Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Geotechnical Report Taloja
Geotechnical Report Taloja
No. Enclosures
1. Development Permission received from CIDCO
2. Soil report
3. Site Location Map
4. Surrounding features of the proposed site (within 500 mt.)
5. Layout Plan
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT (MAY 2019)
PROPOSED HOUSING PROJECT
AT SECTOR 29, TALOJA, NAVI MUMBAI
FOR CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Table of Contents
Item Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
References/Calculations
ANNEXURES
Figure 1: Location Plan of Boreholes
Borehole Logs
Subsurface Profile
Laboratory Test Results
Core Box Photographs
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT (MAY 2019)
PROPOSED HOUSING PROJECT
AT SECTOR 29, TALOJA, NAVI MUMBAI
FOR CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Taloja, Navi Mumbai. Proposed buildings will consist of Stilt + 23 Upper Floors. The work of
geotechnical investigation was awarded to Unitech Engineers. The field work and laboratory
tests for the geotechnical investigation were completed by Unitech Engineers in April 2019.
This report presents results of the geotechnical investigation along with foundation investigation
Twenty two boreholes (BH-01 to BH-22) are completed for the project as illustrated on the
Borehole Location Plan in the Annexure. Borehole termination depths are summarized in
Table A below.
2
TABLE A
BOREHOLE TERMINATION DEPTHS
Borehole Termination
Borehole Number
Depths
BH-01 20.0m
BH-02 20.0m
BH-03 20.0m
BH-04 20.0m
BH-05 20.0m
BH-06 20.0m
BH-07 20.0m
BH-08 20.0m
BH-09 20.0m
BH-10 20.0m
BH-11 20.0m
BH-12 20.0m
BH-13 20.0m
BH-14 20.0m
BH-15 20.0m
BH-16 20.0m
BH-17 20.0m
BH-18 20.0m
BH-19 20.0m
BH-20 20.0m
BH-21 20.0m
BH-22 20.0m
3
2.2 Subsurface Conditions
Subsurface profile at this site generally consists of fill overlying residual soil underlain by
weathered rock and then hard basalt bedrock. Encountered soil/rock layers are described
below;
LAYER I: FILL
Fill were encountered at ground surface in few boreholes. The lower boundary of this layer
Residual soils, consisting mostly of brownish silty clay/sand with gravels, were encountered
below fill layer in the borehole BH-19 whereas were encountered at a ground surface in
other boreholes. Based on Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) conducted within this layer,
consistency of cohesive soils was stiff to hard. The lower boundary of this layer was
Completely to highly weathered rock was encountered at depths of 0.5m to 5.5m below
ground surface in the boreholes. This layer is formed by the in-place disintegration of parent
bedrock material, but still partially retains the original rock mass structure. SPT tests
4
conducted in this layer encountered refusals. Core recoveries were less than 35%. The
lower boundary of this layer was encountered at depths of 1.5m to 7.5m below ground
surface.
Greyish/brownish basalt bedrock was encountered at depths of 1.5m to 7.5m below ground
surface in the boreholes. The bedrock was moderately weathered to sound, generally
improving with depth. Core Recoveries in the bedrock layer varied from 36% to 100%, and
Rock Quality Designations (RQDs) varied from Nil to 100%. Compressive strength of rock
core samples varied between 227 kg/cm2 to 819 kg/cm2. The boreholes were terminated in
Ground water accumulation in the borehole was monitored during and following completion
below ground surface. Seasonal and annual fluctuations in ground water levels can be
5
3.0 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS
Hard rock is encountered at depths of 1.5m to 7.5m below ground. Spread/Raft foundations
for proposed buildings structures supported on hard rock can be designed for net allowable
bearing capacity upto 150 t/m2. Depths to hard rock encountered are summarized in table B
below. Hard rock strata can be identified as it offers complete refusal to bucket excavators.
TABLE B
DEPTHS TO WEATHERED ROCK AND HARD ROCK
Depths to
Borehole Number Depths to hard rock
weathered rock
BH-01 1.0m 6.0m
BH-02 1.0m 3.0m
BH-03 1.0m 3.0m
BH-04 1.0m 1.5m
BH-05 5.5m 7.5m
BH-06 5.5m 7.5m
BH-07 1.0m 3.0m
BH-08 1.0m 3.0m
BH-09 1.0m 1.5m
BH-10 1.0m 1.5m
BH-11 1.0m 3.0m
BH-12 1.0m 3.0m
BH-13 1.0m 4.5m
BH-14 1.0m 4.5m
BH-15 1.0m 4.5m
BH-16 0.8m 3.0m
BH-17 1.0m 4.5m
BH-18 1.0m 4.5m
BH-19 1.5m 4.5m
BH-20 0.5m 1.5m
BH-21 1.0m 3.0m
BH-22 1.0m 7.5m
6
Maximum settlement of foundations will be less than 12mm. A Modulus of subgrade reaction
of 12,500 t/m3 can be utilized for design of foundations. Excavation sides should be sloped
at a maximum slope of 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) or flatter within top 0.5m to 5.5m overburden
soils and 1:2 (Horizontal:Vertical) below this depth. Excavated soils are suitable for use as
footing backfill
7
3.1 Foundation Protection
that the site falls under Class 1 for sulphate concentrations and chloride concentrations (As
per IS456 and as per CIRIA Sp. Publication No. 31). A ‘Moderate’ Exposure Condition was
subsurface concrete and reinforcement. Bitumen coating is not required for foundation
protection.
8
4.0 FIELD EXPLORATION PROCEDURES
The sub-surface investigation was completed generally as per IS: 1892-1979. The field
investigation was carried out using a rotary machine. Casing was used to support sides of
borehole until sufficiently stiff strata was encountered. Standard Penetration Tests (i.e. SPT)
were carried out in soil in accordance with IS 2131-1981. Using this procedure, a 2” outside
diameter split-barrel sampler is driven into the soil by 63.5 kg. weight falling through 75 cm
height. After an initial set of 15cm, the number of blows required to drive the sampler an
When SPT refusal was obtained in hard strata, rock coring was done using diamond bit and
double tube core barrel to obtain rock samples. Percent Rock Core Recovery and Rock
Quality Designation (%RQD) were determined. % RQD = 100 x Sum of length of rock
pieces in cms, each having lengths greater than 10cms/Total length of core run.
Sincerely,
UNITECH ENGINEERS
__________________________________
Jaydeep Wagh
B.E., M.S., P.E. (Geotechnical)
9
REFERENCES
1) Foundation Analysis and Design, J.E. Bowles, McGraw Hill Publication, 5th Edition, 1996.
3) Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice, 2nd Edition, Terzaghi K. and Peck R. B., John
Willey and Sons, 1967.
6) IS 12070: 1987, Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Shallow Foundations
on Rocks
10
SAMPLE CALCULATION OF ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY
FOR FOUNDATIONS ON HARD ROCK
________________________________________________ GL +0.0m
Layer I, Fill
_______________________________________________GL +0.0m / -1.0m
Layer II, Residual Soils
________________________________________________-0.5m to -5.5m
Layer III, Completely to Highly Weathered Rock
________________________________________________-1.5m to -7.5m
Layer IV, Hard Basalt Bedrock
Where,
Nj = Joint condition factor = 0.1 to 0.4 (Ref. 6, Table 4, clause 6.2, pg. 9)
Assumed as 0.1 for hard moderately weathered rock
1 2
Settlement = S q0 B' mI s I f (Ref. 1, 5.16a, pg. 306)
Es
Where,
q0 = Footing Pressure = 150 t/m2
B’ = B/2 (Where B is the width of footing)
U = Poisson’s ratio
E = Modulus of Elasticity
Is = Influence Factor
If = Depth Factor
E value for Basalt bedrock = 17,00,000 t/m 2(Ref. 1, Table 4-11, pg. 278)
Using 1/10th of this value for weathered bedrock, E = 170,000 t/m 2
1 0 .3 2
Settlement of Layer =S1 = 150 x1.5 x x 4 x0.51x1.0
170000