Final Report Team3 - Z3

King Abdulaziz University
Faculty of Engineering
Introduction to Engineering Design 2
(IE202)
Spring 2021/2022
Final Report
(Alert system devise that prevents drowning in pools.)
Section 13
Team 3
M Name ID
1 Mohammed Ahmed 2037235
2 Mustafa Hassanin 2036160
3 Hassan Mazen 2035489
4 Abdullrahman Alelyani 1937120
Instructor: Dr. Mohammed alamudi
Submission date: 5/16/2022

Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
Table of content:
Introduction ....................................................................................................................................5
Literature Review ..........................................................................................................................6
Client Project Problem Statement ..................................................................................................7
Revised Project Problem Statement ...............................................................................................7
Design Objectives ..........................................................................................................................8
Objective Tree ...............................................................................................................................9
Pairwise Comparison Chart ...........................................................................................................9
Realistic Constraints ......................................................................................................................10
Metrics to Measure the Achievement of Objectives .....................................................................10
Initial Design Attributes ................................................................................................................12
Project Charter ...............................................................................................................................13
Work breakdown Structure (WBS) ...............................................................................................15
Linear Responsibility Chart (LRC) .................................................................................…….….17
Gantt Chart ................................................................................................................................... 18
Percent Complete Matrix............................................................................................................... 20
Function to be Realized (Glass Box) ............................................................................................ 23
Function-Means Tree .................................................................................................................... 24
Morph chart................................................................................................................................. 25
Pugh’s Method............................................................................................................................. 26
Mathematical Modeling. ..............................................................................................................27
Design Drawings............................................................................................................................30
Stimulation results........................................................................................................................31
Budget (Cost analysis) ................................ .................................................................................34
Conclusion ....................................................................................................................................35
References ...................................................................................................................................36
Appendices .................................................................................................................................37
2
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
List of Figures:
Figure 1: The ten-leading cause of death...............................................................................6
Figure 2: Lack of Parental Supervision...................................................................................7
Figure 3: pool fence alarm…..................................................................................................7
Figure 4: Objective’s tree………………......................................................................................9
Figure 5: Gantt chart ............................................................................................................19
Figure 6: Glass box. .............................................................................................................23
Figure 7: Function-Means Tree. ...........................................................................................24
Figure 8: Wight of the person in the pool………………………………………………….32
Figure 9: Electrical Power modeling………………………………………………………32
Figure 10: Assembly plan of the circuit……………………………………………………33
3
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
List of Tables:
Table (1): Pairwise Comparison Chart............................................................................................9
Table (2): Initial Design Attributes...............................................................................................12
Table (3) Key milestones.............................................................................................................. 14
Table (4): Linear Responsibility Chart..........................................................................................17
Table (5): Percent Complete Matrix..............................................................................................20
Table (6): The Morph Chart……………………………………………………………………..25
Table (7): Pugh’s Method………………………………………………………………………………………………………..27
Table (8): The Mathematical Model…………………………………………………………….29
Table (9): All the component of the artifact………………………………………………….…30
Table (10): The Cost Analysis…………………………………………………………………..34
Table (11): peer assessment member 1.........................................................................................37
4
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
Introduction:
Swimming pools is a major source of entertainment and enjoyment. Swimming pools serve as a
gathering place for friends and family in the backyard, but when left unattended, they can become
a deadly attraction for an unsupervised child or even your pet. Pools and swimming areas can be
divided into two categories, residential pools used by one dwelling only, and public pools
associated with multiple dwellings provided by the local municipality.
There is not much difference when we look at the safety and risk perspective. Both public pools
and private swimming areas require lifeguard supervision while people are in the pools. Swimming
pool goers often have lifeguards on duty and are often left unsupervised when not in use, resulting
in children or even pets drowning in pools without people knowing about them. In all swimming
pools, parents are the main source of supervision and rescue in the event of a drowning accident,
and sometimes they are the only source of supervision for children in swimming pools, especially
in private home swimming pools with the increase in the number of swimming pools in residential
homes, the risks and drowning accidents also increase. Many pool owners are unaware that a lack
of proper pool safety puts their children and the lives of many others at risk.
In spite of the efforts of government and private companies to produce and market a simple and
effective range of safety techniques, but still children drown in pools and unsupervised swimming
areas is resulting in the loss of loved ones and turning joy into sadness.
Although pool safety technology has advanced over the years from fences and pool covers, this
has led to a decrease in deaths from unintentional drowning.
Alarms are still one of the best ways to keep unattended children out of harm's way by alerting
those around them to a drowning problem, especially pool alarms to warn the homeowner when
anything enters the pool. The alarm system can determine if a child or pet is entering the pool. The
alarm is activated after something enters the pond water. The owner of the house will be a device.
Warning when the child is playing near the pool or the private swimming area. Alarms help reduce
the time for rescuers to arrive from remote areas and also help reduce children drowning by alerting
people and parents in particular that children have drowned.
5
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
Literature review:
Enjoying swimming in swimming pools can turn into a nightmare for families, as drowning is the
fiift cause of death from unintentional injuries worldwide as showing in figure (1), as it stands
behind 7% of all accident-related deaths (1). Drowning causes many complications which range
from death or permanent disability to various degrees, and in some cases, the victim may
survive without any complications, according to what was mentioned in the newspaper.
Figure (1): The ten-leading cause of death.
Young people are the most vulnerable to drowning. The highest rates of drowning in the world
are among children aged between 1- 4 years, followed by children aged 5-9 years. For children
between 5-14 years of age, drowning is the most common cause of death than other causes
that claim their lives (1). The reason for the increase in child drowning cases is the lack of
supervision over children by parents, not supervising the infants, and leaving them alone with
other children in pools.
6
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
Figure (2): Lack of Parental Supervision.
One of the best solutions to use is the pool alarm, young children
and their friends sometimes need a little more supervision to get
out of harm's way. That is why it is a smart move to enhance
protection with a pool alarm. These devices can warn you
immediately when unexpected movement occurs in and around
the pool or spa to avoid drowning accidents (3). These pool alarms
are designed to work around the perimeter of a pool's surrounding
wall or fence. It uses infrared beams to detect motion or magnetic
connections that set off an alarm when they are broken, and the
alarm systems are normally put on the fence to determine if there
Figure (3): Pool fence alarm.
is someone surrounding your pool (4).
Clint problem statement:

Create an artifact that aids in the reduction of child drowning deaths.
Revised Problem Statement:

Creating a safe, affordable, and easy to use alerts device that has an isolated circuit and
unaffected by the wind, the devise helps us to prevent the children and pets from drowning in
7
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
the pool. the device gives us an easy way to informs us that a child or pets are drowning in the
pool using alarm.
Objectives:
1- Environmentally friendly
1.1) Recyclable
2- Safe
2.1) Nonhazardous
2.3) No sharp edges.
3- Comfortable
3.1) Small in size.
3.2) light weight.
4- Inexpensive cost.
5- Durability
5.1) Waterproof
5.2) Sustainable
6- Easy to use
6.1) Easy to repair
6.2) Easy to assemble
6.3) portability
8
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
Objectives tree:
figure 4: Objective’s tree.
Pairwise Comparison Chart:

Table 1: Pairwise Comparison Chart.
Objectives Environmentally Safe Comfortable Inexpensive Durability Easy to score

Friendly cost Use
Environmentally #### 0 1 0 1 1 3
Friendly
Safe 1 ### 1 1 1 1 5
Comfortable 0 0 ### 0 1 0 1
Inexpensive cost 1 0 1 ### 1 0 3
Durability 0 0 0 0 ### 0 0
Easy to Use 0 0 1 1 1 ### 3
After doing the Pairwise Comparison Chart in table, it was found out safe is the most important
objective while Durability is the least important.
9
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
Realistic Constraints:
Every artifact has his own constraints and constraints force us to think smarter and be more
innovative. Project constraints are the general limitations terms of a project. We did identify
the restrictions of our artifact in terms of economic, health and safety, manufacturability.
•Economic:
-Must not exceed 500 SR for the manufacturing.
•Health and safety:
-Should not have toxic chemical material.
•Manufacturability:
- Must contains an isolated circuit
-It must not be affected by the wind.
-Should weight not more than 5 Kg
-Must be Iron rust resistance.
Objective metrics:
• Metrics to measure the achievement of objectives:
It is critical to ensure that the design meets the project's objectives because if the
objectives are not met, the project will be poorly done, making it a failure and ineffective.
To avoid these issues, setting metrics to measure the project's objectives will aid its success
and influence. To perform metrics, we must first create a scale. For example, in our project,
we created a scale ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), as shown below.
1-Environmentally friendly:
100 points Completely reusable.
75 points Material is recyclable.
50 points Material is easily disposable.
25 points Material is disposable with difficulty.
0 points Material is a hazardous waste.
10
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
2-Inexpensive cost:
100 points Lower than 200 SR
75 points 201-300 SR
0 points More than 500 SR
3-Comfortable:
100 points Lower than 5 Kg
75 points 6-10 Kg
50 points 11-15 Kg
25 points 16-20 Kg
0 points More than 20 Kg
4-Easy to Use:
100 points Everyone can use it
75 points Easy to learn its functions
50 points Needs sometimes to get used to
25 points Very young and elders face problems using it
0 points Set up needed by an expert
5-Durability (Sustainable)
100 points Work for a month
75 points Work for 3 weeks
50 points Work for 2 weeks
25 points Work for a week
0 points Work for 3 Days
11
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
Initial Design Attributes:

The project objective, constraints, means, and functions are all included in the initial
design attributes. After interviewing the client and obtaining his perspective on the
project, the initial sit is usually drawn. Furthermore, the first attributes have a
significant impact on the consumer; additionally, they explain how things might
proceed in the future, implying that the engineers should put out a reasonable effort
to complete it appropriately. As a result, engineering techniques will be used to
improve and clear the outcomes of this phase.
Table 2: Initial Design Attributes

Attribute objective Constraint Function Mean
Comfortable √
Water resistance √
Easy to carry √
Inexpensive √
Waterproof √
Must be safe √
Strong structure √
It must not be affected by the wind √
The material used in the device must √
not be toxic and harmful
Must meet OSHA requirement √
Must contains an isolated circuit √
Should not have toxic chemical √
materials
12
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
The weight should not exceed 3Kg √

Should be recyclable √
At least 5kg weight √
Alert light √
Water vibration sensor √
Alert sound √
Power switch √
Door receiver √
Battery √
specker √
Project Charter:
• Goals:
The objectives are for which the project was approved and for which
the project seeks to achieve. The objectives are the beating heart of the project,
and their failure to formulate them well may lead to the failure of the project.
So, these are the goals of our project.
1. Manufacture of a safe and high-quality device.

2. Develop team members skills.
3. Complete client satisfaction with the project deliverables.
13
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
• Deliverables:
The project is not complete without the presence of the deliverables, and the
deliverables are the results of the project that the team members seek to
achieve. So, these are the deliverables of our project.
1. A practical project with a positive impact on society.
2. A progress report contains the latest progress in the project.
3. A structured presentation of the team's work and the progress of that
work.
4. An organized and comprehensive final report.
• Key milestones:
Throughout this course, key milestones will show you the project's timeframe
and keep you updated on your progress.
Table 3 Key milestones

Key milestones Week number
Forming teams 3
Activate MS project 4
The approval from instructor 4
Progress report 8
End-of-term activities 10
Prototyping and proofing the design 13
Present the project 14
Deliver final report 14
Blackboard surveys 14
14
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
• Resources:
The resources that we will use to enhance success in our project are:
o The Engineering design textbook.
o The internet.
o The consulting of our instructor.
Work Breakdown Structure:
We should break down the primary tasks into subtasks to make them easier.
Indeed, the more you split the task, the easier it becomes to do. This strategy,
however, is known as Work Breakdown Structure, and we used it to assist us to
organize our work and achieve better results by completing it. Our work is organized
as follows: detailing customer requirements and translate them into initial design,
implementing and evaluation of the design, and finally the documentation of the
1. Choose a project problem.

1.1 Brainstorming meeting.
1.2 Voting among team members to choose the best three problems.
1.3 Present the problems to the instructor.
1.4 Take the approval from the instructor.
2. Manage a design process.
2.1 Construct a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)
2.2 Make a Linear Responsibility Chart (LRC)
2.3 Make a Gantt chart.
2.4 Make a percent complete matrix (PCM)
3. Identify the user's requirements.
3.1 Gathering information
3.1.1 Writing introduction.
3.1.2 Research for similar projects.
15
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
3.1.3 Discuss the information gathered among team members.

3.1.4 Writing the literature review.
3.1.5 Writing conclusion.
3.1.6 Writing references.
3.1.7 Writing the client problem statement.
3.1.8 Writing the revised problem statement.
3.2 Identify the project objectives.
3.2.1 Determine project objectives.
3.2.2 Implement an objective tree.
3.2.3 Apply a pairwise comparison chart (PCC).
3.3 Identify the constraints.
3.3.1 Identify client constraints.
3.3.2 Identify realistic constraints.
3.4 Identify the functions.
3.4.1 Apply the Glass box method.
3.4.2 Apply a function-means tree method.
4. Select a design.
4.1 Generate various design ideas.
4.1.1 Stratify Morphological Charts.
4.1.2 List feasible alternatives.
4.2 Stratify Pugh’s method.
4.3 Evaluate design alternatives.
4.3.1 Stratify mathematical modelling on the design.
4.3.2 Use budget analysis.
5. Final report.
5.1 Develop the progress report.
5.2 Present the work.
16
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
Linear Responsibility Chart (LRC):
Linear Responsibility Chart is important for distributing tasks among team

members so that there is no dispersion among team members. Tasks are distributed
in this chart so that each member knows what to do and what the other members
must do. In the following table, R means responsible for this task and S means
support in this task.
Table 4: Linear Responsibility Chart
Task M1 M2 M3 M4
1. Choose a project problem
Brainstorming meeting R R R R
Voting among team members to R R R R
choose the best three problems
Present the problems to the R R R R
instructor
Take approval from instructor S S S S
2. Manage design process
Construct a Work Breakdown R S
Structure (WBS)
Make a Linear Responsibility R S
Chart (LRC)
Make a Gantt chart. R S
Make a percent complete matrix R S
(PCM)
3. Identify the users’ requirements
Writing introduction. R S
Research for similar projects R S
Discuss the information gathered R R R R
among team members
Writing the literature review. S R
Writing conclusion. S R
Writing references. S R
Writing the client problem R S
statement
17
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
Writing the revised problem R S

statement
Determine project objectives R R R R
Implement an objective tree S R
Apply a Pairwise Comparison S R
Chart (PCC)
Identify client constraints S R
Identify realistic constraints R S
Apply the Glass Box Method S R
Apply a Function-Means S R
Tree
4. Select a design
Stratify morphological charts R R
List feasible alternatives R S
Stratify Pugh’s method S R
Stratify mathematical modelling S R
on the design
Use budget analysis S S S R
5. Work on the final report
Develop the progress report. R R R R
Present the work. R R R R
Gantt Chart:
18
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
Figure 5: Gant chart
19
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
Percent Complete Matrix (PCM):

The Percent Complete Matrix is prepared to track and organize the progress
of the project and also shows the importance and percentage of completion of each
task in this project.
Table 5: Percent Complete Matrix

%Total
%of All,
Duration Complet Project
Task i.e.
; days eness % Completi
Weight
on
Select a problem. 7 6.86 % 100 % 6.86 %
Brainstorming meeting. 4 3.92 % 100 % 3.92 %
Voting among team 3 2.94 % 100 % 2.94 %
members to choose the
best three problems.
Present the problems 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %
to the instructor.
Take the approval 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %
from the instructor.
Manage a design process. 4 3.92 % 100 % 3.92 %
Construct a Work 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %
Breakdown Structure
(WBS).
Make a Linear 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %
Responsibility Chart
(LRC).
Make a Gantt chart. 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %
Make a percent complete 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %

matrix (PCM).
Identify the user's 18 17.64 % 100 % 17.64 %
requirements.
Gathering information. 7 6.86 % 100 % 6.86 %
Writing introduction. 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %
Research for similar 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %
20
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
Projects.
Discuss the Information 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %
gathered among team
members.
Writing the literature review. 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %
Writing conclusion. 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %
Writing references. 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %
Writing the client problem 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %

Statement.
Writing the revised 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %
problem statement
Identify the project objectives. 3 2.94 % 100 % 2.94 %
Determine project objectives. 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %
Implement an objective tree. 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %
Apply a pairwise 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %

comparison chart (PCC).
Identify the constraints. 2 1.96 % 100 % 1.96 %
Identify client constraints 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %
Identify realistic constraints. 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %
Identify the functions. 2 1.96 % 100 % 1.96 %
Apply the Glass box method. 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %
Apply a function-means 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %

tree method.
Select a design. 6 5.88 % 100 % 5.88 %
Generate various design ideas. 2 1.96 % 100 % 1.96 %
21
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
Stratify Morphological Charts. 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %
List feasible alternatives. 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %
Stratify Pugh’s method. 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %
Evaluate design alternatives. 3 2.94 % 100 % 2.94 %
Stratify mathematical 3 2.94 % 100 % 2.94 %

modelling on the design.
Use budget analysis. 0 0% 100 % 0%
Work on the final report 7 6.86 % 100 % 6.86 %
Develop the progress report. 6 5.88 % 100 % 5.88 %
Present the work. 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %
Total 102 days 100 % 100 %
22
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
Glass Box:
In terms of usability, the glass box is comparable to the black box, but
it focuses more on what happens between the inputs and outputs, which is the
artifact's system. It's also advantageous for an expert to know how the artifact
is supposed to work.
Sound
Alarm
Power speaker
Battery sound
Produces
c
electricity.
sensor Switch
Water
wave Water
vibration LED Alarm
light light
Figure 6: Glass Box
23
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
• Function-Means Tree:
A function–means tree is a common engineering design method. It

helps in the creation of the basic function as well as the other functions that
are required. The means utilized to implement each function are also shown
in the function means tree graph. Furthermore, the graph relates two crucial
questions, namely, what must we do? and how might we go about doing it?
King Abdulaziz University
AsEngineering
Faculty of a result, the following figure (7) depicts our project's function meaning
tree.to Engineering Design II – IE 202
Introduction
Spring 2022
Alert system devise

Functions
that prevents
drowning in pools
Means Makes a sound that Reads the wave Makes light that alerts Working for a
alerts people vibrations people long time
Attached Water wave Big capacity

LED surface light
speaker system sensor Battery
Contol room LED subsurface Chargable

Wind sencor
speaker system light battary
Figure (7): Function-Means Tree
24
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
Morph chart:
A conversion chart is a tool for creating design alternatives and developing a design space. In
the first column, the major functions or features are mentioned, followed by different ways to
achieve each function in the row for that function. By selecting one medium from each row, one
concept design is grouped. As a result, each vertical path has an own design approach. Also, while
there may be a large number of options, not all of them are feasible. The morph chart for our
project is shown in table (6).
Table (6): The Morph Chart:
Function or Means
features 1 2 3 4 5
Control
1. Makes a Attached
room Wireless
sound that speaker - -
speaker speaker
alerts people. system
system
2. Reads the Water
Water wave Wind
wave movement - -
Sensor. sensor
vibrations sensor
3. Makes LED
LED surface Indoor light
light that subsurface - -
light. system
alerts People. Light.
4. Working Solar
Big capacity Chargeable
for power - -
Battery battery
long time. battery.
Feature:
Wood Plastic Aluminum Metal -
Materials
25
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
Discussion:
The construction of the Morphological chart using artifact’s functions, features, and means,
helped us to determine the number of the design alternatives that is possible to build it to
achieve the objectives of this artifact. Therefore, the number of alternatives is equal to 324
designs. Furthermore, 3 design alternatives is specified and selected to continue with.
Alternative 1:
Attached speaker system _ Water wave Sensor _ LED surface light_ Chargeable battery_ Plastic.
Alternative 2:
Wireless speaker_ Water wave Sensor_ Indoor light system_Big capacity Battery_Aluminum.
Alternative 3:
Control room speaker system_ Water wave Sensor_ Indoor light system_ Solar power battery_
metal.
Pugh's method:
Pugh's method is intended to locate an available design on the market and compare it to many
original choices generated by the designers. The chosen design must be similar to the
generated designs or achieve similar goals. The Datum is the name of the chosen design, which
in our case is a Pool Fence alarm [3]. Furthermore, we compared our initial designs generated in
the morph chart with the Datum in the following table (7) and chose the option with the
greatest score, which is alternative 1.
26
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
Table (7): Pugh’s Method:
# Objective weight ALT ALT ALT

value 1 2 3
Environmentally
1 8
friendly S S -
2 Recyclable 6 S S -
Safe
3 10
+ + +
4 Nonhazardous 8 + + -
5 No sharp edges 10 + - +
Comfortable
6
6 - + S
+
Datum (Pool Fence alarm)
7 Small in size 9 -
+
8 light weight. 10 + + +
9 Waterproof 8 + S +
10 Sustainable 8 + S S
Durability +
11 9 - S
Easy to use _
12 10 S -
Easy to repair _
13 5 + S
Easy to assemble
14 8
+ + _
portability
15 10 + S S
16 Inexpensive cost 8 S - _
TOTAL POSITIVES (+) 86 42 56
27
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
Mathematical Modeling:
Mathematical models are essential for device or system design and precise prediction. The goal
of mathematical modeling is to capture all of the system's significant attributes in order to
derive the mathematical (or analytical) equations that regulate the system's behavior.
Nonlinear, dependent on how system components behave. Linear models may provide quick
and simple solutions; however, non-linear models may reveal properties of the system that
linear models cannot predict, and once a mathematical model is available, equilibrium
equations must be derived to describe the physical phenomena of the system and are intended
for quantification.
Table (8) shows a set of parameters, that could be used to build a mathematical model for a
“Sitting-Posture Corrector project”. Also, it presents the relevant parameters for the next three
functions:
1_Makes a sound that alerts people.

2_Makes light that alerts People.
3_Working for long time.
For each of the above function has related variables are shown below with their units:
1. Makes alerts sound.

• Reference distance (m)
• Sound pressure (pa)
• Sound intensity (W/m^2)
2. Makes alerts light.
• Power source (V)
28
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
• Intensity of illumination (cd)

• Distance between human body and device (m)
3. Working for long time.
• Power source (V)
• Device heat (C°)
• Battery capacity (mAh)
Table 8: The Mathematical Model:
Parameter (variable) Affected

performance Impact
Name
Unit (function)
+ abbreviation or acronym
Increase in RD ≥ decrease in
Reference distance (RD) (m)
Makes alerts AS
sound
Sound pressure (SP) (pa) Increase in SP ≥ increase in AS
(AS) in (HZ)
Sound intensity (SI) (W/m^2) Increase in SI ≥ increase in AS
Power source (V) Increase power PS ≥ increase

(PS) in AL
Intensity of illumination (IOI) (cd) Makes alerts light Increases in IOI ≥ increase in
(AL) in (cd) AL
Distance between human body and device (m) Increase in DHD ≥ decrease in
(DHD) AL
Power source (V) Increase in PS ≥ increase in
(PS) WLT
Device heat (C°) Working for long Increase in DH ≥ decrease in
(DH) time. WLT
Battery capacity (mAh) (WLT) in (minutes) Increase in BC ≥ increase in
(BC) WLT
29
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
Design Drawing:
Design drawings are used to develop and communicate ideas about a developing
design. We did the Design drawings to clarify any misunderstanding or mistakes and visual
representation help us to describe the shape and the size of all the components clearly.
The components of the artifact:

Table** shows every part we used to form our artifact. The artifact includes eleven parts which
are large Breadboard, Rain sensor, resistor 1k ohm, Resistor 100-ohm, transistor 2N2222,
Buzzer Device, red light emitter, Connectors for Battery, Battery.
Table (9): All the component of the artifact:
Number The Part Name The Part image

1 Breadboard
Breadboard.STEP
2 Rain Senior
RainSen.SLDPRT
3 resistor 1k ohm
RESISTOR 1K
1X8W.SLDPRT
4 Resistor 100 ohm

RESIST~2.SLD
5 transistor 2n2222
2N22221A.SLDPRT
6 Buzzer Device
Buzzer- Mallory
PB-09N23P-03Q.STEP
30
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
7 Red Light Emitter

LED 3mm RED.STEP
8
Capacitor10000pf(103) 2200uF_16V.STEP
9 Battery 9v
Battery 9V.SLDPRT
10 Connectors for Battery

9 Volt battery
connector prt.STEP
11 Case
Experimental Testing & Results:
1. Wight of the person in the pool

W=m*g
W= Wight (Newton)
m= mass (Kilogram).
g=Gravity acceleration {meter ⁄ (second2)}.
2. Electrical power
P=V*I
P= Electrical power (Watt)
V= Voltage (Volt)
I= Current (Ampere)
31
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
Simulation results
After that we consider logical equations, we can logically make a simulation based on the
preceding equations. We pick equation 1 & 2 to see the effect of the wight due to mass and gravity
acceleration as well as the effect of the power with the voltage and ampere. The Microsoft Excel
output will be illustrated in the next figure.
Weight of the person in the pool

1600
1400
1200
1000 y = 9.8x
Wight
800
600
400
200
0
50 70 90 110 130 150 170
Mass
Figure 8: Wight of the person in the pool
Electrical Power
50
45
40
Power (Watt)
35
30 y = 9x
25
20
15
10
5
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Current (Ampere)
Figure 9: Electrical Power modeling
32
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
As we can see in figure (8), the relationship between the wight and mass is liner. So, as a result
increasing the mass will affecting the water level in the pool which will make the water touch the
water sensor. Therefore, the circuit will be close, and buzzer will turn on. Note that we the gravity
acceleration 9.8 m/s2. In the figure (9), the value of the electrical power will be higher if we are
increasing the current.
The Explanation of Artifact:

The water board module consists of two copper tracks, designed in such a way that under the dry
conditions they provide high resistance to the supply voltage. The water board module consists of
two pins used to connect to the control board. The water sensor board functions as a variable
resistor. More current flows through the board when it is wet. So, when the water touches the
sensor, the circuit will be close making the current flow to the buzzer.
Figure 10: Assembly plan of the circuit
33
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
Budget (Cost Analysis):
In order to calculate the cost of producing the device, we decided to do our best to find all
the parts needed in our local markets We found the necessary parts from several suppliers, but
we found it difficult to find three parts, so we went to buy them through the Amazon
website(www.amazon.com) where the three parts were found, but the shipping fees were added
by Amazon, which increased the total cost of the device. Moreover, we only found ten pieces in
local retail stores. The following table shows all the parts used in the artifact and their detailed
cost.
Table (10): The Cost Analysis:
Part Part name Part cost Shipment cost Total part

number (SAR) (SAR) cost (SAR)
1 Breadboard. 15.00 12.00 27.00
2 Rain sensor. 34.00 20.00 54.00
3 1k-ohm resistor. 2.55 0.00 2.55
4 100-ohm resistor. 3.00 0.00 3.00
5 Transistor 2n2222. 2.00 0.00 2.00
6 Buzzer Device. 9.00 0.00 9.00
7 Red light emitter. 2.50 0.00 2.50
8 10000pf (103) Capacitor. 3.50 0.00 3.50
9 9V Battery. 6.00 0.00 6.00
10 Battery conte. 5.00 0.00 5.00
11 Connecting wire spool. 58.00 0.00 58.00
12 Push Button switch. 5.00 0.00 5.00
13 Electrical Junction Box, Waterproof. 100.85 20.00 120.85
Assembly and 40 SAR
tools cost (labor)
Total cost 298.40 SAR
34
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
Conclusion:
To summarize, this report clarified three key aspects of the project, which are defining the
problem, setting the project plan and requirements establishment. The project is about using
engineering approach to solve a problem proposed by a client, which is the swimming pool is not
always safe for kids and beginners on swimming. In the time it takes to order a rocky-road cone,
a person can drown. No matter how much we know about drowning prevention, it remains the
top cause of unintentional injury death in children in most countries in the world. The problem
was defined and analyzed through several methods in order to come up with well-defined
statement of the problem. As a result, effective functions with the corresponding means can be
established. Many methods and tools are used in this report. First, the project planning is set by
breakdown structure, linear responsibility chart and Gantt chart. Second, the functions,
objectives and constraints are also set with objectives tree, glass box, and function-means tree.
Until this point, working on the project should be continued to select the best solution that will
resolve the problem by a real artifact. solutions could possibly succeed therefore in order to
narrow our design alternatives we used Morphological chart Table (5) to create some feasible
design alternatives. Methods like Pugh’s Table (6) helped us choose the best alternative. Also, we
preferred it over other alternatives for many main reasons. Moreover, after we picked the best
alternative, we continued to Calculate the artifact performance and identify the terms of our
model thus we accomplished that by applying mathematical modelling Table (7). Moreover, since
the deanship has decided that we will design a prototype of the artifact we simulated it and did
the drawings by program called Solid works Figure (15). The way the simulation will work is by
giving signals if a person is drawing in the pool, alerting the people around to save his life. After
that we did used (cost analysis) to calculate total cost of the artifact which would cost (298.40
SAR) including the Laboure works which was assumed to be 40 SAR. Table (10). And we tested
the artifact to improve it also to reduce the problems that could hinder its work and also to make
sure that its works well without any problem.
35
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
References:
1. Who.int. 2022. Drowning. [online] Available at: https://www.who.int/ar/news-

room/fact-sheets/detail/drowning [Accessed 27 March 2022].
2. ‫ السباحة إرشادات لحماية األطفال والمراهقين من حوادث الغرق‬.2022 .‫البيان‬. [online] Available at:
https://www.albayan.ae/health/health-happiness/2018-12-23-1.3441159
[Accessed 27 March 2022].
3. Spas, B., 2022. Swimming Pool Safety: How Pool Alarms Boost Protection. [online]
Articles.bluehaven.com. Available at:
https://articles.bluehaven.com/swimming-pool-safety-how-pool-alarms-boost-protection
[Accessed 27 March 2022].
4. Jlmartin.ku.edu. 2022. [online]Available at:

https://jlmartin.ku.edu/courses/math105-F11/Lectures/chapter1-part4.pdf
[Accesse28 March 2022].
1. Youtube.com. 2022. [online] Available at:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orrQFHKlocs [Accessed 28 March 2022].
Appendices:
36
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
Table (11): peer assessment member 1

Rubric for Teamwork Peer Assessment (Team# 3 )
Name of Evaluator: ____Mohammed Ahmed ___ Member Number of evaluator: __ 1___
Evaluated Team Members

Item
3 2 1 0 Number
Evaluated
M1 M2 M3 M4
Contribution Collects and presents to the Collects basic, useful Collects information when Does not collect any relevant
to teamwork team a great deal of information related to the asked for; tries to offer information; no useful
relevant information; project; occasionally offers some ideas, but not well suggestions to address team's
offers well-developed and useful ideas to meet the developed, and not clearly needs. 3 3 2
clearly expressed ideas team's needs. expressed, to meet team's
directly related to the needs.
purpose of the team
Taking Performs all tasks very Performs all assigned tasks; Performs assigned tasks Does not perform assigned
responsibility effectively, attends all attends meetings regularly but needs many reminders; tasks; often misses meetings
meetings, and participates and usually participates attends meetings regularly and, when present, does not
enthusiastically and effectively; generally but generally does not say have anything constructive to 3 2 3
remains very reliable. reliable. anything constructive; say; relies on others to do the
sometimes expects others work.
to do his/her work.
Valuing other Always listens to others and Generally, listens to others' Usually does much of the Often argues with team
team their ideas; helps them points of view; always uses talking; does not pay much mates; doesn't let anyone
members develop their ideas while appropriate and respectful attention when others talk, else talk; occasional personal
giving them full credit; language; tries to make a and often assumes their attacks and "put-downs";
always helps the team definite effort to ideas will not work; no wants to have things done his
3 3 3
reach a fair decision. understand others' ideas. personal attacks and put- way and does not listen to
downs but sometimes alternate approaches.
patronizing; when others
get through to him, works
reasonably well with them.

Name of Evaluator: ____Mustafa Hasnain___ Member Number of evaluator: __ 2___

Item
3 2 1 0 Number
Evaluated
M1 M2 M3 M4
purpose of the team
to do his/her work.
3 3 3
37
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021

Name of Evaluator: ____ Hassan Mazen ___ Member Number of evaluator: __ 3___

Item
3 2 1 0 Number
Evaluated
M1 M2 M3 M4
purpose of the team
to do his/her work.
3 2

Name of Evaluator: ____ Abdullrahman Alelyani ___ Member Number of evaluator: __ 4___

Item
3 2 1 0 Number
Evaluated
M1 M2 M3 M4
purpose of the team
to do his/her work.
3 3 3
38
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
Team Meetings
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Team 3-Team Meeting
Agenda For Meeting 1#

Member No.
1 Leader
Mohammed Ahmed
2 Recorder
Mustafa Hassanin
3 Summarizer
Hassan Mazen
4 Supporter
Abdullrahman Alelyani
Meeting Time: 6pm- 8pm

Meeting Place: Zoom Call
Meeting Date: 2022/3/17
NO. of Tasks Description of Member Resources/ Estimated Time

task Responsible Comments
1 self-introduction All members - 5 mins
2 Contact before Recorder Agenda 45mins

work and briefing
3 Learn About Leader 70mins

Next Meeting Distribution of
tasks
What Happened?
- The meeting started on time.
- Tell the team members what will achieve in this meeting by the team leader and recorder
39
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
The results
We are aal aware of the responsibilities that have been
allocated to each of us.
Member Member Name %

No
1 Mohammed Ahmed 30
3 Hassan Mazen 20
Decisions have been made:
-We set the date for the next meeting.
Team 3-Team Meeting

Member No.
1 Leader
Mohammed Ahmed
2 Recorder
Mustafa Hassanin
3 Summarizer
Hassan Mazen
4 Supporter

40
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
NO. of Tasks Description of task Member Resources/ Estimated Time

Responsible Comments
1 Contact before work All members Agenda 15 mins

and briefing
2 Show to each our All members - 30mins

the work we did
3 Review the Leader 15mins

Resources The leader did
That every member
used it for his part
research about our
resources
What Happened?
-The meeting started on time
-We reviewed all the recourses

-End of the meeting the leader set the date for the next meeting
The results
- The team obtained sources about the project

No
1 Mohammed Ahmed 40
3 Hassan Mazen 20
41
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
Member No.
1 Leader
Mohammed Ahmed
2 Recorder
Mustafa Hassanin
3 Summarizer
Hassan Mazen
4 Supporter

NO. of Tasks Description of Member Resources/ Estimated Time

task Responsible Comments
1 self-introduction All members - 5 mins
2 Contact before Recorder Agenda 50mins

work and briefing
3 Learn About Leader 80mins

Next Meeting Distribution of
tasks
What Happened?
- The meeting started on time.
- Tell the team members what will achieve in this meeting by the team leader and recorder
The results
We are aal aware of the responsibilities that have been
allocated to each of us.
42
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021

No
1 Mohammed Ahmed 25
3 Hassan Mazen 20
Decisions have been made:
-We set the date for the next meeting.
Team 3-Team Meeting

Member No.
1 Leader
Mohammed Ahmed
2 Recorder
Mustafa Hassanin
3 Summarizer
Hassan Mazen
4 Supporter

NO. of Tasks Description of task Member Resources/ Estimated Time

Responsible Comments
1 Contact before work All members Agenda 15 mins

and briefing
2 Show to each our All members - 30mins

the work we did
43
Team #3
IE202
Fall 2021
3 Review the Leader 15mins

Resources The leader did a
That every member
used it for his part
research about our
resources
What Happened?
-The meeting started on time
-We reviewed all the recourses

-End of the meeting the leader set the date for the next meeting
The results
- The team obtained sources about the project

No
1 Mohammed Ahmed 40
3 Hassan Mazen 20
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
44

Final Report Team3 - Z3

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Final Report Team3 - Z3

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

King Abdulaziz University

(Alert system devise that prevents drowning in pools.)

Instructor: Dr. Mohammed alamudi

Submission date: 5/16/2022

Figure (1): The ten-leading cause of death.

Figure (2): Lack of Parental Supervision.

Clint problem statement:

Revised Problem Statement:

figure 4: Objective’s tree.

Pairwise Comparison Chart:

Objectives Environmentally Safe Comfortable Inexpensive Durability Easy to score

Inexpensive cost 1 0 1 ### 1 0 3

Easy to Use 0 0 1 1 1 ### 3

Initial Design Attributes:

Table 2: Initial Design Attributes

The weight should not exceed 3Kg √

1. Manufacture of a safe and high-quality device.

Table 3 Key milestones

Work Breakdown Structure:

1. Choose a project problem.

3.1.3 Discuss the information gathered among team members.

Linear Responsibility Chart (LRC):

Linear Responsibility Chart is important for distributing tasks among team

Table 4: Linear Responsibility Chart

Writing the revised problem R S

Figure 5: Gant chart

Percent Complete Matrix (PCM):

Table 5: Percent Complete Matrix

Make a percent complete 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %

Research for similar 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %

Writing references. 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %

Writing the client problem 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %

Determine project objectives. 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %

Implement an objective tree. 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %

Apply a pairwise 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %

Identify client constraints 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %

Identify realistic constraints. 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %

Identify the functions. 2 1.96 % 100 % 1.96 %

Apply the Glass box method. 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %

Apply a function-means 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %

Generate various design ideas. 2 1.96 % 100 % 1.96 %

Stratify Morphological Charts. 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %

List feasible alternatives. 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %

Stratify Pugh’s method. 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %

Evaluate design alternatives. 3 2.94 % 100 % 2.94 %

Stratify mathematical 3 2.94 % 100 % 2.94 %

Work on the final report 7 6.86 % 100 % 6.86 %

Develop the progress report. 6 5.88 % 100 % 5.88 %

Present the work. 1 0.98 % 100 % 0.98 %

Total 102 days 100 % 100 %

Figure 6: Glass Box

A function–means tree is a common engineering design method. It

Alert system devise

Attached Water wave Big capacity

Contol room LED subsurface Chargable

Figure (7): Function-Means Tree

Table (6): The Morph Chart:

Table (7): Pugh’s Method:

# Objective weight ALT ALT ALT

1_Makes a sound that alerts people.

1. Makes alerts sound.

• Intensity of illumination (cd)

Table 8: The Mathematical Model: