Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Philippe RAMONDENC
SNCF – Head of Engineering Department - FRANCE
Critical aspects of the High-speed rail infrastructure
ª General information
Its environment,
The track,
The vehicle.
Requirements of high speed
ª Environnemental requirements
The environmental requirements concern the infrastructure’s
insertion in its site
Requirements of high speed
its stability,
its strength,
its deformability,
its longevity.
Requirements of high speed
Earthworks, embankments
and cuttings
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª General information
The specifications require a high
standard of track geometry
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Principles of design
Recommended settlement criteria :
Course layer
Draining of surrounding
peat and anthropogenic fill
(1.5 to 5 m)
Network of prefabricated
vertical drains
(1.40 m triangular mesh)
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
Savings in sub-ballast
Facilitates maintenance
Precautions to be taken :
Drainage of platforms,
Rocky Thalweg
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Draining of the platforms and constraints hydraulic
R701
N
R703 R709
R708
R704
R705
R706
R707
0 100m
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Protection against noise effects
Platforms must be
supplemented by
earth or noise
barriers
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Protection against noise effects
Shallow foundations
earth embankments and foundations
ª Protection against noise effects
Pile
foundations
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Protection against noise effects
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Cross winds
Physical phenomenon :
9monitoring network
of anemometers
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Cross winds
Methodology to be followed :
The track design itself (ballasted or direct) must also take these
requirements into account
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª The direct laying
Possibility, on a high
speed line, of limiting
the effect of trains
running to values not
exceeding those of
HGVs at conventional
speeds (V≤ 200km/h).
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª The direct laying
3080
280 2520 280
330
T.N
500
350
340
2000
500 790 500 790 500
500
500
1250
2000
1250
500 2400 1500 2400 1500 2400 1500 2400 1500 2400 1500 2400 1500 2400
500
26800
Completed track
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Specially-designed structures
Specially-designed
structures in railway
bridges on the LGV
East
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Specially-designed structures
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Specially-designed structures
Critical aspects of the High-speed rail infrastructure
ª General information
Ground/structure interaction,
Rail/wheel contact,
Ride quality.
Bridges and Viaducts
ª The Service Limit States
9 Ballast acceleration,
9 Ballast decompression
(at the edges).
Bridges and Viaducts
ª The Service Limit States
9 Warping
9 Deck acceleration
Bridges and Viaducts
ª The Service Limit States
9 Deck deflection
Bridges and Viaducts
ª The Service Limit States
80 kN:m
80 kN:m
= 1+ϕ’
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Résonance
4
γ = y" (t ) = f ( L ) g ( β , S (λ ))
mπ λ
n0
The dynamic signature which highlights specific exciter frequencies for
v
each train and each speed ( f = ) characterises, by its intensity, the
λ
dynamic aggressiveness of this convoy.
Bridges and Viaducts
Signature of high speed trains ª Résonance
0
0 5 10 15
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Résonance
8000
7000
6000
The High Speed Load
5000 Model (HSLM) is
S0
(k 4000 composed by ten TGV
N)
trains which have the
3000
maximum signature, for
2000 each wave length.
1000
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Train D (m) d (m) P (kN)
Wave length λ (m)
1 18 2 170
2 19 3.5 200
3 20 2 180
4 21 3 190
5 22 2 170
6 23 2 180
7 24 2 190
8 25 2.5 190
9 26 2 210
10 27 3.5 220
Bridges and Viaducts
2 criteria to check :
2. If there is continuity of the ballast, the end of the deck must not
shift by more than 5 mm under braking and 10 (or 8) mm under
the effects of vertical flexion of the deck, in order to avoid
deconsolidation of the deck where it meets the
running track.
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Stability of track layer
Frail
Fv
F1 F2
f(x)
θ
h
K
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Stability of track layer
Frail
F1 F2
f(x)
ΔT
F
K
u1 u2
F = Ku1 = ∫ f ( x ) dx = − F2 − F1 ; u 2 − u1 = α L ΔT
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Rail / structure interaction and Rail continuity
Frail
F1 Fb F2
f(x)
F
K
u u
F = Ku = ∫ f ( x ) dx = − Fb − F2 − F1
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Rail / structure interaction and Rail continuity
Rail
K
plateforme tablier
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Rail / structure interaction and Rail continuity
Rail u(x) f
f(x)
f(x)
u(x)-v(x)
v(x) 0
Effort normal dans la voie :
Support (tablier / plateforme)
ΔN t = ∫ f (u ( x ) − v ( x )) dx
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Rail / structure interaction and Rail continuity
Analytical model of the connection load f(x)
f f
voie chargée voie chargée
60 kN/m 60 kN/m
0 2 mm 0 0,5 mm u(x)-v(x)
Acceptability criteria :
Rail continuity :
9 stiffness of the track without load between 20 and 40 kN/m and with
load at 60 kN/m
Displacements criteria :
Reduction factor ξ
Total length of the structure [m] Continuous track Thermal dilatation device at one end
Single or double track Single or double track
≤ 30 0,50 --
60 0,50 0,60
90 0,60 0,65
180 -- 0,80
210 -- 0,85
240 -- 0,90
270 -- 0,90
300 -- 0,90
For bridges carrying track with an expansion device at each end of the deck, ξ = 1.0
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Rail / structure interaction and Rail continuity
AD AD AD
fixed bearing
mobile bearing
joint guard-ballast
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Rail-wheel contact
Several checks necessary :
the twist must be less than the maximum
twist (calculate using UIC system)
g = (θ i − θ i −1 )× 1500 → mm / m
3
Δθ
θ
gie
2
bo
me
mê
’un
3m
xd
ie u
Rail
ss
ee
θ
ntr
ee
1
nc
sta
Di
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Rail-wheel contact
ª Passenger comfort
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Passenger comfort
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Passenger comfort
For dynamic analysis, experience shows that the following
can be considered separately :
deformation of structure,
Modélisation
Modelling du phénomène
phenomenon
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Passenger comfort
3.000
V=
2.500 1/2500 350
V=
300
V=
2.000 1/2000
280
V=
250
V=
220
L/δ
1.500 1/1500 V=
200
V=
160
1.000
V=
120
(2)
(1)
500
1/500 20 40 60 80 100
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
L [m ]
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Fatigue
« Oval mark »
Fatigue can occur not just for metal but for all materials !
Bridges and Viaducts
oGas cutting
L ≤ 50mm
Grinding of
yes 50 < L ≤ 50mm
connections
no l > 100mm
> 150mm
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Fatigue
λ = λ 1 x λ2 x λ3 x λ4
with λ1 span + traffic
λ2 traffic
λ3 lifetime
λ4 number of tracks
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Fatigue
- damage mechanics
n actual number of cycles under Δσ
S=
N maximum admissible number of cycles under Δσ
Each real train T is transformed into an equivalent UIC 71 load model relative to
fatigue, using a coefficient λT, such that, on the cross-section considered where
the calculation is made : S (λT ΔσUIC) = S (ΔσT)
where
λT S (ΔσUIC) = S (ΔσT)
S (ΔσT)
λT =
S (ΔσUIC)
Critical aspects of the High-speed rail infrastructure
Tunnels
Tunnels
ª General information
gauges
maintenance
safety
Tunnels
ª Gauges
LR gauge
4,8m
C1 gauge
GC gauge LR : Lorry-rail
GB1(B+) gauge C1 : new lines
GB gauge GC : construction and
reconstruction projects
Gabarit
GA gaugeGA
GB1 : 3 major routes of
3.3 gauge combined traffic
GB : major routes of
combined transport - 9’6’’
GA : minimum gauge
(ultimately) 8’6 ½ ’’
3.3 : double-decked rolling
stock
Tunnels
Aerodynamic phenomena :
The most critical element when designing the
cross section of an underground structure
Tunnels
ª Aerodynamic and vibratory phenomena
Slipstream effect
500 Compression
wave
0 Depression
0 5 10 15 20 25 wave
Temps [Sec]
Entrée de la rame
Tunnels
ª Aerodynamic and vibratory phenomena
Variations of pressure
2000
1000
Train-tunnel interaction 0
0 5 10 15 20
L tunnel/L train
Tunnels
ª Aerodynamic and vibratory phenomena
Variations of pressure
Influence of speed
3000
ΔPmax (Pa)
2000
1000
0
150 200 250 300 350
Vitesse du train (km/h)
Tunnels
ª Aerodynamic and vibratory phenomena
Variations of pressure
Influence of the blockage ratio
5000
Δpmax (Pa)
4000
3000
2000
20 40 60 80 100 120
(0.5) (0.25) (0.17) (0.125) (0.1)
Cross-section of tunnel in m2
(blockage ratio in brackets)
Tunnels
ª Aerodynamic and vibratory phenomena
Variations of pressure
Why worry about variations in air
pressure in tunnels ?
Cross-section of human ear
120
Eardrum Pinna
Eustachian tube Ear
canal
Tunnels
ª Aerodynamic and vibratory phenomena
Variations of pressure
Physiological issues
120
Tunnels
ª Aerodynamic and vibratory phenomena
Variations of pressure
Pressure gradient :
< 500 Pa/s. 500 Pext
0 Pint
Pression [Pa]
-500
-1000
-1500
-2000
0 5 10 15 20 25
Temps [Sec]
Tunnels
ª Aerodynamic and vibratory phenomena
Variations of pressure
DV 97 m2 93 m2 77 m2
300 VU 97 m2 89 m2 70 m2
DV 110 m2 104 m2 91 m2
DV 104 m2
350 VU 64 m2 61 m2 59 m2
DV 135 m2
Tunnels
ª Aerodynamic and vibratory phenomena
Variations of pressure
5 VENT = 0
VENT > 0
4 VENT < 0
Erdaun Simulation
3
2
With initial wind in same
1 direction as train progress
0 No initial
. wind
-1
With initial wind in opposite
-2 direction to train progress
TIMES (S)
ª Vibratory phenomena
Vibration emission
Structure noise
Technical solutions
Tunnels
ª Vibratory phenomena
Admissible thresholds
-human sensitivity: 66 dB
-residential - night: 69 dB
-residential - day: 72 dB,
-offices: 78 dB.
Example of spectrum
measured at the apex of an
80m tunnel during passage of
a train
Tunnels
ª Vibratory phenomena
Acoustic disturbance
Solutions used
Tunnels
ª Maintenance
Partial or total sealing
depending on context
Concrete coating
Tunnels
ª Safety
Infrastructure
Operation
Rolling stock
Tunnels
ª Safety
Shared dispositions
Civil engineering
Dispositions
Road access and parking at head of tunnel 3.1.1 applicable from
400 à 800 m
Routing 3.1.2
Emergency access
devices (sinks / 800m) yes yes no no no no
Communications between
tubes (width 4.8m / 800m) no no yes yes yes yes
yes if yes if yes if yes if
Helicopter landing site no no unfavourable unfavourable unfavourable unfavourable
area area area area
Anti-smoke-recycling yes if bi-tube yes if bi-tube yes if bi-tube yes if bi-tube yes if bi-tube yes if bi-tube
Advanced medical
station
Tunnels
ª Safety
Tunnel lighting
in recesses emergency
Tunnels
ª Safety
Typical cross-section of tunnel for V300
Conclusion
The infrastructure
is the fundamental element of the railway system :
in fact it is the ‘rail-way’ itself !
Thank you for your attention !