Geotech Brgy Sabang

CCAP Geotech and Engineering Services
Accredited: Bureau of Research and Standards

Leiden St. University Site, Ibabang Dupay, Lucena City
Tel. # 042-719-1950
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page ................................................................................................................................. i
Table of Contents ................................................................................................................... ii
List of Tables ......................................................................................................................... iii
List of Figures ....................................................................................................................... iii
Appendices ............................................................................................................................ iii
References ............................................................................................................................. iii
I. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1
II. Project Description
II.A. Geology of Region IV-A (CALABARZON) .................................................... 2
II.B. Geology of the Province of Cavite ..................................................................... 3
II.C. The Project Site .................................................................................................. 5
III. FIELD AND LABORATORY TESTING ............................................................. 5
IV. SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITION ................................................... 7
V. ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
V.1. Soil Bearing Capacity ....................................................................................... 7
V.2. Settlement ......................................................................................................... 8
V.3. Hydraulic Conductivity .................................................................................... 8
V.4. Seismicity ......................................................................................................... 9
V.5. Soil Liquefaction ............................................................................................ 10
V.6. Foundation Design Considerations and Recommendations ........................... 11
P a g e | ii
Services: *Geotechnical boring test, soil analysis *Structural planning, estimate, design *Construction material testing
Tel. # 042-719-1950
VI. CONCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS .............................................................. 12
LIST OF TABLES
Soil Bearing Capacity .................................................................................................... 13
Field Boring Log ........................................................................................................... 16
Summary of Data ........................................................................................................... 22
Grain Size Analysis and Atterberg Limits AASHTO Standards Test Report ............... 24
Summary of Laboratory Results .................................................................................... 42
LIST OF FIGURES
Borehole Plan ................................................................................................................ 45
Borehole Coordinates .................................................................................................... 46
Drilling Pictures ............................................................................................................ 47
APPENDICES
REFERENCES
P a g e | iii
Tel. # 042-719-1950
APPENDICES
Services: *Geotechnical – boring test, soil analysis *Structural – planning, estimate, design *Construction – material testing
Tel. # 042-719-1950
DEFINITIONS
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
is a registered Civil Engineer with special qualification in the practice of Geotechnical

Engineering as recognized by the Board of Civil Engineering of the Professional
Regulatory Commission as endorsed by the Specialty Division of Geotechnical
Engineering of the Philippine Institute of Civil Engineers (PICE).
Excerpt from SECTION 2, DEFINITIONS of the NATIONAL STRUCTURAL CODE OF THE

PHILIPPINES 2015, Volume 1 Buildings, Towers, and other Vertical Structures
SITE INVESTIGATION AND ASSESSMENT
The geotechnical site investigation and assessment shall be performed by a

geotechnical engineer.
REPORT
A geotechnical investigation and assessment shall be presented in a report. The report,

together with a brief resume and a sworn statement of accountability of the geotechnical
engineering consultant who prepared it, shall be included in the submittals to be received and
examined by the building official or government authority in charge of issuing the relevant
permits such as environmental compliance certificate and/or building permit.
Excerpt from SECTION 304.1, FROM GEOTECHNICAL SITE INVESTIGATION AND ASSESSMENT
of the NATIONAL STRUCTURAL CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES 2015, Volume 1 Buildings, Towers,
and other Vertical Structures
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Tel. # 042-719-1950
REFERENCES
Tel. # 042-719-1950
References:
[1] Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Marikina Valley Fault System

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marikina_Valley_Fault_System
[2] Mapping Philippine Vulnerability to Environmental Disasters Copyright 2005 Center for
Environmental Geomatics Manila Observatory
http://vm.observatory.ph/geophys_maps.html
[3] PHIVOLCS FaultFinder DOST

http://faultfinder.phivolcs.dost.gov.ph/
[4] PHIVOLCS-DOST Earthquake Information

https://www.phivolcs.dost.gov.ph/index.php/earthquake/earthquake-information3
https://earthquaketrack.com/quakes/2019-11-06-20-52-55-utc-5-7-10
[5] National Structural Code of the Philippines (NSCP) Volume 1, Seventh Edition, 2015
CHAPTER 1 General Requirements and Chapter 2 Minimum Design Loads
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Distance of Brgy. Sabang, Dasmariñas , Cavite

from Valley Fault System West Valley Fault [3]
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Distance of Brgy. Sabang, Dasmariñas , Cavite

from Valley Fault System West Valley Fault [3]
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Risk to Projected Rainfall Change [2]
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Combined Risk to Climate Disasters [2]
Tel. # 042-719-1950
National Structural Code of the

Philippines (NSCP) Volume 1, Seventh
Edition, 2015 [5]
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Safe Bearing Capacity Capacity Capacity

S. No. (Type of rocks & soils) (kg/cm2) (kN/m2)
ROCKS
1 Rocks hard without lamination and defects, 33.0 3300
for example granite, trap and
dolerite
2 Laminated rocks, for example sandstone and limestone 16.5 1650
in sound condition
3 Residual deposits of shattered and broken rock and 9.0 900
hard shale, Cemented materials
4 Soft rock 4.5 450
NON COHESIVE SOILS
1 Gravel, sand and gravel, compact and offering high 4.5 450
resistance to penetration when excavated by tools see note-1
below
2 Coarse sand, compact and dry (dry means that the 4.5 450
ground water level is at a depth not less than the width
of foundation, below the base of foundation)
3 Medium sand, compact and dry 2.5 250
4 Fine sand, silt (dry lumps easily pulverized by the 2.5 250
fingers)
5 Loose gravel or sand gravel mixture 1.5 150
Loose, coarse to medium sand dry see note-2
below
6 Fine sand, loose, 1.0 100
dry
COHESIVE SOILS
1 Soft shale, hard or stiff clay in deep bed, dry 4.5 450
2 Medium clay, readily indented with a thumb nail 2.5 250
3 Most clay and sand clay mixture which can be indented 1.5 150
with strong thumb pressure
4 Soft clay indented with moderate thumb pressure 1.0 100
5 Very soft clay which can be penetrated several cm. 0.5 50
Tel. # 042-719-1950
with the thumb

6 Black cotton soil or other shrinkable or expansive clay see note-3
in dry condition {50% saturation) To be determined below
after investigation.
PEAT
1 Peat see note 3 &
4 below
MADE -UP GROUND
1 Fills or made up grounds see note 2 &
5 below
NOTE:
1. Increase or decrease the allowable bearing values as follows:
a) The allowable bearing values may be increased by an amount equal to the weight of
the materials (virgin soil) removed from above the bearing level that is the base of the
foundation.
b) For non-cohesive soils, the allowable bearing shall be reduced by 50% if the water
table is above or near the bearing surface of the soil. If the water table is below the bearing
surface of the soil at a distance at least equal to the width of the foundation, no such reduction
shall apply. For intermediate depths of the water table, proportional reduction of the allowable
bearing value may be made.
2. Compactness looseness of non-cohesive materials may be determined by driving a wooden
picket or dimensions 5 x 5 x 70 cm. with a sharp point. The picket shall be pushed vertically
into the soil by the full weighing at-least 70 kgs. If the penetration of the picket exceeds 20 cm.
the loose state shall be assumed to exist.
3. No generalized values for safe bearing pressures can be given for these types of soils. In such
area, adequate site investigation (see IS: 1892) shall be carried out and expert advice shall be
sought.
4. Peat may occur in a very soft spongy condition or may be quite, firm and compact. While
ultimate bearing capacity may be high in the compact cases very large consolidation
settlements occur even under small pressures and the moments continue for decades.
5. Strength of made-up ground depends on the nature of the materials, its depth and age, and the
methods used for consolidating it.
Reference: IS-1892, Code of Practice for site Investigations for Foundations.
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Report on the Geotechnical Investigation of the Construction Site for the Construction
Of Road From Brgy. Sabang To Brgy. San Jose, Brgy. Sabang, Dasmariñas City, Cavite
for Department of Public Works and Highways Cavite 3rd DEO
I. INTRODUCTION
This report is intended for the geotechnical investigation of the construction site for
the Construction Of Road From Brgy. Sabang To Brgy. San Jose, Brgy. Sabang,
Dasmariñas City, Cavite for Department of Public Works and Highways Cavite 3rd
DEO located in Dasmariñas City, Cavite which has been prepared in order to
provide important data necessary in the design of the footings/foundation for the above
mentioned project.
The subsurface investigation was undertaken last October 17, 20, 21 and 23,
2020 which consists of three (3) boreholes only. This investigation was conducted using
dry drilling method, wash boring method and coring method; employing standard
penetration test. Soil samples and core samples have been gathered from the holes in
the field for laboratory tests in order to determine some important physical characteristics of
the underlying materials necessary for the computation of the soil bearing capacity.
The undersigned evaluated the results of the investigation which will be used to
recommend some important parameters that will aid the designer in right choice design of
footing/foundations and useful information, if any, on the behaviour of the underlying
materials that may cause problems specifically during and after construction.
This report is composed of the results of the investigation including boring log, soil
profile, laboratory tests, soil classification using AASHTO Soil Classification System
and soil properties and behavior in which the designer will base the design of the foundation.
Other important data together with conclusions and recommendations are also included in
this report.
Page |1
Tel. # 042-719-1950
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
II.A. Geology of Region IV-A (CALABARZON)
Three provinces of CALABARZON Region; namely: Batangas, Rizal and Quezon

have geological settings that have high mineral endowment or prospectivity of occurrence of
both metallic and non-metallic mineral deposits with very promising economic potentials.
Laguna and Cavite do not show indications of metallic mineral resources of economic
importance but are rich in non-metallic deposits such as aggregates or construction raw
materials and clays.
The geological surveys undertaken by the Mines and Geosciences Bureau (MGB) and
the private sector revealed that occurrences of metalliferrous deposits containing gold, copper,
lead and zinc are evident in the municipalities of Lobo, Taysan, Mabini, Batangas City, Lipa,
Ibaan, Cuenca and Maribacan Island all in Batangas province. While in Rizal province
metaliferrous mineral deposits containing gold, copper and iron are also known to occur.
Gold-bearing minerals occur as vein and placer deposits in Tanay and Rodriguez, Rizal.
Copper mineralization is evident in Puray, Rodriguez, Rizal. The Sta. Ines magnetite
Iron deposits found along the border of Antipolo and Tanay, Rizal occur as replacement in
metamophosed sedimentary rocks, notably skarn. Finally in Quezon province, occurrences of
metaliferrous deposits containing gold, copper, molydenum and iron can be found in the
municipalities of Gen. Nakar, Infanta, Polillo, Tagkawayan, Real, San Narciso and Buenavista.
Occurrences of manganese mineralization have been reported in northern Mauban, Quezon.
Cement raw materials such as limestone, shale and silica deposits occur in huge
quantities in the towns of Calatagan, Batangas City and Taysan in Batangas Province, Tayabas,
Atimonan, Mauban, Alabat Island, Pagbilao, P. Burgos, Gen. Nakar and Tagkawayan all in
Quezon province and Antipolo and Teresa in Rizal province. Construction materials or
concrete aggregates consisting of basalt, andesite, sand and gravel are abundant in almost all
localities of every province of CALABARZON. Industrial mineral deposits such as clays of
Page |2
Tel. # 042-719-1950
various types, barite, gypsum and pumice are present in Nasugbu, Calatagan, Batangas City,
San Juan, Lobo and Mabini all in Batangas province.
Fertilizer raw materials like guano and rock phosphate can be found in Lobo, Batangas.
Some of limestone in Rizal and Quezon provinces which are not used as cement raw materials
industrial lime, quicklime or agricultural lime. Industrial mineral deposits such as clays of
various types, feldspar, silica sand and bull quartz, are present in Tagkawayan, Gen. Nakar and
Atimonan all in Quezon province. Lastly, in Rizal province, red-burning clay as a result of
residual weathering of pyroclastic rocks are extensive in Tanay, San Mateo and Antipolo,
while industrial minerals such as diatomaceous earth can be found in Jala-jala.
II.B. Geology of the Province of Cavite
Cavite is composed of several soil types according to soil surveys conducted by

the Bureau of Soils and Water Management (BSWM). Classification of soil types in a specific
area is a very important consideration in identifying its most fitted land-use.
The lowland area of Cavite is generally composed of Guadalupe clay and clay loam. It
is characterized as coarse and granular when dry but sticky and plastic when wet. Its
substratum is solid volcanic tuff. Guadalupe clay adobes are abundant in the southern part
of Bacoor and Imus bordering Dasmariñas. This soil is hard and compact and difficult to
cultivate. It is very sticky when wet and granular when dry. Hydrosol and Obando sand are
found along Bacoor Bay. The shoreline of Rosario, Tanza, Naic and Ternate are lined with
Guadalupe sand.
The central area principally consists of Magallanes loam with streaks of Magallanes
clay loam of sandy texture. The eastern side of Cavite consists of Carmona clay loam with
streaks of Carmona clay loam steep phase and Carmona sandy clay loam. This type of soil is
Page |3
Tel. # 042-719-1950
granular with tuffaceaous material and concretions. It is hard and compact when dry, sticky and
plastic when wet. Guingua fine sandy loam is found along the lower part of Malabon and
Alang-ilang River at Noveleta.
The type of soils that dominate the upland areas are Tagaytay loam and Tagaytay sandy
loam with mountain soil undifferentiated found on the south-eastern side bordering Laguna
province. Also on the southern tip are Magallanes clay and Mountain soil undifferentiated with
interlacing of Magallanes clay loam steep phase. The Tagaytay loam contains fine sandy
materials, moderately friable, and easy to work on when moist. In an undisturbed condition, it
bakes and becomes hard when dry. On the other hand, Tagaytay sandy loam is friable and
granular with considerable amount of volcanic sand and underlain by adobe clay. Cavite also
has the Patungan sand characterized by pale gray to almost white sand with substratum of
marine conglomerates which are found at Santa Mercedes in Maragondon and in some
coastlines of Ternate.
The greater parts of Cavite are composed of volcanic materials, tuff, cinders, basalt,
breccias, agglomerate and interbeddings of shales and sandstones. The dormant and active
volcanoes (Taal) are within these volcanic areas and have been the sources of volcanic
materials which form the Tagaytay Cuesta. The drainage systems are deeply entrenched in the
tuffs, eroding thin interbedded sandstones and conglomerate rocks which are sources of little
reserves of sand and gravel in the larger stream. Adobe stone quarries also flourish in the tiff
areas.
Cavite coastal areas have marl and conglomerate sedimentary rocks and some igneous
rocks which are prominent in the high, mountainous regions of western part of the province.
Black sands are found in Kawit while Noveleta has its own salt products. Magallanes has
gravel deposits while reserves of sand and gravel materials are found in Alfonso, Carmona,
Gen. Aguinaldo, Naic, Ternate, Maragondon and Silang.
Page |4
Tel. # 042-719-1950
II.C. The Project Site
The project site is located along Imus River in Brgy. Sabang, Dasmariñas City, Cavite.
Borehole number one (BH1) is currently a vacant lot located about 5.60 m. from the river
bed. The ground surface, where the samples were taken, is of uneven ground covered with
grass. Borehole number two (BH2), which is surrounded with trees, is approximately 10.00
m. above the river bed and about 5.00 m. away from the river bank. Borehole number three
(BH3) is approximately 6.00 m. above the river bed and about 2.00 m. away from the river
bank. The ground surface is of uneven ground covered with grass. The surface strata are
sedimentary rock (sandstone).
The holes were drilled at different locations within the proposed construction area as
reflected in the borehole plan. Groundwater table was not encountered in the field during the
subsurface investigation.
III. FIELD AND LABORATORY TESTING
The field exploratory program consisted of three (3) boreholes which were extended
down to 10.50 m. and 15.00 m. depths from the existing ground surface in which soil samples
and core samples were obtained for laboratory testing.
Page |5
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Preliminary identification of the soil samples in the field were conducted applying
plasticity tests for fine grained soils and physical observation for coarse grained soils.
Standard Penetration Test (SPT) was also conducted in order to obtain information
regarding the consistency and/or density of the soil encountered. Representative soil samples
were obtained from the site by means of split spoon sampler. Core samples were obtained using
core barrel.
All soil samples and core samples gathered during the subsurface investigation were
placed in polyethylene bags and core boxes, respectively, which were properly sealed, labelled
and transported to the laboratory for testing. Detailed description of the subsurface materials,
measurements, observation and other pertinent data were recorded as reflected in the boring
log.
Groundwater table was not encountered in the field during the subsurface investigation.
The laboratory program in both phases of subsurface investigation consisted of

standard laboratory tests such as moisture content, specific gravity, grain size analysis/sieve
analysis, hydrometer analysis and Atterberg Limit Tests (plastic limit and liquid limit);
strength tests such as triaxial test and direct shear test; and consolidation test such as
one-dimensional consolidation, swell-potential of clays and collapse potential of soils that are
necessary in the determination of the index properties, and soil parameters that may affect the
behaviour of the underlying materials when subjected to loading. The Moisture Density
Relation of soil is also determined. All the laboratory tests were performed in accordance to the
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) standards.
The soil samples gathered were classified after conducting the different laboratory tests
as mentioned above using the AASHTO Soil Classification System. The types of soil
encountered during the exploratory program at different depth were identified and explained
below under the surface and subsurface conditions.
Page |6
Tel. # 042-719-1950
IV. SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITION
In this investigation, three (3) boreholes were drilled, specified as borehole number
one (BH1) to borehole number three (BH3), located within the proposed construction area as
reflected in the borehole plan.
During the subsurface investigation, it was found out that the strata from the ground
surface down to 10.50 m. and 15.00 m. depths which varies with distance as well as with depth
of the proposed construction area is reflected in the boring log and soil profile.
Groundwater table was not encountered in the field during the subsurface investigation.
V. ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
V.1. Soil Bearing Capacity
Based from the result of the subsurface investigation, the Standard Penetration Test can
be used to correlate the unit weight, internal angle of friction, cohesion and other pertinent data
necessary to obtain the bearing capacity of the soil.
Using the results obtained from SPT and the different laboratory tests together with the
soil classification, the ultimate and allowable bearing capacity of the soil were determined. The
computation for allowable soil bearing capacity of the underlying soils is based on the
values registered from SPT and the laboratory tests.
SPT and laboratory tests data indicate that the strata in borehole number one (BH1) to
borehole number three (BH3), from the ground surface down to 10.50 m. and 15.00 m.
depths, comprise silty soils (A-4), silty or clayey gravel and sand (A-2-4), clayey soils
(A-6), stone fragments, gravel and sand (A-1-b) and sedimentary rock (sandstone
and siltstone). Descriptions of pertinent data of soil and core samples, which vary with
depth, were reflected in the boring log and soil profile.
Page |7
Tel. # 042-719-1950
The bearing capacity of the soil obtained in the geotechnical investigation for this
project is reflected in Table 1.
V.2. Settlement
Clay settles for a longer period of time since the actual settlement takes place upon
complete dissipation of water from the soil layer. The settlement underlain by saturated fine
soils is virtually unaffected by a short application of high load and because of the slow response
of clay to applied load, the settlement should be estimated on the basis of the dead load plus the
best possible estimate of the long term average instead of the maximum live load.
In sand, water dissipates quickly that leads to immediate settlement upon application of
load.
The study conducted on older structure shows that the biggest differential settlement of
clay and sand is from the order of 32 mm to 45 mm for isolated and raft foundation,
respectively. Clay undergoes a maximum differential settlement that varies from 75 mm for
isolated footing to 125 mm for raft foundation.
V.3. Hydraulic Conductivity
If most of the soil samples are fine grained materials, the movement of water through
the layer is very slow which indicates that the seepage is not so likely to occur especially when
the soil layer is properly treated/compacted especially at the base of the foundation/footing.
Page |8
Tel. # 042-719-1950
V.4. Seismicity
The Marikina Valley Fault System, also known as the Valley Fault System (VFS),
is a dominantly dextral strike slip fault system in Luzon, Philippines. It extends from Doña
Remedios Trinidad, Bulacan in the north and runs through the provinces of Rizal (Montalban
and San Mateo), the Metro
Manila cities of Quezon, Marikina, Pasig, Makati, Taguig and Muntinlupa, and the provinces
of Cavite (Carmona and Tagaytay) and Laguna (San Pedro, Biñan, Santa Rosa and
Calamba) that ends in Canlubang. [1]
The Marikina Fault Line is the most geologically active fault line in the Philippines. It
is located in East of Metro Manila and cuts through all the modern and progressive portions of
Manila, Rizal, Marikina City, Quezon City such as Eastwood, Rockwell, Ortigas Center,
Bonifacio Global City, Ayala Center, and Alabang. It was renamed to West Valley Fault. [1]
The West Valley Fault segment traverses from Doña Remedios

Trinidad to Calamba with a length of 129.47 kilometers (80.45 mi). It is the only most feared
fault system in recent years in the Philippines. The West Fault is capable of producing large
scale earthquakes on its active phases with a magnitude of 7 or higher. The East Valley Fault
is the eastern segment, known as East Valley Fault (EVF), moves in an oblique dextral motion.
It extends to about 17.24 kilometers (10.71 mi) from Rodriguez to San Mateo in the province
of Rizal. [1]
In Cavite, about 85.10 percent of the land was prone to ground shaking in the event of
an earthquake in 2018. The province of Cavite is one of the provinces that are at risk to
projected rainfall and combined risk to climate disasters as indicated in the map of the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) [2]
The project site situated in Brgy. Sabang, Dasmariñas City, Cavite has a distance
of about 5.70 km. from the nearest active fault trace (Fault Name Valley Fault System and
Segment Name West Valley Fault). [3]
Page |9
Tel. # 042-719-1950
The earthquakes that recently occurred and affected the province of Cavite, as recorded
by PHIVOLCS, has the least magnitude of about MS 4.8 that occurred in Claveria, Cagayan
Valley in August 21, 2020. The strongest magnitude of about MS 5.7 occurred in Casuguran,
Calabarzon in November 06, 2019. A 3.5 magnitude earthquake, which is eleven (11)
kilometers from depth from Tagaytay City occurred on January 12, 2020, as recorded by
PHIVOLCS. [4]
The assigned Soil Profile Type for the project site in Cavite is B , C
and D with a Soil Profile Name or Generic Description of , dense soil

and , respectively. The Seismic Source Type is ,
considering the strongest earthquake recorded with the magnitude of 5.7. The province of
Cavite is among the Zone 4 Seismic Zone. [5]
V.5. Soil Liquefaction
Soil liquefaction occurs when a saturated or partially saturated soil substantially loses
strength and stiffness in response to an applied stress such as shaking during an earthquake or
other sudden change in stress condition, in which material that is ordinarily a solid behaves like
a liquid.
As per National Structural Code of the Philippines (NSCP) Volume 1, Seventh

Edition, 2015 Chapter 3 Earthworks and Foundations, page 3-9, a liquefaction
susceptibility assessment in accordance with the accepted practice is warranted if both
conditions below are discovered during the course of the geotechnical investigation:
1. Shallow ground water, 2 m. or less
2. Unconsolidated saturated sandy alluvium (N<15)
Both conditions were not discovered at a time at the same specific location during the
course of the geotechnical investigation, thus, liquefaction is not probable.
P a g e | 10
Tel. # 042-719-1950
V. 6. Foundation Design Considerations and Recommendations
The following foundation design considerations and recommendations are based from
the result of the investigation conducted on the site as described previously.
a) From the holes, the strata consist of silty soils (A-4), silty or clayey gravel and sand
(A-2-4), clayey soils (A-6), stone fragments, gravel and sand (A-1-b) and sedimentary
rock (sandstone and siltstone); descriptions of pertinent data of soil samples and core
samples, which vary with depth, were reflected in the boring log and soil profile.
b) Groundwater table was not encountered in the field during the subsurface investigation;
however, this condition should be observed well during excavation to avoid problems
during and after construction.
c) The computed plasticity index (PI) values for the soil range from 3.00 19.00, a
predominantly slightly plastic to medium plastic soil.
d) Tolerable settlement of 35 mm can be used and a maximum settlement of 65 mm to 100

mm for the design of raft foundation.
e) The design of the footing/foundation shall be based from the computed allowable soil
bearing capacity reflected in Table 1.
f) Application of plastic filters in the design of foundation is also recommended to minimize

scouring.
g) Adjacent existing structures should be given attention during excavation to avoid

problems.
h) Provision of shoring and side protection during the excavation for footing/foundation shall
be done to avoid collapse of soil within excavated area.
i) If ever soil condition which is not included in this report is encountered in the field during
construction, the undersigned should be notified regarding the matter to further analyse the
condition.
j) this report in order to appraise the

subsurface condition at the project site during construction.
P a g e | 11
Tel. # 042-719-1950
VI. CONCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS
This report has been prepared as a guide in the design of footing/foundation for the
Construction Of Road From Brgy. Sabang To Brgy. San Jose, Dasmariñas City, Cavite
for Department of Public Works and Highways Cavite 3rd DEO located in
Dasmariñas City, Cavite descri
significant aspects relevant to the soil and foundation considerations as encountered in the
investigation.
The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based in the part
upon data obtained from a limited number of soil samples gathered during subsurface soil
exploration.
The analyses and recommendations have been performed by the Undersigned in

accordance with the generally accepted engineering principles. Its scope is therefore limited to
the above mentioned location/site and type of structure described herein. The scope of the
work and the liability of the Undersigned is limited to this project only and is therefore cannot
be extended to any other party by any means. In the event that this report is used in other
projects for design purposes, the Undersigned likewise, disclaim the responsibility.
Prepared by:
RONALD KEVIN D. NOBLEZA, CE

Technical Department Head
Checked by:
BELLA CHITA M. MONILLA

Civil Engineer, PRC Lic. # 28101
Specialist, Geotechnical Engineering
Accreditation No. GT 21
PTR. # 1056468 (1-09-2020)
P a g e | 12
P a g e | 13
P a g e | 14
P a g e | 15
T el. # 042-719-1950
FIELD BORING LOG

P ROJ ECT TITLE: CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD FROM BRGY. SABANG TO BRGY. SAN JOSER BOREHOLE ID: B H1
P ROJ ECT LOCATION: BRGY. SABANG, DAS MARIÑAS CITY, CAVITE S URFACE ELEVATION: 117 . 0 0 m.
LATITUDE: 14.33995 N LONGITUDE: 120.92436 E WEATHER CONDITION: S UNNY BOREHOLE DIAMETER: 4 "
DRILLING METHOD: D R Y D R ILLIN G/ W A S H B OR IN G/ C OR IN G M ETHOD DRILLING RIG: YB M HAMMER EFFICIENCY: 0 . 8 0
S AM P LER TYP E(S ) AND S IZE(S ) ID: 2 " S P LIT S P OON S A MP . / B Q C OR E B A R . S P T HAMMER TYP E: DO NUT TOTAL DEP TH OF BORING: 15 . 0 0 m
BEGIN DATE: O CTO B ER 2 3 , 2 0 2 0 BEGIN TIME: 12 :3 5 P M BOREHOLE BACKFILL: NO NE
COMP LETION DATE: O CTO B ER 2 3 , 2 0 2 0 COMP LETION TIME: 0 4 :15 P M DURING DRILLING: NO NE
G WL
LOGGED BY: JO HN RALP H L. MUTYA, CE DRILLING CONTRACTOR: CCAP AFTER DRILLING: NO NE
DESCRIPT ION REMARKS
0.5
Moist, dark brown clayey silt
1.0 SS18/11/13 24 100 30. 6 8
1.5
Moist, gray silty fine sand 100
2.0 SS2 60 29. 9 5
REFUSAL
2.5 RO TARY DRILLING
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
Sedimentary rock - Brown sandstone
5.0
5.5
6.0 CS1 -
6.5
7.0
7.5
Sedimentary rock - Dark gray sandstone
8.0
8.5
9.0 CS2 -
9.5
10.0
10.5
11.0
Sedimentary rock - Brownish gray
sandstone
11.5
12.0 CS3 -
12.5
13.0
13.5
14.0
Sedimentary rock - Gray sandstone
14.5
15.0 CS4 - RO TARY DRILLING

DR ILLING S UP ER VIS OR P R OJ EC T TITLE: C O N S T R UC T IO N O F S LO P E P R O T E C T IO N A LO N G
IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: J OHN R A LP H L. M U TY A , C E IM US R IVE R , B R G Y. S A M P A LO C IV, D A S M A R IÑA S C IT Y, C A VIT E
DP WH INS P EC TOR P R OJ EC T OR B R IDGE NAM E
DPWH CAVITE 3RD DEO
B R IDGE NUM B ER P R EP AR ED B Y DATE S HEET
10 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 1
P a g e | 16
T el. # 042-719-1950
FIELD BORING LOG
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
15.5
16.0
16.5
17.0
17.5
18.0
18.5
19.0
19.5
20.0
20.5
21.0
21.5
22.0
22.5
23.0
23.5
24.0
24.5
25.0
25.5
26.0
26.5
27.0
27.5
28.0
28.5
29.0
29.5
30.0
SITE DESCRIPTION:
- approximately 10.00 m. above the river bed
- surrounded by trees
- 5.00 m. away from the river bank

IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: J O HN R A LP H L. M U T Y A , C E IM US R IVE R , B R G Y. S A M P A LO C IV, D A S M A R IÑA S C IT Y, C A VIT E
DPWH CAVITE 3RD DEO
10 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2
P a g e | 17
T el. # 042-719-1950
FIELD BORING LOG

P ROJ ECT TITLE: CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD FROM BRGY. SABANG TO BRGY. SAN JOSE BOREHOLE ID: B H2
P ROJ ECT LOCATION: BRGY. SABANG, DAS MARIÑAS CITY, CAVITE S URFACE ELEVATION: 12 2 . 0 0 m.
LATITUDE: 14.341639 N LONGITUDE: 120.924333 E WEATHER CONDITION: S UNNY BOREHOLE DIAMETER: 4 "
S AM P LER TYP E(S ) AND S IZE(S ) ID: 2 " S P LIT S P OON S A MP . / B Q C OR E B A R . S P T HAMMER TYP E: DO NUT TOTAL DEP TH OF BORING: 15 . 0 0 m.
BEGIN DATE: O CTO B ER 2 3 , 2 0 2 0 BEGIN TIME: 0 8 :5 1 AM BOREHOLE BACKFILL: NO NE
COMP LETION DATE: O CTO B ER 2 3 , 2 0 2 0 COMP LETION TIME: 11:10 P M DURING DRILLING: NO NE
G WL
0.5
Moist, brown silty clay
1.0 SS1 2/8/6 14 100 29. 9 1
1.5
Moist, gray silty fine sand
2.0 SS2 50/10 60 100 30. 7 0
REFUSAL
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0 CS1 -
9.5
10.0
10.5
11.0
11.5
12.0 CS2 -
12.5
13.0
13.5
14.0
14.5
sandstone
DRILLING SUPERVISOR P R OJ EC T TITLE: C O N S T R UC T IO N O F S LO P E P R O T E C T IO N A LO N G
IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: JO HN RALPH L. MUTYA, C E IM US R IVE R , B R G Y. S A M P A LO C IV, D A S M A R IÑA S C IT Y, C A VIT E
DPWH CAVITE 3RD DEO
10 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 1
P a g e | 18
T el. # 042-719-1950
FIELD BORING LOG
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
15.5
16.0
16.5
17.0
17.5
18.0
18.5
19.0
19.5
20.0
20.5
21.0
21.5
22.0
22.5
23.0
23.5
24.0
24.5
25.0
25.5
26.0
26.5
27.0
27.5
28.0
28.5
29.0
29.5
30.0
SITE DESCRIPTION:
- surrounded by trees
- slighlty sloping ground surface
- approximately 12.30 m. above the river
bed
DRILLING SUPERVISOR P R OJ EC T TITLE: C O N S T R UC T IO N O F S LO P E P R O T E C T IO N A LO N G

IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: JO HN RALPH L. MUTYA, C E IM US R IVE R , B R G Y. S A M P A LO C IV, D A S M A R IÑA S C IT Y, C A VIT E
DPWH CAVITE 3RD DEO
10 / 2 3 / 2 0 2 0 2
P a g e | 19
T el. # 042-719-1950
FIELD BORING LOG

P ROJ ECT TITLE: CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD FROM BRGY. SABANG TO BRGY. SAN JOSE BOREHOLE ID: B H3
P ROJ ECT LOCATION: BRGY. SABANG, DAS MARIÑAS CITY, CAVITE S URFACE ELEVATION: 118 . 0 0 m.
LATITUDE: 14.339953 N LONGITUDE: 120.924358 E WEATHER C ONDITION: C LO UD Y BOREHOLE DIAMETER: 4 "
S AM P LER TYP E(S ) AND S IZE(S ) ID: 2 " S P LIT S P OON S A MP . / B Q C OR E B A R . S P T HAMMER TYP E: DO NUT TOTAL DEP TH OF BORING: 15 . 0 0 m.
BEGIN DATE: O CTO B ER 2 1, 2 0 2 0 BEGIN TIME: 10 :4 7 AM BOREHOLE BACKFILL: NO NE
COMP LETION DATE: O CTO B ER 2 1, 2 0 2 0 COMP LETION TIME: 0 3 :3 3 P M DURING DRILLING: NO NE
G WL
0.5
Moist, grayish brown silty sand 60 100

1.0 SS1 31. 1 9
1.5
2.0
Moist, dark brown silty clay with sand SS2 62 100 29. 6 9
REFUSAL
2.5 W ASH BO RING
3.0
Brown dense silty gravelly sand
3.5 SS3 - W ASH BO RING
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5 CS1 -
8.0
8.5
9.0 sandstone CS2 -
9.5
10.0
10.5
Sedimentary rock - Gray siltstone CS3 -
11.0
11.5
12.0
12.5
13.0
13.5
14.0
14.5

IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: J OHN R A LP H L. M U TY A , C E IM US R IVE R , B R G Y. S A M P A LO C IV, D A S M A R IÑA S C IT Y, C A VIT E
DPWH CAVITE 3RD DEO
10 / 2 1/ 2 0 2 0 1
P a g e | 20
T el. # 042-719-1950
FIELD BORING LOG
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
15.5
16.0
16.5
17.0
17.5
18.0
18.5
19.0
19.5
20.0
20.5
21.0
21.5
22.0
22.5
23.0
23.5
24.0
24.5
25.0
25.5
26.0
26.5
27.0
27.5
28.0
28.5
29.0
29.5
30.0
SITE DESCRIPTION:
- approximately 7.50 m. above the river
bed
- slightly sloping ground surface
- surrounded with trees
- lower than the existing road surface
- near the existing residential houses

IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: J O HN R A LP H L. M U T Y A , C E IM US R IVE R , B R G Y. S A M P A LO C IV, D A S M A R IÑA S C IT Y, C A VIT E
DPWH CAVITE 3RD DEO
10 / 2 1/ 2 0 2 0 2
P a g e | 21
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Table 2. Summary of Data
Soil
Borehole Depth N Bearing
Soil Description Classification
Number (m) Values Capacity
(kPa)
1.00 24 201.68
Clayey silt A-4 (2)
2.00 60 369.92
Silty fine sand A-2-4 (0)
3.00 - 1650
4.50 - 1650
Sedimentary rock Sandstone -
6.00 - 1650
BH1 7.50 - 1650
9.00 - 1650 Sedimentary rock Sandstone -
10.50 - 1650
13.50 - 1650
1.00 14 126.70 Silty clay A-6 (6)

2.00 60 369.92 Silty fine sand A-2-4 (0)
3.00 - 1650
4.50 - 1650
BH2 7.50 - 1650
9.00 - 1650
10.50 - 1650
12.00 - 1650
13.50 - 1650
15.00 - 1650
P a g e | 22
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Table 2. Summary of Data
Soil
Borehole N Bearing
Depth Soil Description Classification
Number Values Capacity
(kPa)
1.00 60 330.58
Silty sand A-2-4 (0)
1.25 - -
2.00 62 281.10 Silty clay with sand A-6 (6)
3.00 - 450
Dense silty gravelly sand A-2-4 (0)
3.50 - -
4.50 - 1650
BH3
7.50 - 1650
10.50 - 1650 Sedimentary rock Siltstone -
11.00 - -
12.00 - 1650
13.50 - 1650
15.00 - 1650
P a g e | 23
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS AND ATTERBERG LIMITS AASHTO STANDARDS TEST REPORT
Project Name: Construction Of Road From Brgy. Sabang To Brgy. San Jose, Brgy. Sabang, Dasmariñas City, Cavite
Project Location: Brgy. Sabang, Dasmariñas City, Cavite
Cl ient: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS CAVITE 3RD DEO
Cl ient's Address: Carmona, Cavite
Sampli ng Locati on: Leiden St. University Site, Brgy. Ibabang Dupay, Lucena City, Quezon Province
BH Number: BH1
Sample ID: SS1
Sample Depth: 0.00 - 1.00 m.
Date of Testing: October 26, 2020
Liquid Limit(%) Plastic Limit (%)

Figure 1. Flow Curve
Tri a l Numbe r 1 2 3 4 1 2 3
Ca n Numbe r A B C D A C 50
B 45
We t Soi l + Ca n (g) 88.90 90.80 87.40 88.90 27.80 22.50 29.30 40
35
Dry Soi l +Ca n (g) 83.30 76.50 78.00 80.80 23.50 19.30 25.10 30
Ma s s of Ca n (g) 65.60 35.80 53.60 61.30 8.20 8.30 10.10 25
20
Moi s ture Los s (g) 5.60 14.30 9.40 8.10 4.30 3.20 4.20 15
10
Ma s s of Dry Soi l (g) 17.70 40.70 24.40 19.50 15.30 11.00 15.00 5
0
Moi s ture Conte nt (%) 31.64 35.14 38.52 41.54 28.10 29.09 28.00
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Numbe r of Bl ows 36 29 22 15
Liquid Limit (%) 37.07 28.40 Number of Blows
Plasticity Index (%) 8.67
Grain Size Distribution Curve

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS OF SOILS 100
90
TOTAL SAMPLE (g): 500
80
SIEVE METHOD
Cum. 70
Particle Diam Cum. % Cum. %
Si e ve # Ma s s 60
(mm) Retained Pas sing
Re t. (g)
3" 75.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 50
2 1/2 " 63.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 40
2" 50.000 0.00 0.00 100.00
30
1 1/2" 37.500 0.00 0.00 100.00
1" 25.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 20
3/4" 19.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 10
3/8" 9.500 0.00 0.00 100.00
0
#4 4.750 0.00 0.00 100.00
100.0000 10.0000 1.0000 0.1000 0.0100 0.0010 0.0001
# 10 2.000 11.80 2.36 97.64
# 40 0.425 43.50 8.70 88.94 Particle Diameter (mm)
# 100 0.150 85.20 17.04 71.90
# 200 0.075 106.70 21.34 50.56
Course to Med Fine
Silt Clay
Gravel
Sand
Pa n 0.000 252.80 50.56 0.00
MOISTURE CONTENT OF SOILS SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
Trial 1 2 3 Moisture Content (%): 30.68

Wet Soil + Can (g): 53.90 37.50 48.20 Liquid Limit (%): 37.07
Dry Soil + Can (g): 44.30 31.30 39.80 Plastic Limit (%): 28.40
Mass of Can (g): 12.40 11.70 12.10 Plasticity Index (%): 8.67
Moisture of Loss (g): 9.60 6.20 8.40 AASHTO A-4 (2)
Original Dry Mass (g): 31.90 19.60 27.70 Soil Description
Moisture Content (%): 30.09 31.63 30.32
Moist, dark brown clayey silt
Average Moisture Content (%): 30.68
Performed by: Checked by:

MARY MAJELA R. VALDEZ RONALD KEVIN D. NOBLEZA, CE
Laboratory Engineer Technical Department Head
P a g e | 24
BH Number: BH1
Sample ID: SS2
Sample Depth: 1.00 m. - 2.00 m.

Tri a l Numbe r 1 2 3 4 1 2 3
B 45
We t Soi l + Ca n (g) 90.70 89.30 87.00 92.50 32.80 24.50 19.20 40
35
Dry Soi l +Ca n (g) 84.30 86.40 80.10 81.50 27.10 21.20 17.10 30
Ma s s of Ca n (g) 65.00 78.00 61.30 53.60 7.70 10.10 10.20 25
20
Moi s ture Los s (g) 6.40 2.90 6.90 11.00 5.70 3.30 2.10 15
10
Ma s s of Dry Soi l (g) 19.30 8.40 18.80 27.90 19.40 11.10 6.90 5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

90
80
SIEVE METHOD
Cum. 70
Si e ve # Ma s s 60
Re t. (g)
3" 75.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 50
2 1/2 " 63.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 40
2" 50.000 0.00 0.00 100.00
30
1 1/2" 37.500 0.00 0.00 100.00
1" 25.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 20
3/4" 19.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 10
3/8" 9.500 0.00 0.00 100.00
0
#4 4.750 0.00 0.00 100.00
100.0000 10.0000 1.0000 0.1000 0.0100 0.0010 0.0001
# 10 2.000 129.50 26.98 73.02
# 100 0.150 63.70 13.27 38.73
# 200 0.075 81.40 16.96 21.77
Course to Med Fine
Silt Clay
Gravel
Sand
Pa n 0.000 104.50 21.77 0.00

Moisture of Loss (g): 10.20 8.30 8.00 AASHTO A-2-4 (0)

P a g e | 25
BH Number: BH1
Sample ID: CS1

Tri a l Numbe r 1 2 3 4 1 2 3
Ca n Numbe r A B C D A B C 50
45
We t Soi l + Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 40
35
Dry Soi l +Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 30
Ma s s of Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 25
20
Moi s ture Los s (g) - - - - - - - 15
10
Ma s s of Dry Soi l (g) - - - - - - - 5
0
Moi s ture Conte nt (%) - - - - - - -
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Numbe r of Bl ows - - - -
Liquid Limit (%) - - Number of Blows
Plasticity Index (%) -

90
TOTAL SAMPLE (g): -
80
SIEVE METHOD
Cum.
70
Si e ve # Ma s s 60
Re t. (g)
3" 75.000 - - - 50
2 1/2 " 63.000 - - - 40
2" 50.000 - - -
30
1 1/2" 37.500 - - -
1" 25.000 - - - 20
3/4" 19.000 - - - 10
3/8" 9.500 - - -
0
#4 4.750 - - -
100.0000 10.0000 1.0000 0.1000 0.0100 0.0010 0.0001
# 10 2.000 - - -
# 40 0.425 - - - Particle Diameter (mm)
# 100 0.150 - - -
# 200 0.075 - - -
Course to Med Fine
Silt Clay
Gravel
Sand
Pa n 0.000 - - -
Trial 1 2 3 Moisture Content (%): -

Wet Soil + Can (g): - - - Liquid Limit (%): -
Dry Soil + Can (g): - - - Plastic Limit (%): -
Mass of Can (g): - - - Plasticity Index (%): -
Moisture of Loss (g): - - - AASHTO -
Original Dry Mass (g): - - - Soil Description
Moisture Content (%): - - -
Average Moisture Content (%): -

P a g e | 26
Leiden St. Univers ity Site, Ibabang Dupay, Lucena City
Project Locati on: Brgy. Sabang, Dasmariñas City, Cavite
Sampli ng Locati on: Leiden St. Univers ity Site, Brgy. Ibabang Dupay, Lucena City, Quezon Province
BH Number: BH1
Sample ID: CS2

Tri a l Numbe r 1 2 3 4 1 2 3
B 45
We t Soi l + Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 40
35
Dry Soi l +Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 30
Ma s s of Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 25
20
Moi s ture Los s (g) - - - - - - - 15
10
Ma s s of Dry Soi l (g) - - - - - - - 5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

90
TOTAL SAMPLE (g): -
80
SIEVE METHOD
Cum. 70
Si e ve # Ma s s 60
Re t. (g)
3" 75.000 - - - 50
2 1/2 " 63.000 - - - 40
2" 50.000 - - -
30
1 1/2" 37.500 - - -
1" 25.000 - - - 20
3/4" 19.000 - - - 10
3/8" 9.500 - - -
0
#4 4.750 - - -
100.0000 10.0000 1.0000 0.1000 0.0100 0.0010 0.0001
# 10 2.000 - - -
# 100 0.150 - - -
# 200 0.075 - - -
Course to Med Fine
Silt Clay
Gravel
Sand
Pa n 0.000 - - -

Average Mois ture Content (%): -

P a g e | 27
BH Number: BH1
Sample ID: CS3

Tri a l Numbe r 1 2 3 4 1 2 3
45
We t Soi l + Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 40
35
Dry Soi l +Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 30
Ma s s of Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 25
20
Moi s ture Los s (g) - - - - - - - 15
10
Ma s s of Dry Soi l (g) - - - - - - - 5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

90
TOTAL SAMPLE (g): -
80
SIEVE METHOD
Cum. 70
Si e ve # Ma s s 60
Re t. (g)
3" 75.000 - - - 50
2 1/2 " 63.000 - - - 40
2" 50.000 - - -
30
1 1/2" 37.500 - - -
1" 25.000 - - - 20
3/4" 19.000 - - - 10
3/8" 9.500 - - -
0
#4 4.750 - - -
100.0000 10.0000 1.0000 0.1000 0.0100 0.0010 0.0001
# 10 2.000 - - -
# 100 0.150 - - -
# 200 0.075 - - -
Course to Med Fine
Silt Clay
Gravel
Sand
Pa n 0.000 - - -

Sedimentary rock - Brownish gray sandstone

P a g e | 28
BH Number: BH1
Sample ID: CS4
Sample Depth: 12.00 m. - 15.00 m.

Tri a l Numbe r 1 2 3 4 1 2 3
B 45
We t Soi l + Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 40
35
Dry Soi l +Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 30
Ma s s of Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 25
20
Moi s ture Los s (g) - - - - - - - 15
10
Ma s s of Dry Soi l (g) - - - - - - - 5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

90
TOTAL SAMPLE (g): -
80
SIEVE METHOD
Cum. 70
Si e ve # Ma s s 60
Re t. (g)
3" 75.000 - - - 50
2 1/2 " 63.000 - - - 40
2" 50.000 - - -
30
1 1/2" 37.500 - - -
1" 25.000 - - - 20
3/4" 19.000 - - - 10
3/8" 9.500 - - -
0
#4 4.750 - - -
100.0000 10.0000 1.0000 0.1000 0.0100 0.0010 0.0001
# 10 2.000 - - -
# 100 0.150 - - -
# 200 0.075 - - -
Course to Med Fine
Silt Clay
Gravel
Sand
Pa n 0.000 - - -


P a g e | 29
BH Number: BH2
Sample ID: SS1

Tri a l Numbe r 1 2 3 4 1 2 3
B 45
We t Soi l + Ca n (g) 88.90 92.50 87.60 85.40 32.30 26.80 22.70 40
35
Dry Soi l +Ca n (g) 82.80 77.30 78.20 78.50 28.50 23.80 20.90 30
Ma s s of Ca n (g) 65.60 35.80 53.60 61.30 10.50 9.30 11.60 25
20
Moi s ture Los s (g) 6.10 15.20 9.40 6.90 3.80 3.00 1.80 15
10
Ma s s ofDry Soi l (g) 17.20 41.50 24.60 17.20 18.00 14.50 9.30 5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

90
80
SIEVE METHOD
Cum. 70
Si e ve # Ma s s 60
Re t. (g)
3" 75.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 50
2 1/2 " 63.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 40
2" 50.000 0.00 0.00 100.00
30
1 1/2" 37.500 0.00 0.00 100.00
1" 25.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 20
3/4" 19.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 10
3/8" 9.500 0.00 0.00 100.00
0
#4 4.750 0.00 0.00 100.00
100.0000 10.0000 1.0000 0.1000 0.0100 0.0010 0.0001
# 10 2.000 11.50 2.25 97.75
# 100 0.150 73.60 14.43 72.94
# 200 0.075 104.20 20.43 52.51
Course to Med Fine
Silt Clay
Gravel
Sand
Pa n 0.000 267.80 52.51 0.00

Moist, brown silty clay

P a g e | 30
BH Number: BH2
Sample ID: SS2

Tri a l Numbe r 1 2 3 4 1 2 3
B 45
We t Soi l + Ca n (g) 88.50 92.30 86.70 89.20 29.50 21.70 20.20 40
35
Dry Soi l +Ca n (g) 82.70 77.40 77.60 81.30 24.60 18.60 17.90 30
25
Ma s s of Ca n (g) 65.60 35.80 53.60 61.30 8.20 8.30 10.10 20
Moi s ture Los s (g) 5.80 14.90 9.10 7.90 4.90 3.10 2.30 15
10
Ma s s ofDry Soi l (g) 17.10 41.60 24.00 20.00 16.40 10.30 7.80 5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

90
80
SIEVE METHOD
70
Cum.
Si e ve # Ma s s 60
Re t. (g)
3" 75.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 50
2 1/2 " 63.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 40
2" 50.000 0.00 0.00 100.00
30
1 1/2" 37.500 0.00 0.00 100.00
1" 25.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 20
3/4" 19.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 10
3/8" 9.500 0.00 0.00 100.00
0
#4 4.750 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.0000 10.0000 1.0000 0.1000 0.0100 0.0010 0.0001
# 10 2.000 121.90 24.88 75.12
# 100 0.150 86.50 17.65 38.39
# 200 0.075 93.10 19.00 19.39
Course to Med Fine
Silt Clay
Gravel
0.000 95.00 19.39 0.00 Sand
Pa n


P a g e | 31
BH Number: BH2
Sample ID: CS1

Tri a l Numbe r 1 2 3 4 1 2 3
B 45
We t Soi l + Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 40
35
Dry Soi l +Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 30
Ma s s of Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 25
20
Moi s ture Los s (g) - - - - - - - 15
10
Ma s s ofDry Soi l (g) - - - - - - - 5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

90
TOTAL SAMPLE (g): -
80
SIEVE METHOD
Cum. 70
Si e ve # Ma s s 60
Re t. (g)
3" 75.000 - - - 50
2 1/2 " 63.000 - - - 40
2" 50.000 - - -
30
1 1/2" 37.500 - - -
1" 25.000 - - - 20
3/4" 19.000 - - - 10
3/8" 9.500 - - -
0
#4 4.750 - - -
100.0000 10.0000 1.0000 0.1000 0.0100 0.0010 0.0001
# 10 2.000 - - -
# 100 0.150 - - -
# 200 0.075 - - -
Course to Med Fine
Silt Clay
Gravel
Sand
Pa n 0.000 - - -


P a g e | 32
BH Number: BH2
Sample ID: CS2

Tri a l Numbe r 1 2 3 4 1 2 3
B 45
We t Soi l + Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 40
35
Dry Soi l +Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 30
25
Ma s s of Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 20
Moi s ture Los s (g) - - - - - - - 15
10
Ma s s ofDry Soi l (g) - - - - - - - 5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

90
TOTAL SAMPLE (g): -
80
SIEVE METHOD
70
Cum.
Si e ve # Ma s s 60
Re t. (g)
3" 75.000 - - - 50
2 1/2 " 63.000 - - - 40
2" 50.000 - - -
30
1 1/2" 37.500 - - -
1" 25.000 - - - 20
3/4" 19.000 - - - 10
3/8" 9.500 - - -
0
#4 4.750 - - - 100.0000 10.0000 1.0000 0.1000 0.0100 0.0010 0.0001
# 10 2.000 - - -
# 100 0.150 - - -
# 200 0.075 - - -
Course to Med Fine
Silt Clay
Gravel
Sand
Pa n 0.000 - - -


P a g e | 33
BH Number: BH2
Sample ID: CS3
Sample Depth: 12.00 m. - 15.00 m.

Tri a l Numbe r 1 2 3 4 1 2 3
B 45
We t Soi l + Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 40
35
Dry Soi l +Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 30
25
Ma s s of Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 20
Moi s ture Los s (g) - - - - - - - 15
10
Ma s s ofDry Soi l (g) - - - - - - - 5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

90
TOTAL SAMPLE (g): -
80
SIEVE METHOD
70
Cum.
Si e ve # Ma s s 60
Re t. (g)
3" 75.000 - - - 50
2 1/2 " 63.000 - - - 40
2" 50.000 - - -
30
1 1/2" 37.500 - - -
1" 25.000 - - - 20
3/4" 19.000 - - - 10
3/8" 9.500 - - -
0
#4 4.750 - - - 100.0000 10.0000 1.0000 0.1000 0.0100 0.0010 0.0001
# 10 2.000 - - -
# 100 0.150 - - -
# 200 0.075 - - -
Course to Med Fine
Silt Clay
Gravel
Sand
Pa n 0.000 - - -


P a g e | 34
BH Number: BH3
Sample ID: SS1

Tri a l Numbe r 1 2 3 4 1 2 3
50
We t Soi l + Ca n (g) 92.10 87.15 88.60 93.10 27.10 23.30 19.60 40
35
Dry Soi l +Ca n (g) 85.40 84.80 81.40 82.10 22.70 20.30 17.50 30
25
Ma s s of Ca n (g) 65.00 78.00 61.30 53.60 7.70 10.10 10.20 20
15
Moi s ture Los s (g) 6.70 2.35 7.20 11.00 4.40 3.00 2.10 10
Ma s s of Dry Soi l (g) 20.40 6.80 20.10 28.50 15.00 10.20 7.30 5
0
Moi s ture Conte nt (%) 32.84 34.56 35.82 38.60 29.33 29.41 28.77 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

90
80
SIEVE METHOD
Cum. 70
Si e ve # Ma s s
(mm) Retained Pas sing 60
Re t. (g)
3" 75.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 50
2 1/2 " 63.000 0.00 0.00 100.00
40
2" 50.000 0.00 0.00 100.00
37.500 0.00 0.00 100.00 30
1 1/2"
1" 25.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 20
3/4" 19.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 10
3/8" 9.500 0.00 0.00 100.00
0
#4 4.750 0.00 0.00 100.00
100.0000 10.0000 1.0000 0.1000 0.0100 0.0010 0.0001
# 10 2.000 136.20 28.38 71.63
# 100 0.150 63.10 13.15 38.08
# 200 0.075 34.60 7.21 30.88
Course to Med Fine
Silt Clay
Gravel
0.000 148.20 30.88 0.00 Sand
Pa n

Moist, grayish brown silty sand

P a g e | 35
BH Number: BH3
Sample ID: SS2

Tri a l Numbe r 1 2 3 4 1 2 3
45
We t Soi l + Ca n (g) 91.30 89.70 86.90 91.30 26.10 18.60 24.20 40
35
Dry Soi l +Ca n (g) 84.70 84.20 82.60 82.60 23.30 17.10 21.70 30
Ma s s of Ca n (g) 65.60 69.00 71.30 61.30 10.20 9.80 10.30 25
20
Moi s ture Los s (g) 6.60 5.50 4.30 8.70 2.80 1.50 2.50 15
10
Ma s s of Dry Soi l (g) 19.10 15.20 11.30 21.30 13.10 7.30 11.40 5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

90
80
SIEVE METHOD
70
Cum.
Si e ve # Ma s s 60
Re t. (g)
3" 75.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 50
2 1/2 " 63.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 40
2" 50.000 0.00 0.00 100.00
30
1 1/2" 37.500 0.00 0.00 100.00
1" 25.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 20
3/4" 19.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 10
3/8" 9.500 0.00 0.00 100.00
0
#4 4.750 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.0000 10.0000 1.0000 0.1000 0.0100 0.0010 0.0001
# 10 2.000 11.40 2.28 97.72
# 100 0.150 77.30 15.46 73.08
# 200 0.075 108.10 21.62 51.46
Course to Med Fine
Silt Clay
Gravel
Sand
Pa n 0.000 257.30 51.46 0.00

Moist, dark brown silty clay with sand

P a g e | 36
BH Number: BH3
Sample ID: SS3

Tri a l Numbe r 1 2 3 4 1 2 3
B 45
We t Soi l + Ca n (g) 90.50 87.10 85.60 90.50 28.20 25.50 21.90 40
35
Dry Soi l +Ca n (g) 77.00 73.50 72.00 75.10 23.50 21.80 18.70 30
Ma s s of Ca n (g) 35.80 35.40 37.30 38.30 7.70 9.80 8.20 25
20
Moi s ture Los s (g) 13.50 13.60 13.60 15.40 4.70 3.70 3.20 15
10
Ma s s of Dry Soi l (g) 41.20 38.10 34.70 36.80 15.80 12.00 10.50 5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

90
80
SIEVE METHOD
Cum. 70
Si e ve # Ma s s 60
Re t. (g)
3" 75.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 50
2 1/2 " 63.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 40
2" 50.000 0.00 0.00 100.00
30
1 1/2" 37.500 0.00 0.00 100.00
1" 25.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 20
3/4" 19.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 10
3/8" 9.500 0.00 0.00 100.00
0
#4 4.750 0.00 0.00 100.00
100.0000 10.0000 1.0000 0.1000 0.0100 0.0010 0.0001
# 10 2.000 107.20 22.81 77.19
# 100 0.150 46.90 9.98 49.89
# 200 0.075 103.40 22.00 27.89
Course to Med Fine
Silt Clay
Gravel
0.000 131.10 27.89 0.00 Sand
Pa n

Wet Soil + Can (g): - - - Liquid Limit (%): 37.44
Dry Soil + Can (g): - - - Plastic Limit (%): 30.35
Mass of Can (g): - - - Plasticity Index (%): 7.09
Moisture of Loss (g): - - - AASHTO A-2-4 (0)
Brown dense silty gravelly sand

P a g e | 37
BH Number: BH3
Sample ID: CS1

Tri a l Numbe r 1 2 3 4 1 2 3
45
We t Soi l + Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 40
35
Dry Soi l +Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 30
Ma s s of Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 25
20
Moi s ture Los s (g) - - - - - - - 15
10
Ma s s of Dry Soi l (g) - - - - - - - 5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

90
TOTAL SAMPLE (g): -
80
SIEVE METHOD
Cum. 70
Si e ve # Ma s s 60
Re t. (g)
3" 75.000 - - - 50
2 1/2 " 63.000 - - - 40
2" 50.000 - - -
30
1 1/2" 37.500 - - -
1" 25.000 - - - 20
3/4" 19.000 - - - 10
3/8" 9.500 - - -
0
#4 4.750 - - -
100.0000 10.0000 1.0000 0.1000 0.0100 0.0010 0.0001
# 10 2.000 - - -
# 100 0.150 - - -
# 200 0.075 - - -
Course to Med Fine
Silt Clay
Gravel
Pa n 0.000 - - - Sand


P a g e | 38
BH Number: BH3
Sample ID: CS2

Tri a l Numbe r 1 2 3 4 1 2 3
B 45
We t Soi l + Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 40
35
Dry Soi l +Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 30
Ma s s of Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 25
20
Moi s ture Los s (g) - - - - - - - 15
10
Ma s s of Dry Soi l (g) - - - - - - - 5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

90
TOTAL SAMPLE (g): -
80
SIEVE METHOD
Cum. 70
Si e ve # Ma s s 60
Re t. (g)
3" 75.000 - - - 50
2 1/2 " 63.000 - - - 40
2" 50.000 - - -
30
1 1/2" 37.500 - - -
1" 25.000 - - - 20
3/4" 19.000 - - - 10
3/8" 9.500 - - -
0
#4 4.750 - - - 100.0000 10.0000 1.0000 0.1000 0.0100 0.0010 0.0001
# 10 2.000 - - -
# 100 0.150 - - -
# 200 0.075 - - -
Course to Med Fine
Silt Clay
Gravel
Pa n 0.000 - - - Sand


P a g e | 39
BH Number: BH3
Sample ID: CS3

Tri a l Numbe r 1 2 3 4 1 2 3
B 45
We t Soi l + Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 40
35
Dry Soi l +Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 30
Ma s s of Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 25
20
Moi s ture Los s (g) - - - - - - - 15
10
Ma s s of Dry Soi l (g) - - - - - - - 5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

90
TOTAL SAMPLE (g): -
80
SIEVE METHOD
Cum.
70
Si e ve # Ma s s 60
Re t. (g)
3" 75.000 - - - 50
2 1/2 " 63.000 - - - 40
2" 50.000 - - -
30
1 1/2" 37.500 - - -
1" 25.000 - - - 20
3/4" 19.000 - - - 10
3/8" 9.500 - - -
0
#4 4.750 - - - 100.0000 10.0000 1.0000 0.1000 0.0100 0.0010 0.0001
# 10 2.000 - - -
# 100 0.150 - - -
# 200 0.075 - - -
Course to Med Fine
Silt Clay
Gravel
0.000 - - - Sand
Pa n

Sedimentary rock - Gray siltstone

P a g e | 40
BH Number: BH3
Sample ID: CS4
Sample Depth: 10.50 m. - 15.00 m.

Tri a l Numbe r 1 2 3 4 1 2 3
B 45
We t Soi l + Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 40
35
Dry Soi l +Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 30
Ma s s of Ca n (g) - - - - - - - 25
20
Moi s ture Los s (g) - - - - - - - 15
10
Ma s s of Dry Soi l (g) - - - - - - - 5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

90
TOTAL SAMPLE (g): -
80
SIEVE METHOD
Cum.
70
Si e ve # Ma s s 60
Re t. (g)
3" 75.000 - - - 50
2 1/2 " 63.000 - - - 40
2" 50.000 - - -
30
1 1/2" 37.500 - - -
1" 25.000 - - - 20
3/4" 19.000 - - - 10
3/8" 9.500 - - -
0
#4 4.750 - - - 100.0000 10.0000 1.0000 0.1000 0.0100 0.0010 0.0001
# 10 2.000 - - -
# 100 0.150 - - -
# 200 0.075 - - -
Course to Med Fine
Silt Clay
Gravel
0.000 - - - Sand
Pa n


P a g e | 41
P a g e | 42
P a g e | 43
P a g e | 44
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Tel. # 042-719-1950
PROJECT TITLE: Construction Of Road From Brgy. Sabang To Brgy. San Jose, Brgy.
Sabang, Dasmariñas City, Cavite
PROJECT LOCATION: Brgy. Sabang, Dasmariñas City, Cavite
Sample ID : BH1 SS1
Soil Description : Clayey silt
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Sabang IV, Dasmariñas City, Cavite
Sample ID : BH2 SS1
Soil Description : Silty clay
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Sample ID : BH3 SS2
Soil Description : Silty clay with sand
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Borehole No. / Sample No. : BH3 SS2
Soil Description : Silty clay with sand
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Borehole No. : BH1

Sample No. : SS1
Visual Description : Clayey silt
LABORATORY INFORMATION
Room temperature range : 26 °C Max. 24 °C Min.
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Borehole No. : BH1

Sample No. : SS1
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Borehole No. : BH2

Sample No. : SS1
Visual Description : Silty clay
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Borehole No. : BH2

Sample No. : SS1
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Borehole No. : BH3

Sample No. : SS2
Visual Description : Silty clay with sand
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Borehole No. : BH3

Sample No. : SS2
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Trial Pit / Borehole No. : BH1

Sample Ref. / Type : SS1

Method of Preparation : Remoulded
Tel. # 042-719-1950


Tel. # 042-719-1950


Tel. # 042-719-1950

Sample Ref. / Type : SS3 / Disturbed
Visual Description : Dense silty gravelly sand

Tel. # 042-719-1950
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Borehole No. : BH1 SS1

Sample Preparation : Disturbed
TEST RESULT
Initial Soil Properties
Particle Density : 2.65 Assumed
Moisture Content : 35 %
Bulk Density : 1.91 Mg/m 3
Dry Density : 1.42 Mg/m 3
Void ratio : 0.87
Degree of Saturation : 100 %
Height of solid particles : 10.15 mm
Test Conditions
Laboratory temperature : 24 to 26 °C
Time fitting method : Square root time
Pressure Coefficient of volume Coefficient of

Increment Void Ratio compressibility consolidation
(kPa) m v (m²/MN) c v (m²/year)
0 0.872 - -
25 0.802 1.503 5.29
50 0.770 0.691 16.20
100 0.735 0.403 10.84
200 0.688 0.267 68.34
400 0.627 0.183 6.49
800 0.549 0.119 20.02
1600 0.480 0.056 40.97
Initial Void Ratio e 0 = 0.87

Compression Index Cc = 0.230
Estimated Preconsolidation Pressure pc = 250 kPa
Tel. # 042-719-1950

TEST RESULT
Tel. # 042-719-1950

PRECONSOLIDATION PRESSURE (CASAGRANDE METHOD)
Tel. # 042-719-1950

TEST RESULT
Dry Density : 0.91 Mg/m3
Void ratio : 1.90
Test Conditions

0 1.897 - -
25 1.506 5.402 2.84
50 1.464 0.663 1.67
100 1.379 0.686 1.84
200 1.277 0.432 1.54
400 0.149 0.279 2.02
800 0.017 0.154 2.30
1600 0.861 0.097 1.99

Tel. # 042-719-1950

TEST RESULT
Tel. # 042-719-1950

Tel. # 042-719-1950

TEST RESULT
Dry Density : 0.91 Mg/m3
Void ratio : 1.90
Test Conditions

0 1.897 - -
25 1.506 5.402 2.84
50 1.464 0.663 1.67
100 1.379 0.686 1.84
200 1.277 0.432 1.54
400 0.149 0.279 2.02
800 0.017 0.154 2.30
1600 0.861 0.097 1.99

Tel. # 042-719-1950

TEST RESULT
Tel. # 042-719-1950

Tel. # 042-719-1950
Tel. # 042-719-1950
PROJECT TITLE: Construction Of Road From Brgy. Sabang To Brgy. San Jose, Brgy. Sabang, Dasmariñas City, Cavite
Borehole No. / Sample No. : BH1 SS1 Soil Description : Clayey silt
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Borehole No. / Sample No. : BH2 SS1 Soil Description : Silty clay
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Borehole No. / Sample No. : BH3 SS2 Soil Description : Silty clay with sand
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Borehole Plan
(Not to scale)
P a g e | 45
Tel. # 042-719-1950
Borehole Coordinates
(Not to scale)
P a g e | 46
· CCAP Geotech and Engineering Services
Leiden St. University Site, lbabang Dupay, Lucena City
Tel.# 042-719-1950
•
PR I> 20(SIJQ()i
['ROJECT TITtf ( ( IJ$iROCT'£ Mf'Jr ROAD
FROM BRGY. SABANG TO BRGY. 51>.N JOSE
()A<;M/, W. C.llY,CA'IPE
f'R(.1:(f' 1.0U.Tl01'l: l'IXV SABANG, iJ.All-W"i
• fld<EllOI.E IJJ>MOOZ B H 1
CCO'.PINA"ltS :.AT, 14.33995
l..()ij(: 120.911\36
DATI: C/Jll!XCIB>. OctolltR 2 .2020
Standard Penetration Test in BHl
Page 47
Services: *Geotechnical - boring test, soil analysis *Structural - planning, estimate, design *Construction - material testing
Tel.# 042-719-1950
•
Wash Boring/Coring in BH2
Page 48
Tel.# 042-719-1950
•
Standard Penetration Test in BH3
Page 49

Geotech Brgy Sabang

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Geotech Brgy Sabang

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CCAP Geotech and Engineering Services

Accredited: Bureau of Research and Standards

Title Page ................................................................................................................................. i

Table of Contents ................................................................................................................... ii

List of Tables ......................................................................................................................... iii

List of Figures ....................................................................................................................... iii

Appendices ............................................................................................................................ iii

References ............................................................................................................................. iii

II. Project Description

II.A. Geology of Region IV-A (CALABARZON) .................................................... 2

II.B. Geology of the Province of Cavite ..................................................................... 3

II.C. The Project Site .................................................................................................. 5

III. FIELD AND LABORATORY TESTING ............................................................. 5

IV. SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITION ................................................... 7

V. ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

V.1. Soil Bearing Capacity ....................................................................................... 7

V.2. Settlement ......................................................................................................... 8

V.3. Hydraulic Conductivity .................................................................................... 8

V.4. Seismicity ......................................................................................................... 9

V.5. Soil Liquefaction ............................................................................................ 10

V.6. Foundation Design Considerations and Recommendations ........................... 11

VI. CONCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS .............................................................. 12

Soil Bearing Capacity .................................................................................................... 13

Field Boring Log ........................................................................................................... 16

Summary of Data ........................................................................................................... 22

Summary of Laboratory Results .................................................................................... 42

Borehole Plan ................................................................................................................ 45

Borehole Coordinates .................................................................................................... 46

Drilling Pictures ............................................................................................................ 47

is a registered Civil Engineer with special qualification in the practice of Geotechnical

Excerpt from SECTION 2, DEFINITIONS of the NATIONAL STRUCTURAL CODE OF THE

SITE INVESTIGATION AND ASSESSMENT

The geotechnical site investigation and assessment shall be performed by a

A geotechnical investigation and assessment shall be presented in a report. The report,

[1] Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Marikina Valley Fault System

[3] PHIVOLCS FaultFinder DOST

[4] PHIVOLCS-DOST Earthquake Information

Distance of Brgy. Sabang, Dasmariñas , Cavite

Distance of Brgy. Sabang, Dasmariñas , Cavite

Risk to Projected Rainfall Change [2]

Combined Risk to Climate Disasters [2]

National Structural Code of the

Safe Bearing Capacity Capacity Capacity

with the thumb

Reference: IS-1892, Code of Practice for site Investigations for Foundations.

II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

II.A. Geology of Region IV-A (CALABARZON)

Three provinces of CALABARZON Region; namely: Batangas, Rizal and Quezon

II.B. Geology of the Province of Cavite

Cavite is composed of several soil types according to soil surveys conducted by

II.C. The Project Site

III. FIELD AND LABORATORY TESTING

The laboratory program in both phases of subsurface investigation consisted of

IV. SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITION

V. ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

V.1. Soil Bearing Capacity

V.3. Hydraulic Conductivity

The West Valley Fault segment traverses from Doña Remedios

and D with a Soil Profile Name or Generic Description of , dense soil

V.5. Soil Liquefaction

As per National Structural Code of the Philippines (NSCP) Volume 1, Seventh

V. 6. Foundation Design Considerations and Recommendations

d) Tolerable settlement of 35 mm can be used and a maximum settlement of 65 mm to 100