entered into by the parties is different from their true agreement. The parties are bound by their real agreement provided it does not prejudice a third person and is not intended for a purpose contrary to law, morals, good customs, public order, or public policy. Example: D and C entered into a contract of mortgage. But wanting to hide the mortgage, it was made to appear in the form of a deed of sale. As far as D and C are concerned, the contract entered into between them is a contract of mortgage. As to third persons, the apparent contract, the contract of sale, is the one entered into. Consequently, if C is the mortgagee but is made to appear as the buyer and C sells the land to B, the latter will acquire ownership. D and C are in estoppel. Article 1390. The following contracts are voidable or annullable, even though there may have been no damage to the contracting parties: (1) Those where one of the parties is incapable of giving consent to a contract; (2) Those where the consent is vitiated by mistake, violence, intimidation, undue influence or fraud. These contracts are binding, unless they are annulled by a proper action in court. They are susceptible of ratification. (n) Article 1391. The action for annulment shall be brought within four years. This period shall begin: In cases of intimidation, violence or undue influence, from the time the defect of the consent ceases. In case of mistake or fraud, from the time of the discovery of the same. And when the action refers to contracts entered into by minors or other incapacitated persons, from the time the guardianship ceases. (1301a) Article 1403. The following contracts are unenforceable, unless they are ratified: (1) Those entered into in the name of another person by one who has been given no authority or legal representation, or who has acted beyond his powers; (2) Those that do not comply with the Statute of Frauds as set forth in this number. In the following cases an agreement hereafter made shall be unenforceable by action, unless the same, or some note or memorandum, thereof, be in writing, and subscribed by the party charged, or by his agent; evidence, therefore, of the agreement cannot be received without the writing, or a secondary evidence of its contents: (a) An agreement that by its terms is not to be performed within a year from the making thereof; (b) A special promise to answer for the debt, default, or miscarriage of another; (c) An agreement made in consideration of marriage, other than a mutual promise to marry; d) An agreement for the sale of goods, chattels or things in action, at a price not less than five hundred pesos, unless the buyer accept and receive part of such goods and chattels, or the evidences, or some of them, of such things in action or pay at the time some part of the purchase money; but when a sale is made by auction and entry is made by the auctioneer in his sales book, at the time of the sale, of the amount and kind of property sold, terms of sale, price, names of the purchasers and person on whose account the sale is made, it is a sufficient memorandum; (e) An agreement for the leasing for a longer period than one year, or for the sale of real property or of an interest therein; ( f ) A representation as to the credit of a third person. Agreement not to be performed within one year from the making thereof – On June 10, 2003, S entered into an oral contract with B for the construction of B’s house to begin on June 20, 2004. The contract must be in writing to be enforceable. In order that this provisions be applicable, it must appear that the parties intended when they made the contract that it should not be performed within one year. Promise to answer for the debt, default, or miscarriage of another –
D owes C P1000.00 with G as guarantor. Here, G
has a special promise to answer for the debt of D in case D fails to pay the same. This promise is unenforceable unless it is in writing signed by G. Agreement in consideration of marriage other than mutual promise to marry
M agrees to build a house worth 1M for W if W
will marry M. This must appear in writing to be enforceable unless M ratifies the agreement. The statute applies even when the promise to build the house is made by a third person to W.