Filipino side(Deputy prime minister)

Honorable chair, esteemed judges, worthy opponents, and fellow debaters,

As the Deputy Prime Minister for the Filipino side in this debate, I would like to emphasize the
significance of the Cavite Mutiny in the struggle for Philippine independence and the credibility of the
Filipino soldiers who participated in this historic event.

Firstly, the Filipino soldiers who participated in the mutiny were not merely rebelling against their
Spanish colonizers, but rather fighting for their basic rights and dignity. The oppressive Spanish regime
had deprived the Filipinos of their basic human rights and freedoms, and the soldiers’ actions were a
legitimate response to this injustice.

Moreover, the fact that the mutiny was widespread and involved soldiers from different regions of the
Philippines shows that it was not an isolated incident, but rather an expression of a deeper frustration
among the Filipino people towards Spanish rule.

It is also important to note that the Spanish authorities had a vested interest in discrediting the Filipino
side of the story. The Spanish government had a history of manipulating the truth and silencing
dissenting voices to maintain their power and control over the Philippines.

In contrast, the accounts of the Filipino soldiers who participated in the mutiny were corroborated by
eyewitnesses and historical records. Their accounts provide a unique perspective that sheds light on the
struggles and aspirations of the Filipino people during that period.

Furthermore, the legacy of the Cavite Mutiny lives on in the hearts and minds of the Filipino people. The
bravery and resilience of the Filipino soldiers who participated in the mutiny inspired a sense of national
pride and ignited the flames of the Philippine Revolution.

In conclusion, the Filipino side of this debate strongly believes that the Filipino soldiers who participated
in the Cavite Mutiny are credible sources of information. Their accounts provide valuable insights into
the struggles and aspirations of the Filipino people during the colonial period. We must acknowledge
their contributions to Philippine history and recognize their courage in standing up against an oppressive
regime. Thank you.
Spanish side(Deputy prime minister)

Honorable chair, esteemed judges, worthy opponents, and fellow debaters,

As the Deputy Prime Minister for the Spanish side in this debate, I would like to argue that the Spanish
perspective on the Cavite Mutiny is the more credible account of what transpired during this event.

Firstly, it is important to recognize that the Spanish authorities had a comprehensive understanding of
the situation on the ground in the Philippines during the colonial period. They had access to intelligence
reports, eyewitness accounts, and historical records, which allowed them to paint an accurate picture of
the events that unfolded during the mutiny.

Moreover, the Spanish accounts of the mutiny are supported by objective evidence, such as official
reports, court proceedings, and military records. These sources provide a detailed account of the events
leading up to the mutiny, the actions of the mutineers, and the response of the Spanish authorities.

Additionally, the Spanish side of the story has been corroborated by independent historical research and
analysis. Numerous scholars and experts have examined the available evidence and come to the
conclusion that the Spanish accounts of the mutiny are more credible and accurate than the Filipino
perspective.

It is also worth noting that the Filipino accounts of the mutiny are based largely on oral traditions and
folklore, which are susceptible to exaggeration and distortion over time. In contrast, the Spanish
accounts are grounded in factual evidence and official records, which are less likely to be distorted or
manipulated.

In conclusion, we believe that the Spanish perspective on the Cavite Mutiny is the more credible account
of what transpired during this event. The Spanish authorities had access to a wealth of information and
evidence, and their accounts are supported by objective sources and independent analysis. We must
recognize the value of these sources and acknowledge their role in shaping our understanding of this
important historical event. Thank you.