The document compares the original question item to an improved version. It notes that the improved item is no longer negatively worded but still contains some typos. Additionally, while choice D seemed most probable, it was found to be lacking and not enough to be considered the right answer, meaning the improved item still has no unambiguously correct response like the original.
The document compares the original question item to an improved version. It notes that the improved item is no longer negatively worded but still contains some typos. Additionally, while choice D seemed most probable, it was found to be lacking and not enough to be considered the right answer, meaning the improved item still has no unambiguously correct response like the original.
The document compares the original question item to an improved version. It notes that the improved item is no longer negatively worded but still contains some typos. Additionally, while choice D seemed most probable, it was found to be lacking and not enough to be considered the right answer, meaning the improved item still has no unambiguously correct response like the original.
DID THE ITEM IMPROVED? Based on our observation we realized that the question item has: Improved in the sense that it is no longer a negative question. But there were still some typos found. (nag - ang, pansirili - pansarili) And lastly, choice D - which seemed to be the most probable answer for the item doesn't seem enough to be the right answer. It was lacking. Therefore, the same with the original item, this seems to have no right answer as well.