You are on page 1of 1

The table illustrates the consequence of survey about one university over 10 years from 2000 to 2010.

Overall, it is crystal clear that, while the number of teaching quality, print resources, electronic
resources experienced an upward trend, the percentage of range of modules offered witnessed a
downward trend, with buildings, teaching facilities remaining the same. Obviously, print and electronic
resources exceeded the others, whereas range of modules offered was the least in the survey at the end
of the course.

As is presented in 2000, print resources being the best for students, started with 87% of the total
percentage, followed by buildings, teaching facilities and teaching quality at 77% and 65% respectively.
The next was electronics resources at 45%. However, the least proportion of the respondents voted for
range of modules offered at …%…?.

The proportion of print resources experienced a slow decline from 89% to 88%. the rate of teaching
quality decreased slowly to 63% in 2005, which continued with a slight fall to 69% in 2010. As for
electronic resources, the percentage had a significant growth 16% over 5 years. there was a slight
decline in the rate of Range of modules offered. With regard to the proportion survey of
buildings/teaching facilities remained static during the period.

You might also like