Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Morgenstern 1
by
Norbert R. Morgenstern
Professor of Civil Engineering
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
SYNOPSIS
The need to understand the geological processes that give rise to
the geotechnical complexity of a site is stressed and the role of
geological model-making for geotechnical objectives is emphasized.
INTRODUCTION
The analysis of slope stability problems in geotechnical practice
is undertaken routinely by means of limit equilibrium methods. The
evolution of these methods, at least for two-dimensional problems,
is now mature and a variety of solutions exist that adequately
satisfy the statics of the problem. Since the availability of
computer programs to solve the equations associated with these
solutions is widespread, there is no computational barrier in terms
of limit equilibrium analyses to solving slope stability
problems. There is general agreement that the barriers that do
exist arise from difficulties in defining the operational strength
properties and pore water pressures as opposed to being able to
conduct the analysis.
apparent and, while the pore pressures at failure may not be known,
it is often possible to ~ound them in a reasonable manner. The
geotechnical - ·1 i terature abounds with case histories, analysed by
1 imi t equilibrium methods, that provide an acceptable explanation
of the circumstances surrounding the particular landslide.
However, the situation associated with the prior evaluation of
landslide potential is much less satisfactory. Here, one has to
interpret from the process of site characterization the most likely
failure mechanism, the operational strength characteristics, and,
if working in terms of effective stress, the appropriate pore
pressure distribution. This is a fraught with many more
difficulties than explaining instability by means of back-analysis.
-
f f)
.§ 100
0
uJ
..J
~ 10
ct
(I)
uJ
~
3
0
>
0.1
0.001 0.01 0 .1 10 100 1000
VOLUME LOADED x 106 (m 3 )
GEOTECHNICAL COMPLEXITY
Geotechnical matters are generally concerned with the properties of
strength, deformability and permeability of soils and rocks.
Morgenstern and Cruden (1979) suggested, as a definition, that
geotechnical complexity arises when the properties that govern the
geotechnical behaviour of the project vary rapidly across a wide
range within the site. Site is meant to embrace extended linear
projects such as tunnels, highways or pipelines as well as the more
local situations such as arise with dam and building foundations.
Geotechnical complexity arises from heterogeneity in geotechnical
properties.
Morgenstern and Cruden (op.cit.) went on to suggest that
geotechnical complexity at any site may result from one or any
combination of three classes of processes:
1) genetic processes
2) epigenetic processes
3) weathering processes
Each type of process may modify the complexity that the material
has inherited from prior processes and in this way the total
complexity resembles an overlay of the sequence of processes that
have affected the geotechnical properties of the soil or rock under
investigation. Sedimentation is an obvious example of a genetic
process while tectonic deformation is an epigenetic process.
OVERBANK
CLAYS
---·-· -...
--·- ·-... p
A AP AP-PA
__ ,.._
SANO
SHALE
SAND
SHALE.
»I SANO _ 1
SHALE
~ -o
SHALE
layers that are the dominant feature while the fourth involves
large variations in shear strength of a soft clay over short
distances. In each case an understanding of the geological
circumstances at the site is a prerequisite for representative
geotechnical characterization and the successful resolution of the
associated stability problems.
Commentary
The geotechnical 1 i terature contains many examples of instability
in both soil and rock due to the presence of weak clay seams. The
first step in avoiding instability is to suspect that clay seams
exist in the ground. This might be obvious from prior knowledge,
outcrops, or because of adjacent instability. Alternatively the
presence of such seams would have to be inferred from geological
evidence. The second step is to locate the seams and to evaluate
whether they are pre-sheared to residual or not. Many processes
result in shearing of clay in-situ. As discussed by Morgenstern et
al (1977) the most common are tectonic action, valley rebound,
glacial drag and previous landsliding. Often the evidence of pre-
shearing is subdued and if clay seams exist it is prudent to assume
that they are pre-sheared and prove otherwise if strengths higher
N.R. Morgenstern 6
Both the geologic al model and site history indicate d that the
explora tion programm e for the Convent ion Centre developm ent should
concent rate ·on · the presence of weak layers within the bedrock. A
conside rable amount of geotech nical informa tion existed for the
area which was synthesi zed. In addition deep continuo us core
sampling of the bedrock was undertak en using triple-t ube core
barrels. Addition al auger holes were drilled to define
stratigr aphic detail in the overburd en.
When searchin g for weak layers and shear zones, visual examina tion
of disrupte d core is the best techniqu e. While wasteful of core
for potentia l testing of undistur bed samples, the presence or
absence of these layers is of such overridi ng signific ance, that
having fewer to test in the laborato ry is a secondar y issue. Al 1
core was carefull y examined in this way. Bentoni te layers and
pervasiv ely sheared zones, displayi ng shiny slickens ides, were
identifi ed. Some bentonit e layers were not pre-shea red. The
location s of all zones were compiled on stratigr aphic sections and
correlat ed with failure zones from the adjacen t slide area.
690
-I
ff)
I
Cl)
t1
cr cr 690 I ::,
m m
l&J l&J
680 680
SILT/CLA Y
670 670
TILL IO
...,!660 SANO ANO GR~
I
cr '°crI
m 660
ILi
z SHALE ANO SANDSTONE BEDROCK m
0 l&J
i= 650 650
er a,
> ~BENT ONITE CLAY
l&J I
jj 640 cr
BEDROCK m 640
ILi
0 10 20
STRATIGRAPHY BETWEEN BOREHOLE I I I I
LOCATION IS INFERRED HORIZ. SCALE (m)
Figure 4. Cross Section of Edmont on Conven tion Centre Site (Balank o, et al, 1982)
CX)
.:x,z
.
3:
0
'1
IO
J: (I)
37 kPo-, 14- (0.09H) V ::,
TIED BACK WALL
g CJ)
(1"
680~-...,.-..---- -------------.---. -----,~ ANCHOR LOADS E (I)
I')
aj '1
::,
EQUIVALENT
HORIZONTAL
-J:
ID
670 STRESS g
-_§ l:~~~
DISTRIBUTION
E
CID
l'i
660 1.. ~1
z ASSUMED PIEZOMETRIC 180kPo
...2
C(
SURFACE
> I BEDROCK
ILi
~
650
SHEAR ZONE
--- --- --- ---
BEDROCK
640
BENTONITE ZONE
BEDROCK
630
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50
DISTANCE (m)
--r- I- -~
-,-
· --r- Cl)
w
Ct:
u
w
e -.l--
,_
REJECT
WINDROWED
--r- .J
.J
1J:
3
'J:
·1_
-,
IN-PIT
_j-- -f
,' :',
---t-
C>
:f
3
~ . w CUT BEING
z MINEO
OIL SANO
o~, 1,,,
WINDROWED OIL I-
ON BENCH TUB
Cl)
w
Ct:
u
.J
.J
ci
BENCH 3
J:
PIT
~
J:
0
.J
0
However the oilsand also possesse s clay seams that can give rise to
sudden block slides which jeopardi ze the safety of the dragline s.
The loss of a dragline would have a most serious impact on Syncrude
due to both lost producti on and replacem ent cost. In order to
ensure a safe and efficien t mining operatio n procedu res have been
establis hed to identify and monitor potentia l highwall instabi lity
problems and where appropr iate institut e remedial stabiliz ation.
These procedu res are reviewed in detail by Fair and Lord ( 1984).
Only the geologic al controls on stabilit y of this geotech nically
intensiv e extended project are singled out for discussi on here.
Block slides along clay seams can extend directly beneath the
dragline . Moreove r they evolve very rapidly. Therefor e they are
the most hazardou s instabil ity mechanis m encounte red at Syncrude
and a conside rable effort has been expended to develop methods to
anticipa te the occurren ce of clay seams and mitigate the potenti al
for block slides.
The oils ands occur within the Cretaceo us McMurray Formatio n and
they are an example of a genetic ally complex deposit within which
no simple stratigra phy can be establis hed, at least at a practica l
scale. The McMurray Formatio n was deposite d in a tidal environm ent
and the sedimen ts originat e from successi ve depositi on in fluvial,
estuarin e tidal depositi on where tidal flats develope d without
strong wave energy. Drainage of these inter-ti dal flats was
accompl ished by a network of inter-co nnected meander ing tidal
channel s. Dipping clay beds which are a necessar y feature for the
occurren ce of block slides are thought to have originat ed in the
channels for reasons such as:
ii) In active migrating tidal channels, the dipping clay beds are
formed by lateral accretion of channel point bars. The beds
dip from . the surface of the point bars toward the channel
axis.
These inclined clay beds can dip to 20° or more norma 1 to the
channel axis. Their lateral continuity depends on the width, depth
and degree of meandering of the channel. Strength properties can
be correlated on a facies basis and generally vary with plasticity
over a wide range. Pore pressures remain fairly high in the
highwall. Gas exsolution inhibits the pore pressure reduction that
would be associated with excavation. Therefore, provided the
geometric circumstance s permit the development of a block slide
over such an extended length it is prudent to assume that it can
develop. Geological information provides the basis for more
refined resolution of this problem. As summarized by Fair and
Lord (1984) the sources of information are:
i) Dipmeter logs
ii) Highwall mapping
iii) Highwall bench trenching
iv) Past highwall performance
The tool fits down a 130mm diameter borehole. Three or four small
pads record the variation in resistivity of the various beds to
produce a continuous structural log. The tool provides sufficient
resolution to determine both dip directions and magnitude. Figure
7 illustrates a typical log. The depth is recorded along the
vertical axis while the dip magnitude is recorded along the
horizontal axis. Rose diagram plots are utilized to illustrate the
dominant dip direction at various depths.
BOREHOLE 20-23-7-3/3
5
~
1111
I
MINE
NORTH
10
30
35
'
DOMINANT AZIMUTH 227° BUT
SIGNIFICANT DIP DIRECTION AT 25°
~AZIMUTH (0-360°)
~DIP
ROW OF SLOPE
INCLINOMETERS LOCATED
ALONG NEW HIGHWALL SLOPE INCLINOMETER
PANEL-READ TO RECORD BURIED THEN RECOVERED
RESPONSE IN TO ALLOW ORAGLINE TO
NEW HIGHWALL ~ MINED THROUGH AREA
R R
II
II II
NEW HIGHWALL 11 DRAGLINE TUB
LOCATION
II
II
CREST II Q
II II II
II II II
u u I
11 OLD HIGHWALL II
11 CREST II
ti II
II U
:OW OF S L O P E /
INCLINOMETERS LOCATED ALONG
OLD HIGHWALL PANEL- READ TO
OE TECT MOVEMENT ALONG OLD
HIGHWALL IN AF.EA OF DRAGLINE
BASE OF FEED
The general layout of the tailings pond and perimeter dyke is shown
in Figure 9. For planning purposes, the dyke perimeter has been
divided into 700m long segments, which are referred to as cells.
The cell locations with respect to the dyke perimeter and numbering
sequence are also shown in Figure 9.
I
.,
7
SLIDING
22 [ MICROMETER
LOCATIONS
23
Km-TARSAND
It)
N ___,. MAJOR MOVEMENT ZONE
I
rt)
N
360 I
It) N
~ rt)
(I) I
rt)
,.._ ,.._
-340
E
N
I
IO
""
N
I
ft)
ID
N
I
If)
rt)
I
ft)
-I
ft)
~
z (I)
N
I
N
I
N
I
N
I
...
Q 320
<X
q-
ID
IC)
!?
Cl') BASE
It)
~
q-
~
w
> (I)
ROAD
II) (I)
..J
w 300
280
eu
-z
I- 5
eu
I-
2 CONSTRUCTION
z TO EL.. 331 m
~ CONSTRUCTION w
I.I.I TO EL..331m :E
V w
c:r u 4
..J 4
Q. ..J
(I)
Q.
TYPICAL. RESPONSE (I)
0 TO HYDRAULIC
..J 15 CONSTRUCTION 0
::z ..J
c:r
I-
6
I.I.I
z
:E 20
I.I.I
I.I.I
ct: 2
u I.I.I 8
z a:
u
2~ ~
10
1984 1985 1986 1983 1984 1985 1986
(a) ( b)
Figure 12. Performance History~ 310 Berm (a), Toe (b) (Fair and
Handford, 1986)
between slope inclinometers at the dyke toe and those across the
base road. The maximum monitored strain in the till is 0.2 percent
which is an -order of magnitude less than the strain to failure
found in the laboratory. In addition, there is no evidence of any
development of a passive shear surf ace in the ti 11. Acceleration
of movements during times when there is no dyke construction would
indicate the need to consider the immediate construction of a toe
berm to arrest the movement.
Soft clays are usually thought to be simpler than stiff clays and
easier to characterize by in-situ and/or laboratory testing.
Recent studies of a soft, fissured lacustrine clay have revealed
that this need not be so.
A soft fissured clay has given rise to various geotechnical
problems at the site of the Genesee Power Project which is located
about 60 km southwest of Edmonton, Canada. A new highway
embankment has failed, instability has occurred in excavations and
large deformations have developed in the foundation of a tailings
N.R. Morgenstern 21
retention dyke.
The site is underlain by a 10 to 20m thick lacustrine clay which
overlies an ablation till. During the site investigation for
various aspects of the project it was found that there were
numerous slickensided fissures within the lacustrine clay and that
there was a marked areal variability in undrained strength across
the site. In their analysis of the highway embankment failure,
Crooks et al (1987) concluded that the operational strength of the
clay was controlled by the fissures. Subsequent studies by Chan
(1985) discovered that the geological setting and post-deposit ional
processes greatly influenced the geotechnical properties.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
When the geotechnical engineer knows what to look for and what to
monitor, he can fulfill his responsibili ties in a remarkably
reliable manner. Most failures and extra construction costs arise
N.R. Morgenstern 22
REFERENCES
Chan, A.C.Y. and Morgens tern, N.R., 1986. Measurem ent of lateral
stresses in a lacustri ne clay deposit. Proc. 39th Can.
Geotech . Conf., Ottawa, p. 285-290.
Crooks, J.H.H., Been, K., Micklebo rough, B.W. and Dean, J.P., 1987.
An embankm ent failure on soft fissured clay, Canadian
Geotech nical Journal, in press.
Dusseau lt, M.B. and Morgens tern, N.R., 1979. Locked sands,
Quarter ly J. Eng. Geol., Vol. 12, p. 117-131.
Fair, A.E. and Handford , G.T., 1986. Overview of the tailings dyke
instrum entation program at Syncrude Canada Ltd. In Geotech nical
Stabilit y in Surface Mining, ed. by R.K. Singha!, Balkema,
Rotterda m, pp. 245-254.
Fair, A.E. and Lord, E.R.F., 1984. Methods used to monitor and
control block slides in oilsands at Syncrud e's dragline
operatio n in northern Alberta, Canada. Proc. 37th Can.
Geotech . Conf., Toronto, p. 103-112.
Mathews on, C.C. and Cato, K.D., 1986. "Pre and post" mine
geotech nical conditio ns for surface mines, develope d from · the
comp re hens ive explora tion program. In Geotech nical Stabi 1 i ty
in Surface Mining, ed. by R.K. Singhal , Balkema , Rotterda m,
p. 3-10.
Mittal, H. and Hardy, R., 1977. Geotech nical aspects of a tar sand
tailings dyke. Proc. Conf. in Geotech nical Practice for
Disposa l of Solid Waste Materia ls, ASCE, u. of Michigan , p.
327-347.
Morgens tern, N.R. and Cruden, D., 1979. Descrip tion and
classifi cation of geotech nical complex ities. Proc. Int. Symp.
on the Geotech nics of Structu rally Complex Formatio n,
Associaz ione Geotecn ica Italiana , Vol. 2, p. 195-204.
Morgens tern, N., Blight, G.E., Janbu, N., and Resendiz , D., 1977.
Slopes and excavati ons - State of the Art, Proc. 9th Int. Conf.
Soil Mechs. Found. Eng., Tokyo, Vol. 2, p. 547-604.
N.R. Morgenstern 24
Price, D.G. and Knill, J.L., 1974. Scale in the planning of site
investigation. Proc. 2nd Int. Cong. Int. Assoc. Eng. Geo 1.,
Sao Paulo, Vol. 1, Paper III-3.