Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Profitability Index (PI ) and Net Present Value (NPV) are both discounted cash flow technique in capita
budgeting decision making process.
NPV :
NPV is method is the classic economic method of evaluating investment proposals. The method
recognizes the time value of money
NPV > 0 , investment would add value to the firm and project may be accepted.
NPV<0 , investment would subtract value from the firm and project should be rejected.
NPV = 0, investment would neither increase nor lose the value of firm, decision should be indifferent.
PI :
It is the ratio of the present value of cash inflows at the required rate of return to the initial cash outlays.
PV of cash inflow
It is a valuation of NPV rule. PI =
Initial cash Outlay
Quantitative Analysis
Suppose Present value of cash inflow of a firm is Rs. 50 0000 and present value cash outflow is
Rs 250000 then we can calculate PI and NPV from the above formula :
500000
PI = =2
250000
NPV technique is better than PI as NPV shows wealth at the end in absolute form, which will help to
make a decision clearly, whereas the same advantage is not available with PI method.
However, PI shows return over investment in times , which will be very useful for immediate decision
making.
In practice, over the years , company uses the technique of NPV for capital budgeting decision that PI
technique.
(B ) (i) Payback :
Initial Investment
Formula : Payback =
Annual cash flow
10000−7500 1
Project B : 1 + = 1 years
7500 3
10000−6000 1
Project C : 2 + = 2 years
12000 3
Project D : 1 year
(ii) ARR :
(10000−10000) /2
Project A : =0
10000/2
(15000−10000) /2 2500
Project B : = = 50%
10000/2 5000
(18000−10000) /2 2667
Project C : = = 53%
10000/2 5000
(16000−10000)/2 2000
Project D : = = 40%
10000/2 5000
(iii) IRR :
The discount rate which equates the present values of an investment’s cash inflows is its
internal rate of return.
Project A : The net cash inflow is just equal to initial investment in the 1 st year. So IRR (r) = 0%
Project B : We can calculate considering the case of annuity. Present value of annuity factor is
= 10000/7500 = 1.333. If we look the annuity table then this factor we found in 2
year column under 32%. Therefore r = 32%
Project C : Since cash flows are unequal , trial and error method we need to apply . We have to
2000+4000+12000
Average cash inflow = = Rs. 6000
3
We locate 1.667 lies nearest to 1.696 in 3 years row which is annuity of Rs.1 at 35%
PV of cash inflow
Now we have to find out NPV at some other discount rate, it should be more than 35% or less
than 35% . since NPV is negative other discount rate should be less than 35%.
To get correct IRR from the formula below , one NPV should be negative and other one should
be positive.
IRR =
NPV at lower discount rate
Lower discount rate +
NPV at lower discount rate−NPV at higher discount rate
x( difference in
discount rates)
448
= 25 + x 10
448+1504
= 27.29 %
Project D : Since cash flows are unequal , trial and error method we need to apply . We have to
calculate fake payback period first.
10000+3000+3000
Average cash inflow = = Rs. 5333
3
We locate 1.875 lies nearest to 1.896 in 3 years row which is annuity of Rs.1 at 27%
PV of cash inflow
Now we have to find out NPV at some other discount rate, it should be more than 27% or less
than 27% . since NPV is positive other discount rate should be more than 27%.
To get correct IRR from the formula below , one NPV should be negative and other one should
be positive.
1194
= 27 + x 13
1194+238
= 37.83 %
(iV) NPV
Project A :
Project B :
Project C :
Project D :
Projec
t Ranks
AR IR
Payback R R NPV @10% NPV @30%
A 1 4 4 4 4
B 2 2 2 3 2
C 3 1 3 1 3
D 1 3 1 2 1
(b) Payback and ARR are non – discounted cash flow technique and theoretically unsound methods
for choosing the investment projects whereas the NPV and IRR are the discounted cash flow
technique which gives consistent results. If the projects are independent either IRR or NPV can
be used since same of projects will be accepted by any of the methods. In the present case all
the three Project (B,C,D) are accepted if 10% discount factor considered except project A. In case
If we assume the projects are mutually exclusive, then under the assumption of 30% discount rate,
the choice will be between Project B and Project D , since A and C are unprofitable. Both criteria ,
IRR & NPV gives same results. i,e Project D will be the best. Under the assumption of 10% discount
rate ranking according to IRR and NPV conflict (except for project A). if we follow the IRR rule ,
Project D is to be accepted. But if we consider the NPV rule the we can see that Project C is more
profitable. The NPV gives consistent results inconformity with the wealth maximization . We
would therefore accept Project C following the NPV rule.