Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CREDO
COURSE/YEAR: BS-CRIM-III
Pretest
1. Conspiracy exists when two or more persons come to an agreement and decide to
commit it.
5. Any person who assist in the burial of the victim of homicide to prevent its discovery
is an accessory.
7. It is the ties of blood which compels one to conceal crimes committed by relatives.
8. Formal agreement is not necessary in conspiracy it is sufficient that their minds meet.
11. Death of the offended party does not extinguish the criminal liability of the accused.
15. A deduction of 1/5 of the period of sentence shall be granted to prisoner for special
time allowance for loyalty.
17. Marriage contracted in good faith between the offender and the victim
extinguishes criminal liability.
19. If the offender dies after final judgment, pecuniary penalties are not extinguished.
20. Criminal and civil liability is extinguished when the offender dies before final
judgment.
Learning Activities
Situation 1: Two guys, Bert and Lambert, who don’t know each other, get pissed at some dude,
Albert, at a bar. They shot him at the same time. Albert died instantly.
Situation 2: Adel, a lawyer punches an annoying person, Nomo. The latter suffered minor
injuries.
Situation 3: Tony threw a grenade that killed his father and his father’s friend.
Situation 4: Ponce was convicted of stealing laptops from Solid mark Appliance. He was
convicted. The period during which convict was not inside prison walls as he was taken to a
hospital.
Persons
Principle contains in the Explain the principle as
Scene involved in the
scenario (Identify and to the criminal
No. crime
define that principle briefly) liability of the accused
(victim/accused)
There is a conspiracy in
this scenario because
according to the statement,
The principle in this scenario
Bert and lambert are
is a Conspiracy which two
Albert the victim, agreed to shot to Albert. All
persons come to an
1 Bert and Lambert are the accused was acquitted
agreement concerning the
the accused from any criminal liability
commission of a felony and
since their actions were
decide to commit it.
justified but civil liability
may arise from the given
situation.
In this scenario of
Mitigating Intoxication, the
offender was not of her
The principle in this scenario
control in that time that she
is a Mitigating Intoxication
annoyed to another, then
Nomo the victim, that it is not habitual nor not
2 she should not be held
Adel the accused subsequent to the plan which
liable for a crime because
the offender lost her physical
her compromised mental
and mental control.
state prevented her from
forming the necessary men
rea of a crime.
In this scenario of
Aggravating Intoxication,
the offender maybe was
The principle in this scenario not in his clear thinking
His father and his is an Aggravating Intoxication and maybe he felt
father’s friend are the that it is habitual and it is neglected so that he made
3 victim, intentional which the offender this kind of crime. Because
Tony the accused must have done heinousness of the intoxication, the
of the crime. offender did not
understand the nature of
his actions or know what
he was doing.
In this scenario of a
Compound crime was
The principle in this scenario
being presented since the
Solid Mark Appliance was a Compound crime
offender produces two or
4 was the victim, which a single act constitutes
more crimes. The accused
Ponce the accused two or more grave or less
was acquitted from any
grave felonies.
criminal liability since his
actions were justified.
ASSESSMENT
A. Multiple Choice
Directions: Choose the correct answer and write the corresponding letter on the space
provided before each item.
A 5. The accessory takes part _______ the crime is/has been committed.
a. After b. Before c. During d. None
A 7. The act of a person who shall buy which he knows derived from the proceeds of
robbery is
a. Fencing b. Fence c. Anti-fencing d. Accessory
A 9. Felonies that are punishable only when they have been consummated.
a. Light b. Afflictive c. Correctional d. None
A 11. A juridical condition in which no one should be punished for the crime another.
a. Personal b. Legal c. Correctional d. Equal
A 14. A man pours gasoline in a bus and caught fire burning a house, killing a person
and injuring another person.
a. Complex crime b. Arson c. Homicide d. Separate crimes
A 15. In single divisible, there is one mitigating and one aggravating, what proper
period?
a. Offset b. Medium c. Minimum d. Maximum
A 18. The suspension of the sentence of a convict after serving the minimum
sentence.
a. Parole b. Conditional pardon c. Absolute pardon d. Good conduct allowance
B 19. Death of convict extinguishes, aside from criminal liability, also what before
final
judgment?
a. Pecuniary b. Civil c. Reparation d. Civil interdiction
A 20. It completely extinguishes the penalty and all its effects.
a. Amnesty b. Pardon c. Death d. Prescription of crime
B. Identification/Analysis (One Paragraph Summary)
Directions: Clip one news crime article related from what you learn from this unit from a
daily newspaper. Find and identify the 5 W’s of criminal investigation and one H.
Analyze
the principle involved and write on the space provided. Use the space below for your
writing. Submit your work in the pigeon boxes which are provided in your
department/college, or to google class on or before as reflected in your study schedule.
See Rubric in One Paragraph Summary on page 75.
It was all about the two suspects Carel Macarine, 32 years old and Ryan Sale, 28
years old truck drivers, who’s behind robbing a China bank Otis Branch in Paco,
Manila.
The two suspects will face charges on a case of robbery stick-up and punishable
by up to 20 years in prison.
According to a police report, the incident occurred on Monday China bank in Otis
Branch in Paco, Manila.
Police said that the robber was able to enter the bank by pretending to be a
customer applying for a new bank account.
According to the witness, Carel Macarine and Ryan Sale who were the suspects
of robbery are able to enter the bank, caught in the CCTV and they robbed the
China Bank Otis Branch in Paco, Manila and carting away about PHP700,000 in
cash.
Principle/s Involved: Given under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.