Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Our first sequence we will be within the Science and Technology study area :
00- To begin, please tell me the words that come to your mind when you hear
"transhumanism"
NUAGE DE MOTS
0-TITLE
And your final task will be to stage a TEDx Talk conference on a transhumanist enhancement
of your choice.
1
MEDICAL TRANSHUMANISM PREMIÈRES SPÉ AMC
1 - What scientific breakthrough is referred to?
The scientific breakthrough which is referred to is immortality/biohacking/transhumanism/the
idea that thanks to science and drug therapy, lifespan extends. Scientists are trying to prolong life
through medication.
2 - Give a definition of transhumanism. What do transhumanists in general want?
You can visit the World Transhumanist Association website to get acquainted with their tenets and read their declaration:
https://www.humanityplus.org/the-transhumanist-declaration
Transhumanism is the theory that science and technology can help human beings develop beyond
what is physically and cognitively possible at the present time. Transhumanists want to overcome
human limitations such as aging, dying, getting sick...
1 - What is a biohacker?
A biohacker is a person who uses drugs to change his/her own biology. Though they carry out
scientific experiments, they are not real scientists. They take chemical substances such as
hormones in order to improve the condition of their body and of their mind.
2 - What does Eric Matzner think about age? Why?
He thinks that mental and physical age is different from chronological age, and that
when/while/ whereas chronological age cannot be changed, the physical and mental age
of his body can be improved
3 - What methods does he use to fight aging?
He takes a significant amount of medication but he also works out in order to maximise his fitness.
4 - What is his ultimate goal?
His ultimate goal is to stay alive as long as possible.
III-REACT
Would you be willing to do the same? Why ?
2
MEDICAL TRANSHUMANISM PREMIÈRES SPÉ AMC
• un remède
• une percée scientifique
• une épée à double tranchant = argument
• amélioration humaine (= amélioration)
• durée de vie = espérance de vie•
• guérir = guérir
• pour ouvrir de nouveaux horizons
• pour faire de grands progrès
• pour changer pour le mieux
• atténuer le processus de vieillissement
• surmonter les limites humaines / •
développer les capacités humaines
•accélérer = accélérer les applications
bénéfiques
• avant-gardiste = pionnier
• de plus en plus populaire
FOCUS ON GRAMMAR
Cela fonctionne de la même manière lorsque le comparatif porte sur un nom, comme dans
l’exemple ci-dessous : « Plus il prenait de médicaments » the more medicine he took
The adj-ER/more (ADJ ou NOM) + SUJET + VERBE, the adj-ER/more (ADJ ou NOM) + SUJET + VERBE
The more scientists prolong life expectancy, the more questions about how to cure age-related
diseases arise.
3
MEDICAL TRANSHUMANISM PREMIÈRES SPÉ AMC
MARDI 27 septembre
1 / Les faire passer par couple dans le role play
2/ deuxième chapitre
II THE DILEMMAS OF TINKERING WITH HUMAN
BIOLOGY
• BEFORE YOU WATCH THE VIDEO
1 What is gene editing? What application(s) does it have?
Gene editing is a method which makes it possible to alter the DNA of an
organism. It is used in therapeutic treatments to cure genetic diseases.
4
MEDICAL TRANSHUMANISM PREMIÈRES SPÉ AMC
• WATCH FROM 00:00 TO 00:45
2 What breakthrough has recently sparked controversy in the scientific
world?
A Chinese doctor claims he helped make the first genetically-edited babies
during fertility treatments.
• WATCH FROM 00:45 TO 1:10
3 What did the Chinese doctor do?
The Chinese doctor used CRISPR to alter the DNA of embryos during in-vitro
fertilisation.
• WATCH FROM 1:10 TO 2:52
5 What is CRISPR able or not able to do? What risks does it trigger?
In this experiment, CRISPR was able to eliminate HIV in one of the two twins.
Yet, the study showed it raised the risk of death by the flu and the
potentiality of catching West Nile virus.
6 What are the critical issues with this recent breakthrough?
The critical issues are that CRISPR could have “off- target effects”, that is to
say that changing one letter in the DNA could affect other parts of the DNA.
7 Why is it controversial that the experiment was carried out on embryos?
The fact that the experiment was carried out on embryos is controversial
inasmuch as (since, because) the changes in the DNA could now be passed
on from one generation to another. Before, the treatment was only carried
out on adults and the genetic modifications affected only one individual.
5
MEDICAL TRANSHUMANISM PREMIÈRES SPÉ AMC
Treating diseases with CRISPR Videoscript: Chinese claim world’s 1st gene- edited babies
CBS News, 26 November 2018
WOMAN JOURNALIST: A Chinese researcher has created an international controversy over
science and ethics, after claiming he helped make the world’s first genetically edited babies.
According to The Associated Press, the researcher altered embryos for seven couples during
fertility treatments; one resulted in the birth of twin girls.
The claims have not been independently verified. They also were not published in a medical
journal, where they could be vetted by experts. Now, this kind of gene editing is banned in the
United States. The changes can be passed to future generations and could harm other genes.
Our doctor David Agus is an oncologist and leads the USC Westside Cancer Center and is here to
talk more about this. A lot of people on the medical community are buzzing about this. Can you
tell us how this doctor was able to do this?
DOCTOR ANGUS: I mean, this is wild, this is an enormous step, and what the doctor did was just
jolt sperm out of a man, and took it out of the semen and put it together with an egg (this is in-
vitro fertilization) and then when it made an embryo, he put in this thing called CRISPR, that’s
able to surgically change one of the three billion letters of the DNA code and he changed the code
for the HIV receptor, for the AIDS receptor in the cells and then that embryo was put into a
woman.
WOMAN JOURNALIST: So, is this process able to eliminate HIV? Because it’s being promoted that
way.
DOCTOR ANGUS: Well, in this study, when you edit these receptors, yes, you can eliminate HIV,
but in these two twins, only one of them had it fully taken out, the other one had it partially
taken out. But at the same time, it raises the risk of death to flu, and increases the rate of getting
West Nile virus. So it’s not a perfect treatment. And the problem is: there’re a lot of off-target
effects. This enzyme is promiscuous. Even though it can change one letter, it happens to maybe
change other things in the DNA.
WOMAN JOURNALIST: So we don’t know any of the unintended consequences yet. Obviously,
this raises a lot of ethical questions. This is banned, this process, here in the United States. Do you
ever see this actually being possible amongst US doctors?
DOCTOR ANGUS: Well, to me, this is an experiment on children, right? These were parents – the
fathers actually had HIV themselves, and the mothers did not. And then they consented them on
a consented HIV vaccine. It didn’t say “gene-editing” experiment. This is something we can get rid
of inborn errors of genetic disease potentially. But a lot more science needs to be done. It is way
too premature to put it in kids ‘cause we’re not gonna know the answer for 10, 20, 30 years
whether it worked.
WOMAN JOURNALIST: But this is a subject we clearly will be talking about going forward. We’ve
been talking about CRISPR for the past two years. What can you tell us about this doctor?
DOCTOR ANGUS: Well, this is a doctor who trained in the United States, and then went to
Europe. You know there are CRISPR studies on-going now in the United States, but we do that in
adults to treat a disease. This isn’t passed generation to generation. Once you hit what we call the
germ-line, the DNA of a child, it then is passed to the next generation, and the next. So these
changes are permanent.
WOMAN JOURNALIST: Huge changes in the world of science. We’ll be hearing more from this
doctor; he speaks at a conference in Honk-Kong. But great to hear you this morning talk about it.
6
MEDICAL TRANSHUMANISM PREMIÈRES SPÉ AMC
1- Gene editing can lead to eugenic practices, that is, the selection of
particular traits / characteristics in order to ameliorate the human species
1- Genetic treatment is
and make a “perfect” human.characteristics are deemed (considered)
definitive: the disease is cured
better than others.
once and all. Patients would
not live in fear of developing 2- It is not what God intended for humans.
the illness again. 3- It is against Nature.
4- It would create a gap between the rich and the poor and those who can’t
2- It would eradicate some
afford genetic treatment would be left behind.
diseases.
5- People would die or age later, and so more generations would coexist,
3- Humans can improve the which could create problems.
human race, so they should do 6- It could create a feeling of superiority in those who can afford gene
it. editing, towards those who can’t afford it.
Texte philosophique
Read from line 1 to 18: What is the relation between biomedicine and transhumanism?
The fundamental principle of transhumanism is to use biomedicine to enhance humans.
Transhumanists use the advances in biomedicine to overcome human limitations and become
“stronger, smarter, less prone to violence, and long-lived”.
Read from line 19 to 37: According to the author, what is the major threat of transhumanism?
Why?
The major threat of transhumanism is the problem of unequal access to the advances of human
enhancement: the less rich (affluent) will necessarily be left behind.
According to the author, transhumanists are wrong about human nature because
today’s humans are the result of a complex evolution.
The author asserts that in human nature, “good” and “bad” characteristics emerged
simultaneously and are therefore necessarily linked.
He adds that every human so-called “flaw” – including mortality – has played an
essential part in the development of the human race and is still necessary today to the
survival of humans. Erasing or changing one specific human trait would unbalance the
equilibrium. As of today, we are not able to foresee the possible effects of such
changes.
What should be done about this issue?
7
MEDICAL TRANSHUMANISM PREMIÈRES SPÉ AMC
have taken regarding the respect of “non-human nature”, in order to preserve the
specificities of humans and do no harm to humanity as a whole.
8
MEDICAL TRANSHUMANISM PREMIÈRES SPÉ AMC
Use short sentences. Be brief but not too brief (a minimum of 4 minutes for this exercise) − A TED
Talk lasts on average 18 minutes.
Rehearse, rehearse and rehearse!