You are on page 1of 146

Critical Aspects of the

High-speed rail infrastructure

Philippe RAMONDENC
SNCF – Head of Engineering Department - FRANCE
Critical aspects of the High-speed rail infrastructure

ªRequirements of high speed

Why should we be concerned?


Requirements of high speed

ª General information

Speed record set on 29th March 1955 : 331 Km/h


Requirements of high speed
ª General information

What does the Infrastructure


consist of?
Requirements of high speed
ª General information

‰ What are the particular requirements for high-speed rail


infrastructure?

Perfect rail/wheel contact,

Particular loads and stresses,

Dynamic and aerodynamic effects,

Noise and vibrations .


Requirements of high speed
ª General information

‰ Consequences of these particular


requirements :

Continuous, welded rails (CWR) are a


necessity,

Need for controlled elasticity in the


track to reduce the effects.
Requirements of high speed
ª General information

‰ High speed on an infrastructure = obligation to solve


some requirements concerning :

Its environment,

The infrastructure itself,

The track,

The vehicle.
Requirements of high speed

ª Environnemental requirements
The environmental requirements concern the infrastructure’s
insertion in its site
Requirements of high speed

ª Requirements for the infrastructure


‰ The requirements for the infrastructure itself mainly concern :

its stability,

its strength,

its deformability,

its longevity.
Requirements of high speed

ª Requirements of the track

The track imposes its laws on the infrastructure, which


ultimately just has to support it : without the track there is
no need for an infrastructure!

In the 19th century, the French dictionary definition of


an Ouvrage d’Art (a civil engineering structure) was
"a structure designed to ensure the continuity of a railway."

The infrastructure must therefore guarantee the integrity of


the track and the continuity of the rail.
Requirements of high speed

ª Requirements to the vehicle


Critical aspects of the High-speed rail infrastructure

Earthworks, embankments
and cuttings
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings

ª General information
The specifications require a high
standard of track geometry
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings

ª Principles of design
‰ Recommended settlement criteria :

Normal zones: "maximum settlement < 10 cm with


settlement rate < 1 cm/year for 25 years",

Proximity to civil engineering (CE) structures :


"absence of differential settlement between structures
and embankment" hence the need for specially
designed structures.
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Principles of design

Course layer

Typical cross-section of a high-speed rail platform


Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Principles of design
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Principles of design

The materials are selected to guarantee the durability and


longevity of the embankments
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Principles of design
Example of sub-ballast materials
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings

ª Dimensioning and constructive dispositions


Normal track bed structures
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Dimensioning and constructive dispositions

Track bed structures with sub-ballast layer added


Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Dimensioning and constructive dispositions

‰ bearing capacity characteristics to take into account


(bearing soils) or to determine (treatment of levelling
courses and sub-ballast layers)

Ground support - Reference


load-bearing capacities

-S1 ‘tolerable’ quality soil 30 Mpa

-S2 ‘good’ quality soil 50 MPa

-S3 ‘very good’ quality soil 80 MPa


Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Dimensioning and constructive dispositions

Ground support Improvement of levelling courses


-S1:
. Treatment over at least 35 cm
. Objective of 40 MPa
-S2
. Treatment over at least 35 cm
. Objective of
» 50 MPa if granular solution chosen
» 80 MPa if treated
-S3:
.Treatment prohibited
.Objective of 80 MPa

Treated sub-ballast layer


-Objective of
. 120 MPa treated sub-ballast layer
. 80 MPa granular sub-ballast layer
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
Sub-ballast layer ª Dimensioning and constructive dispositions
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Dimensioning and constructive dispositions

Draining of surrounding
peat and anthropogenic fill
(1.5 to 5 m)

Network of prefabricated
vertical drains
(1.40 m triangular mesh)
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings

ª La grave bitume : a particular constructive disposition

‰ New material : « grave bitume »- expected advantages :

Makes work easier

Savings in sub-ballast

Facilitates maintenance

Reduces structure thickness


Earthworks, embankments and cuttings

ª Draining of the platforms and hydraulic constraints

Rail infrastructures are highly


vulnerable to hydraulic
hazards,
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Draining of the platforms and hydraulic constraints

Many malfunctions occur


with rail traffic
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Draining of the platforms and constraints hydraulic

‰ Precautions to be taken :

Surveying natural flows,

Evacuation of overhead water,

Drainage of platforms,

Drainage of ground water.

Rocky Thalweg
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Draining of the platforms and constraints hydraulic

‰ Particular operations for draining residual water from


structures :

Various watertight facings and extraction techniques,

Drawdown basin at the


bottom of the excavation.
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings

Draining of the platforms and constraints hydraulic

In the "track design" phase, it is indispensable to


integrate the hydraulic constraints !
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Draining of the platforms and constraints hydraulic

Cross-section of a prefabricated ditch with


weepholes
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Draining of the platforms and constraints hydraulic

Laying a perforated drainage pipe


Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
Earth ditch with sills ª Draining of the platforms and constraints hydraulic
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Draining of the platforms and constraints hydraulic

Cross-section of a gutter which can be used for access


Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Draining of the platforms and constraints hydraulic

Cross-section of a gutter which can’t be used for access


Earthworks, embankments and cuttings

ª Protection against noise effects


The design of platforms, earth embankments must also
take noise pollution into account

Single unit TGV at Single unit TGV at


100km/h 300km/h
9-coach Corail train at 9-coach Corail train at
100km/h 160km/h
10-wagon freight Train at 10-wagon freight Train at
100km/h 100km/h
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Protection against noise effects

R701
N

R703 R709

R708

R704

R705

R706

R707

0 100m
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Protection against noise effects

Platforms must be
supplemented by
earth or noise
barriers
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Protection against noise effects
Shallow foundations
earth embankments and foundations
ª Protection against noise effects
Pile
foundations
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Protection against noise effects
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings

ª Cross winds

A requirement to take into account in the construction of


a new high-speed line

Major impact on equipment for laying fill or building


structures
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Cross winds

‰ Physical phenomenon :

Shifting of load from one rail

Overloading on the other rail


Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Cross winds

‰ Protection strategy and methodology :

Line security ensured by :

9placing barriers at critical


sites

9"all-weather" transit speed


of 80 km/h

9monitoring network
of anemometers
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Cross winds

‰ Methodology to be followed :

Characterisation of wind on the line

Characterisation of aerodynamic and dynamic behaviour of TGV


coaches
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings

ª The direct laying


In 1970, SNCF chose the ballasted option for its high-speed
network (speed : 300 km/h).
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª The direct laying

The track design itself (ballasted or direct) must also take these
requirements into account
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª The direct laying

Possibility, on a high
speed line, of limiting
the effect of trains
running to values not
exceeding those of
HGVs at conventional
speeds (V≤ 200km/h).
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª The direct laying

‰ Choice of ballasted track confirmed by :

commercial speed of 300Km/h on the LGV (high speed line)


network over more than 18 years

speed record - 574Km/h on the TGV East


Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª The direct laying
A system of way of original design
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª The direct laying
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª The direct laying

1 reinforced concrete slab


2 treated gravel sub-ballast layer
3 track cemented in place with fibrous concrete
4 polyurethane resin sealing
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª The direct laying

3080
280 2520 280

330
T.N

500
350
340

2000
500 790 500 790 500
500

500
1250
2000

1250

500 2400 1500 2400 1500 2400 1500 2400 1500 2400 1500 2400 1500 2400
500

26800

anchored with sheet piling


Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª The direct laying

Sliding formwork system controlled by means of GPS


Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª The direct laying

‰ Choice of design confirmed by :

Possibility of building a thinner structure

Use of standard concrete

The effects of local


subsidence reduced by
a continuous slab
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª The direct laying

Track before cementing

Completed track
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings

ª Specially-designed structures

The transition between earth embankments and


civil engineering structures requires very specific
measures to be taken to ensure adequate
continuity in the elasticity of the track and its
course layer
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Specially-designed structures

Specially-designed
structures in railway
bridges on the LGV
East
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Specially-designed structures
Earthworks, embankments and cuttings
ª Specially-designed structures
Critical aspects of the High-speed rail infrastructure

Bridges and Viaducts


Bridges and Viaducts

ª General information

‰ Criteria to take into account when designing bridges and


viaducts :

Ground/structure interaction,

Interaction between track/CE structure,

Interaction between vehicle/track and


CE structure.
Railway bridges :
specific design characteristics !
Bridges and Viaducts

ª The Service Limit States

‰ During the design process, a number of checks need


to be carried out :

To the ultimate limit states – ULS,

To the service limit states– SLS.


Bridges and Viaducts
ª The Service Limit States

Some SLS are specific to railways.


Compliance with SLS is critical for railway
infrastructure safety.
Bridges and Viaducts
ª The Service Limit States

Stability of the track course,

Continuity of the track,

Rail/wheel contact,

Ride quality.
Bridges and Viaducts
ª The Service Limit States

Checks to be carried out to ascertain the stability of the


track course (sleepers embedded in the ballast)

9 Ballast acceleration,

9 Ballast decompression
(at the edges).
Bridges and Viaducts
ª The Service Limit States

Checks to be carried out to ascertain the track continuity

9Stress in the rail (function of the behaviour scheme)


Bridges and Viaducts
ª The Service Limit States

Checks to be carried out to ensure rail/wheel contact

9 Warping

9 Horizontal and vertical


angulation

9 Deck acceleration
Bridges and Viaducts
ª The Service Limit States

Checks to be carried out to make sure of ride quality for users

9 Deck deflection
Bridges and Viaducts
ª The Service Limit States

These railway SLS only make sense if the


structure’s deformations are reversible!
Earthquake
SLS
Bridges and Viaducts

ª The UIC 71 load model

The static sizing basis for railway bridges is the


UIC71 load model. Its dynamic effects are partly
modelled by a ‘static equivalent’, the ΦUIC
coefficient.
Bridges and Viaducts
ª The UIC 71 load model

250 kN 250 kN 250 kN 250 kN

80 kN:m
80 kN:m

illimité 0,8 m 1,6 m 1,6 m 1,6 m 0,8 m illimité

The UIC 71 load model


Bridges and Viaducts

ª The effect of fast loading

δ4y (x,t) δy (x,t) δ2y (x,t)


EI +C +m = p (x,t)
δx4 δt δt2

y(x,t) is the deflection of the beam as a function of the abscissa and


time, E, I, C, m are the deck’s mechanical characteristics.
Bridges and Viaducts
ª The effect of fast loading

= 1+ϕ’
Bridges and Viaducts

ª The effect of fast loading

The dynamic increase coefficient


with an actual train, the UIC is written fully as :
1 + φ = 1 + ϕ’ + λϕ’’
0≤λ≤1
ϕ’’ takes into account the track’s maintenance condition; it is a coefficient
based both on theory and experience
- L2 - L2
a 100 n1 L 400
ϕ’’ = 56 e + 50 -1 e
100 80 V
a=
22
According to the track’s condition and as a general rule, we
consider that λ = 0,5
Bridges and Viaducts

ª The effect of fast loading

An approximate formula for φ (L) (track in good condition λ=0.5) is :

φ2 = (1,44/√Lφ - 0,2) + 0,82


By proceeding in the same way with a track in poor condition (λ=1, also
used for shearing force) :

φ3 = (2,16/ √Lφ - 0,2) + 0,73

Lφ is the characteristic length of the element being considered,


given as a function of its span L and its links to the edges.
Bridges and Viaducts

ª Résonance

How do we take the possibilities of forced resonance


into account ?

The fundamental equation for dynamics thus becomes :

A + B + C = Σ δi (x - Vt) [P+Q sin ωt]


Bridges and Viaducts
ª Résonance

4
γ = y" (t ) = f ( L ) g ( β , S (λ ))
mπ λ

n0
The dynamic signature which highlights specific exciter frequencies for
v
each train and each speed ( f = ) characterises, by its intensity, the
λ
dynamic aggressiveness of this convoy.
Bridges and Viaducts
Signature of high speed trains ª Résonance

0
0 5 10 15
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Résonance
8000

7000

6000
The High Speed Load
5000 Model (HSLM) is
S0
(k 4000 composed by ten TGV
N)
trains which have the
3000
maximum signature, for
2000 each wave length.
1000

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Train D (m) d (m) P (kN)
Wave length λ (m)
1 18 2 170
2 19 3.5 200
3 20 2 180
4 21 3 190
5 22 2 170
6 23 2 180
7 24 2 190
8 25 2.5 190
9 26 2 210
10 27 3.5 220
Bridges and Viaducts

ª Stability of track layer


Long welded rails
Depuis 30-40 ans, toutes les
voies nouvelles sont conçues
avec des longs rails soudés.
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Stability of track layer

‰ 2 criteria to check :

1. Vertical acceleration of the deck less than 0.35g

2. If there is continuity of the ballast, the end of the deck must not
shift by more than 5 mm under braking and 10 (or 8) mm under
the effects of vertical flexion of the deck, in order to avoid
deconsolidation of the deck where it meets the
running track.
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Stability of track layer

Longitudinal displacement under vertical effects

Frail

Fv
F1 F2
f(x)

θ
h

K
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Stability of track layer

20m>LD<60m 60m<LD<100m LD>100m


Bridges and Viaducts

ª Rail / structure interaction and Rail continuity

What is rail / structure interaction ?


Bridges and Viaducts
ª Rail / structure interaction and Rail continuity
Variations in temperature ΔT (example of iso-static span)

Frail

F1 F2
f(x)

ΔT

F
K
u1 u2

F = Ku1 = ∫ f ( x ) dx = − F2 − F1 ; u 2 − u1 = α L ΔT
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Rail / structure interaction and Rail continuity

Braking (or acceleration) Fb (example of iso-static span)

Frail

F1 Fb F2
f(x)

F
K
u u
F = Ku = ∫ f ( x ) dx = − Fb − F2 − F1
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Rail / structure interaction and Rail continuity

‰ Finite element analysis


In order to evaluate rail/structure interaction with finite element analysis we
need to use the following model

Rail

K
plateforme tablier
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Rail / structure interaction and Rail continuity

‰ Behaviour of the rail/deck connection

Rail u(x) f

f(x)

f(x)

u(x)-v(x)
v(x) 0
Effort normal dans la voie :
Support (tablier / plateforme)
ΔN t = ∫ f (u ( x ) − v ( x )) dx
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Rail / structure interaction and Rail continuity
‰ Analytical model of the connection load f(x)

f f
voie chargée voie chargée
60 kN/m 60 kN/m

voie non chargée


40 kN/m
voie non chargée
20 kN/m

0 2 mm 0 0,5 mm u(x)-v(x)

voie ballastée voie non ballastée


u(x)-v(x)
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Rail / structure interaction and Rail continuity

‰ Acceptability criteria :

Rail continuity :

9 Additional constraints in the rails :


Δσ < 72 MPa in compression
Δσ < 92 MPa in traction
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Rail / structure interaction and Rail continuity

To make sure the constraints in the rail without needing to


calculate them, simplified methods can be used – under certain
conditions :

9 stiffness of the track without load between 20 and 40 kN/m and with
load at 60 kN/m

9 actions stipulated in the SNCF Booklet 2.01 for braking and


acceleration and for temperatures ΔT = 35° C

9 on ballast tracks, expansion devices are not necessary if the


dilatable length LT is < 60 m for metal decks and < 90 m for
concrete and mixed decks

Displacements criteria :

9 5mm underbraking and acceleration


9 10mm under deck flexion
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Rail / structure interaction and Rail continuity
Calculating a displacement from braking with the simplified method

Reduction factor ξ

Total length of the structure [m] Continuous track Thermal dilatation device at one end
Single or double track Single or double track

≤ 30 0,50 --

60 0,50 0,60

90 0,60 0,65

120 0,70 0,70

150 0,75 0,75

180 -- 0,80

210 -- 0,85

240 -- 0,90

270 -- 0,90

300 -- 0,90

For bridges carrying track with an expansion device at each end of the deck, ξ = 1.0
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Rail / structure interaction and Rail continuity

Inert span with double expansion device


Bridges and Viaducts
ª Rail / structure interaction and Rail continuity

Example of functional diagram

AD AD AD

L < 900 m ~ 40 m L < 900 m

fixed bearing
mobile bearing
joint guard-ballast
Bridges and Viaducts

ª Rail-wheel contact
‰ Several checks necessary :
the twist must be less than the maximum
twist (calculate using UIC system)

g = (θ i − θ i −1 )× 1500 → mm / m
3

Δθ

θ
gie

2
bo
me

’un
3m

xd
ie u

Rail
ss
ee

θ
ntr
ee

1
nc
sta
Di
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Rail-wheel contact

‰ Several checks are necessary :


Deck acceleration must be less than 0.5g (always checked
beforehand for ballasted track, considering the other criteria to be
checked)

Deck angulation must respect limits

1.8.1.4 flèches horizontales 2 voies chargées


- V≤ 120 km/h θ ≤ .0035 rd (1)
- 120≤V≤200 km/h θ ≤ .0020 rd
- V>200 km/h θ ≤ .0015 rd

(1) pont à 2 voies ou plus


Bridges and Viaducts

ª Passenger comfort
Bridges and Viaducts

ª Passenger comfort
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Passenger comfort
‰ For dynamic analysis, experience shows that the following
can be considered separately :

deformation of structure,

behaviour of the vehicle on the deformed structure.

Modélisation
Modelling du phénomène
phenomenon
Bridges and Viaducts

ª Passenger comfort

For a ride quality corresponding to 1 m/s²

3.000

V=
2.500 1/2500 350

V=
300
V=
2.000 1/2000
280
V=
250
V=
220
L/δ

1.500 1/1500 V=
200

V=
160
1.000
V=
120
(2)

(1)
500
1/500 20 40 60 80 100

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

L [m ]
Bridges and Viaducts

ª Fatigue

1842 1st accident (Paris - Versailles)


Broken axle: 164 victims including 55 dead

1850 Fatigue phenomenon identified


Bridges and Viaducts
ª Fatigue

Defect in the metal

« Oval mark »
Fatigue can occur not just for metal but for all materials !
Bridges and Viaducts

With weld continuity ª Fatigue

oGas cutting
L ≤ 50mm
Grinding of
yes 50 < L ≤ 50mm
connections
no l > 100mm

> 150mm
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Fatigue

‰ European Community rule for rail bridges

γFF .. λ . ∅ . Δ σuic ≤ Δσ c,t


γ MF

λ = λ 1 x λ2 x λ3 x λ4
with λ1 span + traffic

λ2 traffic

λ3 lifetime

λ4 number of tracks
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Fatigue

To estimate fatigue under real convoys we use :

- damage mechanics
n actual number of cycles under Δσ
S=
N maximum admissible number of cycles under Δσ

- and continuum damage mechanics.


If the structure is subject to a set of constraint cycles (ni, Δσi)
then S = Σ nii
Si = Σ n
S = ∑ Si = ∑
Ni i
N
Bridges and Viaducts
ª Fatigue

Each real train T is transformed into an equivalent UIC 71 load model relative to
fatigue, using a coefficient λT, such that, on the cross-section considered where
the calculation is made : S (λT ΔσUIC) = S (ΔσT)
where
λT S (ΔσUIC) = S (ΔσT)

S (ΔσT)
λT =
S (ΔσUIC)
Critical aspects of the High-speed rail infrastructure

Tunnels
Tunnels

ª General information

gauges

aerodynamic phenomena/vibratory phenomena

maintenance

safety
Tunnels

ª Gauges

Gauges do not have sufficient clearance for passing


through tunnels with maximum safety and comfort. It
is necessary to take account of aerodynamic
phenomena
Tunnels
ª Gauges
Structure gauges

LR gauge
4,8m
C1 gauge
GC gauge LR : Lorry-rail
GB1(B+) gauge C1 : new lines
GB gauge GC : construction and
reconstruction projects
Gabarit
GA gaugeGA
GB1 : 3 major routes of
3.3 gauge combined traffic
GB : major routes of
combined transport - 9’6’’
GA : minimum gauge
(ultimately) 8’6 ½ ’’
3.3 : double-decked rolling
stock
Tunnels

ª Aerodynamic and vibratory phenomena

Aerodynamic phenomena :
The most critical element when designing the
cross section of an underground structure
Tunnels
ª Aerodynamic and vibratory phenomena

‰ Slipstream effect

Strong pressure created by the piston effect of trains


Tunnels
ª Aerodynamic and vibratory phenomena

‰ Ensuring safety for personnel

Personnel must be able to work safely in tunnels

Equipment must be able to withstand the pressures


created
Tunnels
ª Aerodynamic and vibratory phenomena
‰ Variations of pressure
Standard tunnel pressure diagram
at a point on the outside of the train

Pression extérieure [Pa] 500


0 Outside P
-500
-1000
-1500
-2000
0 5 10 15 20 25
Temps [Sec]
1500
Head of train
Distance [m]

1000 Tail of train

500 Compression
wave
0 Depression
0 5 10 15 20 25 wave
Temps [Sec]
Entrée de la rame
Tunnels
ª Aerodynamic and vibratory phenomena
‰ Variations of pressure

Parameters influencing air pressure in tunnels

Characteristics of structures ΔP en fonction de la longueur de tunnel


(B=0,15)
5000

Δ P max. en 4 s.( Pa)


4000
Characteristics of trains 3000

2000
1000

Train-tunnel interaction 0
0 5 10 15 20
L tunnel/L train
Tunnels
ª Aerodynamic and vibratory phenomena
‰ Variations of pressure

Influence of speed

Evolution de la pression maximale crête à crête


TGV - S=71m² - L=1500m
4000

3000
ΔPmax (Pa)

2000

1000

0
150 200 250 300 350
Vitesse du train (km/h)
Tunnels
ª Aerodynamic and vibratory phenomena
‰ Variations of pressure
Influence of the blockage ratio

Peak to peak maximum pressure curve


TGV - V=300km/h - L=1500m
6000

5000
Δpmax (Pa)

4000

3000

2000
20 40 60 80 100 120
(0.5) (0.25) (0.17) (0.125) (0.1)

Cross-section of tunnel in m2
(blockage ratio in brackets)
Tunnels
ª Aerodynamic and vibratory phenomena
‰ Variations of pressure
Why worry about variations in air
pressure in tunnels ?
Cross-section of human ear

Inner ear Middle ear Outer ear

120

Eardrum Pinna
Eustachian tube Ear
canal
Tunnels
ª Aerodynamic and vibratory phenomena
‰ Variations of pressure

™ Physiological issues

Diagrammatic illustration of the ear

120
Tunnels
ª Aerodynamic and vibratory phenomena
‰ Variations of pressure

™ Criteria of eardrum safety

Pressure variation (felt by all passengers) :


< 10,000 Pascals

During entire passage through tunnel (irrespective of time)


Tunnels
ª Aerodynamic and vibratory phenomena
‰ Variations of pressure
‰ Criteria for eardrum comfort

Non-airtight train (outside pressure = pressure inside train)


Pressure < 2500 Pa for a 4 second interval and < 4500 Pa (passing another train)

Airtight train (relatively airtight: pressure variations attenuated)


Inside pressure :
< 1000 Pa (10 s)

Pressure gradient :
< 500 Pa/s. 500 Pext
0 Pint
Pression [Pa]

-500

-1000

-1500

-2000
0 5 10 15 20 25
Temps [Sec]
Tunnels
ª Aerodynamic and vibratory phenomena
‰ Variations of pressure

Indicative values for air sections resulting from the preceding


criteria

Speed Number L<2km 2km<L<4km L>4km


of
tracks

Non-airtight trains 270 VU 82 m2 73 m2 59 m2

DV 97 m2 93 m2 77 m2

300 VU 97 m2 89 m2 70 m2

DV 110 m2 104 m2 91 m2

Airtight trains 320 VU 60 m2 58 m2 55 m2

DV 104 m2

350 VU 64 m2 61 m2 59 m2

DV 135 m2
Tunnels
ª Aerodynamic and vibratory phenomena
‰ Variations of pressure

Old tunnel V 160 – S 42m2 Modern tunnel on traditional line V 160 –


S 56 m2

Tunnel on H-S line V 270 – S 71 m2 Tunnel on H-S line V 300 – S 100 m2

Changes to transverse sections over the last 100 years


Tunnels
ª Aerodynamic and vibratory phenomena
‰ The sonic “Boom”
Installing vents at the head
Tunnels
ª Aerodynamic and vibratory phenomena
‰ Piston effect on ventilation
speed
m/s
6

5 VENT = 0
VENT > 0
4 VENT < 0
Erdaun Simulation
3

2
With initial wind in same
1 direction as train progress

0 No initial
. wind
-1
With initial wind in opposite
-2 direction to train progress
TIMES (S)

(to = train stopped in tunnel / V120/ S tunnel 50m2)


t0 t0+3’ t0+8’ t0+15’
Tunnels

ª Vibratory phenomena

‰ Vibration emission

‰ Structure noise

‰ Technical solutions
Tunnels
ª Vibratory phenomena

‰Vibration emissions -Tactile vibratory annoyance

Admissible thresholds
-human sensitivity: 66 dB
-residential - night: 69 dB
-residential - day: 72 dB,
-offices: 78 dB.

Example of spectrum
measured at the apex of an
80m tunnel during passage of
a train
Tunnels

ª Vibratory phenomena

‰ Acoustic disturbance

People living near tunnels report discomfort when the 30 dB(A)


threshold in Leq 1s is reached, above the tunnel, or exceeded when
trains are passing.

Acoustic discomfort is produced by weaker vibrations than those


that produce tactile discomfort.
Tunnels
ª Vibratory phenomena

‰ Solutions used
Tunnels

ª Maintenance
Partial or total sealing
depending on context

Concrete coating
Tunnels

ª Safety

Safety in tunnels is the result of a combination of measures,


concerning :

Infrastructure

Operation

Rolling stock
Tunnels
ª Safety
Shared dispositions

Reaction & resistance to fire

Civil engineering
Dispositions
Road access and parking at head of tunnel 3.1.1 applicable from
400 à 800 m
Routing 3.1.2

Safe conditions for maintenance workers 3.1.3

General safety equipment Dispositions


applicables
Electrical power 3.2.1 beyond 800 m
Lighting 3.2.2

Indicating exits and their distance 3.2.3

Water supplies for fire-fighting


Tunnels in urban or peri-urban environments 3.2.4.1

Tunnels in a country environment non

Communications for emergency services non

Hoisting rings 3.2.6

Return rings 3.2.7


Tunnels
ª Safety
Particular dispositions

Nature of the measures


(civil engineering) Urban lines Intercity lines Mixed lines
Measures 800 - 5 km 5 - 10 km 800 - 5 km 5 - 10 km 800 - 5 km 5 – 10 km

Drainage system (100l/s yes if MD yes if MD yes if MD


mini; 80m3; siphon /50m) no transit no transit non transit

Emergency access
devices (sinks / 800m) yes yes no no no no

Communications between
tubes (width 4.8m / 800m) no no yes yes yes yes
yes if yes if yes if yes if
Helicopter landing site no no unfavourable unfavourable unfavourable unfavourable
area area area area

Anti-smoke-recycling yes if bi-tube yes if bi-tube yes if bi-tube yes if bi-tube yes if bi-tube yes if bi-tube

Ventilation for smoke yes yes no


yes if standard
no
yes if MD or
extraction stock standard stock
Tunnels
Installations at heads ª Safety

Advanced medical
station
Tunnels
ª Safety
Tunnel lighting

in recesses emergency
Tunnels
ª Safety
Typical cross-section of tunnel for V300
Conclusion
The infrastructure
is the fundamental element of the railway system :
in fact it is the ‘rail-way’ itself !
Thank you for your attention !

You might also like