Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice
Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice
To cite this article: Alanna O'Broin & Almuth McDowall (2014) Coaching – psychological concepts
and coaching cultures, Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 7:2,
87-89, DOI: 10.1080/17521882.2014.954324
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the
“Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis,
our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to
the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions
and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors,
and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content
should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources
of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims,
proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or
howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising
out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any
substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,
systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms &
Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-
and-conditions
Downloaded by [Uniwersytet Warszawski] at 05:36 31 January 2015
Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 2014
Vol. 7, No. 2, 87–89, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2014.954324
EDITORIAL
Coaching – psychological concepts and coaching cultures
We have two themes underpinning the contributions in this issue. Our opening theme
is the role of coaching and coaching cultures in organisations. We have three
contributions which speak to the topic of differing perspectives on coaching in
organisations across three continents. Drawing from literature on industry and education
perspectives, Helen Gormley and Christian van Nieuwerburgh review coaching cultures
in organisations. They suggest that coaching cultures can help to develop leadership
quality, increase resources and encourage innovation, also highlighting implications of a
lack of definition of the term ‘coaching’ on differing usage of the term ‘coaching culture,’
and the need for organisations to consider and reflect on their purpose in introducing a
coaching culture.
Suzette Skinner’s article continues the theme of coaching cultures and individual
difference through addressing the relatively underexplored research area of senior
women’s professional identity in organisations. Using semi-structured interviews with
11 senior female Australian executives, her grounded theory research findings suggested
the need for a tailored recognition within the backdrop of their specific organisational
context, of leader identity formation of each individual coachee, arguing in effect the
need for a gender perspective in coaching women in senior roles.
Stephen Walston’s survey of Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) provides another view
on the perception of coaching in organisations, this time on the health setting of US
hospitals. His findings demonstrated that coaching was perceived as more valuable for
staff improvement than for succession planning in this setting. The perceived value of
coaching appeared to be influenced by both individual factors (gender and number of
subordinates) and organisational factors (system affiliation and ownership). Walston
suggests the need for a greater understanding of factors influencing the utilisation of
coaching to encourage integration of coaching in leadership development.
Practitioner relevance and an explicit link to coaching practice is a major tenet of the
aims and scope for this journal, and with this in mind, this issue includes an interview
with our new Practice Editor, Doug Mackie. With an eye to academic rigour, debate and
discussion on the question of evidence in coaching, Doug informs us about his aspirations
for his new role and potential deliverables for readers and practitioners, his views on
coaching internationally and his own research on the effects of strength-based leadership
coaching on transformation leadership.
Secondly, there is an underlying theme of using sometimes controversial psycholo-
gical concepts in coaching. Emotional Intelligence (EI), for instance, is a psychological
© 2014 Taylor & Francis
88 Editorial
concept used in coaching with firm supporters (Goleman, 2006) and equally firm
detractors. Daus and Ashkanasy (2003) outline their debate with Locke and Landy from a
Society of Industrial and Organisational Psychology (SIOP) meeting, where the concept
was by all accounts hotly contested in terms of its construct validity, incremental validity
and fitness for purpose. It is the latter which is addressed in this issue by asking – “is
there anything to be gained from working with an EI approach in coaching?” In an
invited contribution from Nicky Schlatter and Almuth McDowall, an EI model is used for
a step-wise coaching approach in the mining industry, an unusual context for work-based
coaching. The submission reports on the process rather than actual outcomes (the authors
hope to report on these in good time), but the account so far suggests that simply raising
the topic of how managers are dealing with their own and others emotions, and offering
measurements focused on these, was a valuable addition to the coaching process using a
skill-based model of EI (Bar-On, 1997). Incidentally, Adrian Banks and Anna Barlow
Downloaded by [Uniwersytet Warszawski] at 05:36 31 January 2015
drew on the same skill-based model to undertake and evaluate an EI-based coaching
intervention for a sports team. Their randomised controlled study (RCS) investigated the
short-term impact of solution-focused coaching using EI on factors related to performance
in athletes, concluding its effectiveness when a direct link is identified between specific
scales on the EQ-i, and anxiety and self-efficacy.
Strengths-based approaches are another psychological concept prevalent in coaching.
Almuth McDowall and Lucy Butterworth’s controlled study found that group strengths-
based coaching improved short-term self-efficacy, strengthens knowledge and confidence
in goal attainment and emphasised the possible role of the coaching in increasing
coachee’s ability to align the goal with their individual strengths, in keeping with the goal
self-concordance model.
We hope you enjoy reading this issue.
Alanna O’Broin
Productive Living Limited, 33 Isis House, Bridge Wharf,
Chertsey, Surrey KT16 8LB, UK
Almuth McDowall
School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
Notes on contributors
Dr Alanna O’Broin is a practising coaching psychologist. She has been co-
editor for Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and
Practice since January 2013. Her main research and practice interests are the
coaching relationship and boundaries with other helping relationships, as
well as cognitive behavioural approaches to coaching. Following a first
career in the UK financial sector as an Investment Analyst and Fund
Manager, she retrained as a psychologist at Royal Holloway University of
London, and City University London, and is a Chartered Psychologist and
Registered Psychologist. Alanna’s doctorate research was on exploring
aspects contributing to the quality of the coaching relationship, and how the
coach uses themselves, specifically in adapting to their individual coachee. She has published
several co-authored articles and book chapters in the academic and practitioner press on this and
other coaching topics. She combines her executive coaching work as an independent practitioner
with writing, presenting and lecturing and has an interest in undertaking further research on the
coaching relationship.
Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice 89
the practitioner press and is a regular speaker at national and international conferences. She works
in the field of work–life balance as a coach and adviser to organisations and has a keen interest in
undertaking research with the Police and other emergency services.
References
Bar-On, R. (1997). The Emotional Intelligence Inventory (EQ-I): Technical manual. Toronto: Multi-
Health Systems.
Daus, C. S., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2003). Will the real emotional intelligence please stand up? On
deconstructing the emotional intelligence “debate”. The Industrial–Organizational Psychologist,
41(2), 69–72.
Goleman, D. (2006). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York, NY:
Random House LLC.