You are on page 1of 2

Abstract Review Forms

Abstract Title

Abstract Identification
Number

Date Received

Topic of this abstract is relevant to the following categories (Please tick one (1) box only)

Tick
Code Categories
Box
01 Resilience
02 Recycling

Page 1 out of 2
Please evaluate each aspect of the abstract in scale from 1 to 5 where 1 is very poor and 5 is the best.
For each evaluation aspect comments are welcome, especially if valuation is less than 3. Your
comments will help to improve quality of the conference papers.

Comments (If
No. Evaluation Aspect Rating
relevant)
Title and content of the abstract is important and
1 1 2 3 4 5
relevant to the conference / seminar theme
Abstract contains sufficient overview, well defined
2 1 2 3 4 5
objectives and tasks of the research
Precise keywords are provided to represent content of
3 1 2 3 4 5
the paper

4 Abstract is free from grammatical and spelling errors 1 2 3 4 5

Probability that the topic will stimulate interest / debate


5 1 2 3 4 5
during the conference
Suggestions to the Author(s)
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________

Recommendations to the Editors (Please tick one (1) box only)

Accepted
Reject

Reviewer’s Information (Confidential)


Name
Institution
Email
Date

Page 2 out of 2

You might also like