Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Personality
The term personality has been defined differently by different psychologists.
Floyed Allport says ‘personality traits may be considered as so many important dimensions
in which people may be found to differ.” Watson opines that personality is everything that
we do.
Kimble Young says, “Personality refers to the more or less organised body of ideas,
attitudes, traits, values and habits which an individual has built into roles and status for
dealing with others and with himself.” In brief, personality is a comprehensive concept that
give importance on the growth and behaviour of the child as an organised whole.
The word personality itself stems from the Latin word persona, which refers to a theatrical
mask worn by performers in order to either project different roles or disguise their
identities.
At its most basic, personality is the characteristic patterns of thoughts, feelings, and
behaviors that make a person unique. It is believed that personality arises from within the
individual and remains fairly consistent throughout life.
There are a number of theories about how personality develops, and different schools of
thought in psychology influence many of these theories. Some of these major perspectives
on personality include the following.
Type theories are the early perspectives on personality. The concept of Type A and Type B
Personality was coined by two American Cardiologist Meyer Friedman and Ray H.
Rosenman, in the year 1976. In their study, they discovered that people with Type A
personality are likely to suffer coronary artery disease in their later life. These theories
suggested that there are a limited number of "personality types" that are related to
biological influences, including:
Type A: perfectionist, impatient, competitive, work-obsessed, achievement-oriented,
aggressive, stressed
Type B: low stress, even-tempered, flexible, creative, adaptable to change, patient,
tendency to procrastinate
Type C: highly conscientious, perfectionists, struggle to reveal emotions (positive and
negative)
Type D: feelings of worry, sadness, irritability, pessimistic outlook, negative self-talk,
avoidance of social situations, lack of self-confidence, fear of rejection, appearing gloomy,
hopelessness
Type A Personality
Type B Personality
Type B personality is one that is less prone to stress, easy going, work steadily, enjoy
achievement, modest ambition, and live in the moment. They are social, creative,
thoughtful, procrastinating. Individuals who possess a Type B personality are associated with
the following behavioural traits:
They are not concerned about time.
They compete for fun, not to win.
Mild-mannered.
Never in a hurry and has no pressing deadlines.
Does not brag.
Focus on quality rather than quantity.
Laidback and live a stress-less life.
BASIS FOR
TYPE A PERSONALITY TYPE B PERSONALITY
COMPARISON
Nature of Learning
Nature of learning means the characteristic features of learning. Learning involves change;
it may or may not guarantee improvement. It should be permanent in nature, that is
learning is for lifelong.
The change in behavior is the result of experience, practice and training. Learning is
reflected through behavior.
Learning is based upon some key factors that decide what changes will be caused by this
experience. The key elements or the major factors that affect learning are motivation,
practice, environment, and mental group.
Coming back to these factors let us have a look on these factors −
Motivation − The encouragement, the support one gets to complete a task, to
achieve a goal is known as motivation. It is a very important aspect of learning as it
acts gives us a positive energy to complete a task. Example − The coach motivated
the players to win the match.
Practice − We all know that ”Practice makes us perfect”. In order to be a
perfectionist or at least complete the task, it is very important to practice what we
have learnt. Example − We can be a programmer only when we execute the codes
we have written.
Environment − We learn from our surroundings, we learn from the people around
us. They are of two types of environment – internal and external. Example − A child
when at home learns from the family which is an internal environment, but when
sent to school it is an external environment.
Mental group − It describes our thinking by the group of people we chose to hang
out with. In simple words, we make a group of those people with whom we
connect. It can be for a social cause where people with the same mentality work in
the same direction. Example − A group of readers, travelers, etc.
These are the main factors that influence what a person learns, these are the root level for
our behavior and everything we do is connected to what we learn.
Learning can be understood clearly with the help of some theories that will explain our
behavior. Some of the remarkable theories are −
Classical Conditioning Theory
Operant Conditioning Theory
Social Learning Theory
Cognitive Learning Theory
All perception involves signals in the nervous system, which in turn result from physical or chemical
stimulation of the sense organs.
It is not the passive receipt of these signals but is shaped by learning, memory, expectation, and
attention.
The study, of these perceptual processes, shows that their functioning is affected by three classes of
variables – the objects or events being perceived, the environment in which perception occurs, and
the individual doing the perceiving.
What is Perception?
Perception depends on complex functions of the nervous system but subjectively seems mostly
effortless because this processing happens outside of conscious awareness.
According to Joseph Reitz; “Perception includes all those processes by which an individual receives
information about his environment—seeing, hearing, feeling, tasting and smelling.”
Uday Pareek said perception can be defined as “the process of receiving, selecting, organizing,
interpreting, checking, and reacting to sensory stimuli or data.”
According to S. P. Robbins, perception can be defined as “the process by which individuals organize
and interpret their sensory impressions in order to give meaning to their environments.”
Perception includes the 5 senses; touch, sight, taste smell and sound. It also includes what is known
as perception, a set of senses involving the ability to detect changes in body positions and
movements.
Importance of Perception
Perception is a subjective, active and creative process through which we assign meaning to sensory
information to understand ourselves and others. It can be defined as our recognition and
interpretation of sensory information. It also includes how we respond to the information.
Perception not only creates our experience of the world around us; it allows us to act within
our environment.
People’s behavior is based on their perceptions of what reality is, not on reality itself. The
world as it is perceived is the world that is important for understanding human behavior.
However, what one perceives can be substantially different from objective reality. It is the
process through which the information from the outside environment is selected, received,
organized and interpreted to make it meaningful.
The factors which affect the perception are shown in the figure below:
Process of Perception
Process of Perception
People in organisations are always judging each other. Managers must appraise their
subordinate’s performance. Let us look at the more obvious applications of perceptions in
organisations.
Employment Interview
Performance Evaluation
Performance Expectations
Employee Loyalty
Employment Interview
A major input into who is hired and who is rejected in any organisation is the employment
interview. Evidence indicates that interviewers often make inaccurate perceptual
judgements. Interviewers generally draw early impressions that become very quickly
entrenched.
Performance Evaluation
An employee’s performance appraisal very much depends on the perceptual process. The
performance appraisal represents an assessment of an employee’s work. While this can be
objective, many jobs are evaluated in subjective terms. Subjective measures are, by
definition, judgemental.
Performance Expectations
A manager’s expectations of an individual affect both the manager’s behaviour towards the
individual and the individual’s response.
Employee Loyalty
Another important judgement that managers make about employees is whether they are
loyal to the organisation. Few organisations appreciate employees, especially those in the
managerial ranks openly disparaging the firm.
Values are standards or ideals with which we evaluate actions, people, things, or situations.
Beauty, honesty, justice, peace, generosity are all examples of values that many people
endorse. In thinking about values it is useful to distinguish them into three kinds: Personal
values: values endorsed by an individual.
Some common business values are fairness, innovations and community involvement.
According to M. Haralambos, “A value is a belief that something is good and desirable”.
According to R.K. Mukherjee, “Values are socially approved desires and goals that are
internalized through the process of conditioning, learning or socialization and that become
subjective preferences, standards, and aspirations”.
According to Zaleznik and David, “Values are the ideas in the mind of men compared to
norms in that they specify how people should behave. Values also attach degrees of
goodness to activities and relationships”
These are extremely practical, and valuation requires not just techniques but also an
understanding of the strategic context.
These can provide standards of competence and morality.
These can go beyond specific situations or persons.
Personal values can be influenced by culture, tradition, and a combination of internal and
external factors.
These are relatively permanent.
These are more central to the core of a person.
Most of our core values are learned early in life from family, friends, neighborhood school,
the mass print, visual media and other sources within the society.
Values are loaded with effective thoughts about ideas, objects, behavior, etc.
They contain a judgmental element in that they carry an individual’s ideas as to what is
right, good, or desirable.
Values can differ from culture to culture and even person to person.
Values play a significant role in the integration and fulfillment of man’s basic impulses and
desire stably and consistently appropriate for his living.
They are generic experiences in social action made up of both individual and social
responses and attitudes.
They build up societies, integrate social relations.
They mold the ideal dimensions of personality and depth of culture.
They influence people’s behavior and serve as criteria for evaluating the actions of others.
They have a great role to play in the conduct of social life. They help in creating norms to
guide day-to-day behavior.
The values of a culture may change, but most remain stable during one person’s lifetime.
Socially shared, intensely felt values are a fundamental part of our lives. These values
become part of our personalities. They are shared and reinforced by those with whom we
interact.
Since values often strongly influence both attitude and behavior, they serve as a kind of
personal compass for employee conduct in the workplace.
These help to determine whether an employee is passionate about work and the workplace,
which in turn can lead to above-average returns, high employee satisfaction, strong team
dynamics, and synergy.
Types of Values
1. Terminal Values.
2. Instrumental Values.
Terminal Values are most desirable to humans and Instrumental values are views of how
human desires should be achieved.
Terminal Values
These are values that we think are most important or most desirable.
These refer to desirable end-states of existence, the goals a person would like to achieve
during his or her lifetime.
They include happiness, self-respect, recognition, inner harmony, leading a prosperous life,
and professional excellence.
Instrumental Values
Instrumental values deal with views on acceptable modes of conductor means of achieving
the terminal values.
These include being honest, sincere, ethical, and being ambitious. These values are more
focused on personality traits and character.
There are many typologies of values. One of the most established surveys to assess
individual values is the Rokeach Value Survey.
Attitude
Attitudes are also known as “frames of reference“. They provide the background against
which facts and events are viewed An attitude describes persons’ enduring favorable or
unfavorable cognitive evaluations, feelings, and action tendencies toward some object or
idea. People have attitudes regarding almost everything such as religion, politics, cloth,
music, food.
A person’s attitudes settle into a coherent pattern and to change one may require difficult
adjustment in many others. Thus, a company would be well advised to fit its product into
existing attitudes rather than to try changing people’s attitude.
Cognitive component
Beliefs are the cognitive components of consumer attitude. Cognitive component of attitude
is associated with the value statement. It consists of values, belief, ideas and other
information that a person may have faith in.
Positive brand associations enhance brand equity and are achieved through a number of
positioning strategies. Through brand associations, marketers establish and influence
favorable beliefs about a brand and unfavorable beliefs about competitors. Example:
Quality of sincere hard is a faith or value statement that a manager may have.
Affective component
Affective is the emotive component of consumer attitude. Affective component of attitude is
associated with individual feelings about another person, which may be positive, neutral or
negative.
Three research models describe the determinants of affective response.
Functional theory of attitude explains that consumers buy as a result of one of four
psychological functions: adjustment, ego defense, value expression, and application of
prior knowledge.
Types of Attitude
Job satisfaction
A collection of positive and/or negative feelings that an individual holds toward his or her
job.A person will hold a positive attitude if had a high level of satisfaction, while dissatisfied
people will generally display a negative attitude towards life.When we talk about attitude,
we generally speak about job satisfaction because they are inter-related in organizational
behaviour.
The feelings people have toward their job. It is probably the most important job attitude and
denotes how satisfied an employee is at his work. A person with high job satisfaction
appears to hold generally positive attitude, and one who is dissatisfied holds negative
attitude towards their job.
Job involvement
Job involvement refers to the degree to which a person identifies himself (psychologically)
with his job, actively participates and considers his perceived performance level important
to self-worth. (Robbins)
Higher job satisfaction leads to low absenteeism & employee turnover and indicates that
the individual cares for his job.
Organizational commitment
Organizational commitment refers to a degree to which an employee identifies himself
with the organizational goals and wishes to maintain membership in the organization.
Organizational commitment is the emotional or psychological attachment people have
toward the company they work for. A highly committed employee identifies completely
with the organizations’ objectives and is willing to put in whatever effort it takes to meet
them. Such an employee will be willing to remain with the organization and grow with it.
Motivation is an inspiration that helps to use the employees’ knowledge and skill for the
growth and development of the organization. It is an act of persuading the people who work
in the organization. It is defines as the psychological process that hell to increase the will to
do work. It is the process of inspiring people from which the people can use their ability. It is
an important function of management. The employees who are engaged in the organization
must be motivated. Without motivation, their ability and skill can’t be used properly. Every
employee has the capacity to do work. It is the process that helps the employee to explore
their talent.
–Delton e. McFarland
Importance of motivation
9. Fewer disputes and strikes: disputes and strikes are harmful for organizational activities.
When the employees are not motivates they are dissatisfies which creates disputes in the
organization.
10. Better human relation: all employees must be treated as human beings by the
organization. Motivation I mainly related to behave the human beings.
Types of Motivation
The two types of motivation are:
1. Intrinsic motivation
2. Extrinsic motivation
Types of motivation
Intrinsic motivation
Intrinsic motivation can arise from self-generated factors that influence people’s behaviour.
It is not created by external incentives.
It can take the form of motivation by the work itself when individuals feel that their work is
important, interesting and challenging and provides them with a reasonable degree of
autonomy (freedom to act), opportunities to achieve and advance, and scope to use and
develop their skills and abilities.
Extrinsic motivation
Extrinsic motivation occurs when things are done to or for people to motivate them. These
include rewards, such as incentives, increased pay, praise, or promotion; and punishments,
such as disciplinary action, withholding pay, or criticism. Extrinsic motivators can have an
immediate and powerful effect, but will not necessarily last long.
Motivation theories
Human motivation can be defined as the fulfillment of various needs. These needs can
encompass a range of human desires, from basic, tangible needs of survival to complex,
emotional needs surrounding an individual’s psychological well-being.
The needs in Maslow’s hierarchy include physiological needs (food and clothing), safety
needs (job security), social needs (friendship), self-esteem, and self-actualization. This
hierarchy can be used by managers to better understand employees’ needs and motivation
and address them in ways that lead to high productivity and job satisfaction.
At the bottom of the pyramid are the physiological (or basic) human needs that are
required for survival: food, shelter, water, sleep, etc. If these requirements are not met, the
body cannot continue to function. Faced with a lack of food, love, and safety, most people
would probably consider food to be their most urgent need.
The third level of need is social, which includes love and belonging; when individuals have
taken care of themselves physically, they can address their need to share and connect with
others. Deficiencies at this level, on account of neglect, shunning, ostracism, etc., can impact
an individual’s ability to form and maintain emotionally significant relationships. Humans
need to feel a sense of belonging and acceptance, whether it comes from a large social
group or a small network of family and friends. Other sources of social connection may be
professional organizations, clubs, religious groups, social media sites, and so forth. Humans
need to love and be loved (sexually and non-sexually) by others. Without these
attachments, people can be vulnerable to psychological difficulties such as loneliness, social
anxiety, and depression. These conditions, when severe, can impair a person’s ability to
address basic physiological needs such as eating and sleeping.
The fourth level is esteem, which represents the normal human desire to be valued and
validated by others, through, for example, the recognition of success or status. This level
also includes self-esteem, which refers to the regard and acceptance one has for oneself.
Imbalances at this level can result in low self-esteem or an inferiority complex. People
suffering from low self-esteem may find that external validation by others—through fame,
glory, accolades, etc.—only partially or temporarily fulfills their needs at this level.
At the top of the pyramid is self-actualization. At this stage, people feel that they have
reached their full potential and are doing everything they’re capable of. Self-actualization is
rarely a permanent feeling or state. Rather, it refers to the ongoing need for personal
growth and discovery that people have throughout their lives. Self-actualization may occur
after reaching an important goal or overcoming a particular challenge, and it may be marked
by a new sense of self-confidence or contentment.
The results from this inquiry form the basis of Herzberg’s Motivation-Hygiene Theory
(sometimes known as Herzberg’s “Two Factor Theory”). Published in his famous article,
“One More Time: How do You Motivate Employees,” the conclusions he drew were
extraordinarily influential, and still form the bedrock of good motivational practice nearly
half a century later. He’s especially recognized for his two-factor theory, which hypothesized
that are two different sets of factors governing job satisfaction and job dissatisfaction:
“hygiene factors,” or extrinsic motivators and “motivation factors,” or intrinsic motivators.
Hygiene factors, or extrinsic motivators, tend to represent more tangible, basic needs—i.e.,
the kinds of needs included in the existence category of needs in the ERG theory or in the
lower levels of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Extrinsic motivators include status, job security,
salary, and fringe benefits. It’s important for managers to realize that not providing the
appropriate and expected extrinsic motivators will sow dissatisfaction and decrease
motivation among employees.
Motivation factors, or intrinsic motivators, tend to represent less tangible, more emotional
needs—i.e., the kinds of needs identified in the “relatedness” and “growth” categories of
needs in the ERG theory and in the higher levels of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Intrinsic
motivators include challenging work, recognition, relationships, and growth potential.
Managers need to recognize that while these needs may fall outside the more traditional
scope of what a workplace ought to provide, they can be critical to strong individual and
team performance.
The factor that differentiates two-factor theory from the others we’ve discussed is the
role of employee expectations. According to Herzberg, intrinsic motivators and extrinsic
motivators have an inverse relationship. That is, intrinsic motivators tend to
increase motivation when they are present, while extrinsic motivators tend to reduce
motivation when they are absent. This is due to employees’ expectations. Extrinsic
motivators (e.g., salary, benefits) are expected, so they won’t increase motivation when
they are in place, but they will cause dissatisfaction when they are missing. Intrinsic
motivators (e.g., challenging work, growth potential), on the other hand, can be a source of
additional motivation when they are available.
Theory X
Work is inherently distasteful to most people, and they will attempt to avoid work whenever
possible.
Most people are not ambitious, have little desire for responsibility, and prefer to be
directed.
Most people have little aptitude for creativity in solving organizational problems.
Motivation occurs only at the physiological and security levels of Maslow’s hierarchy of
needs.
Most people are self-centered. As a result, they must be closely controlled and often
coerced to achieve organizational objectives.
Most people resist change.
Most people are gullible and unintelligent.
Essentially, Theory X assumes that the primary source of employee motivation is monetary,
with security as a strong second. Under Theory X, one can take a hard or soft approach to
getting results.
Drawing on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, McGregor argues that a need, once satisfied, no
longer motivates. The company uses monetary rewards and benefits to satisfy employees’
lower-level needs. Once those needs have been satisfied, the motivation disappears. Theory
X management hinders the satisfaction of higher-level needs because it doesn’t
acknowledge that those needs are relevant in the workplace. As a result, the only way that
employees can attempt to meet higher-level needs at work is to seek more compensation,
so, predictably, they focus on monetary rewards. While money may not be the most
effective way to self-fulfillment, it may be the only way available. People will use work to
satisfy their lower needs and seek to satisfy their higher needs during their leisure time.
However, employees can be most productive when their work goals align with their higher-
level needs.
Theory Y
The higher-level needs of esteem and self-actualization are ongoing needs that, for most
people, are never completely satisfied. As such, it is these higher-level needs through which
employees can best be motivated.
Under these assumptions, there is an opportunity to align personal goals with organizational
goals by using the employee’s own need for fulfillment as the motivator. McGregor stressed
that Theory Y management does not imply a soft approach.
McGregor recognized that some people may not have reached the level of maturity
assumed by Theory Y and may initially need tighter controls that can be relaxed as the
employee develops.
Decentralization and delegation: If firms decentralize control and reduce the number of
levels of management, managers will have more subordinates and consequently need to
delegate some responsibility and decision making to them.
Job enlargement: Broadening the scope of an employee’s job adds variety and
opportunities to satisfy ego needs.
Participative management: Consulting employees in the decision-making process taps their
creative capacity and provides them with some control over their work environment.
Performance appraisals: Having the employee set objectives and participate in the process
of self-evaluation increases engagement and dedication.
A leader should have the ability to maintain good interpersonal relations with the followers or
subordinates and motivate them to help in achieving the organizational objectives.
Features of Leadership
Group process: It is a group process that involves two or more people together
interacting with each other. A leader cannot lead without the followers.
Dependent on the situation: It is situation bound as it all depends upon tackling the
situations present. Thus, there is no single best style of leadership.
Importance of Leadership:
Initiating Action: Leadership starts from the very beginning, even before the work
actually starts. A leader is a person who communicates the policies and plans to the
subordinates to start the work.
Providing guidance: A leader not only supervises the employees but also guides them in
their work. He instructs the subordinates on how to perform their work effectively so
that their efforts don’t get wasted.
Building work environment: A good leader should maintain personal contacts with the
employees and should hear their problems and solve them. He always listens to the
point of view of the employees and in case of disagreement persuades them to agree
with him by giving suitable clarifications. In case of conflicts, he handles them carefully
and does not allow it to adversely affect the entity. A positive and efficient
work environment helps in stable growth of the organization.
Co-ordination: A leader reconciles the personal interests of the employees with the
organizational goals and achieves co-ordination in the entity.
Creating Successors: A leader trains his subordinates in such a manner that they can
succeed him in future easily in his absence. He creates more leaders.
Induces change: A leader persuades, clarifies and inspires employees to accept any
change in the organization without much resistance and discontentment. He makes sure
that employees don’t feel insecure about the changes.
Often, the success of an organization is attributed to its leaders. But, one must not forget that
it’s the followers who make a leader successful by accepting his leadership. Thus, leaders and
followers collectively play a key role to make leadership successful.
Qualities of a Leader
Personality: A pleasing personality always attracts people. A leader should also friendly
and yet authoritative so that he inspires people to work hard like him.
Knowledge: A subordinate looks up to his leader for any suggestion that he needs. A
good leader should thus possess adequate knowledge and competence in order to
influence the subordinates.
Integrity: A leader needs to possess a high level of integrity and honesty. He should have
a fair outlook and should base his judgment on the facts and logic. He should be
objective and not biased.
Initiative: A good leader takes initiative to grab the opportunities and not wait for them
and use them to the advantage of the organization.
Self-confidence and Will Power: A leader needs to have a high level of self-confidence
and immense will-power and should not lose it even in the worst situations, else
employees will not believe in him.
Intelligence: A leader needs to be intelligent enough to analyze the pros and cons of a
situation and take a decision accordingly. He also needs to have a vision and fore-
sightedness so that he can predict the future impact of the decisions taken by him.
Decisiveness: A leader has to be decisive in managing his work and should be firm on the
decisions are taken by him.
Social skills: A leader should possess empathy towards others. He should also be a
humanist who also helps the people with their personal problems. He also needs to
possess a sense of responsibility and accountability because with great authority comes
great responsibility.
Leadership Styles
The autocratic leader understands the strength of authority. Autocratic leaders are not
interested in opening up the decision-making process to the entire group. Instead, they choose
to bear the leadership completely alone. They expect those who fall under their authority to
follow orders.
The main advantage of an autocratic leader is streamlined work that improves efficiency and
productivity. They create firm deadlines and have a very clear set of expectations. This is
ideal in a time of crisis or when last-minute decisions are needed. This leadership style allows
for fewer misunderstandings as directions are passed down.
They often have a limited perspective. Given that they only draw from their own ideas and
experience, any input from other members of the team will likely go unspoken. Those who
work under this leadership style sometimes end up resenting their manager. They feel
undervalued due to limited recognition of their contributions. Additionally, this leader is
more likely to micromanage their team. Autocratic leaders tend to find themselves at the
center of low work morale and high employee turnover.
The autocratic style is best used during a crisis when a leader is most valuable. You need
someone who takes control to make quick and difficult decisions to potentially reduce
damage. During times of emergency, teams appreciate a strong and decisive leader.
Autocratic leadership may also come in handy when team correction is necessary. After the
crisis has passed, it is generally beneficial to switch styles.
A democratic leader encourages the free exchange of ideas throughout the team. All members
have a valued voice and the leader acts as a spokesperson or facilitator. Democratic leaders
rely on the participation of every member of the group. They emphasize the value and
expertise each member brings to the table. Every team member shares the freedoms and
responsibilities of leadership.
An advantage of democratic leadership is the boundless creativity of the entire group that
allows for open discussion of issues and solutions. Team unity generally grows as a result of
democratic leadership. This environment can make an employee feel appreciated,
accomplished, and important to the success of the organization. Common office politics such
as gossiping, cliques, and manipulation become much less prevalent. The end result is an
improved work environment and lower employee turnover: 63% of employees who are
recognized for their work are less likely to job hunt.
This is the most effective method for day-to-day work as it allows the group to take part in
decision-making. This gives teams a feeling of ownership over projects, deliverables, and
results. Many business leaders identify the democratic leadership style as their go-to style,
but this technique can be less effective during times of crisis.
Laissez-faire leaders are the hands-off type. They assign tasks and give general direction but
they’re usually uninvolved in day-to-day tasks. Employees decide on the best approach to
fulfill their responsibilities. Laissez-faire leaders put a great amount of faith in the individual.
They trust them to remain self-motivated, on-task, and accountable. If issues arise, these
leaders are available to offer direction, but only upon request. Laissez-faire leaders allow
each member of their team to succeed or fail based on their own abilities.
A disadvantage can be the loss of productivity without a strong leadership hand to keep it on
track. This can result in missed deadlines, omissions in the process, and low-quality work.
With each team member pursuing goals in their own way, team unity may suffer. Some may
start to lose interest in work due to distant and seemingly uninterested leaders. This can lead
to significant losses for the organization. Disengaged employees can cost American
businesses an estimated $450-550 billion per year.
Laissez-faire leadership is best when individuals are able to function without supervision.
Before using this style, make sure each team member has the right skill level and self-
direction capability. They must be able to motivate themselves to keep the work going.
Otherwise, this approach could backfire and cause more harm than good.
Which business leadership style is right for you? You may find that you don’t fit neatly into
any one category. The most successful leaders are those who jump between leadership styles.
Pick and choose techniques that best fit the team or task at hand and adapt them along the
way as needed. Effective leadership is, and always has been, about knowing what techniques
to use and when.
The most important leadership skill that you can develop is self-awareness; know what works
and what doesn’t. By understanding these most common business leadership styles, you’ll be
able to move between them as needed, and set yourself and your team up for success.
In addition to the three styles identified by Lewin and his colleagues, researchers have
described numerous other characteristic patterns of leadership. A few of the best-known
Transformational Leadership
Transformal leadership is often identified as the single most effective style. This style was
first described during the late 1970s and later expanded upon by researcher Bernard M.
Bass. Transformational leaders are able to motivate and inspire followers and to direct
positive changes in groups.
These leaders tend to be emotionally intelligent, energetic, and passionate. They are not
only committed to helping the organization achieve its goals, but also to helping group
members fulfill their potential.
Research shows that this style of leadership results in higher performance and more
improved group satisfaction than other leadership styles. One study also found that
transformational leadership led to improved well-being among group members.
Transactional Leadership
One of the main advantages of this leadership style is that it creates clearly defined
roles. People know what they are required to do and what they will be receiving in
exchange. This style allows leaders to offer a great deal of supervision and direction, if
needed.
Group members may also be motivated to perform well to receive rewards. One of the
biggest downsides is that the transactional style tends to stifle creativity and out-of-the-box
thinking.
Bases of Power
The concept of power derives its ultimate meaning from the 2 strong bases of power. In other
words, the following 2 bases are the core foundation for organizational power. They are as
follows:
Informal Power refers to the power that comes from an individual’s unique
characteristics. These are the most effective because personal skills, traits and
knowledge influence personal power.
Formal Power refers to the power that establishes because of the individual’s position in
an organization.
2. Reward Power – The power that allows you to give pay raises, promotion, praise,
interesting projects, and other rewards to your subordinates. Moreover, there is a limit
to the number of rewards, however, it can be a great tool to motivate subordinates.
o Termination
2. Referent Power – Fame is a critical aspect of referent power. However, this fame could
be in the field of film, sports, music stars, etc. Moreover, agreeable, conscientious, and
giving people are also awarded referent power. People with referent power possess high
expertise. Their ability to obtain resources, and also to secure their surroundings is what
provides them referent powers.
Rational persuasion. A tactic that is used to try and convince someone with a valid
reason, rational logic, or realistic facts.
Personal appeals. A tactic that refers to friendship and loyalty while making a request.
Exchange. A tactic that suggests that making express or implied promises and trading
favours.
Coalition tactics. Refers to a tactic that prescribes getting others to support your effort
to persuade someone.
Conflict
But if managed well, conflict can be healthy and spark creativity as parties try to
come to consensus. Some of the benefits of conflict include:
High energy
Task focus
Cohesiveness within the group
Discussion of issues
There has been plenty of conflict over how conflict is viewed in the workplace over
the years. Just like our concept of teams, our concepts of managing people and how
they’re motivated, our concepts of stress in the workplace have changed as we’ve
learned.
2. POOR PROCESSES
Often poorly constructed processes and procedures can create conflict. To avoid this
pitfall, it is helpful to regularly review your procedures and policies to ensure they
support teamwork and collaboration.
3. COMMUNICATION PROBLEMS
This is a common contributor to conflict and can occur among all levels of staff.
Keeping communication channels open and having a culture where questions are
welcomed will go a long way in mitigating this contributor to conflict.
5. LACK OF RESOURCES
If employees have to compete for resources, whether it’s managerial support, tools,
equipment, or financial resources, the stage is set for competition and conflict.
Asking employees what’s needed and then providing it (if possible) will build a spirit
of collaboration rather than competition.
TYPES OF CONFLICT
The types of conflicts in an organization may differ, but there are some
broad categories we can put them into. After all, people worldwide function
in somewhat similar ways in the workplace.
2.INTERPERSONAL CONFLICT
Every individual is unique. Even if you are working towards the same
goal, there are chances that differences arise in approaches. These
differences can be about philosophy, work ethic, rule adherence, vision,
or management style. Out of all types of conflicts in an organization,
interpersonal conflict is the one most of us would have most likely
experienced. Sometimes taking an ugly form through office gossip or
even categorized as ‘office politics,’ interpersonal conflicts is almost
inevitable when people with different perspectives and from different
walks of life spend a significant amount of their time together.
Interpersonal conflicts adversely affect productivity and morale. They can
easily escalate if not attended to in a timely manner.
3.INTRA-TEAM CONFLICT
Organizational goals are often ambitious—they require the coming
together of people with varying levels of experience and expertise.
Therefore, it is common for the workforce to be divided into teams for
smooth functioning. Like some other types of conflicts in an organization,
intra-team conflict is a result of diverse personalities working together in
the same team. It is possible that a few people from the team or the
group hold a few values and beliefs in common, but as the size of the
team increases, the chances are that conflict does too. Intra-team
conflict can be managed by a clear division of responsibilities, a fair
division of work, and a management policy under which no team
member is given any kind of ‘special’ treatment.
4.INTER-TEAM CONFLICT
One of the biggest types of conflict in the workplace, in scale, would be
inter-team conflict. For any organization to function effectively, there has
to be equilibrium among all the cogs of the wheel. With multitudes of
individuals, groups, teams, boards, and other stakeholders working
together, it is the responsibility of the organizational leaders to resolve
inter-team conflicts. Supervisors need to ensure that communication
channels are open and any tension or lack of cooperation between
teams is nipped in the bud. To do this, they need to eradicate bias,
allocate workload effectively, and build morale. A leader has to take
personality differences, co-worker relationships, and collective strength
into account. Verbal discussions and positive reinforcements go a long
way in resolving inter-team conflicts.
Whether you’re managing the conflict of two subordinates or embroiled in the midst
of your own conflict, you make a choice on how the conflict should be managed by
weighing the importance of the goal against the importance of the relationships in
questions.
Each person brings his own innate style of conflict management to the party. Are
they all right or all wrong? Let us examine each one of them
The avoiding style of conflict resolution is one where one has low concern for his or
her ultimate goal and low concern for his or her relationship with the other. In this
situation, Heitor might avoid any discussion with Teresa, n.ot wanting to start any
fights. He’s just not that kind of guy. But his idea isn’t getting furthered along, nor is
hers, nor is the company meeting its goals. The conflict hasn’t gone away, and the
job just isn’t getting done.
Finally, the collaborating style is one where there is high concern for relationships
and high concern for achieving one’s own goal. Those with a collaborating style look
to put all conflict on the table, analyze it and deal openly with all parties. They look
for the best possible solution: a win for each party in the conflict. In this situation,
Heitor and Teresa would sit down, look at the possible conversion rate of each of
their planned marketing campaigns. Perhaps they would find that a third option—
online advertising—would provide a more targeted audience at a discounted price.
With this new option that both parties could get behind, conflict is resolved and both
feel like the company’s goal will be satisfied.
Artifacts: It is the first level of organisational culture. It is observable symbols and signs of the
organisations. It includes visible parts of organisation e.g., structures, processes etc. Artifacts are
hard to decipher.
Espoused Values: These are the reasons (e.g., strategies, goals, philosophies) given by an
organisation for the way things are done. It is the second level of organisational culture.
Basic Assumptions: Basic assumptions are the beliefs that are taken for granted by the members of
an organisation. These are ultimate source of values and action that include: unconscious,
perceptions, takenfor-granted beliefs, thoughts, feelings etc. It is the third level of organisational
culture.
Organisational culture may be distinguished with respect to their core basic values. Core values are
the primary or dominant values that are accepted throughout the organisation. The dominant values
determine the dominant culture of an organisation. Thus, the dominant culture reflects the core
values that are shared by most of the members of the organisation.
However presence of dominant culture within the organisation does not mean that there may not
be subcultures within any given culture. Particularly in large organisations there may be subcultures
within the dominant culture. Subcultures are minicultures within an organisation, typically defined
by department designations and geographical separation.
Some organisations may have strong culture whereas others may have weak culture. In
organisations having strong cultures, core values are intensely held and widely shared. In weak
cultures managerial styles may be more person-centred. Strong cultures lead to more behavioural
consistency and less employee turnover. Strong cultures may also serve as substitute of
formalisation.
• Market Oriented culture – It is where employees are result oriented and focus on the
job, competition and achievements.
For example, an educational institute has a hierarchically oriented culture. It is the way
all the activities function and also people perceive, think, and feel about things at the
institute.
Litwin and Stringer have proposed seven dimensions of organisational climate: conformity,
responsibility, standards, rewards, organisational clarity, warmth and support, and
leadership.
Dependency: concern for being in close touch with others in a significant way;
On the basis of review of various studies and discussions with managers, Pareek has
identified twelve processes of organisational climate. Let us learn them briefly.
Decision Making: Levels at which decisions are taken, degree of participation in decision
making are the issues, which influence organisational climate.
• Culture represents the true image of the organization, whereas climate represents
individuals’ perceptions, although there might be differences between each of their
ideas.