The renovation of Grenfell Tower involved the building being externally clad with a ventilated rainscreen system designed to protect the building from direct rainfall with a cavity behind the outer skin to ensure that any rainwater was collected and drained away to prevent it from penetrating into the building. The rainscreen panels were known as “Reynobond 55 PE” Aluminium Composite Panels (ACP). Each panel consisted of two 0.5 mm thick aluminium sheets bonded to a 3 mm central plastic (poly- ethylene) core. Behind the panels was a layer of insulation fixed directly to the building. On the spandrels this, predominantly, consisted of two 80 mm layers of Celotex RS5000 PIR polymer foam with one 100 mm layer of the same insulation being affixed to the columns. Before being installed, the panels were fitted into “cassettes” which were hung onto aluminium or steel supports affixed to the concrete structure. This left a 50 mm cavity between the inside face of the rain- screen panel and the outer face of the insulation to allow the ventilation and drainage of any rainwater that penetrated the gaps between the ex- ternal cladding panels. Smaller cavities, with no design function, were also formed between the face of the insulation board and the columns. The problem with PIR foams is that they have a comparatively low time to ignition, and so they support rapid flame spread. In addition to this, the PIR foam in the cavities accelerated the spread of flame on adjacent materials.8 See Figure 2, which is a horizontal section detail of the external wall system illustrating the position of the cavities between the insulation and the cladding. At Grenfell, the vertical flame spread could also be explained by the cavities producing chimney effects, that is, the upward movement of hot air in enclosed vertical spaces. However, Professor Torreo concluded that given the relatively slow rate of vertical flame spread in comparison to other similar fires, the detailing of the external cladding system had only a minor effect. The important factor in the rate and extent of the flame spread was the composition of the materials used. Cavity barriers were installed as part of the over-cladding system. They comprised an intumescent strip which expands in the event of a fire to seal the gap between the barrier and the rear of the cladding pan- els. However, cavity barriers were not provided to all the columns and no cavity barriers were present at the top of the columns nor at the head of the rainscreen cladding. Evidence presented to the inquiry outlined two major problems:
a The cavity barriers were prevented from being continuous due to
the presence of the cladding rails supporting the ACM panels. The Grenfell Tower fire 11
Figure 2 Horizontal Section Through the External Wall System.
(Credit Professor Bisby supplemental report [LBYS0000001] p. 43 Fig. 16.)