaintifis were litigated lands and there were protected tenants claim going on “before the Revenue Courts in resp "plaintiffs. The said acts of the defendant Nos.1 to 3 was nothing but fraudulent " and deceitful and as such the plaintiffs were entitled for suit relief as held by the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 1994 (1) SCC page 1, that fraud vitiaies “everything at any stage of proceedings. The plaintiffs submitted that they had steps for cancellation of exchange deed bearing document 19790/2005 dt.01.12.2005 before the District Registrar, Ranga Reddy ‘Apart from that, the plaintiffs hed also got issued legal notice to the Tl Scanned By Camera Scannerregistrations as well as r dant Nos.4 to 7 could not stop over the suit schedule lands. The plaintiffs submitted tl 115, the defendant Nos.1 to 3 with the help of local land grabl hers came to the suit property and trespassed into the plaintiffs’ ‘enjoyment over the suit properties after knowing the issuance of the legal notiee through the postal authorities. The plaintiffs resisted the defendant Nos.1 to 3 4 and their followers but they are threatening the plaintiffs with dire ‘consequences. The said fact was brought to the notice of defendant No.7, but the defendant Nos.4 to 7 insisted for the Court order to take any action against the defendant Nos.1 to 3. The plaintiffs in the said circumstances filed Writ __mandama for decarng the action of defendant No.2 and 9 therein in entering | he registrations over the suit lands as ileal, arbitrary and against Article Y Scanned By Camera Scannerwere sent to all the d that defendant Nos.1 to 3 were avos for substitute service By a) ras ordered. As the defendant Nos ‘Government Pleader filed memo f Bhs right to fle written statement of defendant Nos.¢ to 7 is forfeited and Nos.4 to 7 are also set exparte. holder of the plaintiffs is examined as PW.1 and irrevocable GPA AS are marked on behalf of the plaintitls. Scanned By Camera ScannerVillage, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District having purchased s ‘Same through registered sale deeds and believing the words of defendant Nos.1 10S, they agreed for exchange of their lands and entered into an exchange de #6£01-12.2005 with defendant Nos.1 to 3 which was registered as document N0.19790/2005 registered at DRO, Ranga Reddy District, The defendant Nos.1_ BH Saled to inform the plaintiffs that there was protected tenant claims going Snbefore the Revenue Courts with respect to the lands exchanged by them with _ that of the plaintiffs and played fraud upon the plaintifis is the Memo 014 issued by DC and Tahsilder, Serilingampally Mandal, Scanned By Camera Scannerthe evidence of PW.1 which remained uncontroverted, it i¢ ssue restraining the defendant Nos.1 to 3 from laintiffs over the suit schedule property: Wy in favour of the plaintiffs. fit to allow this is the possession of the Pl issue No.2 is also answered according! ISSUE No.3: Ha the result, the suit is decreed with costs, cancelling the exchange deed 1.12.2005 and granting permanent ocument No.19790/2005 4t.0: g the Ie reatraining the defendant Nos.} to 3 from altering f changing of the suit lands. ps nce rst yn arnt nl meer A ae ea eta 1 ay of December 2020 a hodho har "Ee aaeDR ENE RANGE TRIMERS DRE Scanned By Camera ScannerRANGARE Ranga rau Dist pe = a al = EouPARED eye ERTIFIED Ta PHOTO ¢ Scanned By Camera Scanner