ANNEX “3B”

A
INTERVIEW EVALUATION FORM
Name:_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PCIN
(RANK) (LAST) (FIRST) (MIDDLE NAME) (QUALIFIER) (BADGE NUMBER)

HIGHEST EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT DATE OF LAST PROMOTION

HIGHEST MANDATORY TRAINING DATE OF CSC ATTESTED PERMANENT APPOINTMENT
PRESENT DESIGNATION & DATE DESIGNATED EXPERIENCE/ TIG (PERM + TEMP)
APPROPRIATE ELIGIBILITY PENDING CASE AT:

NO. CRITERIA DESCRIPTIVE EVALUATION NUMERICAL

RATING
1 VERY QUITE LIMITED VERY LIMITED
JOB KNOWLEDGE(25 pts) KNOWLEDGEABLE
KNOWLEDGEABLE
KNOWLEDGEABLE KNOWLEDGE KNOWLEDGE (SCORE)
Interviewee’s knowledge and internalization of the PNP
Mission/Vision, flagship programs, critical understanding of
the PNPs capabilities/resources/strengths/weaknesses and (25) (23) (22) (21) (20) (19) (18) (16) (14) (12) (10) (8) (6) (4) (2)
threats with creative suggestions on addressing issues;
preferred future vision for himself/the PNP/country
2 OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD
GOOD MANAGERIAL/ WEAK MANAGERIAL/
VERY WEAK
MANAGERIAL/ MANAGERIAL/ MANAGERIAL/
LEADERSHIP COMPETENCY(25 pts) LEADERSHIP LEADERSHIP
LEADERSHIP LEADERSHIP
LEADERSHIP
COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES
COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES
Satisfactorily understandsthe PNPs organizational
structureand leadership concepts and process;
demonstrates achievements/ accomplishment; shows (25) (23) (22) (21) (20) (19) (18) (16) (14) (12) (10) (8) (6) (4) (2)
sound and supervisory systems and procedures; displays
respectable stance and competent leadership potentials.
3 OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD GOOD POOR VERY POOR
COMMUNICATION SKILLS(20 pts) COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION
SKILS SKILS SKILS SKILS SKILS

Page 1 of 2
 ANNEX “3B”

Expresses one's thoughts/ ideas/ feelings proficiently/ clearly

with brevity; uses appropriate words/ vocabulary; organizes and
presents thoughts logically; projects confidence and a potential
speaker.
(20) (19) (18) (17) (16) (15) (14) (13) (12) (10) (9) (8) (6) (4) (2)
A
4 VERY CLEAR QUITE CLEAR HARDLY EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT
ANALYTICAL/ LOGICAL SOMEWHAT CLEAR
ANALYTICAL/ ANALYTICAL/ ANALYTICAL/
ANALYTICAL/ LOGICAL REASONING(10pts) REASONING LOGICAL
ANALYTICAL/ LOGICAL
LOGICAL LOGICAL
REASONING
REASONING REASONING REASONING
Clarity of logical/ analytical and critical thinking; formulation of
intelligent conclusions/ decisions; comprehension and
translation of abstract concepts to practical and workable (10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
application.

5 EXEMPLARY VERY GOOD

GOOD PERSONALITY/
POOR VERY POOR
PERSONALITY/ VALUES(10pts) PERSONALITY/
VALUES
PERSONALITY/ PERSONALITY/
VALUES VALUES VALUES
Possesses dignified/ respectable personality amidst pressure;
mere physical presence commands respect; typifies a model
police officer and restrained and calculated in emotions and
behavior. Demonstrates sound value judgement anchored on
(10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
right and wrong; publicly affirms non-negotiable value system;
upholds basic principles of human rights and dignity and
promotes and exemplifies strict adherence to PNP core values.

6 VERY EVIDENT QUITE EVIDENT SOMEWHAT EVIDENT LESS EVIDENT

EVIDENT
EMOTIONAL MATURITY(10 pts) MATURITY MATURITY MATURITY MATURITY
EMOTIONAL
IMMATURITY
Sensitivity to ones emotions and that of others. Aware of life's
purpose and obstacles. Positive attitude and good degree of
(10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
resourcefulness and acceptance of one's physical and
psychological health status.

TOTAL SCORE

NOTE: This FORM should be used for Promotion to the rank of PSMS to PEMS. Evaluated by:
This FORM should be stapled to the updated PAIS PDS.
One Form per Board/Committee Member.
 ANNEX “3B”

______________________________________
PCOL RONALD V GAYO
Acting DRDO/
Chairman, Promotion Board Bravo
B
Page 2 of 2
INTERVIEW EVALUATION FORM

Name:_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PCIN
(RANK) (LAST) (FIRST) (MIDDLE NAME) (QUALIFIER) (BADGE NUMBER)

HIGHEST EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT DATE OF LAST PROMOTION

HIGHEST MANDATORY TRAINING DATE OF CSC ATTESTED PERMANENT APPOINTMENT
PRESENT DESIGNATION & DATE DESIGNATED EXPERIENCE/ TIG (PERM + TEMP)
APPROPRIATE ELIGIBILITY PENDING CASE AT:

NO. CRITERIA DESCRIPTIVE EVALUATION NUMERICAL

RATING
1 JOB KNOWLEDGE(25 pts)
VERY
KNOWLEDGEABLE
QUITE LIMITED VERY LIMITED
(SCORE)
KNOWLEDGEABLE KNOWLEDGEABLE KNOWLEDGE KNOWLEDGE
Interviewee’s knowledge and internalization of the PNP
Mission/Vision, flagship programs, critical understanding of
the PNPs capabilities/resources/strengths/weaknesses and (25) (23) (22) (21) (20) (19) (18) (16) (14) (12) (10) (8) (6) (4) (2)
threats with creative suggestions on addressing issues;
preferred future vision for himself/the PNP/country
2 OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD
GOOD MANAGERIAL/ WEAK MANAGERIAL/
VERY WEAK
MANAGERIAL/ MANAGERIAL/ MANAGERIAL/
LEADERSHIP COMPETENCY(25 pts) LEADERSHIP LEADERSHIP
LEADERSHIP LEADERSHIP
LEADERSHIP
COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES
COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES
Satisfactorily understandsthe PNPs organizational
structureand leadership concepts and process;
(25) (23) (22) (21) (20) (19) (18) (16) (14) (12) (10) (8) (6) (4) (2)
demonstrates achievements/ accomplishment; shows
sound and supervisory systems and procedures; displays
 ANNEX “3B”

respectable stance and competent leadership potentials.

3 OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD GOOD POOR VERY POOR
COMMUNICATION SKILLS(20 pts) COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION
SKILS SKILS SKILS SKILS SKILS
Expresses one's thoughts/ ideas/ feelings proficiently/ clearly
with brevity; uses appropriate words/ vocabulary; organizes and
presents thoughts logically; projects confidence and a potential
speaker.
(20) (19) (18) (17) (16) (15) (14) (13) (12) (10) (9) (8) (6) (4) (2) B

4 VERY CLEAR QUITE CLEAR HARDLY EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT

ANALYTICAL/ LOGICAL SOMEWHAT CLEAR
ANALYTICAL/ ANALYTICAL/ ANALYTICAL/
ANALYTICAL/ LOGICAL REASONING(10pts) REASONING LOGICAL
ANALYTICAL/ LOGICAL
LOGICAL LOGICAL
REASONING
REASONING REASONING REASONING
Clarity of logical/ analytical and critical thinking; formulation of
intelligent conclusions/ decisions; comprehension and
translation of abstract concepts to practical and workable (10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
application.

5 EXEMPLARY VERY GOOD

GOOD PERSONALITY/
POOR VERY POOR
PERSONALITY/ VALUES(10pts) PERSONALITY/
VALUES
PERSONALITY/ PERSONALITY/
VALUES VALUES VALUES
Possesses dignified/ respectable personality amidst pressure;
mere physical presence commands respect; typifies a model
police officer and restrained and calculated in emotions and
behavior. Demonstrates sound value judgement anchored on
(10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
right and wrong; publicly affirms non-negotiable value system;
upholds basic principles of human rights and dignity and
promotes and exemplifies strict adherence to PNP core values.

6 VERY EVIDENT QUITE EVIDENT SOMEWHAT EVIDENT LESS EVIDENT

EVIDENT
EMOTIONAL MATURITY(10 pts) MATURITY MATURITY MATURITY MATURITY
EMOTIONAL
IMMATURITY
Sensitivity to ones emotions and that of others. Aware of life's
purpose and obstacles. Positive attitude and good degree of
(10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
resourcefulness and acceptance of one's physical and
psychological health status.

TOTAL SCORE

NOTE: This FORM should be used for Promotion to the rank of PSMS to PEMS.
This FORM should be stapled to the updated PAIS PDS.
One Form per Board/Committee Member.
 ANNEX “3B”

Evaluated by:

______________________________________
PCOL SIBLY P DAWIGUEY, JR
Chief, ROD/
Vice-Chairman, Promotion Board Bravo
C
Page 2 of 2
INTERVIEW EVALUATION FORM

Name:_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PCIN
(RANK) (LAST) (FIRST) (MIDDLE NAME) (QUALIFIER) (BADGE NUMBER)
HIGHEST EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT DATE OF LAST PROMOTION
HIGHEST MANDATORY TRAINING DATE OF CSC ATTESTED PERMANENT APPOINTMENT
PRESENT DESIGNATION & DATE DESIGNATED EXPERIENCE/ TIG (PERM + TEMP)
APPROPRIATE ELIGIBILITY PENDING CASE AT:

NO. CRITERIA DESCRIPTIVE EVALUATION NUMERICAL

RATING
1 VERY QUITE LIMITED VERY LIMITED
JOB KNOWLEDGE(25 pts) KNOWLEDGEABLE
KNOWLEDGEABLE
KNOWLEDGEABLE KNOWLEDGE KNOWLEDGE (SCORE)
Interviewee’s knowledge and internalization of the PNP
Mission/Vision, flagship programs, critical understanding of
the PNPs capabilities/resources/strengths/weaknesses and (25) (23) (22) (21) (20) (19) (18) (16) (14) (12) (10) (8) (6) (4) (2)
threats with creative suggestions on addressing issues;
preferred future vision for himself/the PNP/country
2 OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD
GOOD MANAGERIAL/ WEAK MANAGERIAL/
VERY WEAK
MANAGERIAL/ MANAGERIAL/ MANAGERIAL/
LEADERSHIP COMPETENCY(25 pts) LEADERSHIP LEADERSHIP
LEADERSHIP LEADERSHIP
LEADERSHIP
COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES
COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES
Satisfactorily understandsthe PNPs organizational
structureand leadership concepts and process; (25) (23) (22) (21) (20) (19) (18) (16) (14) (12) (10) (8) (6) (4) (2)
demonstrates achievements/ accomplishment; shows
 ANNEX “3B”

sound and supervisory systems and procedures; displays

respectable stance and competent leadership potentials.
3 OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD GOOD POOR VERY POOR
COMMUNICATION SKILLS(20 pts) COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION
SKILS SKILS SKILS SKILS SKILS
Expresses one's thoughts/ ideas/ feelings proficiently/ clearly
with brevity; uses appropriate words/ vocabulary; organizes and
presents thoughts logically; projects confidence and a potential (20) (19) (18) (17) (16) (15) (14) (13) (12) (10) (9) (8) (6) (4) (2)
speaker.

4 VERY CLEAR QUITE CLEAR

SOMEWHAT CLEAR
HARDLY EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT
ANALYTICAL/ LOGICAL ANALYTICAL/ ANALYTICAL/ ANALYTICAL/
ANALYTICAL/ LOGICAL REASONING(10pts) REASONING LOGICAL
ANALYTICAL/ LOGICAL
LOGICAL LOGICAL
REASONING
REASONING REASONING REASONING
Clarity of logical/ analytical and critical thinking; formulation of
intelligent conclusions/ decisions; comprehension and
translation of abstract concepts to practical and workable (10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
application.

5 EXEMPLARY VERY GOOD POOR VERY POOR

GOOD PERSONALITY/
PERSONALITY/ VALUES(10pts) PERSONALITY/
VALUES
PERSONALITY/ PERSONALITY/
VALUES VALUES VALUES
Possesses dignified/ respectable personality amidst pressure;
mere physical presence commands respect; typifies a model
police officer and restrained and calculated in emotions and
behavior. Demonstrates sound value judgement anchored on
(10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
right and wrong; publicly affirms non-negotiable value system;
upholds basic principles of human rights and dignity and
promotes and exemplifies strict adherence to PNP core values.

6 VERY EVIDENT QUITE EVIDENT SOMEWHAT EVIDENT LESS EVIDENT

EVIDENT
EMOTIONAL MATURITY(10 pts) MATURITY MATURITY MATURITY MATURITY
EMOTIONAL
IMMATURITY
Sensitivity to ones emotions and that of others. Aware of life's
purpose and obstacles. Positive attitude and good degree of
(10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
resourcefulness and acceptance of one's physical and
psychological health status.
 ANNEX “3B”

TOTAL SCORE

NOTE: This FORM should be used for Promotion to the rank of PSMS to PEMS. Evaluated by:
This FORM should be stapled to the updated PAIS PDS.
One Form per Board/Committee Member.
______________________________________
PLTCOL MAURICE C NABUNAT, JR
Assistant Chief, RIDMD/
Member, Promotion Board Bravo
D
INTERVIEW EVALUATION FORM Page 2 of 2

Name:_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PCIN
(RANK) (LAST) (FIRST) (MIDDLE NAME) (QUALIFIER) (BADGE NUMBER)
HIGHEST EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT DATE OF LAST PROMOTION
HIGHEST MANDATORY TRAINING DATE OF CSC ATTESTED PERMANENT APPOINTMENT
PRESENT DESIGNATION & DATE DESIGNATED EXPERIENCE/ TIG (PERM + TEMP)
APPROPRIATE ELIGIBILITY PENDING CASE AT:

NO. CRITERIA DESCRIPTIVE EVALUATION NUMERICAL

RATING
1 JOB KNOWLEDGE(25 pts)
VERY
KNOWLEDGEABLE
QUITE LIMITED VERY LIMITED
(SCORE)
KNOWLEDGEABLE KNOWLEDGEABLE KNOWLEDGE KNOWLEDGE
Interviewee’s knowledge and internalization of the PNP
Mission/Vision, flagship programs, critical understanding of
the PNPs capabilities/resources/strengths/weaknesses and (25) (23) (22) (21) (20) (19) (18) (16) (14) (12) (10) (8) (6) (4) (2)
threats with creative suggestions on addressing issues;
preferred future vision for himself/the PNP/country
2 OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD
GOOD MANAGERIAL/ WEAK MANAGERIAL/
VERY WEAK
MANAGERIAL/ MANAGERIAL/ MANAGERIAL/
LEADERSHIP COMPETENCY(25 pts) LEADERSHIP LEADERSHIP
LEADERSHIP LEADERSHIP
LEADERSHIP
COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES
COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES
 ANNEX “3B”

Satisfactorily understandsthe PNPs organizational

structureand leadership concepts and process;
demonstrates achievements/ accomplishment; shows (25) (23) (22) (21) (20) (19) (18) (16) (14) (12) (10) (8) (6) (4) (2)
sound and supervisory systems and procedures; displays
respectable stance and competent leadership potentials.
3 OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD GOOD POOR VERY POOR
COMMUNICATION SKILLS(20 pts) COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION
SKILS SKILS SKILS SKILS SKILS
Expresses one's thoughts/ ideas/ feelings proficiently/ clearly
with brevity; uses appropriate words/ vocabulary; organizes and
presents thoughts logically; projects confidence and a potential (20) (19) (18) (17) (16) (15) (14) (13) (12) (10) (9) (8) (6) (4) (2)
speaker.

4 VERY CLEAR QUITE CLEAR HARDLY EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT

ANALYTICAL/ LOGICAL SOMEWHAT CLEAR
ANALYTICAL/ ANALYTICAL/ ANALYTICAL/
ANALYTICAL/ LOGICAL REASONING(10pts) REASONING LOGICAL
ANALYTICAL/ LOGICAL
LOGICAL LOGICAL
REASONING
REASONING REASONING REASONING
Clarity of logical/ analytical and critical thinking; formulation of
intelligent conclusions/ decisions; comprehension and
translation of abstract concepts to practical and workable (10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
application.

5 EXEMPLARY VERY GOOD

GOOD PERSONALITY/
POOR VERY POOR
PERSONALITY/ VALUES(10pts) PERSONALITY/
VALUES
PERSONALITY/ PERSONALITY/
VALUES VALUES VALUES
Possesses dignified/ respectable personality amidst pressure;
mere physical presence commands respect; typifies a model
police officer and restrained and calculated in emotions and
behavior. Demonstrates sound value judgement anchored on
(10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
right and wrong; publicly affirms non-negotiable value system;
upholds basic principles of human rights and dignity and
promotes and exemplifies strict adherence to PNP core values.

6 VERY EVIDENT QUITE EVIDENT SOMEWHAT EVIDENT LESS EVIDENT

EVIDENT
EMOTIONAL MATURITY(10 pts) MATURITY MATURITY MATURITY MATURITY
EMOTIONAL
IMMATURITY
Sensitivity to ones emotions and that of others. Aware of life's (10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
purpose and obstacles. Positive attitude and good degree of
 ANNEX “3B”

resourcefulness and acceptance of one's physical and

psychological health status.

TOTAL SCORE

NOTE: This FORM should be used for Promotion to the rank of PSMS to PEMS. Evaluated by:
This FORM should be stapled to the updated PAIS PDS.
One Form per Board/Committee Member.
______________________________________
PLTCOL STEPHEN GEORGE B
ANTONIO
Assistant Chief, RID/
Promotion Board Bravo E
INTERVIEW EVALUATION FORM Page 2 of 2

Name:_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PCIN
(RANK) (LAST) (FIRST) (MIDDLE NAME) (QUALIFIER) (BADGE NUMBER)

HIGHEST EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT DATE OF LAST PROMOTION

HIGHEST MANDATORY TRAINING DATE OF CSC ATTESTED PERMANENT APPOINTMENT
PRESENT DESIGNATION & DATE DESIGNATED EXPERIENCE/ TIG (PERM + TEMP)
APPROPRIATE ELIGIBILITY PENDING CASE AT:

NO. CRITERIA DESCRIPTIVE EVALUATION NUMERICAL

RATING
1 VERY QUITE LIMITED VERY LIMITED
JOB KNOWLEDGE(25 pts) KNOWLEDGEABLE
KNOWLEDGEABLE
KNOWLEDGEABLE KNOWLEDGE KNOWLEDGE (SCORE)
Interviewee’s knowledge and internalization of the PNP
Mission/Vision, flagship programs, critical understanding of
the PNPs capabilities/resources/strengths/weaknesses and (25) (23) (22) (21) (20) (19) (18) (16) (14) (12) (10) (8) (6) (4) (2)
threats with creative suggestions on addressing issues;
preferred future vision for himself/the PNP/country
 ANNEX “3B”

2 OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD

GOOD MANAGERIAL/ WEAK MANAGERIAL/
VERY WEAK
MANAGERIAL/ MANAGERIAL/ MANAGERIAL/
LEADERSHIP COMPETENCY(25 pts) LEADERSHIP LEADERSHIP
LEADERSHIP LEADERSHIP
LEADERSHIP
COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES
COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES
Satisfactorily understandsthe PNPs organizational
structureand leadership concepts and process;
demonstrates achievements/ accomplishment; shows (25) (23) (22) (21) (20) (19) (18) (16) (14) (12) (10) (8) (6) (4) (2)
sound and supervisory systems and procedures; displays
respectable stance and competent leadership potentials.
3 OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD GOOD POOR VERY POOR
COMMUNICATION SKILLS(20 pts) COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION
SKILS SKILS SKILS SKILS SKILS
Expresses one's thoughts/ ideas/ feelings proficiently/ clearly
with brevity; uses appropriate words/ vocabulary; organizes and
presents thoughts logically; projects confidence and a potential (20) (19) (18) (17) (16) (15) (14) (13) (12) (10) (9) (8) (6) (4) (2)
speaker.

4 VERY CLEAR QUITE CLEAR

SOMEWHAT CLEAR
HARDLY EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT
ANALYTICAL/ LOGICAL ANALYTICAL/ ANALYTICAL/ ANALYTICAL/
ANALYTICAL/ LOGICAL REASONING(10pts) REASONING LOGICAL
ANALYTICAL/ LOGICAL
LOGICAL LOGICAL
REASONING
REASONING REASONING REASONING
Clarity of logical/ analytical and critical thinking; formulation of
intelligent conclusions/ decisions; comprehension and
translation of abstract concepts to practical and workable (10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
application.

5 EXEMPLARY VERY GOOD POOR VERY POOR

GOOD PERSONALITY/
PERSONALITY/ VALUES(10pts) PERSONALITY/
VALUES
PERSONALITY/ PERSONALITY/
VALUES VALUES VALUES
Possesses dignified/ respectable personality amidst pressure;
mere physical presence commands respect; typifies a model
police officer and restrained and calculated in emotions and
behavior. Demonstrates sound value judgement anchored on
(10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
right and wrong; publicly affirms non-negotiable value system;
upholds basic principles of human rights and dignity and
promotes and exemplifies strict adherence to PNP core values.
 ANNEX “3B”

6 VERY EVIDENT QUITE EVIDENT SOMEWHAT EVIDENT LESS EVIDENT

EVIDENT
EMOTIONAL MATURITY(10 pts) MATURITY MATURITY MATURITY MATURITY
EMOTIONAL
IMMATURITY
Sensitivity to ones emotions and that of others. Aware of life's
purpose and obstacles. Positive attitude and good degree of
(10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
resourcefulness and acceptance of one's physical and
psychological health status.

TOTAL SCORE

NOTE: This FORM should be used for Promotion to the rank of PSMS to PEMS. Evaluated by:
This FORM should be stapled to the updated PAIS PDS.
One Form per Board/Committee Member.
______________________________________
PMAJ FORD G TUAZON
Legal Representative/ Member
Promotion Board Bravo
F
Page 2 of 2
INTERVIEW EVALUATION FORM

Name:_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PCIN
(RANK) (LAST) (FIRST) (MIDDLE NAME) (QUALIFIER) (BADGE NUMBER)

HIGHEST EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT DATE OF LAST PROMOTION

HIGHEST MANDATORY TRAINING DATE OF CSC ATTESTED PERMANENT APPOINTMENT
PRESENT DESIGNATION & DATE DESIGNATED EXPERIENCE/ TIG (PERM + TEMP)
APPROPRIATE ELIGIBILITY PENDING CASE AT:

NO. CRITERIA DESCRIPTIVE EVALUATION NUMERICAL

RATING
1 VERY QUITE LIMITED VERY LIMITED
JOB KNOWLEDGE(25 pts) KNOWLEDGEABLE
KNOWLEDGEABLE
KNOWLEDGEABLE KNOWLEDGE KNOWLEDGE (SCORE)
Interviewee’s knowledge and internalization of the PNP (25) (23) (22) (21) (20) (19) (18) (16) (14) (12) (10) (8) (6) (4) (2)
 ANNEX “3B”

Mission/Vision, flagship programs, critical understanding of

the PNPs capabilities/resources/strengths/weaknesses and
threats with creative suggestions on addressing issues;
preferred future vision for himself/the PNP/country
2 OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD
GOOD MANAGERIAL/ WEAK MANAGERIAL/
VERY WEAK
MANAGERIAL/ MANAGERIAL/ MANAGERIAL/
LEADERSHIP COMPETENCY(25 pts) LEADERSHIP LEADERSHIP
LEADERSHIP LEADERSHIP
LEADERSHIP
COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES
COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES
Satisfactorily understandsthe PNPs organizational
structureand leadership concepts and process;
demonstrates achievements/ accomplishment; shows (25) (23) (22) (21) (20) (19) (18) (16) (14) (12) (10) (8) (6) (4) (2)
sound and supervisory systems and procedures; displays
respectable stance and competent leadership potentials.
3 OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD GOOD POOR VERY POOR
COMMUNICATION SKILLS(20 pts) COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION
SKILS SKILS SKILS SKILS SKILS
Expresses one's thoughts/ ideas/ feelings proficiently/ clearly
with brevity; uses appropriate words/ vocabulary; organizes and
presents thoughts logically; projects confidence and a potential (20) (19) (18) (17) (16) (15) (14) (13) (12) (10) (9) (8) (6) (4) (2)
speaker.

4 VERY CLEAR QUITE CLEAR

SOMEWHAT CLEAR
HARDLY EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT
ANALYTICAL/ LOGICAL ANALYTICAL/ ANALYTICAL/ ANALYTICAL/
ANALYTICAL/ LOGICAL REASONING(10pts) REASONING LOGICAL
ANALYTICAL/ LOGICAL
LOGICAL LOGICAL
REASONING
REASONING REASONING REASONING
Clarity of logical/ analytical and critical thinking; formulation of
intelligent conclusions/ decisions; comprehension and
translation of abstract concepts to practical and workable (10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
application.

5 EXEMPLARY VERY GOOD POOR VERY POOR

GOOD PERSONALITY/
PERSONALITY/ VALUES(10pts) PERSONALITY/
VALUES
PERSONALITY/ PERSONALITY/
VALUES VALUES VALUES
Possesses dignified/ respectable personality amidst pressure;
mere physical presence commands respect; typifies a model
police officer and restrained and calculated in emotions and (10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
behavior. Demonstrates sound value judgement anchored on
right and wrong; publicly affirms non-negotiable value system;
 ANNEX “3B”

upholds basic principles of human rights and dignity and

promotes and exemplifies strict adherence to PNP core values.

6 VERY EVIDENT QUITE EVIDENT SOMEWHAT EVIDENT LESS EVIDENT

EVIDENT
EMOTIONAL MATURITY(10 pts) MATURITY MATURITY MATURITY MATURITY
EMOTIONAL
IMMATURITY
Sensitivity to ones emotions and that of others. Aware of life's
purpose and obstacles. Positive attitude and good degree of
(10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
resourcefulness and acceptance of one's physical and
psychological health status.

TOTAL SCORE

NOTE: This FORM should be used for Promotion to the rank of PSMS to PEMS. Evaluated by:
This FORM should be stapled to the updated PAIS PDS.
One Form per Board/Committee Member.
______________________________________
PMAJ MARCY GRACE U MARRON
Women Representative/ Member
Promotion Board Bravo
G
INTERVIEW EVALUATION FORM Page 2 of 2

Name:_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PCIN
(RANK) (LAST) (FIRST) (MIDDLE NAME) (QUALIFIER) (BADGE NUMBER)
HIGHEST EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT DATE OF LAST PROMOTION
HIGHEST MANDATORY TRAINING DATE OF CSC ATTESTED PERMANENT APPOINTMENT
PRESENT DESIGNATION & DATE DESIGNATED EXPERIENCE/ TIG (PERM + TEMP)
APPROPRIATE ELIGIBILITY PENDING CASE AT:

NO. CRITERIA DESCRIPTIVE EVALUATION NUMERICAL

 ANNEX “3B”

1 VERY QUITE LIMITED VERY LIMITED RATING

JOB KNOWLEDGE(25 pts) KNOWLEDGEABLE
KNOWLEDGEABLE
KNOWLEDGEABLE KNOWLEDGE KNOWLEDGE (SCORE)
Interviewee’s knowledge and internalization of the PNP
Mission/Vision, flagship programs, critical understanding of
the PNPs capabilities/resources/strengths/weaknesses and (25) (23) (22) (21) (20) (19) (18) (16) (14) (12) (10) (8) (6) (4) (2)
threats with creative suggestions on addressing issues;
preferred future vision for himself/the PNP/country
2 OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD
GOOD MANAGERIAL/ WEAK MANAGERIAL/
VERY WEAK
MANAGERIAL/ MANAGERIAL/ MANAGERIAL/
LEADERSHIP COMPETENCY(25 pts) LEADERSHIP LEADERSHIP
LEADERSHIP LEADERSHIP
LEADERSHIP
COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES
COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES
Satisfactorily understandsthe PNPs organizational
structureand leadership concepts and process;
demonstrates achievements/ accomplishment; shows (25) (23) (22) (21) (20) (19) (18) (16) (14) (12) (10) (8) (6) (4) (2)
sound and supervisory systems and procedures; displays
respectable stance and competent leadership potentials.
3 OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD GOOD POOR VERY POOR
COMMUNICATION SKILLS(20 pts) COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION
SKILS SKILS SKILS SKILS SKILS
Expresses one's thoughts/ ideas/ feelings proficiently/ clearly
with brevity; uses appropriate words/ vocabulary; organizes and
presents thoughts logically; projects confidence and a potential (20) (19) (18) (17) (16) (15) (14) (13) (12) (10) (9) (8) (6) (4) (2)
speaker.

4 VERY CLEAR QUITE CLEAR HARDLY EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT

ANALYTICAL/ LOGICAL SOMEWHAT CLEAR
ANALYTICAL/ ANALYTICAL/ ANALYTICAL/
ANALYTICAL/ LOGICAL REASONING(10pts) REASONING LOGICAL
ANALYTICAL/ LOGICAL
LOGICAL LOGICAL
REASONING
REASONING REASONING REASONING
Clarity of logical/ analytical and critical thinking; formulation of
intelligent conclusions/ decisions; comprehension and
translation of abstract concepts to practical and workable (10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
application.

5 EXEMPLARY VERY GOOD

GOOD PERSONALITY/
POOR VERY POOR
PERSONALITY/ VALUES(10pts) PERSONALITY/
VALUES
PERSONALITY/ PERSONALITY/
VALUES VALUES VALUES
Possesses dignified/ respectable personality amidst pressure; (10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
mere physical presence commands respect; typifies a model
 ANNEX “3B”

police officer and restrained and calculated in emotions and

behavior. Demonstrates sound value judgement anchored on
right and wrong; publicly affirms non-negotiable value system;
upholds basic principles of human rights and dignity and
promotes and exemplifies strict adherence to PNP core values.

6 VERY EVIDENT QUITE EVIDENT SOMEWHAT EVIDENT LESS EVIDENT

EVIDENT
EMOTIONAL MATURITY(10 pts) MATURITY MATURITY MATURITY MATURITY
EMOTIONAL
IMMATURITY
Sensitivity to ones emotions and that of others. Aware of life's
purpose and obstacles. Positive attitude and good degree of
(10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
resourcefulness and acceptance of one's physical and
psychological health status.

TOTAL SCORE

NOTE: This FORM should be used for Promotion to the rank of PSMS to PEMS. Evaluated by:
This FORM should be stapled to the updated PAIS PDS.
One Form per Board/Committee Member.
______________________________________
PEMS Jammieson C Bulatao
Chief Clerk, RPRMD/ Member
Promotion Board Bravo
H
INTERVIEW EVALUATION FORM Page 2 of 2

Name:_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PCIN
(RANK) (LAST) (FIRST) (MIDDLE NAME) (QUALIFIER) (BADGE NUMBER)
HIGHEST EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT DATE OF LAST PROMOTION
HIGHEST MANDATORY TRAINING DATE OF CSC ATTESTED PERMANENT APPOINTMENT
PRESENT DESIGNATION & DATE DESIGNATED EXPERIENCE/ TIG (PERM + TEMP)
APPROPRIATE ELIGIBILITY PENDING CASE AT:
 ANNEX “3B”

NO. CRITERIA DESCRIPTIVE EVALUATION NUMERICAL

RATING
1 JOB KNOWLEDGE(25 pts)
VERY
KNOWLEDGEABLE
QUITE LIMITED VERY LIMITED
(SCORE)
KNOWLEDGEABLE KNOWLEDGEABLE KNOWLEDGE KNOWLEDGE
Interviewee’s knowledge and internalization of the PNP
Mission/Vision, flagship programs, critical understanding of
the PNPs capabilities/resources/strengths/weaknesses and (25) (23) (22) (21) (20) (19) (18) (16) (14) (12) (10) (8) (6) (4) (2)
threats with creative suggestions on addressing issues;
preferred future vision for himself/the PNP/country
2 OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD
GOOD MANAGERIAL/ WEAK MANAGERIAL/
VERY WEAK
MANAGERIAL/ MANAGERIAL/ MANAGERIAL/
LEADERSHIP COMPETENCY(25 pts) LEADERSHIP LEADERSHIP
LEADERSHIP LEADERSHIP
LEADERSHIP
COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES
COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES
Satisfactorily understandsthe PNPs organizational
structureand leadership concepts and process;
demonstrates achievements/ accomplishment; shows (25) (23) (22) (21) (20) (19) (18) (16) (14) (12) (10) (8) (6) (4) (2)
sound and supervisory systems and procedures; displays
respectable stance and competent leadership potentials.
3 OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD GOOD POOR VERY POOR
COMMUNICATION SKILLS(20 pts) COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION
SKILS SKILS SKILS SKILS SKILS
Expresses one's thoughts/ ideas/ feelings proficiently/ clearly
with brevity; uses appropriate words/ vocabulary; organizes and
presents thoughts logically; projects confidence and a potential (20) (19) (18) (17) (16) (15) (14) (13) (12) (10) (9) (8) (6) (4) (2)
speaker.

4 VERY CLEAR QUITE CLEAR HARDLY EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT

ANALYTICAL/ LOGICAL SOMEWHAT CLEAR
ANALYTICAL/ ANALYTICAL/ ANALYTICAL/
ANALYTICAL/ LOGICAL REASONING(10pts) REASONING LOGICAL
ANALYTICAL/ LOGICAL
LOGICAL LOGICAL
REASONING
REASONING REASONING REASONING
Clarity of logical/ analytical and critical thinking; formulation of
intelligent conclusions/ decisions; comprehension and
translation of abstract concepts to practical and workable (10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
application.

5 PERSONALITY/ VALUES(10pts) EXEMPLARY VERY GOOD GOOD PERSONALITY/ POOR VERY POOR
PERSONALITY/ VALUES PERSONALITY/ PERSONALITY/
VALUES VALUES VALUES
 ANNEX “3B”

Possesses dignified/ respectable personality amidst pressure;

mere physical presence commands respect; typifies a model
police officer and restrained and calculated in emotions and
behavior. Demonstrates sound value judgement anchored on
(10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
right and wrong; publicly affirms non-negotiable value system;
upholds basic principles of human rights and dignity and
promotes and exemplifies strict adherence to PNP core values.

6 VERY EVIDENT QUITE EVIDENT SOMEWHAT EVIDENT LESS EVIDENT

EVIDENT
EMOTIONAL MATURITY(10 pts) MATURITY MATURITY MATURITY MATURITY
EMOTIONAL
IMMATURITY
Sensitivity to ones emotions and that of others. Aware of life's
purpose and obstacles. Positive attitude and good degree of
(10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
resourcefulness and acceptance of one's physical and
psychological health status.

TOTAL SCORE

NOTE: This FORM should be used for Promotion to the rank of PSMS to PEMS. Evaluated by:
This FORM should be stapled to the updated PAIS PDS.
One Form per Board/Committee Member.
______________________________________
Mr. NATHANIEL A CAYABA
NAPOLCOM Representative/ Member
Promotion Board Bravo

Page 2 of 2