You are on page 1of 2

CRAAP evaluating sources

source 1 source 2 source 3

Currency The information was last The information was Of The information
updated on the 26th of both posted and last was published on the
February 2021. This makes updated on the 4th of 30th of January 2019
the information very reliable June 2017. Although and updated on the
as it was updated according to my topic of ocean 6th of February 2019.
the current situation. My acidification is an area This makes the
topic requires relatively that changes rapidly information very valid
current information but not (science), data from as it was only written
necessarily from a year or four years ago is still two years ago.
two, it could be as far back as very much relevant
10 years! right now.
Relevance The topic is relevant to my This information aided This article is very
topic of Ocean Acidification me in reaching the helpful and so
and precisely answers my first requirements of my organised first
inquiry of what exactly is assignment as I introducing ocean
ocean acidification with needed to refer to a acidification,
information. The information case study and this discussing the causes
is at a really good level of site greatly helped in and explaining the
understanding as it is understanding the effects in a
technical enough to include situation in the chronological way.
specific scientific vocab but Central Pacific Ocean.
also easy enough to In terms of the
understand the flow of the wording, it was very
text. understandable as
explanations were
administrated
throughout the article.
Accuracy This source seems to be very Many information The information of
accurate as many information here has similar the source is accurate
here is factual and seen in directions and and justifiable. This is
many different sources. It opinions as my other because many of the
doesn’t have absurd claims or sources but in terms words in this article
facts but in fact similar facts of the data evaluation, are linked to provide
as other sources. I also believe I can’t be entirely sure exterior confirmation
that it was reviewed by whether it is all and detail to the facts
subject experts before correct. stated. A table of
published as this website is contents is also
very professional and reliable. provided with very
key headings.
Authority The author of this source is The author of this There is no specific
simply National Ocean source is Roshini Nair, writer mentioned
Service. There are no specific and she is a writer for which leads me to
authors mentioned but rather CBC news. Although believe many have
the entire organisation. The information on her is worked on this article
author is qualified to write not given, all articles who are “the Union of
released by this site concerned. Scientists".
this source because it is very are sure to be checked This source is very
qualified and recognised. and confirmed by CBC creditable and have
news. many
accomplishments
stated on their
website. They have
combined science and
advocacy for more
than fifty years.
Purpose Well, the purpose of the The purpose of this Of The purpose of this
specific article is to educate article is to inform but article is to inform and
but the specific purpose of also slightly persuade. persuade. This is
the author is to provide We as the reader are because information
science-based solutions to informed on the on the issue is given at
address economic, evidence accumulated the start and then
environmental and social during the case study towards the end of
pressures on our ocean and but also persuaded to the article, there is a
coast. There are no biases of do something about section titled “why
any sort because all the this issue through should we all care,
information expressed is Chan’s words. and what can you do”
based off information and which is directly
factual data. persuading the reader
to change.

You might also like